CiteNScope — Scholarly Index & Analytics
Discover / Analytics RESEARCH INTELLIGENCE
CiteNScope / Analytics

Explore the evidence.
Understand the reach.

Research across participating journals · All insights follow your collection filters.

Compare journals ↗
OpenAlex coverage 100.0% · 6/6 recordsLast OpenAlex observation 21 Oct 2026, 00:49 UTC
PUBLICATIONS6In the selected collection
CROSSREF CITATIONS436/6 with known counts
OPENALEX CITATIONS1006/6 with known counts
OPENALEX MEAN16.67Per article with a known count
Explore articles 6 →
Filter collection Publication years, search & more
Reset
institution: Boğaziçi University Remove ×
Your research collection

Output and reach

Publication activity alongside incoming citations.

Publication activity

Articles grouped by publication year

Publications

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.

View data & coverage

Citations received

OpenAlex · year of the citing work

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage
Two perspectives on citations

Follow the research impact

Independent sources. Clear time scales.

Lifetime citations by publication year

Crossref and OpenAlex · separate totals for the same publication cohorts

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

Latest lifetime totals, grouped by the cited article’s year. These are not citations received in that year.

View data & coverage

Citations received each year

OpenAlex · incoming citation links grouped by citing-work year

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage
Annual history: 6/6 articles. Latest history observation: 2026-10-21T00:49:36.287065+00:00. Source totals are never added together.
Research side by side

Compare journals

Select journals to compare the same collection filters. Source totals stay separate. These measures describe research activity, not journal quality.

Leave all unchecked to include every matching journal. Selection affects only comparison charts.
Display range
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science

Publications

Articles by publication year

View data & coverage

Crossref citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex · Citations received

By year of the citing work · 2017–2026

View data & coverage

2026 is year to date. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime charts share a citation scale. Unknown observations appear as gaps; known zero stays zero. Annual receipts use available OpenAlex histories and may not sum to lifetime totals. 0 undated publications excluded from publication-year charts.

Full analytics report All distributions, publications, comparisons & data provenance
6 MATCHING PUBLICATIONSExplore results →Export CSV ↓
INDEXED PUBLICATIONS6
CROSSREF CITATIONS43
CROSSREF · CITED PUBLICATIONS50.0%
CROSSREF · MEAN CITATIONS7.17

Crossref citation coverage: 6 / 6 publications (100.0%). Latest observation: 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC. Means and percentages use records with known counts.

OpenAlex / Separate citation source

A broader view of this research

DOI-matched OpenAlex observations for the same selected publications. These counts are separate from Crossref and are never added together.

OPENALEX CITATIONS100
DOI MATCH COVERAGE100.0%6 / 6 publications
MEAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY16.676 known · 0 unknown
MEDIAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY5.0

Observation range: 21 Oct 2026 00:49 UTC — 21 Oct 2026 00:49 UTC. Missing matches are not zero citations. Previous observations may remain if a refresh fails or a DOI no longer matches.

OpenAlex citation distributionNo citations01–536–20121+2Unknown0

Institutions, countries & topics

OpenAlex affiliations and primary-topic classification. Each publication counts once per institution or country; multi-affiliated publications appear in multiple groups, so percentages can sum above 100%. Countries describe author affiliations, not nationality. Topics use one primary topic per publication.

Citation year / OpenAlex

Citations received over time

Incoming citations to the selected publications, grouped by the year of the citing work. This is separate from lifetime citation totals grouped by the cited article’s publication year.

The publication filters above define which articles receive the citations. The citation-year range below only controls this chart and the incoming-citation comparison. Removing publication-year filters includes older articles’ incoming citations too.

Annual history available for 6 / 6 selected publications. Supported display window: 2017–2026; 2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Missing histories and years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—); partial coverage can understate totals.

Annual-history observations (UTC): 2026-10-21T00:49:29.357430+00:00 — 2026-10-21T00:49:36.287065+00:00. Older observations may be retained after failed or incomplete refreshes.

OpenAlex · Citations received by year

2010.00 2017 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 1 · Annual history coverage 6/62018 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 7 · Annual history coverage 6/62019 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 4 · Annual history coverage 6/62020 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 11 · Annual history coverage 6/62021 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 12 · Annual history coverage 6/62022 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 17 · Annual history coverage 6/62023 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 20 · Annual history coverage 6/62024 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 12 · Annual history coverage 6/62025 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 11 · Annual history coverage 6/62026 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 5 · Annual history coverage 6/6 2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
View openalex · citations received by year data & coverage
Citation yearJournal / scopeOpenAlex · Citations received by yearPublicationsAnnual history known
2017All selected publications166/6
2018All selected publications766/6
2019All selected publications466/6
2020All selected publications1166/6
2021All selected publications1266/6
2022All selected publications1766/6
2023All selected publications2066/6
2024All selected publications1266/6
2025All selected publications1166/6
2026All selected publications566/6

Counts represent citation links, not unique citing papers across a journal: one paper citing two selected articles contributes two links. Older citations outside this window are excluded, so annual sums need not equal lifetime totals. OpenAlex methodology ↗

Crossref citation distribution

Latest Crossref totals for the selected publications; not citations received in the selected years.

Mean7.17
Median2.5
No citations31–516–20121+1Unknown0

Unknown counts are excluded from the mean, median and cited-publication rate.

Journal comparison

Same filters, source and counting rules across journals. Descriptive statistics, not a quality ranking.

Journal / publisherPublicationsCrossref citationsOpenAlex citationsOpenAlex coverageCrossref meanCrossref medianCrossref cited %*Crossref coverage
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science
SSBFNET
6431006/67.172.550.06/6 · 100.0%

* Percentage among publications with a known citation count.

Explore publications

View all 6 →

Most cited · Crossref

JOURNAL ARTICLE

The Impact of Brands on Consumer Buying Behavior

Ulas Akkucuk · Javed Esmaeili

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2016

Read abstract

The aim of this research is to understand the factors behind smartphone purchase decisions of consumers. Nowadays companies make use of various strategies in order to attract new customers, retain existing customers and differentiate their products from those of their competitors. Perhaps, the most important and effective strategy to influence consumer behavior in the product selection is emphasizing the “brand name” of the products. Our aim in this paper is to investigate how smartphone brands can influence consumers’ buying decisions. Brand equity is a set of brand assets and liabilities linked to a brand name and symbol, which add to or subtract from the value provided by a product or service. It enhances the customer’s ability to interpret and process information, improves confidence in the purchase decision and affects the quality of the user experience. Using this construct widely discussed in the literature, we use and build our hypothesis based on Aaker model about the brand equity, including perceived quality, brand awareness, brand association and brand loyalty. The study involved a questionnaire administered to 171 smartphone consumers between December 2015 and March 2016. The consumers were chosen by convenience sampling among the students from a prestigious university in the Istanbul district of Turkey. Our findings indicate that a majority of the smartphone buyers’ decisions are mainly influenced by brand loyalty and brand awareness. Perceived quality and brand association do not seem to influence purchase decisions for the sample of this study.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v5i4.55121 Crossref citations51 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Mediation effect of financial attitude on financial knowledge and financial behavior

Ali Çoşkun · Nurdilek Dalziel

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2020

Read abstract

In this study, 396 university students in Turkey are surveyed online regarding their attitudes towards financial issues, their level of financial knowledge, and their financial behavior. The latest version of OECD/INFE Financial Literacy Survey (2018) is used in the study. Using SPSS and LISREL. Factor analysis, Cronbach's Alpha, and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) are used to analyze the relationship between financial knowledge of the participants with their financial attitude and behavior as well as the mediation effect of financial attitude in this relationship. In line with the common wisdom that the relationship between knowledge and behavior is higher if knowledge is better reflected in the attitude of the individual, the mediation effect of financial attitude strengthens the financial knowledge and financial behavior relationship.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v9i2.64717 Crossref citations37 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Financial Literacy in Turkey

Ali Coskun · Muhammed Abdullah Sahin · Alperen Zengin

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2019

Read abstract

We measure the level of financial literacy in Turkey using the OECD/International Network on Financial Education (INFE) methodology and compare our results with the ones obtained in 14 other countries that has used the same methodology. In our sample, financial knowledge and financial behavior levels are lower than the average of the 14 countries, whereas financial attitude level is around the average. The overall financial literacy score, which is a combination of the three aforementioned aspects, is also lower than the average of the 14 countries. We find that financial behavior is positively related with financial knowledge, female respondents are lagging behind the male respondents in financial literacy, and this lag is bigger than those in the 14 countries. Very young respondents and old respondents are less financially literate, financial literacy score is positively related with income, education, and income stability.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v8i3.2555 Crossref citations6 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Do stock splits matter for returns, volatility, and liquidity?

Nihat Gumus · Ayse Caglayan Gumus

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2021

Read abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of stock splits on the return, riskiness, and liquidity of stocks. Utilizing a sample of 94 stock splits taken place between 2010 and 2019 at Borsa Istanbul, the study analyzes the daily abnormal returns, change in volatility, and changes in volume around the stock split announcement and execution dates. The results display significant positive abnormal returns around the announcement date but not significant abnormal returns around the execution. The volatility and liquidity of stocks increase significantly around both announcement and execution dates. The findings are in line with the positive signaling, and liquidity hypotheses of stock split and with most of the observations reported in the empirical literature. The new evidence provided points out the lack of semi-strong form of market efficiency at Borsa Istanbul as far as the stock splits are considered.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v10i4.12500 Crossref citations1 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Investigation Results of the Anxiety Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Individuals

Ali Çoşkun · Ahmet Erkasap · Murat Aksit

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2020

Read abstract

In this study, 403 participants were asked questions to determine the preventive measures being taken and anxiety levels during COVID-19 Pandemic. Participants were almost equally divided between women (55%) and men (45%). The rate of most worried persons about the pandemic was 62%. The risk of anxiety of women compared to men has been calculated as 2.1 times higher (95% CI 1.20–3.84). The Cramer’s V value of the change in hand-washing habit before and after COVID-19 outbreak is 0.706, indicates the existence of a strong relationship. The data is analysed by using SPSS 24.0. ODDS Ratio values are calculated to determine the impact levels, and Cramer’s V value is calculated to determine the relationship in behavior change in hand-washings habits.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v9i3.7060 Crossref citations1 OpenAlex citations

Selected results

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Do stock splits matter for returns, volatility, and liquidity?

Nihat Gumus · Ayse Caglayan Gumus

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2021

Read abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of stock splits on the return, riskiness, and liquidity of stocks. Utilizing a sample of 94 stock splits taken place between 2010 and 2019 at Borsa Istanbul, the study analyzes the daily abnormal returns, change in volatility, and changes in volume around the stock split announcement and execution dates. The results display significant positive abnormal returns around the announcement date but not significant abnormal returns around the execution. The volatility and liquidity of stocks increase significantly around both announcement and execution dates. The findings are in line with the positive signaling, and liquidity hypotheses of stock split and with most of the observations reported in the empirical literature. The new evidence provided points out the lack of semi-strong form of market efficiency at Borsa Istanbul as far as the stock splits are considered.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v10i4.12500 Crossref citations1 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Investigation Results of the Anxiety Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Individuals

Ali Çoşkun · Ahmet Erkasap · Murat Aksit

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2020

Read abstract

In this study, 403 participants were asked questions to determine the preventive measures being taken and anxiety levels during COVID-19 Pandemic. Participants were almost equally divided between women (55%) and men (45%). The rate of most worried persons about the pandemic was 62%. The risk of anxiety of women compared to men has been calculated as 2.1 times higher (95% CI 1.20–3.84). The Cramer’s V value of the change in hand-washing habit before and after COVID-19 outbreak is 0.706, indicates the existence of a strong relationship. The data is analysed by using SPSS 24.0. ODDS Ratio values are calculated to determine the impact levels, and Cramer’s V value is calculated to determine the relationship in behavior change in hand-washings habits.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v9i3.7060 Crossref citations1 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Mediation effect of financial attitude on financial knowledge and financial behavior

Ali Çoşkun · Nurdilek Dalziel

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2020

Read abstract

In this study, 396 university students in Turkey are surveyed online regarding their attitudes towards financial issues, their level of financial knowledge, and their financial behavior. The latest version of OECD/INFE Financial Literacy Survey (2018) is used in the study. Using SPSS and LISREL. Factor analysis, Cronbach's Alpha, and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) are used to analyze the relationship between financial knowledge of the participants with their financial attitude and behavior as well as the mediation effect of financial attitude in this relationship. In line with the common wisdom that the relationship between knowledge and behavior is higher if knowledge is better reflected in the attitude of the individual, the mediation effect of financial attitude strengthens the financial knowledge and financial behavior relationship.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v9i2.64717 Crossref citations37 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Financial Literacy in Turkey

Ali Coskun · Muhammed Abdullah Sahin · Alperen Zengin

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2019

Read abstract

We measure the level of financial literacy in Turkey using the OECD/International Network on Financial Education (INFE) methodology and compare our results with the ones obtained in 14 other countries that has used the same methodology. In our sample, financial knowledge and financial behavior levels are lower than the average of the 14 countries, whereas financial attitude level is around the average. The overall financial literacy score, which is a combination of the three aforementioned aspects, is also lower than the average of the 14 countries. We find that financial behavior is positively related with financial knowledge, female respondents are lagging behind the male respondents in financial literacy, and this lag is bigger than those in the 14 countries. Very young respondents and old respondents are less financially literate, financial literacy score is positively related with income, education, and income stability.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v8i3.2555 Crossref citations6 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

The Impact of Brands on Consumer Buying Behavior

Ulas Akkucuk · Javed Esmaeili

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2016

Read abstract

The aim of this research is to understand the factors behind smartphone purchase decisions of consumers. Nowadays companies make use of various strategies in order to attract new customers, retain existing customers and differentiate their products from those of their competitors. Perhaps, the most important and effective strategy to influence consumer behavior in the product selection is emphasizing the “brand name” of the products. Our aim in this paper is to investigate how smartphone brands can influence consumers’ buying decisions. Brand equity is a set of brand assets and liabilities linked to a brand name and symbol, which add to or subtract from the value provided by a product or service. It enhances the customer’s ability to interpret and process information, improves confidence in the purchase decision and affects the quality of the user experience. Using this construct widely discussed in the literature, we use and build our hypothesis based on Aaker model about the brand equity, including perceived quality, brand awareness, brand association and brand loyalty. The study involved a questionnaire administered to 171 smartphone consumers between December 2015 and March 2016. The consumers were chosen by convenience sampling among the students from a prestigious university in the Istanbul district of Turkey. Our findings indicate that a majority of the smartphone buyers’ decisions are mainly influenced by brand loyalty and brand awareness. Perceived quality and brand association do not seem to influence purchase decisions for the sample of this study.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v5i4.55121 Crossref citations51 OpenAlex citations

Data coverage & freshness

Source coverage refers to this result set; a publication may occur in several sources. Sync times refer to contributing journals.

Missing abstracts: 0 · Missing authors: 0 · Missing publication dates: 0 · Dates without day precision: 0

SourceMost recent successful journal syncLatest attempt
crossref21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
ojs-rest21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 06:46 UTC
oai-pmh20 Oct 2026 19:55 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 20 Oct 2026 19:50 UTC
openalex-enrichment21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
Full import history & methodology →