CiteNScope — Scholarly Index & Analytics
Discover / Analytics RESEARCH INTELLIGENCE
CiteNScope / Analytics

Explore the evidence.
Understand the reach.

Research across participating journals · All insights follow your collection filters.

Compare journals ↗
OpenAlex coverage 100.0% · 5/5 recordsLast OpenAlex observation 22 Oct 2026, 18:45 UTC
PUBLICATIONS5In the selected collection
CROSSREF CITATIONS35/5 with known counts
OPENALEX CITATIONS35/5 with known counts
OPENALEX MEAN0.6Per article with a known count
Explore articles 5 →
Filter collection Publication years, search & more
Reset
institution: University of Venda Remove ×topic: Accounting Education and Careers Remove ×
Your research collection

Output and reach

Publication activity alongside incoming citations.

Publication activity

Articles grouped by publication year

Publications

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.

View data & coverage

Citations received

OpenAlex · year of the citing work

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage

Research landscape

Leading affiliations and themes in this collection.

Full distributions & methodology ↓

Institutions

University of Venda5University of the Free State15/5 records with data

Countries

South Africa55/5 records with data

Primary topics

Accounting Education and Careers55/5 records with data
Two perspectives on citations

Follow the research impact

Independent sources. Clear time scales.

Lifetime citations by publication year

Crossref and OpenAlex · separate totals for the same publication cohorts

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

Latest lifetime totals, grouped by the cited article’s year. These are not citations received in that year.

View data & coverage

Citations received each year

OpenAlex · incoming citation links grouped by citing-work year

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage
Annual history: 5/5 articles. Latest history observation: 2026-10-22T18:45:31.620193+00:00. Source totals are never added together.
Research side by side

Compare journals

Select journals to compare the same collection filters. Source totals stay separate. These measures describe research activity, not journal quality.

Leave all unchecked to include every matching journal. Selection affects only comparison charts.
Display range
International Journal of Business Ecosystem & StrategyInternational Journal of Research in Business and Social Science

Publications

Articles by publication year

View data & coverage

Crossref citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex · Citations received

By year of the citing work · 2017–2026

View data & coverage

2026 is year to date. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime charts share a citation scale. Unknown observations appear as gaps; known zero stays zero. Annual receipts use available OpenAlex histories and may not sum to lifetime totals. 0 undated publications excluded from publication-year charts.

Full analytics report All distributions, publications, comparisons & data provenance
5 MATCHING PUBLICATIONSExplore results →Export CSV ↓
INDEXED PUBLICATIONS5
CROSSREF CITATIONS3
CROSSREF · CITED PUBLICATIONS20.0%
CROSSREF · MEAN CITATIONS0.6

Crossref citation coverage: 5 / 5 publications (100.0%). Latest observation: 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC. Means and percentages use records with known counts.

OpenAlex / Separate citation source

A broader view of this research

DOI-matched OpenAlex observations for the same selected publications. These counts are separate from Crossref and are never added together.

OPENALEX CITATIONS3
DOI MATCH COVERAGE100.0%5 / 5 publications
MEAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY0.65 known · 0 unknown
MEDIAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY0

Observation range: 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC — 22 Oct 2026 18:45 UTC. Missing matches are not zero citations. Previous observations may remain if a refresh fails or a DOI no longer matches.

OpenAlex citation distributionNo citations41–516–20021+0Unknown0

Institutions, countries & topics

OpenAlex affiliations and primary-topic classification. Each publication counts once per institution or country; multi-affiliated publications appear in multiple groups, so percentages can sum above 100%. Countries describe author affiliations, not nationality. Topics use one primary topic per publication.

Institutions

5 / 5 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 5 selected publications.

Countries

5 / 5 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 5 selected publications.

Primary topics

5 / 5 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 5 selected publications.

Citation year / OpenAlex

Citations received over time

Incoming citations to the selected publications, grouped by the year of the citing work. This is separate from lifetime citation totals grouped by the cited article’s publication year.

The publication filters above define which articles receive the citations. The citation-year range below only controls this chart and the incoming-citation comparison. Removing publication-year filters includes older articles’ incoming citations too.

Annual history available for 5 / 5 selected publications. Supported display window: 2017–2026; 2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Missing histories and years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—); partial coverage can understate totals.

Annual-history observations (UTC): 2026-10-21T07:22:57.171240+00:00 — 2026-10-22T18:45:31.620193+00:00. Older observations may be retained after failed or incomplete refreshes.

OpenAlex · Citations received by year

21.00 2017 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 5/52018 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 5/52019 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 5/52020 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 5/52021 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 5/52022 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 5/52023 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 5/52024 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 5/52025 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 1 · Annual history coverage 5/52026 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 2 · Annual history coverage 5/5 2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
View openalex · citations received by year data & coverage
Citation yearJournal / scopeOpenAlex · Citations received by yearPublicationsAnnual history known
2017All selected publications055/5
2018All selected publications055/5
2019All selected publications055/5
2020All selected publications055/5
2021All selected publications055/5
2022All selected publications055/5
2023All selected publications055/5
2024All selected publications055/5
2025All selected publications155/5
2026All selected publications255/5

Counts represent citation links, not unique citing papers across a journal: one paper citing two selected articles contributes two links. Older citations outside this window are excluded, so annual sums need not equal lifetime totals. OpenAlex methodology ↗

Crossref citation distribution

Latest Crossref totals for the selected publications; not citations received in the selected years.

Mean0.6
Median0
No citations41–516–20021+0Unknown0

Unknown counts are excluded from the mean, median and cited-publication rate.

Journal comparison

Same filters, source and counting rules across journals. Descriptive statistics, not a quality ranking.

Journal / publisherPublicationsCrossref citationsOpenAlex citationsOpenAlex coverageCrossref meanCrossref medianCrossref cited %*Crossref coverage
International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy
Bussecon International Academy
2002/20.00.00.02/2 · 100.0%
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science
SSBFNET
3333/31.0033.33/3 · 100.0%

* Percentage among publications with a known citation count.

Explore publications

View all 5 →

Most cited · Crossref

JOURNAL ARTICLE

From high-school sciences to university accounting in South Africa: how prior learning affects students’ success

Orifha Sinthumule · Innocent Zitha

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2024

Read abstract

Enrolling students in accounting programs based on their proficiency in English, Mathematics, and Accounting is a prevalent practice in many South African institutions of higher learning. However, certain institutions admit students into accounting programs based solely on their proficiency in English and Mathematics. This study posits that such students encounter challenges in acclimating to the accounting science milieu, consequently impeding their academic success. The research draws from the assessment of 112 first-year BCom (Bachelor of Commerce) Accounting Sciences students during the 2023 academic year. The findings affirm that students enrolled based on competency in Accounting, English, and Mathematics outperform those enrolled solely based on English and Mathematics competency. This underscores the necessity for further investigation into the determinants of success among students in accounting programs. Nonetheless, the study corroborates that self-determination and proactivity are significant contributors to success, notwithstanding students' lack of prior exposure to accounting principles.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v13i6.35713 Crossref citations3 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

An online teaching approach for accounting students at a rural university

Arthur Reynolds · Freddy Munzhelele

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2024

Read abstract

South African government statistics have indicated that throughput rates for university students remain low with only 31% of students at public universities completing their degree qualifications in the shortest possible time. Students entering public universities from the high school level are often inadequately prepared for the challenges of a rigorous degree course in accounting. It was found in extant literature, that with a modified, tutor-intensive face-to-face teaching approach, accounting pass rates could be significantly improved. However, online teaching has become more prevalent in South African universities with a gradual shift towards blended teaching. The objective of the study was to develop a teaching approach based on sound principles as proven in past studies, but with due consideration for online teaching implementation. The study adopted a research approach/methodology comprising a systematic literature review and focus group designs; thematic content analysis facilitated the development of the online teaching approach. This approach then presented 4 core activities and 29 specific activities. The findings showed a large emphasis on pre-semester activities as well as support activities. The teaching approach can potentially be adapted for rural and public universities to potentially improve accounting throughput rates.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v13i8.36740 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

The mismatch between training and demand of accounting teachers in Limpopo secondary schools

Takalani Tshiovhe · Takalani Musetha · Mashudu Nenzhelele · Ratau Monobe

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2024

Read abstract

The study sought to examine the obstacles encountered in the teaching and learning of Accounting in the Vhembe East District, Limpopo Province. A qualitative methodology was employed, utilising interview schedules to gather data from six (6) topic advisors, six (6) principals, and six (6) heads of departments. The data was synthesised in accordance with the primary research objectives, revealing that EMS, a fundamental component of accounting in Grades 8 and 9 (Senior Phase), is instructed by educators lacking pedagogical subject understanding in Accounting. Several topic advisers and educators lack specialisation in Accounting, resulting in deficiencies in professional development for these Accounting instructors. Accounting is discontinued without parental involvement. School principals do not endorse the advancement of accounting education. The report advises that the Department of Basic Education should address the issue of unqualified instructors in grades 7-9. Specialist accounting educators and subject consultants must furnish instructors with content and pedagogical expertise to facilitate the proper implementation of the accounting curriculum. Subject advisers, principals, and departmental heads should promote the use of contemporary teaching practices that facilitate collaborative learning among students in small groups to comprehend accounting topics.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v13i8.37540 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

A TPACK–Bloom’s Taxonomy Hybrid Framework for Integrating Technology in Accounting Education in Sub-Saharan African Countries

Emmanuel Kojo Oseifuah

International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2026

Read abstract

The rapid evolution of digital technologies necessitates a transformative approach to accounting education, particularly in developing countries. Building on Mishra and Koehler’s (2006) foundational assertion that there is no universally accepted method for integrating technology into the educational curricula, this study proposes a TPACK-Bloom’s Taxonomy framework to articulate how technology enhances learning in accounting education. TPACK (Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge) offers a multidimensional lens for aligning technological tools with pedagogical strategies and disciplinary content, ensuring that emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence and data analytics are contextually and instructionally relevant. Bloom’s Taxonomy complements this by structuring cognitive development across six hierarchical levels, ranging from remembering to creating, within technology-enhanced learning environments. Together, these two frameworks provide a versatile tool for designing curriculum interventions that foster digital literacy, critical thinking, and professional competence. This study makes three key contributions to the literature. First, it bridges the gap between technology adoption and pedagogical effectiveness by linking digital tools to cognitive learning outcomes. Second, it contributes to human capital development by promoting the integration of technical, cognitive, and digital competencies. Third, it supports organisational transformation by offering a practical, scalable approach to technology-enhanced learning in resource-constrained contexts.

DOI 10.36096/ijbes.v8i4.13190 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

The impact of secondary school accounting on the performance of financial accounting students: a rural comprehensive university

Ndivhuwo Sirembe · Arthur Reynolds

International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2026

Read abstract

This study examines the influence of high school accounting instruction on the academic performance of first-year financial accounting students at a rural comprehensive university. In the context of South African higher education, students frequently gain admission to accounting diploma or degree programs without prior secondary school accounting instruction, prompting questions regarding the impact of previous accounting knowledge on university performance. Current research presents inconclusive findings, with certain studies demonstrating no significant association between high school accounting experience and university achievement, whereas others indicate a favourable correlation. Significantly, a research gap exists for rural comprehensive institutions, which cater to a heterogeneous student body and are inadequately represented in existing studies. This study recruited all first-year accounting students at a rural institution to ascertain the correlation between high school accounting education and university performance. The results suggest that past study of accounting in high school does not significantly influence students' success in first-year accounting courses, indicating that high school accounting knowledge does not immediately improve academic results at the university level. Nonetheless, the data indicate that students who excelled in high school accounting are likely to also succeed in their first year of university accounting, implying that high school achievement may be a valuable predictor of university performance, even if it does not directly affect overall outcomes. The study's shortcomings encompass its concentration on a singular rural institution and the omission of second- and third-year students, so constraining the extent and generalisability of the findings. These constraints underscore the necessity for future investigations encompassing multiple institutions, longitudinal monitoring of students' academic advancement, and comprehensive variable analysis to elucidate the intricate factors affecting student success in rural South African higher education, especially within accounting programs.

DOI 10.36096/ijbes.v7i6.9790 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations

Selected results

JOURNAL ARTICLE

A TPACK–Bloom’s Taxonomy Hybrid Framework for Integrating Technology in Accounting Education in Sub-Saharan African Countries

Emmanuel Kojo Oseifuah

International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2026

Read abstract

The rapid evolution of digital technologies necessitates a transformative approach to accounting education, particularly in developing countries. Building on Mishra and Koehler’s (2006) foundational assertion that there is no universally accepted method for integrating technology into the educational curricula, this study proposes a TPACK-Bloom’s Taxonomy framework to articulate how technology enhances learning in accounting education. TPACK (Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge) offers a multidimensional lens for aligning technological tools with pedagogical strategies and disciplinary content, ensuring that emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence and data analytics are contextually and instructionally relevant. Bloom’s Taxonomy complements this by structuring cognitive development across six hierarchical levels, ranging from remembering to creating, within technology-enhanced learning environments. Together, these two frameworks provide a versatile tool for designing curriculum interventions that foster digital literacy, critical thinking, and professional competence. This study makes three key contributions to the literature. First, it bridges the gap between technology adoption and pedagogical effectiveness by linking digital tools to cognitive learning outcomes. Second, it contributes to human capital development by promoting the integration of technical, cognitive, and digital competencies. Third, it supports organisational transformation by offering a practical, scalable approach to technology-enhanced learning in resource-constrained contexts.

DOI 10.36096/ijbes.v8i4.13190 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

The impact of secondary school accounting on the performance of financial accounting students: a rural comprehensive university

Ndivhuwo Sirembe · Arthur Reynolds

International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2026

Read abstract

This study examines the influence of high school accounting instruction on the academic performance of first-year financial accounting students at a rural comprehensive university. In the context of South African higher education, students frequently gain admission to accounting diploma or degree programs without prior secondary school accounting instruction, prompting questions regarding the impact of previous accounting knowledge on university performance. Current research presents inconclusive findings, with certain studies demonstrating no significant association between high school accounting experience and university achievement, whereas others indicate a favourable correlation. Significantly, a research gap exists for rural comprehensive institutions, which cater to a heterogeneous student body and are inadequately represented in existing studies. This study recruited all first-year accounting students at a rural institution to ascertain the correlation between high school accounting education and university performance. The results suggest that past study of accounting in high school does not significantly influence students' success in first-year accounting courses, indicating that high school accounting knowledge does not immediately improve academic results at the university level. Nonetheless, the data indicate that students who excelled in high school accounting are likely to also succeed in their first year of university accounting, implying that high school achievement may be a valuable predictor of university performance, even if it does not directly affect overall outcomes. The study's shortcomings encompass its concentration on a singular rural institution and the omission of second- and third-year students, so constraining the extent and generalisability of the findings. These constraints underscore the necessity for future investigations encompassing multiple institutions, longitudinal monitoring of students' academic advancement, and comprehensive variable analysis to elucidate the intricate factors affecting student success in rural South African higher education, especially within accounting programs.

DOI 10.36096/ijbes.v7i6.9790 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

An online teaching approach for accounting students at a rural university

Arthur Reynolds · Freddy Munzhelele

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2024

Read abstract

South African government statistics have indicated that throughput rates for university students remain low with only 31% of students at public universities completing their degree qualifications in the shortest possible time. Students entering public universities from the high school level are often inadequately prepared for the challenges of a rigorous degree course in accounting. It was found in extant literature, that with a modified, tutor-intensive face-to-face teaching approach, accounting pass rates could be significantly improved. However, online teaching has become more prevalent in South African universities with a gradual shift towards blended teaching. The objective of the study was to develop a teaching approach based on sound principles as proven in past studies, but with due consideration for online teaching implementation. The study adopted a research approach/methodology comprising a systematic literature review and focus group designs; thematic content analysis facilitated the development of the online teaching approach. This approach then presented 4 core activities and 29 specific activities. The findings showed a large emphasis on pre-semester activities as well as support activities. The teaching approach can potentially be adapted for rural and public universities to potentially improve accounting throughput rates.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v13i8.36740 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

The mismatch between training and demand of accounting teachers in Limpopo secondary schools

Takalani Tshiovhe · Takalani Musetha · Mashudu Nenzhelele · Ratau Monobe

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2024

Read abstract

The study sought to examine the obstacles encountered in the teaching and learning of Accounting in the Vhembe East District, Limpopo Province. A qualitative methodology was employed, utilising interview schedules to gather data from six (6) topic advisors, six (6) principals, and six (6) heads of departments. The data was synthesised in accordance with the primary research objectives, revealing that EMS, a fundamental component of accounting in Grades 8 and 9 (Senior Phase), is instructed by educators lacking pedagogical subject understanding in Accounting. Several topic advisers and educators lack specialisation in Accounting, resulting in deficiencies in professional development for these Accounting instructors. Accounting is discontinued without parental involvement. School principals do not endorse the advancement of accounting education. The report advises that the Department of Basic Education should address the issue of unqualified instructors in grades 7-9. Specialist accounting educators and subject consultants must furnish instructors with content and pedagogical expertise to facilitate the proper implementation of the accounting curriculum. Subject advisers, principals, and departmental heads should promote the use of contemporary teaching practices that facilitate collaborative learning among students in small groups to comprehend accounting topics.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v13i8.37540 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

From high-school sciences to university accounting in South Africa: how prior learning affects students’ success

Orifha Sinthumule · Innocent Zitha

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2024

Read abstract

Enrolling students in accounting programs based on their proficiency in English, Mathematics, and Accounting is a prevalent practice in many South African institutions of higher learning. However, certain institutions admit students into accounting programs based solely on their proficiency in English and Mathematics. This study posits that such students encounter challenges in acclimating to the accounting science milieu, consequently impeding their academic success. The research draws from the assessment of 112 first-year BCom (Bachelor of Commerce) Accounting Sciences students during the 2023 academic year. The findings affirm that students enrolled based on competency in Accounting, English, and Mathematics outperform those enrolled solely based on English and Mathematics competency. This underscores the necessity for further investigation into the determinants of success among students in accounting programs. Nonetheless, the study corroborates that self-determination and proactivity are significant contributors to success, notwithstanding students' lack of prior exposure to accounting principles.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v13i6.35713 Crossref citations3 OpenAlex citations

Data coverage & freshness

Source coverage refers to this result set; a publication may occur in several sources. Sync times refer to contributing journals.

Missing abstracts: 0 · Missing authors: 0 · Missing publication dates: 0 · Dates without day precision: 0

SourceMost recent successful journal syncLatest attempt
crossref21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
ojs-rest21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 06:46 UTC
oai-pmh20 Oct 2026 19:55 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 20 Oct 2026 19:50 UTC
openalex-enrichment21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
Full import history & methodology →