Publication activity
Articles grouped by publication year
Publications
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.
CiteNScope / Analytics
Explore the evidence.
Understand the reach.
Research across participating journals · All insights follow your collection filters.
OpenAlex coverage 100.0% · 547/547 recordsLast OpenAlex observation 21 Oct 2026, 07:23 UTC
PUBLICATIONS547In the selected collection
CROSSREF CITATIONS3061547/547 with known counts
OPENALEX CITATIONS5532547/547 with known counts
OPENALEX MEAN10.11Per article with a known count
Filter collection Publication years, search & more
Your research collection
Output and reach
Publication activity alongside incoming citations.
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
OpenAlex
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
Research landscape
Leading affiliations and themes in this collection.
Full distributions & methodology ↓Institutions
University of Brawijaya49Islamic University of Indonesia29Huazhong University of Science and Technology24500/547 records with dataPrimary topics
Employee Performance and Management34Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior21Technology Adoption and User Behaviour19547/547 records with dataTwo perspectives on citations
Follow the research impact
Independent sources. Clear time scales.
Lifetime citations by publication year
Crossref and OpenAlex · separate totals for the same publication cohorts
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
Latest lifetime totals, grouped by the cited article’s year. These are not citations received in that year.
View data & coverage
Citations received each year
OpenAlex · incoming citation links grouped by citing-work year
OpenAlex
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
Annual history: 547/547 articles. Latest history observation: 2026-10-21T07:23:00.722414+00:00. Source totals are never added together.
Research side by side
Compare journals
Select journals to compare the same collection filters. Source totals stay separate. These measures describe research activity, not journal quality.
Display range
Bussecon Review of Social SciencesInternational Journal of Business Ecosystem & StrategyInternational Journal of Finance & Banking StudiesInternational Journal of Research in Business and Social Science
Publications
Articles by publication year
View data & coverage
Crossref citations
Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year
View data & coverage
OpenAlex citations
Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year
View data & coverage
OpenAlex · Citations received
By year of the citing work · 2017–2026
View data & coverage
2026 is year to date. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime charts share a citation scale. Unknown observations appear as gaps; known zero stays zero. Annual receipts use available OpenAlex histories and may not sum to lifetime totals. 0 undated publications excluded from publication-year charts.
Full analytics report All distributions, publications, comparisons & data provenance
INDEXED PUBLICATIONS547
CROSSREF CITATIONS3061
CROSSREF · CITED PUBLICATIONS97.8%
CROSSREF · MEAN CITATIONS5.6
Crossref citation coverage: 547 / 547 publications (100.0%). Latest observation: 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC. Means and percentages use records with known counts.
OpenAlex / Separate citation source
A broader view of this research
DOI-matched OpenAlex observations for the same selected publications. These counts are separate from Crossref and are never added together.
OPENALEX CITATIONS5532
DOI MATCH COVERAGE100.0%547 / 547 publications
MEAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY10.11547 known · 0 unknown
MEDIAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY9
Observation range: 21 Oct 2026 00:01 UTC — 21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC. Missing matches are not zero citations. Previous observations may remain if a refresh fails or a DOI no longer matches.
Institutions, countries & topics
OpenAlex affiliations and primary-topic classification. Each publication counts once per institution or country; multi-affiliated publications appear in multiple groups, so percentages can sum above 100%. Countries describe author affiliations, not nationality. Topics use one primary topic per publication.
Institutions
500 / 547 with data · 47 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 547 selected publications.
University of Brawijaya49 9.0%Islamic University of Indonesia29 5.3%Huazhong University of Science and Technology24 4.4%University of Johannesburg21 3.8%University of South Africa16 2.9%Durban University of Technology15 2.7%University of Zululand11 2.0%Istanbul Medipol University10 1.8%Ibn Haldun University10 1.8%Karatina University9 1.6%United States International University Africa8 1.5%Nile University of Nigeria8 1.5%University of Limpopo8 1.5%Walter Sisulu University8 1.5%University of KwaZulu-Natal8 1.5%Muhammadiyah University Purwokerto7 1.3%Divine Word College of Laoag7 1.3%Kenyatta University6 1.1%Cape Peninsula University of Technology6 1.1%University of the Free State6 1.1%North-West University6 1.1%Universitas Widyatama6 1.1%Mangosuthu University of Technology5 0.9%Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta5 0.9%University of Santo Tomas5 0.9%University of Rajshahi5 0.9%University of Nairobi4 0.7%President University4 0.7%University of Dhaka4 0.7%Yıldız Technical University4 0.7%Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya4 0.7%College of Business Education4 0.7%Ba Isago University4 0.7%Istanbul University4 0.7%Marmara University4 0.7%State University of Malang3 0.5%Bahçeşehir University3 0.5%Tshwane University of Technology3 0.5%Duta Wacana Christian University3 0.5%Universitas Trisakti3 0.5%Universitas Jambi3 0.5%Chulalongkorn University3 0.5%National University of Lesotho3 0.5%Pancasila University3 0.5%Kigali Independent University3 0.5%Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara3 0.5%LSPR Institute of Communication and Business3 0.5%University of Prishtina3 0.5%Beykent University3 0.5%Padjadjaran University3 0.5%University of Port Harcourt2 0.4%Tunis University2 0.4%Poznań University of Economics and Business2 0.4%Alliant University2 0.4%University of Nottingham2 0.4%Jimma University2 0.4%University of International Business and Economics2 0.4%Mansoura University2 0.4%Hefei University of Technology2 0.4%China University of Political Science and Law2 0.4%Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University2 0.4%Huazhong Agricultural University2 0.4%Universitas Airlangga2 0.4%IPB University2 0.4%Muhammadiyah University of Yogyakarta2 0.4%Abdelmalek Essaâdi University2 0.4%Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology2 0.4%Konya Food and Agriculture University2 0.4%Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim2 0.4%Perbanas Institute2 0.4%Management College of Southern Africa2 0.4%University of Barishal2 0.4%Varendra University2 0.4%Pan Africa Christian University2 0.4%Indian Institute of Management Indore2 0.4%International Islamic University Malaysia2 0.4%St. Paul's University2 0.4%Universitas Tribhuwana Tunggadewi2 0.4%Lebanese French University2 0.4%Koforidua Technical University2 0.4%The Co-operative University of Kenya2 0.4%Rowan University2 0.4%Istanbul Commerce University2 0.4%BRAC University2 0.4%Hacettepe University2 0.4%University of Reading2 0.4%University of Venda2 0.4%Telkom University2 0.4%University of the Western Cape2 0.4%University of Palangka Raya1 0.2%Rajamangala University of Technology1 0.2%Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah1 0.2%Gebze Technical University1 0.2%Jatiya Kabi Kazi Nazrul Islam University1 0.2%Tarumanagara University1 0.2%Kozminski University1 0.2%University of Fort Hare1 0.2%Western Illinois University1 0.2%University of Nigeria1 0.2%Michigan Technological University1 0.2%Mohammed V University1 0.2%University of Science and Technology of China1 0.2%Udayana University1 0.2%Sivas Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi1 0.2%Bahauddin Zakariya University1 0.2%Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli University1 0.2%UNESCO1 0.2%Cihan University-Erbil1 0.2%Vaal University of Technology1 0.2%Doğuş University1 0.2%MEF University1 0.2%Bacha Khan University1 0.2%Pennsylvania State University1 0.2%Zhejiang Sci-Tech University1 0.2%Avrasya University1 0.2%Khadim Ali Shah Bukhari Institute of Technology1 0.2%University of Cape Coast1 0.2%Bandung Institute of Technology1 0.2%Sultan Idris Education University1 0.2%Amman Arab University1 0.2%University of Mostar1 0.2%Central Connecticut State University1 0.2%University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus1 0.2%Edinboro University1 0.2%North South University1 0.2%International Islamic University Chittagong1 0.2%Mzumbe University1 0.2%University of Sargodha1 0.2%Queensland University of Technology1 0.2%Strathmore University1 0.2%University of Greater Manchester1 0.2%University of Georgia1 0.2%National University of Singapore1 0.2%Queen Mary University of London1 0.2%Aligarh Muslim University1 0.2%Gomal University1 0.2%University of the Punjab1 0.2%BRAC1 0.2%Karabük University1 0.2%Mercu Buana University1 0.2%Zhaoqing University1 0.2%King Abdulaziz University1 0.2%Universitas Syiah Kuala1 0.2%Government College University, Faisalabad1 0.2%Riphah International University1 0.2%Wuhan University of Technology1 0.2%University of Lagos1 0.2%State University of Medan1 0.2%Ahi Evran University1 0.2%Nnamdi Azikiwe University1 0.2%California State University, San Marcos1 0.2%Jenderal Soedirman University1 0.2%Sriwijaya University1 0.2%Dzemal Bijedic University of Mostar1 0.2%Africa International University1 0.2%Botswana Accountancy College1 0.2%Government of South Africa1 0.2%Komar University of Science and Technology1 0.2%Kumasi Technical University1 0.2%The University of Dodoma1 0.2%Comilla University1 0.2%University of Indonesia1 0.2%HITEC University1 0.2%Bangladesh Air Force Shaheen College1 0.2%China University of Geosciences1 0.2%Khairun University1 0.2%Shaoguan University1 0.2%Laikipia University1 0.2%Meru University of Science and Technology1 0.2%Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta1 0.2%Nasarawa State University1 0.2%University of Florida1 0.2%University of Zambia1 0.2%Nigerian Defence Academy1 0.2%University of Malaya1 0.2%Kenya Methodist University1 0.2%Wichita State University1 0.2%University for Business and Technology1 0.2%University of Rwanda1 0.2%Universitas Persada Indonesia Yayasan Administrasi Indonesia1 0.2%Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha1 0.2%Universitas Batam1 0.2%GNA University1 0.2%Universitas Indo Global Mandiri1 0.2%Islamic University of Riau1 0.2%Prime University1 0.2%Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa1 0.2%Universitas Patria Artha1 0.2%Arab Open University1 0.2%Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya1 0.2%Universitas Mahasaraswati Denpasar1 0.2%Jagannath University1 0.2%Universitas Darul Ulum1 0.2%International University of Batam1 0.2%Universitas Wisnuwardhana Malang1 0.2%Ministry of Finance1 0.2%Trilogi University1 0.2%Universitas Sangga Buana YPKP1 0.2%Universitas Langlangbuana1 0.2%Jumeira University1 0.2%Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Yogyakarta1 0.2%Preston University1 0.2%Universitas Hindu Indonesia1 0.2%National College of Business Administration and Economics1 0.2%Istanbul Health and Technology University1 0.2%Institut Bisnis dan Informatika Kesatuan1 0.2%Government College University, Lahore1 0.2%Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang1 0.2%Xavier Institute of Management and Entrepreneurship1 0.2%Protestant University of Rwanda1 0.2%Universitas Teknologi Bandung1 0.2%Faculty of Economics and Management of Sfax1 0.2%University of Kotli, Azad Jammu and Kashmir1 0.2%Dhaka Chamber of Commerce & Industry1 0.2%PPM School of Management1 0.2%Bajkul Milani Mahavidyalaya1 0.2%Army Institute of Business Administration, Savar1 0.2%Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Adhyaksa1 0.2%Politeknik Negeri Bali1 0.2%Universitas Sebelas April1 0.2%Seiyun University1 0.2%STMIK TIME1 0.2%Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Y.A.I1 0.2%Institut Bisnis dan Informatika Kosgoro 19571 0.2%Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Professional Manajemen College Indonesia1 0.2%Universitas Dharma AUB Surakarta1 0.2%FEU Diliman1 0.2%Boğaziçi University1 0.2%Maltepe University1 0.2%Ladoke Akintola University of Technology1 0.2%Addis Ababa University1 0.2%Jahangirnagar University1 0.2%Sultan Qaboos University1 0.2%Christ University1 0.2%Feng Chia University1 0.2%Koya University1 0.2%International Burch University1 0.2%Nottingham Trent University1 0.2%Western Washington University1 0.2%Atatürk University1 0.2%Lead City University1 0.2%University of Tabuk1 0.2%Midlands State University1 0.2%Drexel University1 0.2%Rajarata University of Sri Lanka1 0.2%Zhejiang Gongshang University1 0.2%Bangladesh University of Textiles1 0.2%Erciyes University1 0.2%University of Gothenburg1 0.2%Bucharest University of Economic Studies1 0.2%University of Chittagong1 0.2%October University of Modern Sciences and Arts1 0.2%University of New England1 0.2%Tishk International University1 0.2%Garden City University College1 0.2%King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang1 0.2%National Cheng Kung University1 0.2%University of Stavanger1 0.2%Jashore University of Science and Technology1 0.2%Southern Taiwan University of Science and Technology1 0.2%Tunku Abdul Rahman University of Management and Technology1 0.2%Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman1 0.2%Bangladesh University of Professionals1 0.2%Hasanuddin University1 0.2%Kastamonu University1 0.2%Nelson Mandela University1 0.2%
Countries
499 / 547 with data · 48 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 547 selected publications.
Indonesia163 29.8%South Africa103 18.8%Turkey49 9.0%China31 5.7%Kenya31 5.7%Bangladesh20 3.7%Nigeria16 2.9%Philippines12 2.2%United States11 2.0%Pakistan10 1.8%India6 1.1%Malaysia6 1.1%Tanzania6 1.1%Botswana5 0.9%Britain (UK)5 0.9%Iraq5 0.9%Ghana4 0.7%Thailand4 0.7%Egypt3 0.5%Lesotho3 0.5%Morocco3 0.5%Poland3 0.5%Rwanda3 0.5%Tunisia3 0.5%Taiwan3 0.5%XK3 0.5%Australia2 0.4%Bosnia & Herzegovina2 0.4%Ethiopia2 0.4%Jordan2 0.4%Saudi Arabia2 0.4%United Arab Emirates1 0.2%France1 0.2%Sri Lanka1 0.2%Norway1 0.2%Oman1 0.2%Romania1 0.2%Sweden1 0.2%Singapore1 0.2%Yemen1 0.2%Zambia1 0.2%Zimbabwe1 0.2%
Primary topics
547 / 547 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 547 selected publications.
Employee Performance and Management34 6.2%Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior21 3.8%Technology Adoption and User Behaviour19 3.5%Banking stability, regulation, efficiency18 3.3%Customer Service Quality and Loyalty18 3.3%Islamic Finance and Banking Studies13 2.4%Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences12 2.2%Employee Performance and Leadership11 2.0%Corporate Finance and Governance10 1.8%Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance10 1.8%Financial Literacy and Behavior10 1.8%Corporate Governance and Financial Management10 1.8%Monetary Policy and Economic Impact9 1.6%Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting9 1.6%Environmental Sustainability in Business9 1.6%Public Administration in Developing Nations8 1.5%Consumer Behavior and Marketing Influence8 1.5%Innovation and Knowledge Management7 1.3%Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research7 1.3%Microfinance and Financial Inclusion7 1.3%Corporate Taxation and Avoidance7 1.3%Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis6 1.1%Digital Marketing and Social Media6 1.1%Taxation and Compliance Studies6 1.1%Consumer Retail Behavior Studies6 1.1%COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts6 1.1%Human Resource and Talent Management6 1.1%Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification5 0.9%Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation5 0.9%Working Capital and Financial Performance5 0.9%Stress and Burnout Research5 0.9%Financial Markets and Investment Strategies4 0.7%Efficiency Analysis Using DEA4 0.7%Work-Family Balance Challenges4 0.7%Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management4 0.7%FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance4 0.7%Education during COVID-19 pandemic4 0.7%Banking Sector Performance and Management4 0.7%Online and Blended Learning3 0.5%Quality and Supply Management3 0.5%Economic Growth and Productivity3 0.5%Energy, Environment, Economic Growth3 0.5%Global Financial Crisis and Policies3 0.5%Ethics in Business and Education3 0.5%Academic integrity and plagiarism3 0.5%Financial Distress and Bankruptcy Prediction3 0.5%Financial Analysis and Corporate Governance3 0.5%Employer Branding and e-HRM3 0.5%Digital Innovation in Industries3 0.5%Teacher Professional Development and Motivation3 0.5%Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society3 0.5%Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies3 0.5%Teacher Education and Leadership Studies2 0.4%Multi-Criteria Decision Making2 0.4%Global trade and economics2 0.4%Blockchain Technology Applications and Security2 0.4%Traffic and Road Safety2 0.4%Intimate Partner and Family Violence2 0.4%International Business and FDI2 0.4%Disaster Management and Resilience2 0.4%Occupational Health and Safety Research2 0.4%Environmental Education and Sustainability2 0.4%E-Government and Public Services2 0.4%Gender Diversity and Inequality2 0.4%Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering2 0.4%Stock Market Forecasting Methods2 0.4%Emotional Intelligence and Performance2 0.4%Smart Cities and Technologies2 0.4%Healthcare Systems and Reforms2 0.4%Employee Performance and Motivation2 0.4%Higher Education and Employability2 0.4%Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis2 0.4%Public-Private Partnership Projects2 0.4%African Education and Politics2 0.4%Economic Growth and Fiscal Policies2 0.4%Halal products and consumer behavior2 0.4%Public Procurement and Policy2 0.4%School Leadership and Teacher Performance2 0.4%SMEs Development and Digital Marketing2 0.4%Organizational Change and Leadership2 0.4%Competitive and Knowledge Intelligence2 0.4%Local Governance and Development2 0.4%Benford’s Law and Fraud Detection2 0.4%Linguistic and Sociocultural Studies2 0.4%Economic and Technological Innovation2 0.4%Local Economic Development and Planning2 0.4%EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning1 0.2%Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes1 0.2%Science Education and Pedagogy1 0.2%scientometrics and bibliometrics research1 0.2%Reading and Literacy Development1 0.2%Electoral Systems and Political Participation1 0.2%Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques1 0.2%COVID-19 and Mental Health1 0.2%Public Policy and Administration Research1 0.2%Higher Education Research Studies1 0.2%Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights1 0.2%Agricultural Innovations and Practices1 0.2%Construction Project Management and Performance1 0.2%Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology1 0.2%Teaching and Learning Programming1 0.2%Sustainable Supply Chain Management1 0.2%Higher Education Governance and Development1 0.2%Family Dynamics and Relationships1 0.2%Early Childhood Education and Development1 0.2%Design Education and Practice1 0.2%Information and Cyber Security1 0.2%Health Literacy and Information Accessibility1 0.2%Digital Transformation in Industry1 0.2%Team Dynamics and Performance1 0.2%Disability Rights and Representation1 0.2%Evaluation of Teaching Practices1 0.2%Corruption and Economic Development1 0.2%Market Dynamics and Volatility1 0.2%Service and Product Innovation1 0.2%Hearing Impairment and Communication1 0.2%Problem and Project Based Learning1 0.2%Sex work and related issues1 0.2%Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue1 0.2%Cultural Industries and Urban Development1 0.2%Gender Politics and Representation1 0.2%Mobile Health and mHealth Applications1 0.2%ICT Impact and Policies1 0.2%Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications1 0.2%Survey Methodology and Nonresponse1 0.2%Global trade, sustainability, and social impact1 0.2%Fiscal Policies and Political Economy1 0.2%Workplace Violence and Bullying1 0.2%Gambling Behavior and Treatments1 0.2%Education and Critical Thinking Development1 0.2%Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies1 0.2%Organizational Management and Innovation1 0.2%Sustainability in Higher Education1 0.2%Family Business Performance and Succession1 0.2%Advanced Statistical Methods and Models1 0.2%Big Data and Business Intelligence1 0.2%Forecasting Techniques and Applications1 0.2%Knowledge Management and Sharing1 0.2%Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling1 0.2%Urban and Rural Development Challenges1 0.2%African cultural and philosophical studies1 0.2%Environmental Justice and Health Disparities1 0.2%Risk Management in Financial Firms1 0.2%Emotional Labor in Professions1 0.2%Workplace Spirituality and Leadership1 0.2%Insurance and Financial Risk Management1 0.2%Educational Innovations and Challenges1 0.2%Global Trade and Competitiveness1 0.2%Software Engineering and Design Patterns1 0.2%Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies1 0.2%Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy1 0.2%Criminal Justice and Penology1 0.2%Corporate Identity and Reputation1 0.2%Management and Organizational Practices1 0.2%COVID-19 Prevention and Impact1 0.2%Human Rights and Development1 0.2%Gender, Education, and Development Issues1 0.2%Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion1 0.2%Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds1 0.2%Business Strategies and Innovation1 0.2%African Studies and Ethnography1 0.2%Organizational Learning and Leadership1 0.2%Robotic Process Automation Applications1 0.2%Digital Transformation in Financial Services1 0.2%Human Resources and Workforce1 0.2%Labor Market and Education1 0.2%Education and Technology Integration1 0.2%Accounting and Financial Management1 0.2%Nostalgia and Consumer Behavior1 0.2%Transportation Systems and Logistics1 0.2%Education Systems and Policy1 0.2%Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts1 0.2%Coaching Methods and Impact1 0.2%Vocational and Entrepreneurial Education1 0.2%Educational Leadership and Practices1 0.2%Cyberloafing and Workplace Behavior1 0.2%Education in Rural Contexts1 0.2%Generational Differences and Trends1 0.2%Marriage and Family Dynamics1 0.2%Healthcare Quality and Satisfaction1 0.2%Artificial Intelligence in Education1 0.2%Educational Technology and E-Learning1 0.2%
Yearly trendsCitations receivedCompare by yearPublication detailCitationsComparisonPublicationsOpenAlexInstitutions & topicsData coverage
Publication-year cohorts
Publications & citation trends
Citations are the latest recorded totals for articles published in each year, not citations received during that year. Crossref and OpenAlex remain separate and share the same citation scale. 2026 is incomplete; newer articles have had less time to receive citations.
0 undated publications excluded. Unknown citation counts are shown as —, never as zero. Partial coverage can understate totals; expand each table for known / total records.
Publications
View publications data & coverage
| Publication year | Journal / scope | Publications | Publications | Crossref known | OpenAlex known |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | All selected publications | 2 | 2 | 2/2 | 2/2 |
| 2013 | All selected publications | 13 | 13 | 13/13 | 13/13 |
| 2014 | All selected publications | 14 | 14 | 14/14 | 14/14 |
| 2015 | All selected publications | 12 | 12 | 12/12 | 12/12 |
| 2016 | All selected publications | 27 | 27 | 27/27 | 27/27 |
| 2017 | All selected publications | 12 | 12 | 12/12 | 12/12 |
| 2018 | All selected publications | 10 | 10 | 10/10 | 10/10 |
| 2019 | All selected publications | 54 | 54 | 54/54 | 54/54 |
| 2020 | All selected publications | 66 | 66 | 66/66 | 66/66 |
| 2021 | All selected publications | 101 | 101 | 101/101 | 101/101 |
| 2022 | All selected publications | 118 | 118 | 118/118 | 118/118 |
| 2023 | All selected publications | 87 | 87 | 87/87 | 87/87 |
| 2024 | All selected publications | 29 | 29 | 29/29 | 29/29 |
| 2025 | All selected publications | 2 | 2 | 2/2 | 2/2 |
Crossref citations
View crossref citations data & coverage
| Publication year | Journal / scope | Crossref citations | Publications | Crossref known | OpenAlex known |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | All selected publications | 8 | 2 | 2/2 | 2/2 |
| 2013 | All selected publications | 41 | 13 | 13/13 | 13/13 |
| 2014 | All selected publications | 52 | 14 | 14/14 | 14/14 |
| 2015 | All selected publications | 49 | 12 | 12/12 | 12/12 |
| 2016 | All selected publications | 100 | 27 | 27/27 | 27/27 |
| 2017 | All selected publications | 61 | 12 | 12/12 | 12/12 |
| 2018 | All selected publications | 45 | 10 | 10/10 | 10/10 |
| 2019 | All selected publications | 230 | 54 | 54/54 | 54/54 |
| 2020 | All selected publications | 344 | 66 | 66/66 | 66/66 |
| 2021 | All selected publications | 535 | 101 | 101/101 | 101/101 |
| 2022 | All selected publications | 751 | 118 | 118/118 | 118/118 |
| 2023 | All selected publications | 621 | 87 | 87/87 | 87/87 |
| 2024 | All selected publications | 210 | 29 | 29/29 | 29/29 |
| 2025 | All selected publications | 14 | 2 | 2/2 | 2/2 |
OpenAlex citations
View openalex citations data & coverage
| Publication year | Journal / scope | OpenAlex citations | Publications | Crossref known | OpenAlex known |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | All selected publications | 25 | 2 | 2/2 | 2/2 |
| 2013 | All selected publications | 122 | 13 | 13/13 | 13/13 |
| 2014 | All selected publications | 143 | 14 | 14/14 | 14/14 |
| 2015 | All selected publications | 123 | 12 | 12/12 | 12/12 |
| 2016 | All selected publications | 278 | 27 | 27/27 | 27/27 |
| 2017 | All selected publications | 141 | 12 | 12/12 | 12/12 |
| 2018 | All selected publications | 109 | 10 | 10/10 | 10/10 |
| 2019 | All selected publications | 580 | 54 | 54/54 | 54/54 |
| 2020 | All selected publications | 661 | 66 | 66/66 | 66/66 |
| 2021 | All selected publications | 1063 | 101 | 101/101 | 101/101 |
| 2022 | All selected publications | 1177 | 118 | 118/118 | 118/118 |
| 2023 | All selected publications | 857 | 87 | 87/87 | 87/87 |
| 2024 | All selected publications | 239 | 29 | 29/29 | 29/29 |
| 2025 | All selected publications | 14 | 2 | 2/2 | 2/2 |
Citation year / OpenAlex
Citations received over time
Incoming citations to the selected publications, grouped by the year of the citing work. This is separate from lifetime citation totals grouped by the cited article’s publication year.
The publication filters above define which articles receive the citations. The citation-year range below only controls this chart and the incoming-citation comparison. Removing publication-year filters includes older articles’ incoming citations too.
Annual history available for 547 / 547 selected publications. Supported display window: 2017–2026; 2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Missing histories and years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—); partial coverage can understate totals.
Annual-history observations (UTC): 2026-10-21T00:01:59.914678+00:00 — 2026-10-21T07:23:00.722414+00:00. Older observations may be retained after failed or incomplete refreshes.
OpenAlex · Citations received by year
View openalex · citations received by year data & coverage
| Citation year | Journal / scope | OpenAlex · Citations received by year | Publications | Annual history known |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | All selected publications | 40 | 547 | 547/547 |
| 2018 | All selected publications | 65 | 547 | 547/547 |
| 2019 | All selected publications | 131 | 547 | 547/547 |
| 2020 | All selected publications | 178 | 547 | 547/547 |
| 2021 | All selected publications | 344 | 547 | 547/547 |
| 2022 | All selected publications | 584 | 547 | 547/547 |
| 2023 | All selected publications | 1086 | 547 | 547/547 |
| 2024 | All selected publications | 1283 | 547 | 547/547 |
| 2025 | All selected publications | 1094 | 547 | 547/547 |
| 2026 | All selected publications | 620 | 547 | 547/547 |
Counts represent citation links, not unique citing papers across a journal: one paper citing two selected articles contributes two links. Older citations outside this window are excluded, so annual sums need not equal lifetime totals. OpenAlex methodology ↗
Publications by publication year. 2026 is an incomplete year.
View data table
| Period | Publications |
|---|---|
| 2012 | 2 |
| 2013 | 13 |
| 2014 | 14 |
| 2015 | 12 |
| 2016 | 27 |
| 2017 | 12 |
| 2018 | 10 |
| 2019 | 54 |
| 2020 | 66 |
| 2021 | 101 |
| 2022 | 118 |
| 2023 | 87 |
| 2024 | 29 |
| 2025 | 2 |
Crossref citation distribution
Latest Crossref totals for the selected publications; not citations received in the selected years.
Mean5.6
Median5
Unknown counts are excluded from the mean, median and cited-publication rate.
Journal comparison
Same filters, source and counting rules across journals. Descriptive statistics, not a quality ranking.
| Journal / publisher | Publications | Crossref citations | OpenAlex citations | OpenAlex coverage | Crossref mean | Crossref median | Crossref cited %* | Crossref coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bussecon Review of Social Sciences Bussecon International Academy | 8 | 53 | 85 | 8/8 | 6.62 | 6.5 | 100.0 | 8/8 · 100.0% |
| International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy Bussecon International Academy | 30 | 216 | 316 | 30/30 | 7.2 | 7.0 | 100.0 | 30/30 · 100.0% |
| International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies SSBFNET | 86 | 392 | 858 | 86/86 | 4.56 | 4.0 | 95.3 | 86/86 · 100.0% |
| International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science SSBFNET | 423 | 2400 | 4273 | 423/423 | 5.67 | 5 | 98.1 | 423/423 · 100.0% |
* Percentage among publications with a known citation count.
Most cited · Crossref
The racial hierarchisation of the isiXhosa language in South Africa
Read abstract
The reality is that there is a relationship between language and race as advanced and qualified by ethnolinguistics. Such a relationship points to the subjugation of the isiXhosa language (habitually situated in South Africa), among other prescripts, which was fueled by racial hierarchization that ought to be debated within the paradigm of scholarly discourses. The subjugation, distortion and erosion of the isiXhosa language were led by the colonial, apartheid governance and administration that sought to impose censorship. Therefore, this article employs post-colonial theory to argue and scholarly prove that the language and many South African indigenous languages were oppressed based on racial notions that sought to accelerate neo-liberalist and imperialist perceptions. Hypothetically speaking, the isiXhosa language still suffers from the effects of (post)colonialism carried by colonial agents who continue to mock and humiliate the language. The debates and findings underline that such claims (racial hierarchization of the language) must be validated through theoretical and practical discourses. As a result, closing remarks infuse potential recommendations open to public scrutiny regarding the problematised phenomenon and/or conundrum.
DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v12i2.231816 Crossref citations18 OpenAlex citations
Influence of search engine optimization (SEO) on business performance
Read abstract
The aim of the paper is to investigate the impact of SEO on the business performance of a private university in Sarajevo. Thus, the main research question provides the finding on how does the implementation of SEO influence the performance of the business. Moreover, the tested hypothesis presents whether SEO positively influences the business performance of International Burch University (IBU). The research strategy is to analyze primary data derived from a case study, which is generated following a conversation with the Head of the IBU Marketing and PR team. The data sample is derived from Google Analytics (focusing on the number of visits and sessions, average engagement time, keywords and SERP positioning). Seobility tools are employed in data analysis. Business performance is calculated through the IBU CRM system, focusing on student enrolment. Findings indicate that increasing a site's rankings on search engine results pages (SERPs) led to a variety of positive outcomes for companies including an increase in the number of visitors to the site, an increase in the average amount of time users spent on the site, increased user engagement, and an increase in student enrollment, which resulted in IBU increased annual sales revenue. It will benefit many different groups, including the government, which will benefit in both microeconomic and macroeconomic senses, digital marketing enthusiasts and SEO experts, and the academic world, which will benefit as a framework for future studies and research in the field of SEO recognition and implementation in business queries.
DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v11i4.186516 Crossref citations19 OpenAlex citations
Non-performing Loans and Bank Profitability
Read abstract
This study aims to investigate the association between non-performing loans (NPLs) and the profitability of banks in Bangladesh. The data of twenty-five listed banks for the twelve years spanning from 2010 to 2021 have been analyzed to achieve the research objective. through the use of the ordinary least square (OLS) regression model, we found that the NPL has a negative significant impact on the profitability determined by the return on asset (ROA). In addition, the study revealed that the bank size, which is represented by banks’ total assets, is also inversely related to the profitability of the sample banks used in this research. The study concludes that the stakeholders, particularly the management of the banks, as well as the regulators, should be more cautious about NPLs and should try to lessen the level of NPLs because it can bring devastating results both on the microeconomic as well as on macroeconomic metrics of a developing country like Bangladesh.
DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v11i4.231415 Crossref citations19 OpenAlex citations
Assessing the role of entrepreneurship industry and SMEs to economic growth in South Africa
Read abstract
The study looked at the role and contribution of entrepreneurship industry to foster social and economic development through small, micro, and medium-sized businesses in South Africa. The conceptual research looked at the influence of small, micro, and medium-sized businesses (SMMEs) on South African development. The study's objective was to evaluate how small, medium-sized businesses (SMMEs) are now driving economic growth and solving social issues in a setting where big businesses and governments appear to be doing very little. As a result, the study examines how SMMEs might help the nation solve persistent societal evils including poverty, inequality, and social isolation. A desktop literature review research design was adopted to collect data on the role of entrepreneurship in South Africa, policies and practices of big business and government that exacerbate social issues in communities and impede socioeconomic development, as well as the specific roles that SMMEs play in achieving socioeconomic development goals. Findings from research indicate that, among other development outcomes, SMMEs are at the vanguard of creating jobs and fostering social and political justice in the nation. Future empirical studies that account for and evaluate the importance of SMME contributions to the construction of economic, social, and political justice in the nation are advised because this work lacks the empirical support necessary to substantiate its conclusions and observations.
DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v12i7.273015 Crossref citations17 OpenAlex citations
Challenges of school resources management for curriculum delivery in South African Rural High Schools: Principals' perceptions on the way forward
Read abstract
Various existing studies have established the multi-faceted nature of social inequalities in South Africa. The social inequalities also segregate schools into urban and rural schools, with adequate or lack of infrastructure influencing learners' performances in various South African schools. Hence, school principals are expected to manage the available resources to attain curriculum delivery and the whole school's performance. This qualitative study explored principals' perspectives on managing uneven school resources to achieve the goals and objectives of the education system. This study adopted an interpretive paradigm to understand the voices of 20 rural school principals in semi-structured interviews. The principals were purposively selected from 20 rural schools in King Cetshwayo district in KwaZulu-Natal. The audio-recorded interviews were thematically analysed to generate themes for findings and discussion. Findings revealed that most rural schools need more adequate school resources, and the principals need more support to attain quality curriculum delivery in schools adequately. The principals also lamented the high expectations placed on their schools for the academic excellence of their learners. Thus, the contents of each subject curriculum could not be efficiently unpacked and delivered to learners. The study, therefore, recommends improvement in resource provision to rural schools. At the same time, principals should be capacitated on effectively managing available school resources to achieve desired and efficient curriculum implementation in rural schools.
DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v12i6.270915 Crossref citations18 OpenAlex citations
Selected results
The impact of financial literacy on the performance of Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs): A review of literature
Read abstract
This study investigates the impact of financial literacy on small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), focusing on its role in enhancing financial decision-making, access to finance, fintech adoption, and risk management. Grounded in Resource-Based Theory (RBT) and Human Capital Theory (HCT), financial literacy is positioned as both a strategic capability and a form of human capital that strengthens firm resilience and competitiveness. A systematic literature review was conducted, synthesising evidence from 18 empirical studies published between 2016 and 2024. Findings reveal that financial literacy significantly improves SMEs’ ability to budget, manage debt, and evaluate investment decisions. It also enhances creditworthiness through improved financial record-keeping, thereby facilitating access to financing. Moreover, digital financial literacy is identified as a catalyst for fintech adoption, which contributes to cost reduction, operational efficiency, and financial transparency. The study concludes that targeted financial literacy interventions are essential, especially in developing economies where SMEs face structural constraints. It calls for integrated financial education strategies involving policymakers, financial institutions, and SME development agencies. Further empirical research is recommended to examine the long-term and digital dimensions of financial literacy as a driver of sustainable SME performance.
DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v14i3.41579 Crossref citations8 OpenAlex citations
Road infrastructure in South Africa: What is missing?
Read abstract
Road’s infrastructure is regarded as an essential factor to achieve development goals. It is recorded that most people living in the rural areas are constrained by poor road infrastructure, thereby causing poverty, hunger, and food insecurity. This situation calls for more investments in road infrastructure to promote agricultural activities. Using systematic review method, this study reviewed literature pertaining to road infrastructure in South Africa, the review focused on the importance, benefits, and present state of road infrastructure and the socio-economic effects of poor road infrastructure. The study revealed that Most South African roads are in bad shape, especially roads in the rural areas. due to lack of qualified personnel to manage road infrastructure, government regulations and policies and financial challenges. The implications of this study's findings are substantial for future research. Firstly, in order to ensure the timely delivery of infrastructure construction projects, the study's findings are expected to provide guidance to decision-makers and stakeholders in South Africa and other nations on how to proactively implement measures to provide and maintain sustainable, good road infrastructure.
DOI 10.36096/ijbes.v7i2.7385 Crossref citations6 OpenAlex citations
Bridging causal explanation and predictive modeling: the role of PLS-SEM
Read abstract
Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling has gained considerable attention across diverse academic fields, including business, social sciences, marketing, and management. A key challenge in utilizing PLS-SEM is balancing explanatory and predictive power when selecting the most suitable model from competing alternatives. This paper explores the effectiveness of various quality criteria for evaluating causal-predictive models, with a focus on resistance to change in Vietnamese SMEs. The study emphasizes the importance of both in-sample and out-of-sample predictions, using metrics such as R², BIC, AIC, Q², RMSE, MAE, and CVPAT. The findings reveal that traditional criteria like R² may not be sufficient for identifying the best model, while PLSpredict, CVPAT, BIC, and AIC offer superior performance in determining the optimal balance between explanatory and predictive capabilities. These insights provide practical implications for researchers and practitioners, highlighting the need to tailor model selection to specific objectives, such as theory development or real-world forecasting. For practitioners, the study underscores the benefits of leveraging simpler, more generalizable models for robust decision-making in dynamic or resource-constrained environments.
DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v13i10.38886 Crossref citations8 OpenAlex citations
Conflict resolution in indigenous communities: A social work perspective
Read abstract
Indigenous communities possess rich traditions of conflict resolution rooted in their cultural values, collective decision-making, and community involvement. However, the imposition of Western legal frameworks and colonial histories has often disrupted these practices, leading to increased tensions and unresolved conflicts. This study explored conflict resolution within Indigenous communities, emphasizing the role of social work in facilitating culturally appropriate processes. The study employed a qualitative approach, incorporating interviews with Indigenous leaders, social workers, and community members, alongside a review of relevant literature on traditional practices and social work interventions. Social workers play a crucial role as facilitators, helping to navigate tensions and bridging gaps between traditional practices and contemporary needs. Challenges include a lack of cultural competency and the need for ongoing community engagement. The integration of Indigenous knowledge systems into conflict resolution practices enhance outcomes and foster healing. Social workers prioritize cultural humility and active listening, ensuring that Indigenous voices lead the resolution process. By supporting the reclamation of traditional conflict resolution methods and advocating for culturally sensitive practices, social workers empowered Indigenous communities, promote resilience, and facilitate more effective conflict resolution. This perspective underscores the necessity of collaboration, respect, and recognition of Indigenous sovereignty in all social work interventions.
DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v13i10.37896 Crossref citations7 OpenAlex citations
The emergence of artificial intelligence in the higher education
Read abstract
This study presents a systematic literature review analysing the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on higher education, focusing on its methods, results, and implications. By synthesising a diverse range of academic papers, the review explores how AI technologies influence educational standards and practices in higher education institutions. Findings reveal that AI has the potential to enhance the quality of higher education by diversifying teaching responsibilities, customising learning experiences, and employing intelligent, adaptive teaching strategies. These capabilities position AI as a transformative tool for improving educational delivery and outcomes. However, the study also highlights significant challenges associated with integrating AI into higher education. These challenges include delineating the appropriate scope of AI use, addressing inequalities in access to digital resources, and ensuring adequate training and support for educators and students. The review underscores the importance of understanding these complexities to guide the development of effective strategies and policies that optimise AI's potential while mitigating its limitations. The review offers critical insights into the dual role of AI in higher education, where it can either advance or hinder educational standards depending on how it is implemented. By examining the advantages, limitations, and broader consequences of AI-powered instructional tools, this study provides a comprehensive perspective on the intricate relationship between AI and educational quality. The findings aim to inform educators, policymakers, and stakeholders about the opportunities and challenges of adopting AI in higher education, contributing to the development of inclusive, innovative, and sustainable educational practices.
DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v13i8.350712 Crossref citations12 OpenAlex citations
Data coverage & freshness
Source coverage refers to this result set; a publication may occur in several sources. Sync times refer to contributing journals.
Crossref547of 547 selected recordsOJS API511of 547 selected recordsOAI-PMH532of 547 selected recordsXML0of 547 selected recordsOpenAlex547of 547 selected records
Missing abstracts: 0 · Missing authors: 0 · Missing publication dates: 0 · Dates without day precision: 0
| Source | Most recent successful journal sync | Latest attempt |
|---|---|---|
| crossref | 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbs | complete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC |
| ojs-rest | 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbs | complete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 06:46 UTC |
| oai-pmh | 20 Oct 2026 19:56 UTC · ijfbs | complete · ijfbs · 20 Oct 2026 19:55 UTC |
| openalex-enrichment | 21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC · ijrbs | complete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC |