CiteNScope — Scholarly Index & Analytics
Discover / Analytics RESEARCH INTELLIGENCE
CiteNScope / Analytics

Explore the evidence.
Understand the reach.

Research across participating journals · All insights follow your collection filters.

Compare journals ↗
OpenAlex coverage 100.0% · 3/3 recordsLast OpenAlex observation 22 Oct 2026, 05:24 UTC
PUBLICATIONS3In the selected collection
CROSSREF CITATIONS03/3 with known counts
OPENALEX CITATIONS03/3 with known counts
OPENALEX MEAN0.0Per article with a known count
Explore articles 3 →
Filter collection Publication years, search & more
Reset
institution: Vaal University of Technology Remove ×topic: Policing Practices and Perceptions Remove ×
Your research collection

Output and reach

Publication activity alongside incoming citations.

Publication activity

Articles grouped by publication year

Publications

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.

View data & coverage

Citations received

OpenAlex · year of the citing work

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage

Research landscape

Leading affiliations and themes in this collection.

Full distributions & methodology ↓

Institutions

Vaal University of Technology33/3 records with data

Countries

South Africa33/3 records with data

Primary topics

Policing Practices and Perceptions33/3 records with data
Two perspectives on citations

Follow the research impact

Independent sources. Clear time scales.

Lifetime citations by publication year

Crossref and OpenAlex · separate totals for the same publication cohorts

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

Latest lifetime totals, grouped by the cited article’s year. These are not citations received in that year.

View data & coverage

Citations received each year

OpenAlex · incoming citation links grouped by citing-work year

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage
Annual history: 3/3 articles. Latest history observation: 2026-10-22T05:24:12.336880+00:00. Source totals are never added together.
Research side by side

Compare journals

Select journals to compare the same collection filters. Source totals stay separate. These measures describe research activity, not journal quality.

Leave all unchecked to include every matching journal. Selection affects only comparison charts.
Display range
International Journal of Business Ecosystem & StrategyInternational Journal of Research in Business and Social Science

Publications

Articles by publication year

View data & coverage

Crossref citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex · Citations received

By year of the citing work · 2017–2026

View data & coverage

2026 is year to date. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime charts share a citation scale. Unknown observations appear as gaps; known zero stays zero. Annual receipts use available OpenAlex histories and may not sum to lifetime totals. 0 undated publications excluded from publication-year charts.

Full analytics report All distributions, publications, comparisons & data provenance
3 MATCHING PUBLICATIONSExplore results →Export CSV ↓
INDEXED PUBLICATIONS3
CROSSREF CITATIONS0
CROSSREF · CITED PUBLICATIONS0.0%
CROSSREF · MEAN CITATIONS0.0

Crossref citation coverage: 3 / 3 publications (100.0%). Latest observation: 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC. Means and percentages use records with known counts.

OpenAlex / Separate citation source

A broader view of this research

DOI-matched OpenAlex observations for the same selected publications. These counts are separate from Crossref and are never added together.

OPENALEX CITATIONS0
DOI MATCH COVERAGE100.0%3 / 3 publications
MEAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY0.03 known · 0 unknown
MEDIAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY0

Observation range: 21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC — 22 Oct 2026 05:24 UTC. Missing matches are not zero citations. Previous observations may remain if a refresh fails or a DOI no longer matches.

OpenAlex citation distributionNo citations31–506–20021+0Unknown0

Institutions, countries & topics

OpenAlex affiliations and primary-topic classification. Each publication counts once per institution or country; multi-affiliated publications appear in multiple groups, so percentages can sum above 100%. Countries describe author affiliations, not nationality. Topics use one primary topic per publication.

Institutions

3 / 3 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 3 selected publications.

Countries

3 / 3 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 3 selected publications.

Primary topics

3 / 3 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 3 selected publications.

Citation year / OpenAlex

Citations received over time

Incoming citations to the selected publications, grouped by the year of the citing work. This is separate from lifetime citation totals grouped by the cited article’s publication year.

The publication filters above define which articles receive the citations. The citation-year range below only controls this chart and the incoming-citation comparison. Removing publication-year filters includes older articles’ incoming citations too.

Annual history available for 3 / 3 selected publications. Supported display window: 2017–2026; 2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Missing histories and years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—); partial coverage can understate totals.

Annual-history observations (UTC): 2026-10-21T07:23:02.047824+00:00 — 2026-10-22T05:24:12.336880+00:00. Older observations may be retained after failed or incomplete refreshes.

OpenAlex · Citations received by year

10.50 2017 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32018 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32019 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32020 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32021 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32022 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32023 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32024 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32025 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32026 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/3 2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
View openalex · citations received by year data & coverage
Citation yearJournal / scopeOpenAlex · Citations received by yearPublicationsAnnual history known
2017All selected publications033/3
2018All selected publications033/3
2019All selected publications033/3
2020All selected publications033/3
2021All selected publications033/3
2022All selected publications033/3
2023All selected publications033/3
2024All selected publications033/3
2025All selected publications033/3
2026All selected publications033/3

Counts represent citation links, not unique citing papers across a journal: one paper citing two selected articles contributes two links. Older citations outside this window are excluded, so annual sums need not equal lifetime totals. OpenAlex methodology ↗

Crossref citation distribution

Latest Crossref totals for the selected publications; not citations received in the selected years.

Mean0.0
Median0
No citations31–506–20021+0Unknown0

Unknown counts are excluded from the mean, median and cited-publication rate.

Journal comparison

Same filters, source and counting rules across journals. Descriptive statistics, not a quality ranking.

Journal / publisherPublicationsCrossref citationsOpenAlex citationsOpenAlex coverageCrossref meanCrossref medianCrossref cited %*Crossref coverage
International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy
Bussecon International Academy
2002/20.00.00.02/2 · 100.0%
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science
SSBFNET
1001/10.000.01/1 · 100.0%

* Percentage among publications with a known citation count.

Explore publications

View all 3 →

Most cited · Crossref

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Blue lights and broken trust: Unmasking and reforming unethical conduct in South African law enforcement

Radiakga Thabang Molokomme · Mpho Gift Motebe

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2025

Read abstract

Corruption within law enforcement is not just an institutional failure, it is a betrayal of public trust that erodes the very foundation of justice. This study explores the systemic factors contributing to unethical practices among South African law enforcement officers, focusing on weak accountability, socio-economic pressures, and political interference. Grounded in Institutional Anomie Theory, the research employs a qualitative analysis of secondary data, including government reports, academic literature, and case studies, to uncover the root causes of police misconduct. The findings reveal that inadequate oversight mechanisms, financial strain on officers, and political influence create an environment where unethical behaviour thrives. To address these issues, the study recommends strengthening accountability frameworks, improving officer remuneration, and minimizing political interference in law enforcement operations. Additionally, comprehensive ethics training and leadership reforms are essential for fostering a culture of integrity. Beyond its practical implications, this research contributes to the theoretical discourse on ethical policing by emphasising the need for systemic change. Future studies should explore the effectiveness of policy interventions and ethical training programs to ensure long-term solutions. Restoring ethical policing is not merely an institutional challenge, it is a moral imperative.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v14i5.41130 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

The role of intelligence in crime prevention: A comparative analysis of intelligence-led policing in South Africa and across countries

Mahlakwana Mahlomola · Radiakga Thabang Molokomme

International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2026

Read abstract

In an era when information is power, the ability to anticipate crime has become more critical than merely responding to it. Effective crime prevention increasingly depends on the strategic adoption of Intelligence-Led Policing (ILP). This study examines the role of ILP as a proactive crime prevention strategy, comparing South Africa with the more established models of the United Kingdom, the United States, and Australia. Grounded in Routine Activity Theory (RAT), this qualitative desktop study draws on fifteen purposively selected academic and policy sources, identified through a documented search and screening process. The findings show that while ILP is well institutionalised in countries with mature policing systems, its implementation in South Africa remains fragmented, constrained by institutional fragmentation, limited analytical capacity, political interference, and resource shortages. Comparative analysis underscores the importance of inter-agency coordination, professionalisation of intelligence units, and context-specific adaptation of ILP principles rather than direct replication of foreign models. The study concludes that strengthening ILP in South Africa requires a unified intelligence framework that integrates community policing, builds institutional capacity, and embeds a culture of intelligence sharing and accountability, and it proposes a research agenda centred on evaluating pilot ILP interventions.

DOI 10.36096/ijbes.v8i4.12910 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Social media as a Tool for Digital Guardianship: A Desk Research Study of Community-Police Collaboration in Crime Prevention and Detection in South Africa

Radiakga Thabang Molokomme

International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2026

Read abstract

Social media has emerged as a transformative tool in contemporary policing, enabling both crime prevention and crime detection through enhanced community engagement and digital guardianship. This desk research study investigates the utilisation of social media within community police collaboration in South Africa, drawing on Routine Activity Theory and Community Policing Theory as an integrated theoretical framework. Through a systematic review of scholarly literature, policy documents, and official reports, the study examines how social media is conceptualised, identifies documented evidence of effective community police collaboration, and highlights associated opportunities, limitations, and ethical considerations. Findings indicate that social media facilitates the detection of criminal behaviour, deters potential offenders by increasing perceived risks, and strengthens cooperative engagement between citizens and law enforcement. However, unregulated use presents ethical, legal, and operational challenges, underscoring the need for policy-guided, transparent, and accountable practices. The study contributes theoretically by integrating two complementary frameworks to explain crime prevention through detection in digital environments, and practically by providing insights for policymakers and police institutions seeking to leverage social media responsibly.

DOI 10.36096/ijbes.v8i4.12940 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations

Selected results

JOURNAL ARTICLE

The role of intelligence in crime prevention: A comparative analysis of intelligence-led policing in South Africa and across countries

Mahlakwana Mahlomola · Radiakga Thabang Molokomme

International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2026

Read abstract

In an era when information is power, the ability to anticipate crime has become more critical than merely responding to it. Effective crime prevention increasingly depends on the strategic adoption of Intelligence-Led Policing (ILP). This study examines the role of ILP as a proactive crime prevention strategy, comparing South Africa with the more established models of the United Kingdom, the United States, and Australia. Grounded in Routine Activity Theory (RAT), this qualitative desktop study draws on fifteen purposively selected academic and policy sources, identified through a documented search and screening process. The findings show that while ILP is well institutionalised in countries with mature policing systems, its implementation in South Africa remains fragmented, constrained by institutional fragmentation, limited analytical capacity, political interference, and resource shortages. Comparative analysis underscores the importance of inter-agency coordination, professionalisation of intelligence units, and context-specific adaptation of ILP principles rather than direct replication of foreign models. The study concludes that strengthening ILP in South Africa requires a unified intelligence framework that integrates community policing, builds institutional capacity, and embeds a culture of intelligence sharing and accountability, and it proposes a research agenda centred on evaluating pilot ILP interventions.

DOI 10.36096/ijbes.v8i4.12910 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Social media as a Tool for Digital Guardianship: A Desk Research Study of Community-Police Collaboration in Crime Prevention and Detection in South Africa

Radiakga Thabang Molokomme

International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2026

Read abstract

Social media has emerged as a transformative tool in contemporary policing, enabling both crime prevention and crime detection through enhanced community engagement and digital guardianship. This desk research study investigates the utilisation of social media within community police collaboration in South Africa, drawing on Routine Activity Theory and Community Policing Theory as an integrated theoretical framework. Through a systematic review of scholarly literature, policy documents, and official reports, the study examines how social media is conceptualised, identifies documented evidence of effective community police collaboration, and highlights associated opportunities, limitations, and ethical considerations. Findings indicate that social media facilitates the detection of criminal behaviour, deters potential offenders by increasing perceived risks, and strengthens cooperative engagement between citizens and law enforcement. However, unregulated use presents ethical, legal, and operational challenges, underscoring the need for policy-guided, transparent, and accountable practices. The study contributes theoretically by integrating two complementary frameworks to explain crime prevention through detection in digital environments, and practically by providing insights for policymakers and police institutions seeking to leverage social media responsibly.

DOI 10.36096/ijbes.v8i4.12940 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Blue lights and broken trust: Unmasking and reforming unethical conduct in South African law enforcement

Radiakga Thabang Molokomme · Mpho Gift Motebe

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2025

Read abstract

Corruption within law enforcement is not just an institutional failure, it is a betrayal of public trust that erodes the very foundation of justice. This study explores the systemic factors contributing to unethical practices among South African law enforcement officers, focusing on weak accountability, socio-economic pressures, and political interference. Grounded in Institutional Anomie Theory, the research employs a qualitative analysis of secondary data, including government reports, academic literature, and case studies, to uncover the root causes of police misconduct. The findings reveal that inadequate oversight mechanisms, financial strain on officers, and political influence create an environment where unethical behaviour thrives. To address these issues, the study recommends strengthening accountability frameworks, improving officer remuneration, and minimizing political interference in law enforcement operations. Additionally, comprehensive ethics training and leadership reforms are essential for fostering a culture of integrity. Beyond its practical implications, this research contributes to the theoretical discourse on ethical policing by emphasising the need for systemic change. Future studies should explore the effectiveness of policy interventions and ethical training programs to ensure long-term solutions. Restoring ethical policing is not merely an institutional challenge, it is a moral imperative.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v14i5.41130 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations

Data coverage & freshness

Source coverage refers to this result set; a publication may occur in several sources. Sync times refer to contributing journals.

Missing abstracts: 0 · Missing authors: 0 · Missing publication dates: 0 · Dates without day precision: 0

SourceMost recent successful journal syncLatest attempt
crossref21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
ojs-rest21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 06:46 UTC
oai-pmh20 Oct 2026 19:55 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 20 Oct 2026 19:50 UTC
openalex-enrichment21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
Full import history & methodology →