CiteNScope — Scholarly Index & Analytics
Discover / Analytics RESEARCH INTELLIGENCE
CiteNScope / Analytics

Explore the evidence.
Understand the reach.

Research across participating journals · All insights follow your collection filters.

Compare journals ↗
OpenAlex coverage 100.0% · 3/3 recordsLast OpenAlex observation 22 Oct 2026, 18:19 UTC
PUBLICATIONS3In the selected collection
CROSSREF CITATIONS03/3 with known counts
OPENALEX CITATIONS03/3 with known counts
OPENALEX MEAN0.0Per article with a known count
Explore articles 3 →
Filter collection Publication years, search & more
Reset
institution: Regent Business School Remove ×
Your research collection

Output and reach

Publication activity alongside incoming citations.

Publication activity

Articles grouped by publication year

Publications

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.

View data & coverage

Citations received

OpenAlex · year of the citing work

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage

Research landscape

Leading affiliations and themes in this collection.

Full distributions & methodology ↓

Institutions

Regent Business School3Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University13/3 records with data

Countries

South Africa33/3 records with data

Primary topics

Higher Education and Employability1Leadership and Management in Organizations1Marketing and Advertising Strategies13/3 records with data
Two perspectives on citations

Follow the research impact

Independent sources. Clear time scales.

Lifetime citations by publication year

Crossref and OpenAlex · separate totals for the same publication cohorts

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

Latest lifetime totals, grouped by the cited article’s year. These are not citations received in that year.

View data & coverage

Citations received each year

OpenAlex · incoming citation links grouped by citing-work year

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage
Annual history: 3/3 articles. Latest history observation: 2026-10-22T18:19:16.868479+00:00. Source totals are never added together.
Research side by side

Compare journals

Select journals to compare the same collection filters. Source totals stay separate. These measures describe research activity, not journal quality.

Leave all unchecked to include every matching journal. Selection affects only comparison charts.
Display range
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science

Publications

Articles by publication year

View data & coverage

Crossref citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex · Citations received

By year of the citing work · 2017–2026

View data & coverage

2026 is year to date. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime charts share a citation scale. Unknown observations appear as gaps; known zero stays zero. Annual receipts use available OpenAlex histories and may not sum to lifetime totals. 0 undated publications excluded from publication-year charts.

Full analytics report All distributions, publications, comparisons & data provenance
3 MATCHING PUBLICATIONSExplore results →Export CSV ↓
INDEXED PUBLICATIONS3
CROSSREF CITATIONS0
CROSSREF · CITED PUBLICATIONS0.0%
CROSSREF · MEAN CITATIONS0.0

Crossref citation coverage: 3 / 3 publications (100.0%). Latest observation: 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC. Means and percentages use records with known counts.

OpenAlex / Separate citation source

A broader view of this research

DOI-matched OpenAlex observations for the same selected publications. These counts are separate from Crossref and are never added together.

OPENALEX CITATIONS0
DOI MATCH COVERAGE100.0%3 / 3 publications
MEAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY0.03 known · 0 unknown
MEDIAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY0

Observation range: 21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC — 22 Oct 2026 18:19 UTC. Missing matches are not zero citations. Previous observations may remain if a refresh fails or a DOI no longer matches.

OpenAlex citation distributionNo citations31–506–20021+0Unknown0

Institutions, countries & topics

OpenAlex affiliations and primary-topic classification. Each publication counts once per institution or country; multi-affiliated publications appear in multiple groups, so percentages can sum above 100%. Countries describe author affiliations, not nationality. Topics use one primary topic per publication.

Institutions

3 / 3 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 3 selected publications.

Countries

3 / 3 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 3 selected publications.

Primary topics

3 / 3 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 3 selected publications.

Citation year / OpenAlex

Citations received over time

Incoming citations to the selected publications, grouped by the year of the citing work. This is separate from lifetime citation totals grouped by the cited article’s publication year.

The publication filters above define which articles receive the citations. The citation-year range below only controls this chart and the incoming-citation comparison. Removing publication-year filters includes older articles’ incoming citations too.

Annual history available for 3 / 3 selected publications. Supported display window: 2017–2026; 2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Missing histories and years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—); partial coverage can understate totals.

Annual-history observations (UTC): 2026-10-21T07:23:05.921265+00:00 — 2026-10-22T18:19:16.868479+00:00. Older observations may be retained after failed or incomplete refreshes.

OpenAlex · Citations received by year

10.50 2017 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32018 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32019 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32020 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32021 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32022 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32023 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32024 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32025 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32026 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/3 2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
View openalex · citations received by year data & coverage
Citation yearJournal / scopeOpenAlex · Citations received by yearPublicationsAnnual history known
2017All selected publications033/3
2018All selected publications033/3
2019All selected publications033/3
2020All selected publications033/3
2021All selected publications033/3
2022All selected publications033/3
2023All selected publications033/3
2024All selected publications033/3
2025All selected publications033/3
2026All selected publications033/3

Counts represent citation links, not unique citing papers across a journal: one paper citing two selected articles contributes two links. Older citations outside this window are excluded, so annual sums need not equal lifetime totals. OpenAlex methodology ↗

Crossref citation distribution

Latest Crossref totals for the selected publications; not citations received in the selected years.

Mean0.0
Median0
No citations31–506–20021+0Unknown0

Unknown counts are excluded from the mean, median and cited-publication rate.

Journal comparison

Same filters, source and counting rules across journals. Descriptive statistics, not a quality ranking.

Journal / publisherPublicationsCrossref citationsOpenAlex citationsOpenAlex coverageCrossref meanCrossref medianCrossref cited %*Crossref coverage
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science
SSBFNET
3003/30.000.03/3 · 100.0%

* Percentage among publications with a known citation count.

Explore publications

View all 3 →

Most cited · Crossref

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Evaluating the relative impacts of operations management versus marketing on Quick Service Restaurants (QSR)performance: A case study of the Laudian Group

Ruan Strauss · Abner Mthembu · Alexander Oluka

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

This paper evaluates the relative effects of operations management and marketing on the performance of businesses. It aims to demonstrate how the integration of these two functions enhances customer satisfaction, brand loyalty, and sustainable growth. Employing a qualitative, exploratory research design, the study collected primary data through semi-structured interviews with managerial and operational staff, complemented by secondary data for validation. Thematic analysis was used to interpret the findings. Results reveal that efficient operations management—through process optimisation, resource utilisation, and quality control—significantly improves service consistency and customer satisfaction; strategic marketing initiatives, including personalised and data-driven campaigns, enhance brand visibility and loyalty; and the integration of these functions yields superior performance outcomes. The study concludes that aligning operational efficiency with innovative marketing strategies is critical for sustaining competitive advantage and long-term success in the dynamic QSR industry.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v15i3.47340 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Starting over at 35 is a myth: How business education enables smart career pivots

Abner Mthembu · Alexander Oluka

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

This study demonstrates that transitioning into a new career at 35 is not a restart but a strategic shift enabled by business education. Through qualitative insights from mid-career participants, the findings show that motivations for pivoting often stem from the pursuit of stability, growth, and renewed professional purpose. Business education supported by mentorship, practical learning and exposure to modern business practices was found to enhance confidence, expand skill sets, and open new career opportunities. Importantly, many respondents only fully recognised the transformative value of such education during their learning journey. Overall, the study highlights the critical role of accessible and relevant educational pathways in empowering individuals to navigate career change effectively and sustainably. 

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v15i3.47710 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Leadership styles and their impact on organizational culture at Rand Mutual Assurance in South Africa

Denise Linda Lee-Ann Michaelson · Prathana Amrithlal · Muhammad Hoque

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

The issue of leadership styles, perceptions of employees, and culture within the organization of RMA was investigated. The study employed qualitative research with an interview of 15 participants at different levels of leadership. The results indicated the prevalence of transformational and servant leaders who increased engagement levels, trust, and feelings of ownership but made employees more responsible with fewer creative and morale levels at the transactions and autocratic levels. Quantitatively, the results showed an increase in employee engagement levels from 2022 (82%) to 2023 (85%), an increase in the perception of trust of employees with leadership levels (70% to 73.3%), and an increase in the perception of development of employees’ careers (65% to 70%). Finally, the study recommends that the development of employees’ leadership should take place in an organized manner with an official program of development of employees’ careers and that the standard of the leaders should remain consistent. Additionally, the study recommends that decision-making should take place with the participation of employees. Future research should involve bigger samples of the study.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v14i10.47500 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations

Selected results

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Evaluating the relative impacts of operations management versus marketing on Quick Service Restaurants (QSR)performance: A case study of the Laudian Group

Ruan Strauss · Abner Mthembu · Alexander Oluka

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

This paper evaluates the relative effects of operations management and marketing on the performance of businesses. It aims to demonstrate how the integration of these two functions enhances customer satisfaction, brand loyalty, and sustainable growth. Employing a qualitative, exploratory research design, the study collected primary data through semi-structured interviews with managerial and operational staff, complemented by secondary data for validation. Thematic analysis was used to interpret the findings. Results reveal that efficient operations management—through process optimisation, resource utilisation, and quality control—significantly improves service consistency and customer satisfaction; strategic marketing initiatives, including personalised and data-driven campaigns, enhance brand visibility and loyalty; and the integration of these functions yields superior performance outcomes. The study concludes that aligning operational efficiency with innovative marketing strategies is critical for sustaining competitive advantage and long-term success in the dynamic QSR industry.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v15i3.47340 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Starting over at 35 is a myth: How business education enables smart career pivots

Abner Mthembu · Alexander Oluka

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

This study demonstrates that transitioning into a new career at 35 is not a restart but a strategic shift enabled by business education. Through qualitative insights from mid-career participants, the findings show that motivations for pivoting often stem from the pursuit of stability, growth, and renewed professional purpose. Business education supported by mentorship, practical learning and exposure to modern business practices was found to enhance confidence, expand skill sets, and open new career opportunities. Importantly, many respondents only fully recognised the transformative value of such education during their learning journey. Overall, the study highlights the critical role of accessible and relevant educational pathways in empowering individuals to navigate career change effectively and sustainably. 

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v15i3.47710 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Leadership styles and their impact on organizational culture at Rand Mutual Assurance in South Africa

Denise Linda Lee-Ann Michaelson · Prathana Amrithlal · Muhammad Hoque

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

The issue of leadership styles, perceptions of employees, and culture within the organization of RMA was investigated. The study employed qualitative research with an interview of 15 participants at different levels of leadership. The results indicated the prevalence of transformational and servant leaders who increased engagement levels, trust, and feelings of ownership but made employees more responsible with fewer creative and morale levels at the transactions and autocratic levels. Quantitatively, the results showed an increase in employee engagement levels from 2022 (82%) to 2023 (85%), an increase in the perception of trust of employees with leadership levels (70% to 73.3%), and an increase in the perception of development of employees’ careers (65% to 70%). Finally, the study recommends that the development of employees’ leadership should take place in an organized manner with an official program of development of employees’ careers and that the standard of the leaders should remain consistent. Additionally, the study recommends that decision-making should take place with the participation of employees. Future research should involve bigger samples of the study.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v14i10.47500 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations

Data coverage & freshness

Source coverage refers to this result set; a publication may occur in several sources. Sync times refer to contributing journals.

Missing abstracts: 0 · Missing authors: 0 · Missing publication dates: 0 · Dates without day precision: 0

SourceMost recent successful journal syncLatest attempt
crossref21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
ojs-rest21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 06:46 UTC
oai-pmh20 Oct 2026 19:55 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 20 Oct 2026 19:50 UTC
openalex-enrichment21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
Full import history & methodology →