CiteNScope — Scholarly Index & Analytics
Discover / Analytics RESEARCH INTELLIGENCE
CiteNScope / Analytics

Explore the evidence.
Understand the reach.

Research across participating journals · All insights follow your collection filters.

Compare journals ↗
OpenAlex coverage 100.0% · 5/5 recordsLast OpenAlex observation 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC
PUBLICATIONS5In the selected collection
CROSSREF CITATIONS135/5 with known counts
OPENALEX CITATIONS175/5 with known counts
OPENALEX MEAN3.4Per article with a known count
Explore articles 5 →
Filter collection Publication years, search & more
Reset
topic: Science Education and Pedagogy Remove ×
Your research collection

Output and reach

Publication activity alongside incoming citations.

Publication activity

Articles grouped by publication year

Publications

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.

View data & coverage

Citations received

OpenAlex · year of the citing work

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage

Research landscape

Leading affiliations and themes in this collection.

Full distributions & methodology ↓

Institutions

University of South Africa4University of Johannesburg2North-West University15/5 records with data

Countries

South Africa55/5 records with data

Primary topics

Science Education and Pedagogy55/5 records with data
Two perspectives on citations

Follow the research impact

Independent sources. Clear time scales.

Lifetime citations by publication year

Crossref and OpenAlex · separate totals for the same publication cohorts

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

Latest lifetime totals, grouped by the cited article’s year. These are not citations received in that year.

View data & coverage

Citations received each year

OpenAlex · incoming citation links grouped by citing-work year

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage
Annual history: 5/5 articles. Latest history observation: 2026-10-21T07:22:47.369020+00:00. Source totals are never added together.
Research side by side

Compare journals

Select journals to compare the same collection filters. Source totals stay separate. These measures describe research activity, not journal quality.

Leave all unchecked to include every matching journal. Selection affects only comparison charts.
Display range
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science

Publications

Articles by publication year

View data & coverage

Crossref citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex · Citations received

By year of the citing work · 2017–2026

View data & coverage

2026 is year to date. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime charts share a citation scale. Unknown observations appear as gaps; known zero stays zero. Annual receipts use available OpenAlex histories and may not sum to lifetime totals. 0 undated publications excluded from publication-year charts.

Full analytics report All distributions, publications, comparisons & data provenance
5 MATCHING PUBLICATIONSExplore results →Export CSV ↓
INDEXED PUBLICATIONS5
CROSSREF CITATIONS13
CROSSREF · CITED PUBLICATIONS60.0%
CROSSREF · MEAN CITATIONS2.6

Crossref citation coverage: 5 / 5 publications (100.0%). Latest observation: 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC. Means and percentages use records with known counts.

OpenAlex / Separate citation source

A broader view of this research

DOI-matched OpenAlex observations for the same selected publications. These counts are separate from Crossref and are never added together.

OPENALEX CITATIONS17
DOI MATCH COVERAGE100.0%5 / 5 publications
MEAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY3.45 known · 0 unknown
MEDIAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY2

Observation range: 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC — 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC. Missing matches are not zero citations. Previous observations may remain if a refresh fails or a DOI no longer matches.

OpenAlex citation distributionNo citations01–546–20121+0Unknown0

Institutions, countries & topics

OpenAlex affiliations and primary-topic classification. Each publication counts once per institution or country; multi-affiliated publications appear in multiple groups, so percentages can sum above 100%. Countries describe author affiliations, not nationality. Topics use one primary topic per publication.

Institutions

5 / 5 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 5 selected publications.

Countries

5 / 5 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 5 selected publications.

Primary topics

5 / 5 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 5 selected publications.

Citation year / OpenAlex

Citations received over time

Incoming citations to the selected publications, grouped by the year of the citing work. This is separate from lifetime citation totals grouped by the cited article’s publication year.

The publication filters above define which articles receive the citations. The citation-year range below only controls this chart and the incoming-citation comparison. Removing publication-year filters includes older articles’ incoming citations too.

Annual history available for 5 / 5 selected publications. Supported display window: 2017–2026; 2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Missing histories and years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—); partial coverage can understate totals.

Annual-history observations (UTC): 2026-10-21T07:22:43.101534+00:00 — 2026-10-21T07:22:47.369020+00:00. Older observations may be retained after failed or incomplete refreshes.

OpenAlex · Citations received by year

63.00 2017 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 5/52018 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 5/52019 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 5/52020 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 5/52021 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 5/52022 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 2 · Annual history coverage 5/52023 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 1 · Annual history coverage 5/52024 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 6 · Annual history coverage 5/52025 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 6 · Annual history coverage 5/52026 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 2 · Annual history coverage 5/5 2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
View openalex · citations received by year data & coverage
Citation yearJournal / scopeOpenAlex · Citations received by yearPublicationsAnnual history known
2017All selected publications055/5
2018All selected publications055/5
2019All selected publications055/5
2020All selected publications055/5
2021All selected publications055/5
2022All selected publications255/5
2023All selected publications155/5
2024All selected publications655/5
2025All selected publications655/5
2026All selected publications255/5

Counts represent citation links, not unique citing papers across a journal: one paper citing two selected articles contributes two links. Older citations outside this window are excluded, so annual sums need not equal lifetime totals. OpenAlex methodology ↗

Crossref citation distribution

Latest Crossref totals for the selected publications; not citations received in the selected years.

Mean2.6
Median2
No citations21–526–20121+0Unknown0

Unknown counts are excluded from the mean, median and cited-publication rate.

Journal comparison

Same filters, source and counting rules across journals. Descriptive statistics, not a quality ranking.

Journal / publisherPublicationsCrossref citationsOpenAlex citationsOpenAlex coverageCrossref meanCrossref medianCrossref cited %*Crossref coverage
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science
SSBFNET
513175/52.6260.05/5 · 100.0%

* Percentage among publications with a known citation count.

Explore publications

View all 5 →

Most cited · Crossref

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Insights into the interaction and discourse in the senior phase natural sciences classroom

Awelani V Mudau · Ndivhuwo Netshivhumbe

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2022

Read abstract

This paper investigated interaction and discourse during teacher classroom practices in the Senior Phase Natural Sciences in some rural schools positioned in the Vhembe District of the Limpopo Province, South Africa. The research method employed was a qualitative interpretative multiple case study design. Two schools were selected, and one Natural Science teacher from each school participated in this study. Classroom observations and interviews were used to collect data from Senior phase Natural Sciences teachers. Natural sciences teachers were interviewed in their schools and observed during classroom practice. The findings of the study show that the type of discourse observed from Natural Sciences teachers was authoritative discourse and the pattern of discourse employed was Initiation Response Evaluation. Teacher questioning was used to develop the lesson and evaluate learner understanding. Teachers used an interactive-authoritative communicative approach during their lesson presentations. The consequences of the approaches the teachers use limit the opportunities for learners to interact amongst themselves and the subject content. It is recommended that besides focusing on subject matter knowledge during continuous development programs, there is a need to focus on interactions and discourse. Furthermore, there is a need to conduct further studies on a large scale so that a suitable intervention program can be designed for in-service teachers.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v11i6.19679 Crossref citations9 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Exploring teacher improvisation and its influence on learner performance in an under-resourced Grade 11 Life Science class

Thasmai Dhurumraj · Zainul Moola

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2023

Read abstract

The decline in learner performance in science education in South Africa is a perennial problem. Resource paucity in government schools is ubiquitous and reflects inherent challenges that pervade science classrooms. Scientific resources are imperative to the success of content delivery; however, South African government schools need help in procuring these standardised instruments and resources. Therefore, educators must innovate by employing improvised resources. This study illuminates the relationship between improvised resources and learner performance. A quasi-experimental design is adopted. A local school in Gauteng was used for this study, with 40 Grade 11 Life Science students and 1 Life Science educator participating in the project. A pre-test and post-test were administered to evaluate the effect of improvise resources comparatively. The ANOVA two-factor analysis tool demonstrated significant results of performance between the experimental and controlled groups as a statistical difference is seen in the mean scores, further accentuating the invaluable use of improvised resources.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v12i2.23412 Crossref citations2 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Investigating the classroom teaching practices of life sciences teachers in Gauteng

Thasmai Dhurumraj · Jodi-Leigh Broadhurst

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2023

Read abstract

In the analysis of the South African NSC diagnostic reports, the Department of Education prepared areas of learners’ struggle have proved to repeat themselves from 2017 to 2020. The classroom practices of Life Sciences teachers, focusing on teacher knowledge, were observed in a sample of schools in the province of Gauteng, South Africa. The investigation aimed to investigate these practices of Life Sciences teachers and consequently diagnose teaching difficulties. Data was collected through interviews and observations in a multi-case study approach and analyzed using Mudau’s (2016) Classroom Practice Diagnostic Framework. This study reveals that teachers’ classroom practices contribute to the teaching difficulties they experience when considering teachers’ knowledge of the Life Sciences content, the teaching context, and learner understanding.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v12i2.23892 Crossref citations3 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Echoes on the teaching of physical science using the topic projectile motion

Lettah Sikhosana · Awelani V. Mudau

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2022

Read abstract

The aim of this paper was to present reflections on the teaching of physical science using the topic of projectile motion as a launch pad. It focused on the teaching model and what the Department of Basic Education expects from teaching physical science subjects. Furthermore, it looked at some of the challenges regarding teaching physical science in general and in particular to the projectile motion topic. It looked at empirical studies in projectile motion to situate the current research interest to articulate gaps in the topic and the subject. It concludes with recommendations and highlights a need to focus on all grades when teaching physical science subjects, particularly projectile motion than only in grade 12 as stipulated by Curriculum Assessment Policy Statement. The team teaching approach amongst curriculum implementers and subject teachers is also accentuated, and further investigations are proposed.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v11i7.19940 Crossref citations2 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

The influence of instructional strategies on natural science teachers teaching practices in rural classrooms

Thuli Ntuli · Tebogo Nkanyani · Awelani V. Mudau

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2022

Read abstract

This is a qualitative interpretative case study. Its aim is to explore how instructional strategies shape the teaching practices of Natural Sciences teachers in the classroom. The following question guided the study: How do instructional strategies shape the teaching practices of Natural Sciences teachers in the classroom? Semi-structured interviews and observations were used to collect data from two purposefully sampled participants. The findings reveal that instructional strategies have a more significant effect on the teaching practices of natural science teachers. Further, Natural Sciences teachers still use the old way of teaching, which is the rote-learning which promotes meditation instead of understating scientific concepts. This consequently led to the learner’s lack of interest and poor performance in the subject. It is thus sensible to recommend that the Department of Basic Education (DBE) provides adequate support in terms of workshops to teachers on instructional strategies.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v11i7.20140 Crossref citations1 OpenAlex citations

Selected results

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Exploring teacher improvisation and its influence on learner performance in an under-resourced Grade 11 Life Science class

Thasmai Dhurumraj · Zainul Moola

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2023

Read abstract

The decline in learner performance in science education in South Africa is a perennial problem. Resource paucity in government schools is ubiquitous and reflects inherent challenges that pervade science classrooms. Scientific resources are imperative to the success of content delivery; however, South African government schools need help in procuring these standardised instruments and resources. Therefore, educators must innovate by employing improvised resources. This study illuminates the relationship between improvised resources and learner performance. A quasi-experimental design is adopted. A local school in Gauteng was used for this study, with 40 Grade 11 Life Science students and 1 Life Science educator participating in the project. A pre-test and post-test were administered to evaluate the effect of improvise resources comparatively. The ANOVA two-factor analysis tool demonstrated significant results of performance between the experimental and controlled groups as a statistical difference is seen in the mean scores, further accentuating the invaluable use of improvised resources.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v12i2.23412 Crossref citations2 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Investigating the classroom teaching practices of life sciences teachers in Gauteng

Thasmai Dhurumraj · Jodi-Leigh Broadhurst

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2023

Read abstract

In the analysis of the South African NSC diagnostic reports, the Department of Education prepared areas of learners’ struggle have proved to repeat themselves from 2017 to 2020. The classroom practices of Life Sciences teachers, focusing on teacher knowledge, were observed in a sample of schools in the province of Gauteng, South Africa. The investigation aimed to investigate these practices of Life Sciences teachers and consequently diagnose teaching difficulties. Data was collected through interviews and observations in a multi-case study approach and analyzed using Mudau’s (2016) Classroom Practice Diagnostic Framework. This study reveals that teachers’ classroom practices contribute to the teaching difficulties they experience when considering teachers’ knowledge of the Life Sciences content, the teaching context, and learner understanding.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v12i2.23892 Crossref citations3 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Echoes on the teaching of physical science using the topic projectile motion

Lettah Sikhosana · Awelani V. Mudau

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2022

Read abstract

The aim of this paper was to present reflections on the teaching of physical science using the topic of projectile motion as a launch pad. It focused on the teaching model and what the Department of Basic Education expects from teaching physical science subjects. Furthermore, it looked at some of the challenges regarding teaching physical science in general and in particular to the projectile motion topic. It looked at empirical studies in projectile motion to situate the current research interest to articulate gaps in the topic and the subject. It concludes with recommendations and highlights a need to focus on all grades when teaching physical science subjects, particularly projectile motion than only in grade 12 as stipulated by Curriculum Assessment Policy Statement. The team teaching approach amongst curriculum implementers and subject teachers is also accentuated, and further investigations are proposed.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v11i7.19940 Crossref citations2 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

The influence of instructional strategies on natural science teachers teaching practices in rural classrooms

Thuli Ntuli · Tebogo Nkanyani · Awelani V. Mudau

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2022

Read abstract

This is a qualitative interpretative case study. Its aim is to explore how instructional strategies shape the teaching practices of Natural Sciences teachers in the classroom. The following question guided the study: How do instructional strategies shape the teaching practices of Natural Sciences teachers in the classroom? Semi-structured interviews and observations were used to collect data from two purposefully sampled participants. The findings reveal that instructional strategies have a more significant effect on the teaching practices of natural science teachers. Further, Natural Sciences teachers still use the old way of teaching, which is the rote-learning which promotes meditation instead of understating scientific concepts. This consequently led to the learner’s lack of interest and poor performance in the subject. It is thus sensible to recommend that the Department of Basic Education (DBE) provides adequate support in terms of workshops to teachers on instructional strategies.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v11i7.20140 Crossref citations1 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Insights into the interaction and discourse in the senior phase natural sciences classroom

Awelani V Mudau · Ndivhuwo Netshivhumbe

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2022

Read abstract

This paper investigated interaction and discourse during teacher classroom practices in the Senior Phase Natural Sciences in some rural schools positioned in the Vhembe District of the Limpopo Province, South Africa. The research method employed was a qualitative interpretative multiple case study design. Two schools were selected, and one Natural Science teacher from each school participated in this study. Classroom observations and interviews were used to collect data from Senior phase Natural Sciences teachers. Natural sciences teachers were interviewed in their schools and observed during classroom practice. The findings of the study show that the type of discourse observed from Natural Sciences teachers was authoritative discourse and the pattern of discourse employed was Initiation Response Evaluation. Teacher questioning was used to develop the lesson and evaluate learner understanding. Teachers used an interactive-authoritative communicative approach during their lesson presentations. The consequences of the approaches the teachers use limit the opportunities for learners to interact amongst themselves and the subject content. It is recommended that besides focusing on subject matter knowledge during continuous development programs, there is a need to focus on interactions and discourse. Furthermore, there is a need to conduct further studies on a large scale so that a suitable intervention program can be designed for in-service teachers.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v11i6.19679 Crossref citations9 OpenAlex citations

Data coverage & freshness

Source coverage refers to this result set; a publication may occur in several sources. Sync times refer to contributing journals.

Missing abstracts: 0 · Missing authors: 0 · Missing publication dates: 0 · Dates without day precision: 0

SourceMost recent successful journal syncLatest attempt
crossref21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
ojs-rest21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 06:46 UTC
oai-pmh20 Oct 2026 19:55 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 20 Oct 2026 19:50 UTC
openalex-enrichment21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
Full import history & methodology →