Publication activity
Articles grouped by publication year
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.
Research across participating journals · All insights follow your collection filters.
Publication activity alongside incoming citations.
Articles grouped by publication year
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
Leading affiliations and themes in this collection.
Full distributions & methodology ↓Independent sources. Clear time scales.
Crossref and OpenAlex · separate totals for the same publication cohorts
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
Latest lifetime totals, grouped by the cited article’s year. These are not citations received in that year.
OpenAlex · incoming citation links grouped by citing-work year
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
Select journals to compare the same collection filters. Source totals stay separate. These measures describe research activity, not journal quality.
Articles by publication year
Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year
Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year
By year of the citing work · 2017–2026
2026 is year to date. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime charts share a citation scale. Unknown observations appear as gaps; known zero stays zero. Annual receipts use available OpenAlex histories and may not sum to lifetime totals. 0 undated publications excluded from publication-year charts.
Crossref citation coverage: 3 / 3 publications (100.0%). Latest observation: 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC. Means and percentages use records with known counts.
DOI-matched OpenAlex observations for the same selected publications. These counts are separate from Crossref and are never added together.
Observation range: 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC — 21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC. Missing matches are not zero citations. Previous observations may remain if a refresh fails or a DOI no longer matches.
OpenAlex affiliations and primary-topic classification. Each publication counts once per institution or country; multi-affiliated publications appear in multiple groups, so percentages can sum above 100%. Countries describe author affiliations, not nationality. Topics use one primary topic per publication.
3 / 3 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 3 selected publications.
3 / 3 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 3 selected publications.
3 / 3 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 3 selected publications.
Citations are the latest recorded totals for articles published in each year, not citations received during that year. Crossref and OpenAlex remain separate and share the same citation scale. 2026 is incomplete; newer articles have had less time to receive citations.
0 undated publications excluded. Unknown citation counts are shown as —, never as zero. Partial coverage can understate totals; expand each table for known / total records.
| Publication year | Journal / scope | Publications | Publications | Crossref known | OpenAlex known |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | All selected publications | 1 | 1 | 1/1 | 1/1 |
| 2025 | All selected publications | 0 | 0 | 0/0 | 0/0 |
| 2026 | All selected publications | 2 | 2 | 2/2 | 2/2 |
| Publication year | Journal / scope | Crossref citations | Publications | Crossref known | OpenAlex known |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | All selected publications | 0 | 1 | 1/1 | 1/1 |
| 2025 | All selected publications | — | 0 | 0/0 | 0/0 |
| 2026 | All selected publications | 0 | 2 | 2/2 | 2/2 |
| Publication year | Journal / scope | OpenAlex citations | Publications | Crossref known | OpenAlex known |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | All selected publications | 0 | 1 | 1/1 | 1/1 |
| 2025 | All selected publications | — | 0 | 0/0 | 0/0 |
| 2026 | All selected publications | 0 | 2 | 2/2 | 2/2 |
Incoming citations to the selected publications, grouped by the year of the citing work. This is separate from lifetime citation totals grouped by the cited article’s publication year.
The publication filters above define which articles receive the citations. The citation-year range below only controls this chart and the incoming-citation comparison. Removing publication-year filters includes older articles’ incoming citations too.
Annual history available for 3 / 3 selected publications. Supported display window: 2017–2026; 2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Missing histories and years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—); partial coverage can understate totals.
Annual-history observations (UTC): 2026-10-21T07:22:59.259714+00:00 — 2026-10-21T07:23:08.254004+00:00. Older observations may be retained after failed or incomplete refreshes.
| Citation year | Journal / scope | OpenAlex · Citations received by year | Publications | Annual history known |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | All selected publications | 0 | 3 | 3/3 |
| 2018 | All selected publications | 0 | 3 | 3/3 |
| 2019 | All selected publications | 0 | 3 | 3/3 |
| 2020 | All selected publications | 0 | 3 | 3/3 |
| 2021 | All selected publications | 0 | 3 | 3/3 |
| 2022 | All selected publications | 0 | 3 | 3/3 |
| 2023 | All selected publications | 0 | 3 | 3/3 |
| 2024 | All selected publications | 0 | 3 | 3/3 |
| 2025 | All selected publications | 0 | 3 | 3/3 |
| 2026 | All selected publications | 0 | 3 | 3/3 |
Counts represent citation links, not unique citing papers across a journal: one paper citing two selected articles contributes two links. Older citations outside this window are excluded, so annual sums need not equal lifetime totals. OpenAlex methodology ↗
Records with full publication dates only. 2026 is an incomplete year.
| Period | Publications |
|---|---|
| 2024-12 | 1 |
| 2026-03 | 1 |
| 2026-06 | 1 |
Latest Crossref totals for the selected publications; not citations received in the selected years.
Unknown counts are excluded from the mean, median and cited-publication rate.
Same filters, source and counting rules across journals. Descriptive statistics, not a quality ranking.
| Journal / publisher | Publications | Crossref citations | OpenAlex citations | OpenAlex coverage | Crossref mean | Crossref median | Crossref cited %* | Crossref coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science SSBFNET | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3/3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 3/3 · 100.0% |
* Percentage among publications with a known citation count.
This conceptual paper examines mentoring practices aimed at supporting university lecturers in the development of scholarly writing skills. Recognizing that the ability to publish in academic journals is critical to professional growth and institutional contribution, the study explores how mentoring serves as a strategic tool to enhance lecturers' academic writing capacities. Guided by the main research question—"What mentoring practices are employed to support university lecturers in the development of scholarly writing "skills?"—the study adopts a qualitative approach grounded in the interpretive paradigm. Data were collected through an extensive review of existing literature on academic mentorship and scholarly writing support within higher education contexts. Thematic analysis was used to identify key patterns and strategies that characterize effective mentoring relationships, including peer mentoring, writing workshops, structured feedback mechanisms, and institutional support programs. Findings highlight the importance of context-sensitive mentoring practices that address both the technical and emotional aspects of academic writing. The paper concludes by emphasizing the need for universities to institutionalize mentoring frameworks that foster sustainable writing cultures. This study contributes to the broader discourse on academic development and offers insights for policymakers, academic leaders, and faculty development practitioners seeking to enhance scholarly productivity among university lecturers.
This qualitative study explores the role of TVET leaders in enabling career development through sponsorship. Drawing on an inductive approach and a case study design, this study captures Heads of Departments’ and lecturers’ perspectives on TVET leaders’ suitability to provide career sponsorship. The social capital theory of career success, the social exchange theory, and Ang’s sponsorship model were used to provide context and perspective in this study. Semi-structured interviews with 20 participants (6 TVET HODs and 14 lecturers) were conducted across 6 public TVET colleges in South Africa. Transcripts were uploaded onto ATLAS.ti software. Data from the transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis. The findings reveal a dual narrative: while HODs occupy strategically influential positions and display latent capabilities that could enable meaningful career sponsorship, their ability to actualise this role is significantly constrained. TVET leaders were found to be under-resourced, insufficiently supported, inadequately trained, and lacking in essential leadership competencies and well-being. These limitations weaken trust, restrict reciprocal professional relationships, and ultimately hinder the institutionalisation of career sponsorship practices. This study recommends the urgent professionalisation of TVET leadership, including structured leadership development, improved resourcing, and policy mechanisms that formalise sponsorship as a human resource development strategy. Strengthening leadership capacity and embedding sponsorship practices could enhance lecturers’ morale, retention, and career progression, improve organisational performance, and contribute to a more robust and competitive TVET sector
The role of academic mentoring has now become a crucial educational practice not only for student’s academic success and achievement, but also, faculties development and institutional growth. However, the effectiveness of mentoring process is difficult to measure due to a lack of conceptual clarity about the mentoring practices and programs in higher education institutions. In South African universities, mentoring practices face unique challenges and opportunities due to the country’s historical background. Therefore, this literature review conceptualizes academic mentoring by looking at the programs, methods and outcomes associated with academic mentoring in South African universities. An Integrative Qualitative Analysis was employed to review a total of 13 studies that was conducted between 2016 and 2024, and identify three themes namely; Impacts of academic mentoring on student’s performance, Roles of cultural and linguistic diversity on enhancing academic mentoring, and Significance for Integrating mentoring practices into institutional policies. Findings provide a foundation for future research and offer practical recommendations for enhancing academic mentoring practices in South African universities.
This conceptual paper examines mentoring practices aimed at supporting university lecturers in the development of scholarly writing skills. Recognizing that the ability to publish in academic journals is critical to professional growth and institutional contribution, the study explores how mentoring serves as a strategic tool to enhance lecturers' academic writing capacities. Guided by the main research question—"What mentoring practices are employed to support university lecturers in the development of scholarly writing "skills?"—the study adopts a qualitative approach grounded in the interpretive paradigm. Data were collected through an extensive review of existing literature on academic mentorship and scholarly writing support within higher education contexts. Thematic analysis was used to identify key patterns and strategies that characterize effective mentoring relationships, including peer mentoring, writing workshops, structured feedback mechanisms, and institutional support programs. Findings highlight the importance of context-sensitive mentoring practices that address both the technical and emotional aspects of academic writing. The paper concludes by emphasizing the need for universities to institutionalize mentoring frameworks that foster sustainable writing cultures. This study contributes to the broader discourse on academic development and offers insights for policymakers, academic leaders, and faculty development practitioners seeking to enhance scholarly productivity among university lecturers.
This qualitative study explores the role of TVET leaders in enabling career development through sponsorship. Drawing on an inductive approach and a case study design, this study captures Heads of Departments’ and lecturers’ perspectives on TVET leaders’ suitability to provide career sponsorship. The social capital theory of career success, the social exchange theory, and Ang’s sponsorship model were used to provide context and perspective in this study. Semi-structured interviews with 20 participants (6 TVET HODs and 14 lecturers) were conducted across 6 public TVET colleges in South Africa. Transcripts were uploaded onto ATLAS.ti software. Data from the transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis. The findings reveal a dual narrative: while HODs occupy strategically influential positions and display latent capabilities that could enable meaningful career sponsorship, their ability to actualise this role is significantly constrained. TVET leaders were found to be under-resourced, insufficiently supported, inadequately trained, and lacking in essential leadership competencies and well-being. These limitations weaken trust, restrict reciprocal professional relationships, and ultimately hinder the institutionalisation of career sponsorship practices. This study recommends the urgent professionalisation of TVET leadership, including structured leadership development, improved resourcing, and policy mechanisms that formalise sponsorship as a human resource development strategy. Strengthening leadership capacity and embedding sponsorship practices could enhance lecturers’ morale, retention, and career progression, improve organisational performance, and contribute to a more robust and competitive TVET sector
The role of academic mentoring has now become a crucial educational practice not only for student’s academic success and achievement, but also, faculties development and institutional growth. However, the effectiveness of mentoring process is difficult to measure due to a lack of conceptual clarity about the mentoring practices and programs in higher education institutions. In South African universities, mentoring practices face unique challenges and opportunities due to the country’s historical background. Therefore, this literature review conceptualizes academic mentoring by looking at the programs, methods and outcomes associated with academic mentoring in South African universities. An Integrative Qualitative Analysis was employed to review a total of 13 studies that was conducted between 2016 and 2024, and identify three themes namely; Impacts of academic mentoring on student’s performance, Roles of cultural and linguistic diversity on enhancing academic mentoring, and Significance for Integrating mentoring practices into institutional policies. Findings provide a foundation for future research and offer practical recommendations for enhancing academic mentoring practices in South African universities.
Source coverage refers to this result set; a publication may occur in several sources. Sync times refer to contributing journals.
Missing abstracts: 0 · Missing authors: 0 · Missing publication dates: 0 · Dates without day precision: 0
| Source | Most recent successful journal sync | Latest attempt |
|---|---|---|
| crossref | 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbs | complete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC |
| ojs-rest | 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbs | complete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 06:46 UTC |
| oai-pmh | 20 Oct 2026 19:55 UTC · ijrbs | complete · ijrbs · 20 Oct 2026 19:50 UTC |
| openalex-enrichment | 21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC · ijrbs | complete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC |