Explore the evidence.
Understand the reach.

Since 2020, the pledge of shares has been re-recognized as one of the efforts for business development, as an example of which will be carried out by PT Pegadaian after the merger with PT Bank Rakyat Indonesia. This fact shows that Pledge of Shares has developed as a new trend in economic development, especially in limited liability companies. However, in Indonesia, this trend growth has not been matched by a regulatory system that guarantees legal protection for debtors, especially in the Pledge Of Shares Execution for a Public Company, which are carried out by private sale. This condition has created many legal vacuums, which have led to inconsistent court decisions regarding the pledge of shares execution in public companies. Therefore, according to the above, through this writing, the author aims to describe a regulatory pattern that can create a protection mechanism for debtors related to the Pledge of Shares Execution for a Public Company by private Sale—aiming to provide recommendations on regulatory patterns based on a comparison of the pledge of shares execution for public companies in several countries that have a frequency of active business transaction activities with Indonesia, namely Singapore and the United States of America, in the hope of providing a comprehensive reference to determine the regulatory pattern that suits the needs Indonesia to produce sustainable economic development. The preparation of this writing was made using a normative juridical method. So that through the results of this writing, it can be an alternative solution to the legal vacuum.

Airplanes are legal objects of high economic value (high valuable assets) so that airplanes can be used as assets to guarantee the risk of debt agreements. The regulatory provisions related to guarantees for aircraft are based on the provisions of Law Number 15 of 1992 concerning Aviation which stipulates that aircraft can be used as collateral through a mortgage guarantee institution, but in its development, the regulation was replaced by Law Number 1 of 2009 concerning Aviation, which in its latest arrangement eliminates the ability of aircraft to be subject to collateral. This condition creates a legal vacuum because it does not provide alternative settlements and adjustments to aircraft that have been and will become objects of guarantee. So based on these conditions, it is necessary to have a regulatory model that can be used as a reference in the formulation of regulations related to the continuation of aircraft as an object of guarantee. The regulatory model referred to in this paper is in the form of formulating a regulatory pattern that provides a comprehensive overview of the Guarantee Institution, Implementation Mechanism, Guarantee Execution Mechanism, and Guarantee Implementation Authority that adapts to the regulatory system in Indonesia. To describe the regulatory model, the research method used is a normative juridical method based on a statutory and conceptual approach. With the aim of being able to comprehensively present a form of a continuous pattern of arrangements that will form a protection system for creditors by focusing on the Guarantee Institution, the guarantee implementation mechanism, the guarantee execution mechanism, and the Guarantee Implementing Authority for aircraft.

Safe Deposit Box is a banking product that provides goods storage services, such as money, securities, and other valuables. This product guarantees the confidentiality of information related to its use. In this regard, the Safe Deposit Box is one of the services that is risky and vulnerable to being used by money laundering actors. Then, based on the recommendations of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) it is stated that each country is obliged to identify, analyze, and evaluate the risks of money laundering and terrorism financing in that country. To follow up on these recommendations, Indonesia has established an Anti-Money Laundering and Prevention of Terrorism regime, as an effort to determine the direction and mitigate the risks of using financial services in money laundering practices. However, the need to protect Bank Secrecy cannot be ruled out. So it is necessary to make arrangements that can accommodate the need for a Safe Deposit Box Mechanism that can protect bank secrecy and prevent money laundering practices. Based on this research, the writing method used is a normative juridical method with a statutory and conceptual approach. The purpose of this study is to provide an overview and analysis related to the need for legal regulation and supervision of use related to Safe Deposit Boxes that can guarantee bank confidentiality, but can prevent money laundering practices, especially to identify user information, access data and information on money laundering practices and Politically Exposed Persons. (PEP) in Indonesia.

Since 2020, the pledge of shares has been re-recognized as one of the efforts for business development, as an example of which will be carried out by PT Pegadaian after the merger with PT Bank Rakyat Indonesia. This fact shows that Pledge of Shares has developed as a new trend in economic development, especially in limited liability companies. However, in Indonesia, this trend growth has not been matched by a regulatory system that guarantees legal protection for debtors, especially in the Pledge Of Shares Execution for a Public Company, which are carried out by private sale. This condition has created many legal vacuums, which have led to inconsistent court decisions regarding the pledge of shares execution in public companies. Therefore, according to the above, through this writing, the author aims to describe a regulatory pattern that can create a protection mechanism for debtors related to the Pledge of Shares Execution for a Public Company by private Sale—aiming to provide recommendations on regulatory patterns based on a comparison of the pledge of shares execution for public companies in several countries that have a frequency of active business transaction activities with Indonesia, namely Singapore and the United States of America, in the hope of providing a comprehensive reference to determine the regulatory pattern that suits the needs Indonesia to produce sustainable economic development. The preparation of this writing was made using a normative juridical method. So that through the results of this writing, it can be an alternative solution to the legal vacuum.

Airplanes are legal objects of high economic value (high valuable assets) so that airplanes can be used as assets to guarantee the risk of debt agreements. The regulatory provisions related to guarantees for aircraft are based on the provisions of Law Number 15 of 1992 concerning Aviation which stipulates that aircraft can be used as collateral through a mortgage guarantee institution, but in its development, the regulation was replaced by Law Number 1 of 2009 concerning Aviation, which in its latest arrangement eliminates the ability of aircraft to be subject to collateral. This condition creates a legal vacuum because it does not provide alternative settlements and adjustments to aircraft that have been and will become objects of guarantee. So based on these conditions, it is necessary to have a regulatory model that can be used as a reference in the formulation of regulations related to the continuation of aircraft as an object of guarantee. The regulatory model referred to in this paper is in the form of formulating a regulatory pattern that provides a comprehensive overview of the Guarantee Institution, Implementation Mechanism, Guarantee Execution Mechanism, and Guarantee Implementation Authority that adapts to the regulatory system in Indonesia. To describe the regulatory model, the research method used is a normative juridical method based on a statutory and conceptual approach. With the aim of being able to comprehensively present a form of a continuous pattern of arrangements that will form a protection system for creditors by focusing on the Guarantee Institution, the guarantee implementation mechanism, the guarantee execution mechanism, and the Guarantee Implementing Authority for aircraft.

Safe Deposit Box is a banking product that provides goods storage services, such as money, securities, and other valuables. This product guarantees the confidentiality of information related to its use. In this regard, the Safe Deposit Box is one of the services that is risky and vulnerable to being used by money laundering actors. Then, based on the recommendations of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) it is stated that each country is obliged to identify, analyze, and evaluate the risks of money laundering and terrorism financing in that country. To follow up on these recommendations, Indonesia has established an Anti-Money Laundering and Prevention of Terrorism regime, as an effort to determine the direction and mitigate the risks of using financial services in money laundering practices. However, the need to protect Bank Secrecy cannot be ruled out. So it is necessary to make arrangements that can accommodate the need for a Safe Deposit Box Mechanism that can protect bank secrecy and prevent money laundering practices. Based on this research, the writing method used is a normative juridical method with a statutory and conceptual approach. The purpose of this study is to provide an overview and analysis related to the need for legal regulation and supervision of use related to Safe Deposit Boxes that can guarantee bank confidentiality, but can prevent money laundering practices, especially to identify user information, access data and information on money laundering practices and Politically Exposed Persons. (PEP) in Indonesia.