Publication activity
Articles grouped by publication year
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.
Research across participating journals · All insights follow your collection filters.
Publication activity alongside incoming citations.
Articles grouped by publication year
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
Leading affiliations and themes in this collection.
Full distributions & methodology ↓Independent sources. Clear time scales.
Crossref and OpenAlex · separate totals for the same publication cohorts
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
Latest lifetime totals, grouped by the cited article’s year. These are not citations received in that year.
OpenAlex · incoming citation links grouped by citing-work year
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
Select journals to compare the same collection filters. Source totals stay separate. These measures describe research activity, not journal quality.
Articles by publication year
Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year
Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year
By year of the citing work · 2017–2026
2026 is year to date. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime charts share a citation scale. Unknown observations appear as gaps; known zero stays zero. Annual receipts use available OpenAlex histories and may not sum to lifetime totals. 0 undated publications excluded from publication-year charts.
Crossref citation coverage: 2 / 2 publications (100.0%). Latest observation: 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC. Means and percentages use records with known counts.
DOI-matched OpenAlex observations for the same selected publications. These counts are separate from Crossref and are never added together.
Observation range: 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC — 22 Oct 2026 13:15 UTC. Missing matches are not zero citations. Previous observations may remain if a refresh fails or a DOI no longer matches.
OpenAlex affiliations and primary-topic classification. Each publication counts once per institution or country; multi-affiliated publications appear in multiple groups, so percentages can sum above 100%. Countries describe author affiliations, not nationality. Topics use one primary topic per publication.
2 / 2 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 2 selected publications.
2 / 2 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 2 selected publications.
2 / 2 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 2 selected publications.
Citations are the latest recorded totals for articles published in each year, not citations received during that year. Crossref and OpenAlex remain separate and share the same citation scale. 2026 is incomplete; newer articles have had less time to receive citations.
0 undated publications excluded. Unknown citation counts are shown as —, never as zero. Partial coverage can understate totals; expand each table for known / total records.
| Publication year | Journal / scope | Publications | Publications | Crossref known | OpenAlex known |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | All selected publications | 1 | 1 | 1/1 | 1/1 |
| 2025 | All selected publications | 0 | 0 | 0/0 | 0/0 |
| 2026 | All selected publications | 1 | 1 | 1/1 | 1/1 |
| Publication year | Journal / scope | Crossref citations | Publications | Crossref known | OpenAlex known |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | All selected publications | 0 | 1 | 1/1 | 1/1 |
| 2025 | All selected publications | — | 0 | 0/0 | 0/0 |
| 2026 | All selected publications | 0 | 1 | 1/1 | 1/1 |
| Publication year | Journal / scope | OpenAlex citations | Publications | Crossref known | OpenAlex known |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | All selected publications | 0 | 1 | 1/1 | 1/1 |
| 2025 | All selected publications | — | 0 | 0/0 | 0/0 |
| 2026 | All selected publications | 0 | 1 | 1/1 | 1/1 |
Incoming citations to the selected publications, grouped by the year of the citing work. This is separate from lifetime citation totals grouped by the cited article’s publication year.
The publication filters above define which articles receive the citations. The citation-year range below only controls this chart and the incoming-citation comparison. Removing publication-year filters includes older articles’ incoming citations too.
Annual history available for 2 / 2 selected publications. Supported display window: 2017–2026; 2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Missing histories and years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—); partial coverage can understate totals.
Annual-history observations (UTC): 2026-10-21T07:22:57.889870+00:00 — 2026-10-22T13:15:39.316004+00:00. Older observations may be retained after failed or incomplete refreshes.
| Citation year | Journal / scope | OpenAlex · Citations received by year | Publications | Annual history known |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | All selected publications | 0 | 2 | 2/2 |
| 2018 | All selected publications | 0 | 2 | 2/2 |
| 2019 | All selected publications | 0 | 2 | 2/2 |
| 2020 | All selected publications | 0 | 2 | 2/2 |
| 2021 | All selected publications | 0 | 2 | 2/2 |
| 2022 | All selected publications | 0 | 2 | 2/2 |
| 2023 | All selected publications | 0 | 2 | 2/2 |
| 2024 | All selected publications | 0 | 2 | 2/2 |
| 2025 | All selected publications | 0 | 2 | 2/2 |
| 2026 | All selected publications | 0 | 2 | 2/2 |
Counts represent citation links, not unique citing papers across a journal: one paper citing two selected articles contributes two links. Older citations outside this window are excluded, so annual sums need not equal lifetime totals. OpenAlex methodology ↗
Publications by publication year. 2026 is an incomplete year.
| Period | Publications |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 1 |
| 2026 | 1 |
Latest Crossref totals for the selected publications; not citations received in the selected years.
Unknown counts are excluded from the mean, median and cited-publication rate.
Same filters, source and counting rules across journals. Descriptive statistics, not a quality ranking.
| Journal / publisher | Publications | Crossref citations | OpenAlex citations | OpenAlex coverage | Crossref mean | Crossref median | Crossref cited %* | Crossref coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science SSBFNET | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2/2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2/2 · 100.0% |
* Percentage among publications with a known citation count.
COVID-19 is an illness associated with severe respiratory conditions, including pneumonia. Its widespread impact disrupted educational systems internationally. In South Africa, schools were provisionally closed as a preventive measure to limit the spread of the virus, leading to important changes in teaching and learning practices. This study aimed to investigate how COVID-19 impacted the management of teaching and learning strategies in secondary schools within the Hlanganani North Circuit of Vhembe District. A qualitative research approach was adopted, utilising interviews, observations, and document analysis to gather data. Participants were chosen through purposive sampling and included three principals, three deputy principals, and three departmental heads, all serving as members of their respective school management teams. The study focused on three schools, with each school contributing one principal, one deputy principal, and one departmental head. The findings revealed that school leaders come across difficulties in adopting new teaching approaches, largely due to limited technological skills and knowledge. Important challenges identified included inadequate training and a lack of resources, which hindered the ability to sustain effective teaching and learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study recommended that the Department of Education should distribute resources and invest in the necessary infrastructure needed to support the digital transformation of education. It also concluded that providing training opportunities would help school managers strengthen their knowledge and skills associated with effective teaching and learning
The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated significant adjustments across various sectors globally, and the education sector was no exception. To adhere to social distancing requirements and ensure continuity in education, E-learning emerged as a viable solution, offering a glimmer of hope in these challenging times. However, this strategy brought its own set of challenges. This study aimed to explore the experiences of students with E-learning, particularly focusing on the obstacles and benefits encountered. A qualitative approach was employed, utilizing an exploratory research design to gather comprehensive insights. Participants were selected through purposive sampling, focusing on five University of Venda students registered for the 2021 academic year. Data collection was conducted via one-to-one semi-structured interviews, which allowed for detailed and nuanced responses. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the collected data, identifying key themes and patterns in the students' experiences. The findings highlighted various challenges, such as limited access to reliable internet, lack of digital devices, and difficulties in maintaining motivation and engagement in a virtual learning environment. Despite these challenges, some students appreciated the flexibility and convenience offered by E-learning, highlighting its potential. The study underscores the need for improved infrastructure and support systems to enhance the E-learning experience. These insights can inform policymakers and educational institutions in developing more effective strategies to support students in a digital learning landscape, ensuring that the benefits of E-learning are maximized while minimizing its drawbacks. The findings contribute to the broader discourse on the adaptation of education systems in response to global crises, emphasizing the importance of resilience and adaptability in educational practices.
COVID-19 is an illness associated with severe respiratory conditions, including pneumonia. Its widespread impact disrupted educational systems internationally. In South Africa, schools were provisionally closed as a preventive measure to limit the spread of the virus, leading to important changes in teaching and learning practices. This study aimed to investigate how COVID-19 impacted the management of teaching and learning strategies in secondary schools within the Hlanganani North Circuit of Vhembe District. A qualitative research approach was adopted, utilising interviews, observations, and document analysis to gather data. Participants were chosen through purposive sampling and included three principals, three deputy principals, and three departmental heads, all serving as members of their respective school management teams. The study focused on three schools, with each school contributing one principal, one deputy principal, and one departmental head. The findings revealed that school leaders come across difficulties in adopting new teaching approaches, largely due to limited technological skills and knowledge. Important challenges identified included inadequate training and a lack of resources, which hindered the ability to sustain effective teaching and learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study recommended that the Department of Education should distribute resources and invest in the necessary infrastructure needed to support the digital transformation of education. It also concluded that providing training opportunities would help school managers strengthen their knowledge and skills associated with effective teaching and learning
The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated significant adjustments across various sectors globally, and the education sector was no exception. To adhere to social distancing requirements and ensure continuity in education, E-learning emerged as a viable solution, offering a glimmer of hope in these challenging times. However, this strategy brought its own set of challenges. This study aimed to explore the experiences of students with E-learning, particularly focusing on the obstacles and benefits encountered. A qualitative approach was employed, utilizing an exploratory research design to gather comprehensive insights. Participants were selected through purposive sampling, focusing on five University of Venda students registered for the 2021 academic year. Data collection was conducted via one-to-one semi-structured interviews, which allowed for detailed and nuanced responses. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the collected data, identifying key themes and patterns in the students' experiences. The findings highlighted various challenges, such as limited access to reliable internet, lack of digital devices, and difficulties in maintaining motivation and engagement in a virtual learning environment. Despite these challenges, some students appreciated the flexibility and convenience offered by E-learning, highlighting its potential. The study underscores the need for improved infrastructure and support systems to enhance the E-learning experience. These insights can inform policymakers and educational institutions in developing more effective strategies to support students in a digital learning landscape, ensuring that the benefits of E-learning are maximized while minimizing its drawbacks. The findings contribute to the broader discourse on the adaptation of education systems in response to global crises, emphasizing the importance of resilience and adaptability in educational practices.
Source coverage refers to this result set; a publication may occur in several sources. Sync times refer to contributing journals.
Missing abstracts: 0 · Missing authors: 0 · Missing publication dates: 0 · Dates without day precision: 0
| Source | Most recent successful journal sync | Latest attempt |
|---|---|---|
| crossref | 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbs | complete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC |
| ojs-rest | 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbs | complete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 06:46 UTC |
| oai-pmh | 20 Oct 2026 19:55 UTC · ijrbs | complete · ijrbs · 20 Oct 2026 19:50 UTC |
| openalex-enrichment | 21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC · ijrbs | complete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC |