Explore the evidence.
Understand the reach.

The Covid-19 is a new virus found in Wuhan, China at the end of 2019, to be precise in December.  This virus spreads very quickly to various parts of the world, causing access between countries to be closed in anticipation of the transmission of covid-19. Covid-19 can be transmitted from one person to another by touching objects that have been exposed to a person with Covid-19 and can also catch it through coughing or sneezing droplets from that person. The existence of Covid-19 has led to changes in the order of life from normal to having to comply with health protocols implemented by the government in various places to anticipate the spread of covid-19, for example in implementing health protocols in places of worship and in crowded places.  In terms of performing worship in a mosque environment, a person is obliged to obey the protocols that have been implemented but in reality, many people don’t comply with health protocols and don’t care about the safety of others. If this is the case, then the mosque administrators or as takmir of the mosque must be responsible for the violations that occur because they are supposed to enforce health protocols in the mosque environment which is their obligation. The research method used by researchers is normative legal research with a statutory and case approach. The takmir of the mosque as the person in charge of all activities carried out in the mosque must fulfill its responsibility in a civil manner towards public disobedience to health protocols that aren’t obeyed because the mosque takmir should strictly enforce the health protocol

With regulations regarding human rights that have been regulated, norms and institutions should be able to protect humans and their rights to life so that they do not live under threat. Mainly, because the crime of genocide has been regulated by various international human rights instruments like the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR), the 1948 Genocide Convention, and to 1988 Rome Statute on International Criminal Court. But facts show that cases regarding the crime of genocide are still happening. The Criminal Code as a law adopted from the Dutch-herited Criminal Code requires an appropriate codification between the awareness and legal needs of the Indonesian nation, thus requiring a new criminal arrangement to replace the old regulation. The 2019 RKUHP then emerged as a solution, but there are still many ambiguous article formulations that make the 2019 RKUHP still have to be reviewed. An example is the article regarding the crime of genocide in Article 598 of the 2019 RKUHP. Some of the weaknesses of the article are in things such as the fall of authority over the implementation of a crime and one of its regulations that the convict gets a pardon or amnesty written in Article 140. If the crime of genocide remains in the 2019 RKUHP, then a number of revisions must be made by reviewing the Rome Statute so that there is no expansion of the meaning in the article regarding the crime of genocide.

With regulations regarding human rights that have been regulated, norms and institutions should be able to protect humans and their rights to life so that they do not live under threat. Mainly, because the crime of genocide has been regulated by various international human rights instruments like the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR), the 1948 Genocide Convention, and to 1988 Rome Statute on International Criminal Court. But facts show that cases regarding the crime of genocide are still happening. The Criminal Code as a law adopted from the Dutch-herited Criminal Code requires an appropriate codification between the awareness and legal needs of the Indonesian nation, thus requiring a new criminal arrangement to replace the old regulation. The 2019 RKUHP then emerged as a solution, but there are still many ambiguous article formulations that make the 2019 RKUHP still have to be reviewed. An example is the article regarding the crime of genocide in Article 598 of the 2019 RKUHP. Some of the weaknesses of the article are in things such as the fall of authority over the implementation of a crime and one of its regulations that the convict gets a pardon or amnesty written in Article 140. If the crime of genocide remains in the 2019 RKUHP, then a number of revisions must be made by reviewing the Rome Statute so that there is no expansion of the meaning in the article regarding the crime of genocide.

The Covid-19 is a new virus found in Wuhan, China at the end of 2019, to be precise in December.  This virus spreads very quickly to various parts of the world, causing access between countries to be closed in anticipation of the transmission of covid-19. Covid-19 can be transmitted from one person to another by touching objects that have been exposed to a person with Covid-19 and can also catch it through coughing or sneezing droplets from that person. The existence of Covid-19 has led to changes in the order of life from normal to having to comply with health protocols implemented by the government in various places to anticipate the spread of covid-19, for example in implementing health protocols in places of worship and in crowded places.  In terms of performing worship in a mosque environment, a person is obliged to obey the protocols that have been implemented but in reality, many people don’t comply with health protocols and don’t care about the safety of others. If this is the case, then the mosque administrators or as takmir of the mosque must be responsible for the violations that occur because they are supposed to enforce health protocols in the mosque environment which is their obligation. The research method used by researchers is normative legal research with a statutory and case approach. The takmir of the mosque as the person in charge of all activities carried out in the mosque must fulfill its responsibility in a civil manner towards public disobedience to health protocols that aren’t obeyed because the mosque takmir should strictly enforce the health protocol