CiteNScope — Scholarly Index & Analytics
Discover / Analytics RESEARCH INTELLIGENCE
CiteNScope / Analytics

Explore the evidence.
Understand the reach.

Research across participating journals · All insights follow your collection filters.

Compare journals ↗
OpenAlex coverage 100.0% · 2/2 recordsLast OpenAlex observation 22 Oct 2026, 12:24 UTC
PUBLICATIONS2In the selected collection
CROSSREF CITATIONS22/2 with known counts
OPENALEX CITATIONS22/2 with known counts
OPENALEX MEAN1.0Per article with a known count
Explore articles 2 →
Filter collection Publication years, search & more
Reset
institution: University of South Africa Remove ×topic: Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies Remove ×
Your research collection

Output and reach

Publication activity alongside incoming citations.

Publication activity

Articles grouped by publication year

Publications

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.

View data & coverage

Citations received

OpenAlex · year of the citing work

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage

Research landscape

Leading affiliations and themes in this collection.

Full distributions & methodology ↓

Institutions

University of South Africa22/2 records with data

Countries

South Africa22/2 records with data

Primary topics

Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies22/2 records with data
Two perspectives on citations

Follow the research impact

Independent sources. Clear time scales.

Lifetime citations by publication year

Crossref and OpenAlex · separate totals for the same publication cohorts

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

Latest lifetime totals, grouped by the cited article’s year. These are not citations received in that year.

View data & coverage

Citations received each year

OpenAlex · incoming citation links grouped by citing-work year

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage
Annual history: 2/2 articles. Latest history observation: 2026-10-22T12:24:39.161042+00:00. Source totals are never added together.
Research side by side

Compare journals

Select journals to compare the same collection filters. Source totals stay separate. These measures describe research activity, not journal quality.

Leave all unchecked to include every matching journal. Selection affects only comparison charts.
Display range
International Journal of Business Ecosystem & StrategyInternational Journal of Research in Business and Social Science

Publications

Articles by publication year

View data & coverage

Crossref citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex · Citations received

By year of the citing work · 2017–2026

View data & coverage

2026 is year to date. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime charts share a citation scale. Unknown observations appear as gaps; known zero stays zero. Annual receipts use available OpenAlex histories and may not sum to lifetime totals. 0 undated publications excluded from publication-year charts.

Full analytics report All distributions, publications, comparisons & data provenance
2 MATCHING PUBLICATIONSExplore results →Export CSV ↓
INDEXED PUBLICATIONS2
CROSSREF CITATIONS2
CROSSREF · CITED PUBLICATIONS50.0%
CROSSREF · MEAN CITATIONS1.0

Crossref citation coverage: 2 / 2 publications (100.0%). Latest observation: 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC. Means and percentages use records with known counts.

OpenAlex / Separate citation source

A broader view of this research

DOI-matched OpenAlex observations for the same selected publications. These counts are separate from Crossref and are never added together.

OPENALEX CITATIONS2
DOI MATCH COVERAGE100.0%2 / 2 publications
MEAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY1.02 known · 0 unknown
MEDIAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY1.0

Observation range: 22 Oct 2026 04:30 UTC — 22 Oct 2026 12:24 UTC. Missing matches are not zero citations. Previous observations may remain if a refresh fails or a DOI no longer matches.

OpenAlex citation distributionNo citations11–516–20021+0Unknown0

Institutions, countries & topics

OpenAlex affiliations and primary-topic classification. Each publication counts once per institution or country; multi-affiliated publications appear in multiple groups, so percentages can sum above 100%. Countries describe author affiliations, not nationality. Topics use one primary topic per publication.

Institutions

2 / 2 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 2 selected publications.

Countries

2 / 2 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 2 selected publications.

Primary topics

2 / 2 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 2 selected publications.

Citation year / OpenAlex

Citations received over time

Incoming citations to the selected publications, grouped by the year of the citing work. This is separate from lifetime citation totals grouped by the cited article’s publication year.

The publication filters above define which articles receive the citations. The citation-year range below only controls this chart and the incoming-citation comparison. Removing publication-year filters includes older articles’ incoming citations too.

Annual history available for 2 / 2 selected publications. Supported display window: 2017–2026; 2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Missing histories and years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—); partial coverage can understate totals.

Annual-history observations (UTC): 2026-10-22T04:30:06.854706+00:00 — 2026-10-22T12:24:39.161042+00:00. Older observations may be retained after failed or incomplete refreshes.

OpenAlex · Citations received by year

21.00 2017 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 2/22018 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 2/22019 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 2/22020 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 2/22021 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 2/22022 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 2/22023 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 2/22024 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 2/22025 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 2/22026 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 2 · Annual history coverage 2/2 2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
View openalex · citations received by year data & coverage
Citation yearJournal / scopeOpenAlex · Citations received by yearPublicationsAnnual history known
2017All selected publications022/2
2018All selected publications022/2
2019All selected publications022/2
2020All selected publications022/2
2021All selected publications022/2
2022All selected publications022/2
2023All selected publications022/2
2024All selected publications022/2
2025All selected publications022/2
2026All selected publications222/2

Counts represent citation links, not unique citing papers across a journal: one paper citing two selected articles contributes two links. Older citations outside this window are excluded, so annual sums need not equal lifetime totals. OpenAlex methodology ↗

Crossref citation distribution

Latest Crossref totals for the selected publications; not citations received in the selected years.

Mean1.0
Median1.0
No citations11–516–20021+0Unknown0

Unknown counts are excluded from the mean, median and cited-publication rate.

Journal comparison

Same filters, source and counting rules across journals. Descriptive statistics, not a quality ranking.

Journal / publisherPublicationsCrossref citationsOpenAlex citationsOpenAlex coverageCrossref meanCrossref medianCrossref cited %*Crossref coverage
International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy
Bussecon International Academy
1001/10.000.01/1 · 100.0%
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science
SSBFNET
1221/12.02100.01/1 · 100.0%

* Percentage among publications with a known citation count.

Explore publications

View all 2 →

Most cited · Crossref

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Policing cybercrime in South Africa: Issues and challenges

Mmabatho Aphane

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2025

Read abstract

With the rapid advancement of information technology (IT), it increasingly becomes challenging to identify crimes devoid of a digital component. An increase in internet users correlates with a rising percentage of cybercriminals transitioning traditional crime to the online environment. It is essential to enhance the cybercrime preparedness of law enforcement agencies to effectively address and eliminate this issue. Cyber-attacks have adversely affected the escalating epidemic, necessitating effective solutions. This paper employs qualitative content analysis to examine the challenges and opportunities faced by the South African Police Service (SAPS) in addressing cybercrime. The objective is to propose strategies and methodologies for the establishment of robust professional institutions and the allocation of adequate resources to address cybercrime effectively. The findings indicate a relationship between organisational context, complexity, and control in the context of cybercrime response. Larger agencies, such as the SAPS, those whose officers perform more non-routine tasks, and agencies operating under an active collective bargaining agreement are more inclined to allocate specific resources to cybercrime. Agencies characterised by increased hierarchical layers, greater specialisation, and a higher reliance on civilian employees are more inclined to assign dedicated personnel to cybercrime efforts. This article is among the limited studies employing this framework to analyse the relationship between organisational characteristics and responses to cybercrime. This perspective is beneficial for analysing police organisations, policies, programs, and strategies.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v14i6.41482 Crossref citations2 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Gaps in Cyber-Enforcement: Investigating SAPS’s Response to Illegal Online Gambling Platforms

Mmabatho Aphane

International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2026

Read abstract

This article examines how illegal online gambling platforms stress-test South Africa's cyber-enforcement capacity and evaluates the South African Police Service's (SAPS) operational readiness to enforce the National Gambling Act against digitally mediated and often offshore operators. The study pursues four objectives: (1) to assess SAPS's investigative capacity and procedural readiness in cyber-enabled gambling cases; (2) to map the practical enforcement pathway from detection and digital evidence collection to prosecution; (3) to identify recurring operational bottlenecks and jurisdictional obstacles; and (4) to propose targeted measures that align gambling regulation with cybercrime enforcement tools. The study employs a qualitative desktop-based research design incorporating doctrinal legal analysis, a structured scoping review of the literature, and a documentary synthesis of publicly available regulatory communications, policy documents, and court materials. The thematic synthesis of legal, regulatory, and academic sources indicates four persistent enforcement challenges: limited specialist skills in cyber investigations and digital forensics; fragmented coordination among SAPS, gambling regulators, internet service providers, and financial intermediaries; difficulties associated with jurisdiction and cross-border cooperation where platforms operate offshore; and procedural limitations in responding to rapidly evolving technologies. The reviewed literature further suggests that these challenges contribute to inconsistent case development, delays in evidence preservation and attribution, and reduced prosecutorial effectiveness against sophisticated operators. The article argues that strengthening specialist investigative capacity, improving digital evidence procedures, enhancing inter-agency information sharing, and more effectively utilising the Cybercrimes Act alongside gambling legislation could strengthen cyber-enforcement efforts. Collectively, these measures may help reduce the enforcement gap and improve SAPS's ability to address illegal online gambling within an increasingly complex digital environment.    

DOI 10.36096/ijbes.v8i4.13590 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations

Selected results

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Gaps in Cyber-Enforcement: Investigating SAPS’s Response to Illegal Online Gambling Platforms

Mmabatho Aphane

International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2026

Read abstract

This article examines how illegal online gambling platforms stress-test South Africa's cyber-enforcement capacity and evaluates the South African Police Service's (SAPS) operational readiness to enforce the National Gambling Act against digitally mediated and often offshore operators. The study pursues four objectives: (1) to assess SAPS's investigative capacity and procedural readiness in cyber-enabled gambling cases; (2) to map the practical enforcement pathway from detection and digital evidence collection to prosecution; (3) to identify recurring operational bottlenecks and jurisdictional obstacles; and (4) to propose targeted measures that align gambling regulation with cybercrime enforcement tools. The study employs a qualitative desktop-based research design incorporating doctrinal legal analysis, a structured scoping review of the literature, and a documentary synthesis of publicly available regulatory communications, policy documents, and court materials. The thematic synthesis of legal, regulatory, and academic sources indicates four persistent enforcement challenges: limited specialist skills in cyber investigations and digital forensics; fragmented coordination among SAPS, gambling regulators, internet service providers, and financial intermediaries; difficulties associated with jurisdiction and cross-border cooperation where platforms operate offshore; and procedural limitations in responding to rapidly evolving technologies. The reviewed literature further suggests that these challenges contribute to inconsistent case development, delays in evidence preservation and attribution, and reduced prosecutorial effectiveness against sophisticated operators. The article argues that strengthening specialist investigative capacity, improving digital evidence procedures, enhancing inter-agency information sharing, and more effectively utilising the Cybercrimes Act alongside gambling legislation could strengthen cyber-enforcement efforts. Collectively, these measures may help reduce the enforcement gap and improve SAPS's ability to address illegal online gambling within an increasingly complex digital environment.    

DOI 10.36096/ijbes.v8i4.13590 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Policing cybercrime in South Africa: Issues and challenges

Mmabatho Aphane

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2025

Read abstract

With the rapid advancement of information technology (IT), it increasingly becomes challenging to identify crimes devoid of a digital component. An increase in internet users correlates with a rising percentage of cybercriminals transitioning traditional crime to the online environment. It is essential to enhance the cybercrime preparedness of law enforcement agencies to effectively address and eliminate this issue. Cyber-attacks have adversely affected the escalating epidemic, necessitating effective solutions. This paper employs qualitative content analysis to examine the challenges and opportunities faced by the South African Police Service (SAPS) in addressing cybercrime. The objective is to propose strategies and methodologies for the establishment of robust professional institutions and the allocation of adequate resources to address cybercrime effectively. The findings indicate a relationship between organisational context, complexity, and control in the context of cybercrime response. Larger agencies, such as the SAPS, those whose officers perform more non-routine tasks, and agencies operating under an active collective bargaining agreement are more inclined to allocate specific resources to cybercrime. Agencies characterised by increased hierarchical layers, greater specialisation, and a higher reliance on civilian employees are more inclined to assign dedicated personnel to cybercrime efforts. This article is among the limited studies employing this framework to analyse the relationship between organisational characteristics and responses to cybercrime. This perspective is beneficial for analysing police organisations, policies, programs, and strategies.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v14i6.41482 Crossref citations2 OpenAlex citations

Data coverage & freshness

Source coverage refers to this result set; a publication may occur in several sources. Sync times refer to contributing journals.

Missing abstracts: 0 · Missing authors: 0 · Missing publication dates: 0 · Dates without day precision: 0

SourceMost recent successful journal syncLatest attempt
crossref21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
ojs-rest21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 06:46 UTC
oai-pmh20 Oct 2026 19:55 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 20 Oct 2026 19:50 UTC
openalex-enrichment21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
Full import history & methodology →