Publication activity
Articles grouped by publication year
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.
Research across participating journals · All insights follow your collection filters.
Publication activity alongside incoming citations.
Articles grouped by publication year
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
Leading affiliations and themes in this collection.
Full distributions & methodology ↓Independent sources. Clear time scales.
Crossref and OpenAlex · separate totals for the same publication cohorts
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
Latest lifetime totals, grouped by the cited article’s year. These are not citations received in that year.
OpenAlex · incoming citation links grouped by citing-work year
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
Select journals to compare the same collection filters. Source totals stay separate. These measures describe research activity, not journal quality.
Articles by publication year
Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year
Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year
By year of the citing work · 2017–2026
2026 is year to date. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime charts share a citation scale. Unknown observations appear as gaps; known zero stays zero. Annual receipts use available OpenAlex histories and may not sum to lifetime totals. 0 undated publications excluded from publication-year charts.
Crossref citation coverage: 12 / 12 publications (100.0%). Latest observation: 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC. Means and percentages use records with known counts.
DOI-matched OpenAlex observations for the same selected publications. These counts are separate from Crossref and are never added together.
Observation range: 21 Oct 2026 00:14 UTC — 21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC. Missing matches are not zero citations. Previous observations may remain if a refresh fails or a DOI no longer matches.
OpenAlex affiliations and primary-topic classification. Each publication counts once per institution or country; multi-affiliated publications appear in multiple groups, so percentages can sum above 100%. Countries describe author affiliations, not nationality. Topics use one primary topic per publication.
12 / 12 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 12 selected publications.
12 / 12 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 12 selected publications.
12 / 12 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 12 selected publications.
Citations are the latest recorded totals for articles published in each year, not citations received during that year. Crossref and OpenAlex remain separate and share the same citation scale. 2026 is incomplete; newer articles have had less time to receive citations.
0 undated publications excluded. Unknown citation counts are shown as —, never as zero. Partial coverage can understate totals; expand each table for known / total records.
| Publication year | Journal / scope | Publications | Publications | Crossref known | OpenAlex known |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | All selected publications | 2 | 2 | 2/2 | 2/2 |
| 2024 | All selected publications | 5 | 5 | 5/5 | 5/5 |
| 2025 | All selected publications | 1 | 1 | 1/1 | 1/1 |
| 2026 | All selected publications | 4 | 4 | 4/4 | 4/4 |
| Publication year | Journal / scope | Crossref citations | Publications | Crossref known | OpenAlex known |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | All selected publications | 1 | 2 | 2/2 | 2/2 |
| 2024 | All selected publications | 3 | 5 | 5/5 | 5/5 |
| 2025 | All selected publications | 0 | 1 | 1/1 | 1/1 |
| 2026 | All selected publications | 0 | 4 | 4/4 | 4/4 |
| Publication year | Journal / scope | OpenAlex citations | Publications | Crossref known | OpenAlex known |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | All selected publications | 1 | 2 | 2/2 | 2/2 |
| 2024 | All selected publications | 3 | 5 | 5/5 | 5/5 |
| 2025 | All selected publications | 0 | 1 | 1/1 | 1/1 |
| 2026 | All selected publications | 0 | 4 | 4/4 | 4/4 |
Incoming citations to the selected publications, grouped by the year of the citing work. This is separate from lifetime citation totals grouped by the cited article’s publication year.
The publication filters above define which articles receive the citations. The citation-year range below only controls this chart and the incoming-citation comparison. Removing publication-year filters includes older articles’ incoming citations too.
Annual history available for 12 / 12 selected publications. Supported display window: 2017–2026; 2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Missing histories and years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—); partial coverage can understate totals.
Annual-history observations (UTC): 2026-10-21T00:14:28.493205+00:00 — 2026-10-21T07:23:06.696664+00:00. Older observations may be retained after failed or incomplete refreshes.
| Citation year | Journal / scope | OpenAlex · Citations received by year | Publications | Annual history known |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | All selected publications | 0 | 12 | 12/12 |
| 2018 | All selected publications | 0 | 12 | 12/12 |
| 2019 | All selected publications | 0 | 12 | 12/12 |
| 2020 | All selected publications | 0 | 12 | 12/12 |
| 2021 | All selected publications | 0 | 12 | 12/12 |
| 2022 | All selected publications | 0 | 12 | 12/12 |
| 2023 | All selected publications | 0 | 12 | 12/12 |
| 2024 | All selected publications | 0 | 12 | 12/12 |
| 2025 | All selected publications | 1 | 12 | 12/12 |
| 2026 | All selected publications | 3 | 12 | 12/12 |
Counts represent citation links, not unique citing papers across a journal: one paper citing two selected articles contributes two links. Older citations outside this window are excluded, so annual sums need not equal lifetime totals. OpenAlex methodology ↗
Publications by publication year. 2026 is an incomplete year.
| Period | Publications |
|---|---|
| 2023 | 2 |
| 2024 | 5 |
| 2025 | 1 |
| 2026 | 4 |
Latest Crossref totals for the selected publications; not citations received in the selected years.
Unknown counts are excluded from the mean, median and cited-publication rate.
Same filters, source and counting rules across journals. Descriptive statistics, not a quality ranking.
| Journal / publisher | Publications | Crossref citations | OpenAlex citations | OpenAlex coverage | Crossref mean | Crossref median | Crossref cited %* | Crossref coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy Bussecon International Academy | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4/4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 4/4 · 100.0% |
| International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science SSBFNET | 8 | 4 | 4 | 8/8 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 25.0 | 8/8 · 100.0% |
* Percentage among publications with a known citation count.
Enrolling students in accounting programs based on their proficiency in English, Mathematics, and Accounting is a prevalent practice in many South African institutions of higher learning. However, certain institutions admit students into accounting programs based solely on their proficiency in English and Mathematics. This study posits that such students encounter challenges in acclimating to the accounting science milieu, consequently impeding their academic success. The research draws from the assessment of 112 first-year BCom (Bachelor of Commerce) Accounting Sciences students during the 2023 academic year. The findings affirm that students enrolled based on competency in Accounting, English, and Mathematics outperform those enrolled solely based on English and Mathematics competency. This underscores the necessity for further investigation into the determinants of success among students in accounting programs. Nonetheless, the study corroborates that self-determination and proactivity are significant contributors to success, notwithstanding students' lack of prior exposure to accounting principles.
Collaborative teaching strategies that teachers use to enhance learning of accounting concepts were explored in schools located in the Pinetown education district in South Africa. The study employed a qualitative case study within the interpretivist paradigm. A purposive sample of five Grade 10 Accounting teachers from five secondary schools was selected to participate in the study. Individual semi-structured interviews and focus group interviews were used to generate data that was analyzed through thematic analysis. The study found that accounting teachers emphasize the necessity of using diverse collaborative strategies to teach accounting concepts. A questioning approach to the teaching of accounting was used to ascertain learners’ experiences and prior knowledge. Infusing technology and group discussions were utilized to encourage learner involvement and participation in the teaching of accounting concepts. The study emphasizes the need for accounting teachers to strengthen learners’ understanding of concepts in Grade 10 by actively engaging them during the process of teaching and learning.
In the past, accounting education has frequently placed an emphasis on individual abilities and processes; nevertheless, the field of accounting in the real world requires collaboration and critical thinking. This study investigates the ways in which collaborative learning practices might transform accounting classes into communities that actively solve problems, so better preparing students for the issues they would face in their professional lives. The research investigates the use of small-group work, think-aloud protocols, and peer knowledge sharing in the context of financial accounting education. This is accomplished through the observation of classrooms and the analysis of teaching techniques. The findings indicate that when students take part in collaborative problem-solving activities, they have the opportunity to acquire a more profound comprehension of various topics, a more enhanced awareness of their own thought processes, and improved analytical abilities. This study demonstrates how collaborative learning environments are similar to professional accounting practices. These environments are characterised by teams working together to analyse complex financial data and make decisions based on that analysis. Among the important tactics that have been discovered include think-aloud protocols that clarify thinking processes, planned group activities that foster multiple points of view, and opportunities for peer teaching that reinforce learning through discussion. According to the findings of the research, collaborative learning not only improves the problem-solving abilities of individuals, but it also helps to cultivate vital professional qualities such as communication, teamwork, and critical evaluation of various approaches. These discoveries have significant repercussions for accounting educators who are interested in moving beyond the conventional teaching methods and adopting methods that are more interesting and productive for their students. According to the findings of the study, the establishment of collaborative learning communities in accounting education necessitates the meticulous organization of group activities, the competent facilitation of peer interactions, and the establishment of a classroom culture that places a high value on different thinking and the exchange of information. Accounting students benefit from this method because it helps them improve their technical and analytical skills while also preparing them for the collaborative nature of professional work.
This study aimed to investigate how accounting teachers use current technological apps to modernize accounting instruction and guarantee that students acquire critical 21st-century skills. The researcher used a case study research design in conjunction with a qualitative approach to achieve this goal. The authors employed semi-structured interviews to collect data from accounting instructors, using a sample of six educators who were conveniently and purposefully chosen. The results showed that, despite the availability of programs to support accounting instruction, accounting teachers do not use technology to teach accounting. The study also shows that some educators are eager to learn about and make use of the various technological tools at their disposal to better assist their students. The study also found that the secret to modernizing accounting education is forming alliances with networking corporations and academic institutions. To teach accounting, it is imperative that teachers receive retraining and that infrastructure be provided. The authors recommend that, higher education institutions, such as universities, must provide teachers with comprehensive training on all facets of technology use. Teachers who are currently employed by the education department should get training from ICT specialists in the basic education department on pedagogical topic knowledge that may be utilized to update accounting instruction.
This article aims to offer significant insights regarding the degree to which the Accounting curriculum in grade 12 prepares students for the Bachelor of Accounting program. In South Africa, secondary school students traditionally select topics based on their intended occupations. For example, students aiming to obtain a Bachelor of Accounting enrol in a commercial path, with Accounting as one of their primary disciplines. The grade 12 accounting curriculum is considered suitable for preparing students for a Bachelor of Accounting degree. Nonetheless, there are significant deficiencies regarding the degree to which the grade 12 Accounting program equips students for a Bachelor of Accounting. This qualitative study utilised a constructivist framework and implemented a case study research approach. Two Bachelor of Accounting students and instructors were intentionally selected for semi-structured interviews. The acquired data was examined by theme analysis. The research indicated that deficiencies in the grade 12 curriculum of secondary education insufficiently equip students for a Bachelor of Accounting. The university curriculum significantly differs, as the teaching materials for the grade 12 Accounting syllabus are outdated, and the training is solely theoretical. Given the aforementioned findings, this study advocates for an upgrade to the grade 12 Accounting curriculum. by incorporating insights from Bachelor of Accounting specialists and integrating data from various businesses. Additionally, the grade 12 curriculum must incorporate practical learning experiences to provide students with exposure to the program.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly transforming teaching and learning in accounting education. While AI technologies offer opportunities to enhance learning outcomes, academic performance is also influenced by broader educational factors such as teacher competence, institutional support, curriculum design, and student engagement. This study investigates the role of AI and educational factors in shaping academic performance in accounting education through a systematic literature review of studies published between 2020 and 2025. Following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, a structured search of major academic databases yielded 168 initial records. After screening and eligibility assessment, 28 studies were retained for final analysis. The review synthesizes empirical evidence on AI applications in accounting education and identifies key factors influencing student performance. The study is grounded in Human Capital Theory and Social Cognitive Theory, which provide insights into how technological and educational investments influence learning outcomes. The findings reveal that AI technologies such as intelligent tutoring systems, generative AI tools, predictive analytics, and automated assessment platforms enhance academic performance through personalized learning and data-driven feedback. However, the effectiveness of these technologies depends on teacher digital competence, student motivation, curriculum alignment, and institutional support. The study proposes an integrated conceptual framework linking AI adoption and educational factors to academic performance in accounting education. The findings provide implications for educators, policymakers, and curriculum developers seeking to improve accounting education in the digital era.
The rapid evolution of digital technologies necessitates a transformative approach to accounting education, particularly in developing countries. Building on Mishra and Koehler’s (2006) foundational assertion that there is no universally accepted method for integrating technology into the educational curricula, this study proposes a TPACK-Bloom’s Taxonomy framework to articulate how technology enhances learning in accounting education. TPACK (Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge) offers a multidimensional lens for aligning technological tools with pedagogical strategies and disciplinary content, ensuring that emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence and data analytics are contextually and instructionally relevant. Bloom’s Taxonomy complements this by structuring cognitive development across six hierarchical levels, ranging from remembering to creating, within technology-enhanced learning environments. Together, these two frameworks provide a versatile tool for designing curriculum interventions that foster digital literacy, critical thinking, and professional competence. This study makes three key contributions to the literature. First, it bridges the gap between technology adoption and pedagogical effectiveness by linking digital tools to cognitive learning outcomes. Second, it contributes to human capital development by promoting the integration of technical, cognitive, and digital competencies. Third, it supports organisational transformation by offering a practical, scalable approach to technology-enhanced learning in resource-constrained contexts.
In the past, accounting education has frequently placed an emphasis on individual abilities and processes; nevertheless, the field of accounting in the real world requires collaboration and critical thinking. This study investigates the ways in which collaborative learning practices might transform accounting classes into communities that actively solve problems, so better preparing students for the issues they would face in their professional lives. The research investigates the use of small-group work, think-aloud protocols, and peer knowledge sharing in the context of financial accounting education. This is accomplished through the observation of classrooms and the analysis of teaching techniques. The findings indicate that when students take part in collaborative problem-solving activities, they have the opportunity to acquire a more profound comprehension of various topics, a more enhanced awareness of their own thought processes, and improved analytical abilities. This study demonstrates how collaborative learning environments are similar to professional accounting practices. These environments are characterised by teams working together to analyse complex financial data and make decisions based on that analysis. Among the important tactics that have been discovered include think-aloud protocols that clarify thinking processes, planned group activities that foster multiple points of view, and opportunities for peer teaching that reinforce learning through discussion. According to the findings of the research, collaborative learning not only improves the problem-solving abilities of individuals, but it also helps to cultivate vital professional qualities such as communication, teamwork, and critical evaluation of various approaches. These discoveries have significant repercussions for accounting educators who are interested in moving beyond the conventional teaching methods and adopting methods that are more interesting and productive for their students. According to the findings of the study, the establishment of collaborative learning communities in accounting education necessitates the meticulous organization of group activities, the competent facilitation of peer interactions, and the establishment of a classroom culture that places a high value on different thinking and the exchange of information. Accounting students benefit from this method because it helps them improve their technical and analytical skills while also preparing them for the collaborative nature of professional work.
This study examines the influence of high school accounting instruction on the academic performance of first-year financial accounting students at a rural comprehensive university. In the context of South African higher education, students frequently gain admission to accounting diploma or degree programs without prior secondary school accounting instruction, prompting questions regarding the impact of previous accounting knowledge on university performance. Current research presents inconclusive findings, with certain studies demonstrating no significant association between high school accounting experience and university achievement, whereas others indicate a favourable correlation. Significantly, a research gap exists for rural comprehensive institutions, which cater to a heterogeneous student body and are inadequately represented in existing studies. This study recruited all first-year accounting students at a rural institution to ascertain the correlation between high school accounting education and university performance. The results suggest that past study of accounting in high school does not significantly influence students' success in first-year accounting courses, indicating that high school accounting knowledge does not immediately improve academic results at the university level. Nonetheless, the data indicate that students who excelled in high school accounting are likely to also succeed in their first year of university accounting, implying that high school achievement may be a valuable predictor of university performance, even if it does not directly affect overall outcomes. The study's shortcomings encompass its concentration on a singular rural institution and the omission of second- and third-year students, so constraining the extent and generalisability of the findings. These constraints underscore the necessity for future investigations encompassing multiple institutions, longitudinal monitoring of students' academic advancement, and comprehensive variable analysis to elucidate the intricate factors affecting student success in rural South African higher education, especially within accounting programs.
This study aimed to investigate how accounting teachers use current technological apps to modernize accounting instruction and guarantee that students acquire critical 21st-century skills. The researcher used a case study research design in conjunction with a qualitative approach to achieve this goal. The authors employed semi-structured interviews to collect data from accounting instructors, using a sample of six educators who were conveniently and purposefully chosen. The results showed that, despite the availability of programs to support accounting instruction, accounting teachers do not use technology to teach accounting. The study also shows that some educators are eager to learn about and make use of the various technological tools at their disposal to better assist their students. The study also found that the secret to modernizing accounting education is forming alliances with networking corporations and academic institutions. To teach accounting, it is imperative that teachers receive retraining and that infrastructure be provided. The authors recommend that, higher education institutions, such as universities, must provide teachers with comprehensive training on all facets of technology use. Teachers who are currently employed by the education department should get training from ICT specialists in the basic education department on pedagogical topic knowledge that may be utilized to update accounting instruction.
Source coverage refers to this result set; a publication may occur in several sources. Sync times refer to contributing journals.
Missing abstracts: 0 · Missing authors: 0 · Missing publication dates: 0 · Dates without day precision: 0
| Source | Most recent successful journal sync | Latest attempt |
|---|---|---|
| crossref | 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbs | complete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC |
| ojs-rest | 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbs | complete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 06:46 UTC |
| oai-pmh | 20 Oct 2026 19:55 UTC · ijrbs | complete · ijrbs · 20 Oct 2026 19:50 UTC |
| openalex-enrichment | 21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC · ijrbs | complete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC |