CiteNScope — Scholarly Index & Analytics
Discover / Analytics RESEARCH INTELLIGENCE
CiteNScope / Analytics

Explore the evidence.
Understand the reach.

Research across participating journals · All insights follow your collection filters.

Compare journals ↗
OpenAlex coverage 100.0% · 3/3 recordsLast OpenAlex observation 31 Oct 2026, 18:36 UTC
PUBLICATIONS3In the selected collection
CROSSREF CITATIONS23/3 with known counts
OPENALEX CITATIONS33/3 with known counts
OPENALEX MEAN1.0Per article with a known count
Explore articles 3 →
Filter collection Publication years, search & more
Reset
institution: National University of Lesotho Remove ×
Your research collection

Output and reach

Publication activity alongside incoming citations.

Publication activity

Articles grouped by publication year

Publications

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.

View data & coverage

Citations received

OpenAlex · year of the citing work

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage

Research landscape

Leading affiliations and themes in this collection.

Full distributions & methodology ↓

Institutions

National University of Lesotho33/3 records with data

Countries

Lesotho33/3 records with data

Primary topics

Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences1Agricultural Innovations and Practices1Disability Rights and Representation13/3 records with data
Two perspectives on citations

Follow the research impact

Independent sources. Clear time scales.

Lifetime citations by publication year

Crossref and OpenAlex · separate totals for the same publication cohorts

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

Latest lifetime totals, grouped by the cited article’s year. These are not citations received in that year.

View data & coverage

Citations received each year

OpenAlex · incoming citation links grouped by citing-work year

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage
Annual history: 3/3 articles. Latest history observation: 2026-10-31T18:36:58.781581+00:00. Source totals are never added together.
Research side by side

Compare journals

Compare across all journals →

Select journals to compare the same collection filters. Source totals stay separate. These measures describe research activity, not journal quality.

Leave all unchecked to include every matching journal. Selection affects only comparison charts.
Display range
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science

Publications

Articles by publication year

View data & coverage

Crossref citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex · Citations received

By year of the citing work · 2017–2026

View data & coverage

2026 is year to date. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime charts share a citation scale. Unknown observations appear as gaps; known zero stays zero. Annual receipts use available OpenAlex histories and may not sum to lifetime totals. 0 undated publications excluded from publication-year charts.

Full analytics report All distributions, publications, comparisons & data provenance
3 MATCHING PUBLICATIONSExplore results →Export CSV ↓
INDEXED PUBLICATIONS3
CROSSREF CITATIONS2
CROSSREF · CITED PUBLICATIONS33.3%
CROSSREF · MEAN CITATIONS0.67

Crossref citation coverage: 3 / 3 publications (100.0%). Latest observation: 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC. Means and percentages use records with known counts.

OpenAlex / Separate citation source

A broader view of this research

DOI-matched OpenAlex observations for the same selected publications. These counts are separate from Crossref and are never added together.

OPENALEX CITATIONS3
DOI MATCH COVERAGE100.0%3 / 3 publications
MEAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY1.03 known · 0 unknown
MEDIAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY1

Observation range: 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC — 31 Oct 2026 18:36 UTC. Missing matches are not zero citations. Previous observations may remain if a refresh fails or a DOI no longer matches.

OpenAlex citation distributionNo citations11–526–20021+0Unknown0

Institutions, countries & topics

OpenAlex affiliations and primary-topic classification. Each publication counts once per institution or country; multi-affiliated publications appear in multiple groups, so percentages can sum above 100%. Countries describe author affiliations, not nationality. Topics use one primary topic per publication.

Institutions

3 / 3 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 3 selected publications.

Countries

3 / 3 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 3 selected publications.

Primary topics

3 / 3 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 3 selected publications.

Citation year / OpenAlex

Citations received over time

Incoming citations to the selected publications, grouped by the year of the citing work. This is separate from lifetime citation totals grouped by the cited article’s publication year.

The publication filters above define which articles receive the citations. The citation-year range below only controls this chart and the incoming-citation comparison. Removing publication-year filters includes older articles’ incoming citations too.

Annual history available for 3 / 3 selected publications. Supported display window: 2017–2026; 2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Missing histories and years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—); partial coverage can understate totals.

Annual-history observations (UTC): 2026-10-21T07:22:58.511823+00:00 — 2026-10-31T18:36:58.781581+00:00. Older observations may be retained after failed or incomplete refreshes.

OpenAlex · Citations received by year

21.00 2017 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32018 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32019 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32020 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32021 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32022 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32023 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32024 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32025 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 1 · Annual history coverage 3/32026 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 2 · Annual history coverage 3/3 2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
View openalex · citations received by year data & coverage
Citation yearJournal / scopeOpenAlex · Citations received by yearPublicationsAnnual history known
2017All selected publications033/3
2018All selected publications033/3
2019All selected publications033/3
2020All selected publications033/3
2021All selected publications033/3
2022All selected publications033/3
2023All selected publications033/3
2024All selected publications033/3
2025All selected publications133/3
2026All selected publications233/3

Counts represent citation links, not unique citing papers across a journal: one paper citing two selected articles contributes two links. Older citations outside this window are excluded, so annual sums need not equal lifetime totals. OpenAlex methodology ↗

Crossref citation distribution

Latest Crossref totals for the selected publications; not citations received in the selected years.

Mean0.67
Median0
No citations21–516–20021+0Unknown0

Unknown counts are excluded from the mean, median and cited-publication rate.

Journal comparison

Same filters, source and counting rules across journals. Descriptive statistics, not a quality ranking.

Journal / publisherPublicationsCrossref citationsOpenAlex citationsOpenAlex coverageCrossref meanCrossref medianCrossref cited %*Crossref coverage
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science
SSBFNET
3233/30.67033.33/3 · 100.0%

* Percentage among publications with a known citation count.

Explore publications

View all 3 →

Most cited · Crossref

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Insights into incubatees’ deficiencies of university innovation

Regina Thetsane · Nteboheleng Lillian · Tlali Mosoeunyane · Lekhooa Matela

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2024

Read abstract

This study aims to explore incubatees’ perceptions of the challenges facing start-ups and entrepreneurs at the National University of Lesotho Innovation Hub. An interpretive, qualitative approach was adopted. Six purposively selected incubatees partook in semi-structured interviews and the data were analysed through content thematic analysis. Delay in disbursement of incubation funds, infrastructure deficits and deficiency of entrepreneurial knowledge were identified as the major constraints as perceived by incubatees. University hubs should ensure that capitation grants are disbursed to the start-ups on time to provide incubateess’ timely preparation of the budgets and purchase of all the required products and hence timely commencement of the incubation process. Lack of essential facilities in the university hub and deficiency of entrepreneurial knowledge may hinder the ability of start-ups to successfully develop. The study results suggest the development of strategies and initiatives to effectively support start-ups in university hubs. Benchmarking from successful experience of regional and international universities innovation hubs on how to effectively manage incubator sponsorship. Implementation of training and development programs to assist start-ups to acquire new skills and stay updated with the latest industry trends and technologies. Lastly, investment in contemporary facilities, such as labs, offices and provision of state-of-art resources for incubatees is commended.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v13i8.37392 Crossref citations2 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Parental perspectives on experiences of provision of education for children with intellectual disabilities in Lesotho

Mahlape Tseeke

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2024

Read abstract

The education law and policies in Lesotho assert that all children have a right to education, however, the application of these frameworks have been slow when it comes to education provision for children with intellectual disabilities. This study explores parental perspectives on experiences of provision of education for children with intellectual disabilities in Lesotho. Data was collected using semi-structured interviews with parents of children with intellectual disabilities. The findings indicate that parents immensely valued education for its advantages, however, they were aware of and disappointed with the inequitable provision of education children with intellectual disabilities were offered, leading to lack of participation and dropouts. The study therefore highlights the need to amplify implementation of evidence-based practices that ensure effective access and provision of quality and equitable education for children with intellectual disabilities. Keywords: intellectual disabilities, provision of education, education experiences, parental perspectives, Lesotho

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v13i7.36590 Crossref citations1 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Determinants of market participation for small scale broiler farmers in Leribe District of Lesotho

Khutlang Lekhisa · Brian Muroyiwa

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2024

Read abstract

The poultry industry is the fasted growing sub-sector of agriculture in the developing world and this is attributed to several pulling and pushing factors. On the demand side, the issue of urbanisation, income increase and animal protein requirements particularly for chicken has a positive influence on the growth of poultry production. Poultry farming is highly practised in rural households in Lesotho, and it constitutes an important contribution to the development of the rural economy in most developing countries. The poultry industry remains an important sub-sector of agriculture like in many other developing countries and it remains the main source of livelihood for village people and other small-scale farmers in the economy. Many rural communities are keeping poultry as a source of meat and eggs to feed their families, raise income from the surplus and create employment opportunities. However, access to formals markets remains a critical challenge for the farmers. This study examined the socio-economic, market and institutional factors that influenced broiler farmers’ market participation and intensity of participation in the Leribe district in Lesotho. A two-stage sampling technique was employed to select 114 respondents from five villages and the survey data was collected through a structured questionnaire. Heckman's two-stage model was used to analyse factors influencing farmers' market participation and the intensity of market participation. Gender, farmer income, storage access, production experience, extension service, credit access and information access were significant and influenced farmers’ market participation decisions. The study recommends interventions that will increase access and formal market participation.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v13i4.33480 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations

Selected results

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Insights into incubatees’ deficiencies of university innovation

Regina Thetsane · Nteboheleng Lillian · Tlali Mosoeunyane · Lekhooa Matela

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2024

Read abstract

This study aims to explore incubatees’ perceptions of the challenges facing start-ups and entrepreneurs at the National University of Lesotho Innovation Hub. An interpretive, qualitative approach was adopted. Six purposively selected incubatees partook in semi-structured interviews and the data were analysed through content thematic analysis. Delay in disbursement of incubation funds, infrastructure deficits and deficiency of entrepreneurial knowledge were identified as the major constraints as perceived by incubatees. University hubs should ensure that capitation grants are disbursed to the start-ups on time to provide incubateess’ timely preparation of the budgets and purchase of all the required products and hence timely commencement of the incubation process. Lack of essential facilities in the university hub and deficiency of entrepreneurial knowledge may hinder the ability of start-ups to successfully develop. The study results suggest the development of strategies and initiatives to effectively support start-ups in university hubs. Benchmarking from successful experience of regional and international universities innovation hubs on how to effectively manage incubator sponsorship. Implementation of training and development programs to assist start-ups to acquire new skills and stay updated with the latest industry trends and technologies. Lastly, investment in contemporary facilities, such as labs, offices and provision of state-of-art resources for incubatees is commended.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v13i8.37392 Crossref citations2 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Parental perspectives on experiences of provision of education for children with intellectual disabilities in Lesotho

Mahlape Tseeke

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2024

Read abstract

The education law and policies in Lesotho assert that all children have a right to education, however, the application of these frameworks have been slow when it comes to education provision for children with intellectual disabilities. This study explores parental perspectives on experiences of provision of education for children with intellectual disabilities in Lesotho. Data was collected using semi-structured interviews with parents of children with intellectual disabilities. The findings indicate that parents immensely valued education for its advantages, however, they were aware of and disappointed with the inequitable provision of education children with intellectual disabilities were offered, leading to lack of participation and dropouts. The study therefore highlights the need to amplify implementation of evidence-based practices that ensure effective access and provision of quality and equitable education for children with intellectual disabilities. Keywords: intellectual disabilities, provision of education, education experiences, parental perspectives, Lesotho

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v13i7.36590 Crossref citations1 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Determinants of market participation for small scale broiler farmers in Leribe District of Lesotho

Khutlang Lekhisa · Brian Muroyiwa

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2024

Read abstract

The poultry industry is the fasted growing sub-sector of agriculture in the developing world and this is attributed to several pulling and pushing factors. On the demand side, the issue of urbanisation, income increase and animal protein requirements particularly for chicken has a positive influence on the growth of poultry production. Poultry farming is highly practised in rural households in Lesotho, and it constitutes an important contribution to the development of the rural economy in most developing countries. The poultry industry remains an important sub-sector of agriculture like in many other developing countries and it remains the main source of livelihood for village people and other small-scale farmers in the economy. Many rural communities are keeping poultry as a source of meat and eggs to feed their families, raise income from the surplus and create employment opportunities. However, access to formals markets remains a critical challenge for the farmers. This study examined the socio-economic, market and institutional factors that influenced broiler farmers’ market participation and intensity of participation in the Leribe district in Lesotho. A two-stage sampling technique was employed to select 114 respondents from five villages and the survey data was collected through a structured questionnaire. Heckman's two-stage model was used to analyse factors influencing farmers' market participation and the intensity of market participation. Gender, farmer income, storage access, production experience, extension service, credit access and information access were significant and influenced farmers’ market participation decisions. The study recommends interventions that will increase access and formal market participation.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v13i4.33480 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations

Data coverage & freshness

Source coverage refers to this result set; a publication may occur in several sources. Sync times refer to contributing journals.

Missing abstracts: 0 · Missing authors: 0 · Missing publication dates: 0 · Dates without day precision: 0

SourceMost recent successful journal syncLatest attempt
crossref21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
ojs-rest21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 06:46 UTC
oai-pmh20 Oct 2026 19:55 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 20 Oct 2026 19:50 UTC
openalex-enrichment21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
Full import history & methodology →