CiteNScope — Scholarly Index & Analytics
Discover / Analytics RESEARCH INTELLIGENCE
CiteNScope / Analytics

Explore the evidence.
Understand the reach.

Research across participating journals · All insights follow your collection filters.

Compare journals ↗
OpenAlex coverage 100.0% · 6/6 recordsLast OpenAlex observation 22 Oct 2026, 05:05 UTC
PUBLICATIONS6In the selected collection
CROSSREF CITATIONS436/6 with known counts
OPENALEX CITATIONS1326/6 with known counts
OPENALEX MEAN22.0Per article with a known count
Explore articles 6 →
Filter collection Publication years, search & more
Reset
topic: Multi-Criteria Decision Making Remove ×
Your research collection

Output and reach

Publication activity alongside incoming citations.

Publication activity

Articles grouped by publication year

Publications

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.

View data & coverage

Citations received

OpenAlex · year of the citing work

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage

Research landscape

Leading affiliations and themes in this collection.

Full distributions & methodology ↓

Institutions

Istanbul Commerce University3Istanbul Medipol University1Ibn Haldun University16/6 records with data

Countries

Turkey66/6 records with data

Primary topics

Multi-Criteria Decision Making66/6 records with data
Two perspectives on citations

Follow the research impact

Independent sources. Clear time scales.

Lifetime citations by publication year

Crossref and OpenAlex · separate totals for the same publication cohorts

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

Latest lifetime totals, grouped by the cited article’s year. These are not citations received in that year.

View data & coverage

Citations received each year

OpenAlex · incoming citation links grouped by citing-work year

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage
Annual history: 6/6 articles. Latest history observation: 2026-10-22T05:05:27.114437+00:00. Source totals are never added together.
Research side by side

Compare journals

Select journals to compare the same collection filters. Source totals stay separate. These measures describe research activity, not journal quality.

Leave all unchecked to include every matching journal. Selection affects only comparison charts.
Display range
Bussecon Review of Social SciencesInternational Journal of Business Ecosystem & StrategyInternational Journal of Finance & Banking StudiesInternational Journal of Research in Business and Social Science

Publications

Articles by publication year

View data & coverage

Crossref citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex · Citations received

By year of the citing work · 2017–2026

View data & coverage

2026 is year to date. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime charts share a citation scale. Unknown observations appear as gaps; known zero stays zero. Annual receipts use available OpenAlex histories and may not sum to lifetime totals. 0 undated publications excluded from publication-year charts.

Full analytics report All distributions, publications, comparisons & data provenance
6 MATCHING PUBLICATIONSExplore results →Export CSV ↓
INDEXED PUBLICATIONS6
CROSSREF CITATIONS43
CROSSREF · CITED PUBLICATIONS100.0%
CROSSREF · MEAN CITATIONS7.17

Crossref citation coverage: 6 / 6 publications (100.0%). Latest observation: 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC. Means and percentages use records with known counts.

OpenAlex / Separate citation source

A broader view of this research

DOI-matched OpenAlex observations for the same selected publications. These counts are separate from Crossref and are never added together.

OPENALEX CITATIONS132
DOI MATCH COVERAGE100.0%6 / 6 publications
MEAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY22.06 known · 0 unknown
MEDIAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY22.0

Observation range: 22 Oct 2026 01:31 UTC — 22 Oct 2026 05:05 UTC. Missing matches are not zero citations. Previous observations may remain if a refresh fails or a DOI no longer matches.

OpenAlex citation distributionNo citations01–516–20221+3Unknown0

Institutions, countries & topics

OpenAlex affiliations and primary-topic classification. Each publication counts once per institution or country; multi-affiliated publications appear in multiple groups, so percentages can sum above 100%. Countries describe author affiliations, not nationality. Topics use one primary topic per publication.

Institutions

6 / 6 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 6 selected publications.

Countries

6 / 6 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 6 selected publications.

Primary topics

6 / 6 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 6 selected publications.

Citation year / OpenAlex

Citations received over time

Incoming citations to the selected publications, grouped by the year of the citing work. This is separate from lifetime citation totals grouped by the cited article’s publication year.

The publication filters above define which articles receive the citations. The citation-year range below only controls this chart and the incoming-citation comparison. Removing publication-year filters includes older articles’ incoming citations too.

Annual history available for 6 / 6 selected publications. Supported display window: 2017–2026; 2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Missing histories and years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—); partial coverage can understate totals.

Annual-history observations (UTC): 2026-10-22T01:31:40.455678+00:00 — 2026-10-22T05:05:27.114437+00:00. Older observations may be retained after failed or incomplete refreshes.

OpenAlex · Citations received by year

2412.00 2017 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 11 · Annual history coverage 6/62018 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 24 · Annual history coverage 6/62019 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 14 · Annual history coverage 6/62020 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 13 · Annual history coverage 6/62021 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 8 · Annual history coverage 6/62022 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 12 · Annual history coverage 6/62023 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 10 · Annual history coverage 6/62024 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 16 · Annual history coverage 6/62025 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 3 · Annual history coverage 6/62026 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 6 · Annual history coverage 6/6 2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
View openalex · citations received by year data & coverage
Citation yearJournal / scopeOpenAlex · Citations received by yearPublicationsAnnual history known
2017All selected publications1166/6
2018All selected publications2466/6
2019All selected publications1466/6
2020All selected publications1366/6
2021All selected publications866/6
2022All selected publications1266/6
2023All selected publications1066/6
2024All selected publications1666/6
2025All selected publications366/6
2026All selected publications666/6

Counts represent citation links, not unique citing papers across a journal: one paper citing two selected articles contributes two links. Older citations outside this window are excluded, so annual sums need not equal lifetime totals. OpenAlex methodology ↗

Crossref citation distribution

Latest Crossref totals for the selected publications; not citations received in the selected years.

Mean7.17
Median7.0
No citations01–526–20421+0Unknown0

Unknown counts are excluded from the mean, median and cited-publication rate.

Journal comparison

Same filters, source and counting rules across journals. Descriptive statistics, not a quality ranking.

Journal / publisherPublicationsCrossref citationsOpenAlex citationsOpenAlex coverageCrossref meanCrossref medianCrossref cited %*Crossref coverage
Bussecon Review of Social Sciences
Bussecon International Academy
1111/11.01100.01/1 · 100.0%
International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy
Bussecon International Academy
18121/18.08100.01/1 · 100.0%
International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies
SSBFNET
224722/212.012.0100.02/2 · 100.0%
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science
SSBFNET
210472/25.05.0100.02/2 · 100.0%

* Percentage among publications with a known citation count.

Explore publications

View all 6 →

Most cited · Crossref

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Application of Multi-Objective Optimization on the Basis of Ratio Analysis (MOORA) Method for Bank Branch Location Selection

Ali Gorener · Hasan Dinçer · Umit Hacioglu

International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies · 2013

Read abstract

Location selection problem in banking is an important issue for the commercial success in competitive environment. There is a strategic fit between the location selection decision and overall performance of a new branch. Providing physical service in requested location as well as alternative distribution channels to meet profitable client needs is the current problematic to achieve the competitive advantage over the rivalry in financial system. In this paper, an integrated model has been developed to support in the decision of branch location selection for a new bank branch. Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) technique has been conductedto prioritize of evaluation criteria, and multi-objective optimization on the basis of ratio analysis (MOORA) method has been applied to rank location alternatives of bank branch.

DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v2i2.14518 Crossref citations31 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

The Application of AHP Approach for Evaluating Location Selection Elements for Retail Store

Mahmet Akalin · Gulden Turhan · Azize Sahin

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2013

Read abstract

he aims of the study at using AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) are two-fold. First, the study aims to determine the relative importance or weight of multiple criteria and its attributes in the decision problem of location selection. The second aim of the study is to identify a location with the highest potential among alternatives for retailers by using a series of criteria and attributes determined. By the means of the AHP method, decision makers put weighted values to the evaluation criteria with respect to the related goal and the attributes with respect to the corresponding criteria. In addition, the priority weight for every location alternative on each criterion and attribute is estimated. The AHP process involves hierarchically structuring decision problem, setting priority weights, establishing a judgment matrix and weight vector, and then ranking the order of location alternatives. To substantiate the feasibility of this standard approach, a case study is conducted with location selection for a clothing store in this study.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v2i4.778 Crossref citations34 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

A systematic literature review on multi-criteria decision making in disaster management

Fawz Manyaga · Nilufer Nilufer · Zineb Hajaoui

International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2020

Read abstract

This paper through a systematic literature review portrays the academic work that has been done in disaster management by applying multi-criteria decision making. This study reviews 36 academic articles that applied multi-criteria decision-making planning and management of natural disasters i.e. tsunami, floods, heavy rains, earthquake, land sliding, epidemic, pandemic, etc. This study finds out that lack of effective planning and management pre and post disasters is causing loss of human life, temporary migration of locals to safer places, loss of properties, and economic losses. Once the crisis is over, it requires efforts and additional finances to bring life to normal. There are regions where disasters are periodic such as floods in rivers or due to monsoon season. But with effective planning and pre-determined priorities, loss to human life can be mitigated. Disaster management departments need effective planning tools to forecast imminent disasters and prepare accordingly. This study is very relevant to the recent global pandemic COVID-19 that has caused human and economic losses and will leave footprints for the coming years and generations

DOI 10.36096/ijbes.v2i2.1978 Crossref citations12 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Application of Multi-Objective Optimization on the Basis of Ratio Analysis (MOORA) Method for Bank Branch Location Selection

Ali Görener · Hasan Dincer · Umit Hacioglu

International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies · 2016

Read abstract

<p>Location selection problem in banking is an important issue for the commercial success in competitive environment. There is a strategic fit between the location selection decision and overall performance of a new branch. Providing physical service in requested location as well as alternative distribution channels to meet profitable client needs is the current problematic to achieve the competitive advantage over the rivalry in financial system. In this paper, an integrated model has been developed to support in the decision of branch location selection for a new bank branch. Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) technique has been conducted to prioritize of evaluation criteria, and multi-objective optimization on the basis of ratio analysis (MOORA) method has been applied to rank location alternatives of bank branch.  </p>

DOI 10.20525/.v2i2.1456 Crossref citations41 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Decision Making Through the Fuzzy TOPSIS Method

A. Oben Sabuncuoglu · Ali Gorener

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2016

Read abstract

Construction contractors have a great role in terms of operation work properly in construction project management. An effective contractor selection is most important to the success of any construction projects. Contractor selection is a multi criteria decision making problem which includes qualitative and quantitative characteristics. For the contractor selection problem, this study proposes a combined decision approach, which employs analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and Fuzzy Technique Ordered Preference by Similarity to the Ideal Solution (TOPSIS)  methods. In the proposed approach, AHP is used to determine the weights of selection criteria, and Fuzzy TOPSIS is used to select appropriate contractor alternative. Additionally, a real case study in construction industry is presented to illustrate the application of the proposed approach.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v5i2.3282 Crossref citations13 OpenAlex citations

Selected results

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Determining elderly care home selection criteria and prioritizing strategies using Swara method

Yeter Uslu · Busra Sevim · Selenay Koc · Sefer Aygun

Bussecon Review of Social Sciences · 2025

Read abstract

There has been an increase in the elderly population worldwide in recent years. This situation creates some needs both at individual and social level. In particular, elderly individuals need support in carrying out their daily activities. Therefore, elderly care centers are seen as an important supporter in this respect. This study aims to identify the criteria affecting the selection of elderly care centers and prioritize them with SWARA method. The SWARA method was used to weight the criteria affecting the selection of elderly care centers in order of priority. Eight criteria identified through literature review were evaluated by five experts experienced in the relevant field. The experts evaluated the criteria by ranking them according to their importance and the final prioritization was carried out by taking the geometric mean of the evaluations. According to the results of the analysis, the most important factor affecting the selection of an elderly care center was the Quality-of-Life Comfort and Service with a weight of 22%. This was followed by Financial Status with 20%, Health Services with 16%, and Professional Staff with 13%. Location and Transportation criterion was determined as the least important factor with a weight of 0.7%. The fact that life comfort and service quality have the highest weight indicates that elderly individuals expect a quality and comfortable living environment. The results obtained from the study show that policies for elderly care homes should be organized in a way that aims to increase the comfort of living, improve service quality, ensure economic accessibility and ensure the sustainability of health services.

DOI 10.36096/brss.v7i1.7551 Crossref citations1 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

A systematic literature review on multi-criteria decision making in disaster management

Fawz Manyaga · Nilufer Nilufer · Zineb Hajaoui

International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2020

Read abstract

This paper through a systematic literature review portrays the academic work that has been done in disaster management by applying multi-criteria decision making. This study reviews 36 academic articles that applied multi-criteria decision-making planning and management of natural disasters i.e. tsunami, floods, heavy rains, earthquake, land sliding, epidemic, pandemic, etc. This study finds out that lack of effective planning and management pre and post disasters is causing loss of human life, temporary migration of locals to safer places, loss of properties, and economic losses. Once the crisis is over, it requires efforts and additional finances to bring life to normal. There are regions where disasters are periodic such as floods in rivers or due to monsoon season. But with effective planning and pre-determined priorities, loss to human life can be mitigated. Disaster management departments need effective planning tools to forecast imminent disasters and prepare accordingly. This study is very relevant to the recent global pandemic COVID-19 that has caused human and economic losses and will leave footprints for the coming years and generations

DOI 10.36096/ijbes.v2i2.1978 Crossref citations12 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Decision Making Through the Fuzzy TOPSIS Method

A. Oben Sabuncuoglu · Ali Gorener

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2016

Read abstract

Construction contractors have a great role in terms of operation work properly in construction project management. An effective contractor selection is most important to the success of any construction projects. Contractor selection is a multi criteria decision making problem which includes qualitative and quantitative characteristics. For the contractor selection problem, this study proposes a combined decision approach, which employs analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and Fuzzy Technique Ordered Preference by Similarity to the Ideal Solution (TOPSIS)  methods. In the proposed approach, AHP is used to determine the weights of selection criteria, and Fuzzy TOPSIS is used to select appropriate contractor alternative. Additionally, a real case study in construction industry is presented to illustrate the application of the proposed approach.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v5i2.3282 Crossref citations13 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Application of Multi-Objective Optimization on the Basis of Ratio Analysis (MOORA) Method for Bank Branch Location Selection

Ali Görener · Hasan Dincer · Umit Hacioglu

International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies · 2016

Read abstract

<p>Location selection problem in banking is an important issue for the commercial success in competitive environment. There is a strategic fit between the location selection decision and overall performance of a new branch. Providing physical service in requested location as well as alternative distribution channels to meet profitable client needs is the current problematic to achieve the competitive advantage over the rivalry in financial system. In this paper, an integrated model has been developed to support in the decision of branch location selection for a new bank branch. Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) technique has been conducted to prioritize of evaluation criteria, and multi-objective optimization on the basis of ratio analysis (MOORA) method has been applied to rank location alternatives of bank branch.  </p>

DOI 10.20525/.v2i2.1456 Crossref citations41 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

The Application of AHP Approach for Evaluating Location Selection Elements for Retail Store

Mahmet Akalin · Gulden Turhan · Azize Sahin

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2013

Read abstract

he aims of the study at using AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) are two-fold. First, the study aims to determine the relative importance or weight of multiple criteria and its attributes in the decision problem of location selection. The second aim of the study is to identify a location with the highest potential among alternatives for retailers by using a series of criteria and attributes determined. By the means of the AHP method, decision makers put weighted values to the evaluation criteria with respect to the related goal and the attributes with respect to the corresponding criteria. In addition, the priority weight for every location alternative on each criterion and attribute is estimated. The AHP process involves hierarchically structuring decision problem, setting priority weights, establishing a judgment matrix and weight vector, and then ranking the order of location alternatives. To substantiate the feasibility of this standard approach, a case study is conducted with location selection for a clothing store in this study.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v2i4.778 Crossref citations34 OpenAlex citations

Data coverage & freshness

Source coverage refers to this result set; a publication may occur in several sources. Sync times refer to contributing journals.

Missing abstracts: 0 · Missing authors: 0 · Missing publication dates: 0 · Dates without day precision: 0

SourceMost recent successful journal syncLatest attempt
crossref21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
ojs-rest21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 06:46 UTC
oai-pmh20 Oct 2026 19:56 UTC · ijfbscomplete · ijfbs · 20 Oct 2026 19:55 UTC
openalex-enrichment21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
Full import history & methodology →