CiteNScope — Scholarly Index & Analytics
Discover / Analytics RESEARCH INTELLIGENCE
CiteNScope / Analytics

Explore the evidence.
Understand the reach.

Research across participating journals · All insights follow your collection filters.

Compare journals ↗
OpenAlex coverage 100.0% · 3/3 recordsLast OpenAlex observation 22 Oct 2026, 01:09 UTC
PUBLICATIONS3In the selected collection
CROSSREF CITATIONS73/3 with known counts
OPENALEX CITATIONS73/3 with known counts
OPENALEX MEAN2.33Per article with a known count
Explore articles 3 →
Filter collection Publication years, search & more
Reset
institution: University of South Africa Remove ×topic: Microfinance and Financial Inclusion Remove ×
Your research collection

Output and reach

Publication activity alongside incoming citations.

Publication activity

Articles grouped by publication year

Publications

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.

View data & coverage

Citations received

OpenAlex · year of the citing work

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage

Research landscape

Leading affiliations and themes in this collection.

Full distributions & methodology ↓

Institutions

University of South Africa33/3 records with data

Countries

South Africa33/3 records with data

Primary topics

Microfinance and Financial Inclusion33/3 records with data
Two perspectives on citations

Follow the research impact

Independent sources. Clear time scales.

Lifetime citations by publication year

Crossref and OpenAlex · separate totals for the same publication cohorts

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

Latest lifetime totals, grouped by the cited article’s year. These are not citations received in that year.

View data & coverage

Citations received each year

OpenAlex · incoming citation links grouped by citing-work year

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage
Annual history: 3/3 articles. Latest history observation: 2026-10-22T01:09:25.616799+00:00. Source totals are never added together.
Research side by side

Compare journals

Select journals to compare the same collection filters. Source totals stay separate. These measures describe research activity, not journal quality.

Leave all unchecked to include every matching journal. Selection affects only comparison charts.
Display range
International Journal of Finance & Banking StudiesInternational Journal of Research in Business and Social Science

Publications

Articles by publication year

View data & coverage

Crossref citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex · Citations received

By year of the citing work · 2017–2026

View data & coverage

2026 is year to date. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime charts share a citation scale. Unknown observations appear as gaps; known zero stays zero. Annual receipts use available OpenAlex histories and may not sum to lifetime totals. 0 undated publications excluded from publication-year charts.

Full analytics report All distributions, publications, comparisons & data provenance
3 MATCHING PUBLICATIONSExplore results →Export CSV ↓
INDEXED PUBLICATIONS3
CROSSREF CITATIONS7
CROSSREF · CITED PUBLICATIONS66.7%
CROSSREF · MEAN CITATIONS2.33

Crossref citation coverage: 3 / 3 publications (100.0%). Latest observation: 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC. Means and percentages use records with known counts.

OpenAlex / Separate citation source

A broader view of this research

DOI-matched OpenAlex observations for the same selected publications. These counts are separate from Crossref and are never added together.

OPENALEX CITATIONS7
DOI MATCH COVERAGE100.0%3 / 3 publications
MEAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY2.333 known · 0 unknown
MEDIAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY3

Observation range: 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC — 22 Oct 2026 01:09 UTC. Missing matches are not zero citations. Previous observations may remain if a refresh fails or a DOI no longer matches.

OpenAlex citation distributionNo citations11–526–20021+0Unknown0

Institutions, countries & topics

OpenAlex affiliations and primary-topic classification. Each publication counts once per institution or country; multi-affiliated publications appear in multiple groups, so percentages can sum above 100%. Countries describe author affiliations, not nationality. Topics use one primary topic per publication.

Institutions

3 / 3 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 3 selected publications.

Countries

3 / 3 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 3 selected publications.

Primary topics

3 / 3 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 3 selected publications.

Citation year / OpenAlex

Citations received over time

Incoming citations to the selected publications, grouped by the year of the citing work. This is separate from lifetime citation totals grouped by the cited article’s publication year.

The publication filters above define which articles receive the citations. The citation-year range below only controls this chart and the incoming-citation comparison. Removing publication-year filters includes older articles’ incoming citations too.

Annual history available for 3 / 3 selected publications. Supported display window: 2017–2026; 2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Missing histories and years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—); partial coverage can understate totals.

Annual-history observations (UTC): 2026-10-21T07:22:49.822989+00:00 — 2026-10-22T01:09:25.616799+00:00. Older observations may be retained after failed or incomplete refreshes.

OpenAlex · Citations received by year

31.50 2017 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32018 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32019 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32020 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32021 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32022 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32023 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 1 · Annual history coverage 3/32024 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 3 · Annual history coverage 3/32025 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32026 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 3 · Annual history coverage 3/3 2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
View openalex · citations received by year data & coverage
Citation yearJournal / scopeOpenAlex · Citations received by yearPublicationsAnnual history known
2017All selected publications033/3
2018All selected publications033/3
2019All selected publications033/3
2020All selected publications033/3
2021All selected publications033/3
2022All selected publications033/3
2023All selected publications133/3
2024All selected publications333/3
2025All selected publications033/3
2026All selected publications333/3

Counts represent citation links, not unique citing papers across a journal: one paper citing two selected articles contributes two links. Older citations outside this window are excluded, so annual sums need not equal lifetime totals. OpenAlex methodology ↗

Crossref citation distribution

Latest Crossref totals for the selected publications; not citations received in the selected years.

Mean2.33
Median3
No citations11–526–20021+0Unknown0

Unknown counts are excluded from the mean, median and cited-publication rate.

Journal comparison

Same filters, source and counting rules across journals. Descriptive statistics, not a quality ranking.

Journal / publisherPublicationsCrossref citationsOpenAlex citationsOpenAlex coverageCrossref meanCrossref medianCrossref cited %*Crossref coverage
International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies
SSBFNET
1331/13.03100.01/1 · 100.0%
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science
SSBFNET
2442/22.02.050.02/2 · 100.0%

* Percentage among publications with a known citation count.

Explore publications

View all 3 →

Most cited · Crossref

JOURNAL ARTICLE

The role of financial literacy on the growth outreach of South African microfinance institutions

Emmanuel Kuchena · Patricia Lindelwa Makoni

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2023

Read abstract

With the increased emphasis on financial inclusion by developing countries, the emergence, impact and sustainability of microfinance institutions (MFIs) is considered topical. This paper assesses the influence that financial literacy has on the growth outreach of MFIs, from a South African context. Using an online questionnaire, we collected data from 44 respondents, representing various MFIs in Limpopo, South Africa. In addition, interviews were conducted with four subjects from the regulatory body, MFSA. We applied panel data fixed effects regression, with binary logit component to measure relationships and effects of the variables under study. According to the results, there was strong consensus that financial literacy of MFI clients, proxied by loan portfolio education, and financial budgeting and investment training offered to MFI clients, improves overall MFI growth outreach, and MFI sustainability in the long run. The contribution of this paper is that, since microfinance institutions by mandate, pursue socio-economic goals, many are not geared towards being financially sustainable. However, with the drying up of grants, donor funds, subsidies and other capital injections into MFIs, it is important for them to implement alternative measures to ensure that their borrowers meet their repayment obligations timeously, hence improving institutional growth and sustainability.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v12i5.26574 Crossref citations4 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Corporate Governance and Financial Inclusion

Daniel Makina

International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies · 2021

Read abstract

The paper focuses on a scantly researched phenomenon, namely, the extent to which financial inclusion is influenced by corporate governance practices. The question that normally arises is whether corporate governance practices are tailored to supporting the financial inclusion mandate. The other question is whether there are certain corporate governance practices that advance financial inclusion. This paper reviews extant empirical literature on these matters with a view of stimulating debate on the subject. Cognisant that institutions that advance financial inclusion are largely financial institutions, the starting point is relating to contemporary corporate governance practice in financial institutions. We know that financial institutions belong to a specific class of corporations whose failure affects society at large because of the financial services they provide. As a result, they are heavily regulated and their corporate governance structures are bound to differ from those of conventional firms. Similarly, we know that financial inclusion institutions are special types of financial institutions with mandates to provide financial services to underserved population segments which equally require special treatment. The scant literature available shows, albeit not conclusive, some evidence of a positive relationship between sound corporate governance and financial inclusion. However, more research on how corporate governance affects different dimensions of financial inclusion is recommended.

DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v10i4.13493 Crossref citations3 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Entrepreneurial financing: challenges for SMEs in accessing funding<b></b>

Makgopa Tshehla · Nontokozo Mangquku

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

Small enterprises are important catalysts of economic expansion in numerous emerging nations, directly facilitating job creation. Many entrepreneurs encounter many obstacles that impede their sustainability and expansion. This study investigated the availability of finance for nascent entrepreneurs and the challenges they face in securing financial resources to launch their enterprises. The research employed quantitative methodologies and design. The study utilised a purposive sampling method, including a sample size of 54 small to medium firms situated in Fourways, Johannesburg, South Africa. Data were gathered using a survey questionnaire directed at entrepreneurs who sought funding from development finance institutions (DFIs) and banks. Descriptive statistics were employed for data analysis. The findings indicate that entrepreneurs frequently encounter difficulties in securing capital to initiate their ventures, and there exist discrepancies between financiers and entrepreneurs. The main challenges are that entrepreneurs lack the requisite skills and financial literacy to prepare adequate documents for completing fundraising applications. The financiers mandate collateral and equity investments from the entrepreneurs, indicating a need to reassess the funding framework employed by financial institutions. The funder's procedures are protracted, ambiguous, and poorly articulated. The report advises governments and Development Finance Institutions to streamline funding processes, boost transparency, and implement capacity-building programs to improve entrepreneurs' financial literacy.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v14i9.45440 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations

Selected results

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Entrepreneurial financing: challenges for SMEs in accessing funding<b></b>

Makgopa Tshehla · Nontokozo Mangquku

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

Small enterprises are important catalysts of economic expansion in numerous emerging nations, directly facilitating job creation. Many entrepreneurs encounter many obstacles that impede their sustainability and expansion. This study investigated the availability of finance for nascent entrepreneurs and the challenges they face in securing financial resources to launch their enterprises. The research employed quantitative methodologies and design. The study utilised a purposive sampling method, including a sample size of 54 small to medium firms situated in Fourways, Johannesburg, South Africa. Data were gathered using a survey questionnaire directed at entrepreneurs who sought funding from development finance institutions (DFIs) and banks. Descriptive statistics were employed for data analysis. The findings indicate that entrepreneurs frequently encounter difficulties in securing capital to initiate their ventures, and there exist discrepancies between financiers and entrepreneurs. The main challenges are that entrepreneurs lack the requisite skills and financial literacy to prepare adequate documents for completing fundraising applications. The financiers mandate collateral and equity investments from the entrepreneurs, indicating a need to reassess the funding framework employed by financial institutions. The funder's procedures are protracted, ambiguous, and poorly articulated. The report advises governments and Development Finance Institutions to streamline funding processes, boost transparency, and implement capacity-building programs to improve entrepreneurs' financial literacy.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v14i9.45440 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

The role of financial literacy on the growth outreach of South African microfinance institutions

Emmanuel Kuchena · Patricia Lindelwa Makoni

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2023

Read abstract

With the increased emphasis on financial inclusion by developing countries, the emergence, impact and sustainability of microfinance institutions (MFIs) is considered topical. This paper assesses the influence that financial literacy has on the growth outreach of MFIs, from a South African context. Using an online questionnaire, we collected data from 44 respondents, representing various MFIs in Limpopo, South Africa. In addition, interviews were conducted with four subjects from the regulatory body, MFSA. We applied panel data fixed effects regression, with binary logit component to measure relationships and effects of the variables under study. According to the results, there was strong consensus that financial literacy of MFI clients, proxied by loan portfolio education, and financial budgeting and investment training offered to MFI clients, improves overall MFI growth outreach, and MFI sustainability in the long run. The contribution of this paper is that, since microfinance institutions by mandate, pursue socio-economic goals, many are not geared towards being financially sustainable. However, with the drying up of grants, donor funds, subsidies and other capital injections into MFIs, it is important for them to implement alternative measures to ensure that their borrowers meet their repayment obligations timeously, hence improving institutional growth and sustainability.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v12i5.26574 Crossref citations4 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Corporate Governance and Financial Inclusion

Daniel Makina

International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies · 2021

Read abstract

The paper focuses on a scantly researched phenomenon, namely, the extent to which financial inclusion is influenced by corporate governance practices. The question that normally arises is whether corporate governance practices are tailored to supporting the financial inclusion mandate. The other question is whether there are certain corporate governance practices that advance financial inclusion. This paper reviews extant empirical literature on these matters with a view of stimulating debate on the subject. Cognisant that institutions that advance financial inclusion are largely financial institutions, the starting point is relating to contemporary corporate governance practice in financial institutions. We know that financial institutions belong to a specific class of corporations whose failure affects society at large because of the financial services they provide. As a result, they are heavily regulated and their corporate governance structures are bound to differ from those of conventional firms. Similarly, we know that financial inclusion institutions are special types of financial institutions with mandates to provide financial services to underserved population segments which equally require special treatment. The scant literature available shows, albeit not conclusive, some evidence of a positive relationship between sound corporate governance and financial inclusion. However, more research on how corporate governance affects different dimensions of financial inclusion is recommended.

DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v10i4.13493 Crossref citations3 OpenAlex citations

Data coverage & freshness

Source coverage refers to this result set; a publication may occur in several sources. Sync times refer to contributing journals.

Missing abstracts: 0 · Missing authors: 0 · Missing publication dates: 0 · Dates without day precision: 0

SourceMost recent successful journal syncLatest attempt
crossref21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
ojs-rest21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 06:46 UTC
oai-pmh20 Oct 2026 19:56 UTC · ijfbscomplete · ijfbs · 20 Oct 2026 19:55 UTC
openalex-enrichment21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
Full import history & methodology →