CiteNScope — Scholarly Index & Analytics
Discover / Analytics RESEARCH INTELLIGENCE
CiteNScope / Analytics

Explore the evidence.
Understand the reach.

Research across participating journals · All insights follow your collection filters.

Compare journals ↗
OpenAlex coverage 100.0% · 237/237 recordsLast OpenAlex observation 01 Nov 2026, 13:28 UTC
PUBLICATIONS237In the selected collection
CROSSREF CITATIONS728237/237 with known counts
OPENALEX CITATIONS1470237/237 with known counts
OPENALEX MEAN6.2Per article with a known count
Explore articles 237 →
Filter collection Publication years, search & more
Reset
Your research collection

Output and reach

Publication activity alongside incoming citations.

Publication activity

Articles grouped by publication year

Publications

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.

View data & coverage

Citations received

OpenAlex · year of the citing work

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage
Two perspectives on citations

Follow the research impact

Independent sources. Clear time scales.

Lifetime citations by publication year

Crossref and OpenAlex · separate totals for the same publication cohorts

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

Latest lifetime totals, grouped by the cited article’s year. These are not citations received in that year.

View data & coverage

Citations received each year

OpenAlex · incoming citation links grouped by citing-work year

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage
Annual history: 237/237 articles. Latest history observation: 2026-11-01T13:28:49.409819+00:00. Source totals are never added together.
Research side by side

Compare journals

Compare across all journals →

Select journals to compare the same collection filters. Source totals stay separate. These measures describe research activity, not journal quality.

Leave all unchecked to include every matching journal. Selection affects only comparison charts.
Display range
International Journal of Finance & Banking StudiesInternational Journal of Research in Business and Social Science

Publications

Articles by publication year

View data & coverage

Crossref citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex · Citations received

By year of the citing work · 2017–2026

View data & coverage

2026 is year to date. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime charts share a citation scale. Unknown observations appear as gaps; known zero stays zero. Annual receipts use available OpenAlex histories and may not sum to lifetime totals. 0 undated publications excluded from publication-year charts.

Full analytics report All distributions, publications, comparisons & data provenance
237 MATCHING PUBLICATIONSExplore results →Export CSV ↓
INDEXED PUBLICATIONS237
CROSSREF CITATIONS728
CROSSREF · CITED PUBLICATIONS72.2%
CROSSREF · MEAN CITATIONS3.07

Crossref citation coverage: 237 / 237 publications (100.0%). Latest observation: 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC. Means and percentages use records with known counts.

OpenAlex / Separate citation source

A broader view of this research

DOI-matched OpenAlex observations for the same selected publications. These counts are separate from Crossref and are never added together.

OPENALEX CITATIONS1470
DOI MATCH COVERAGE100.0%237 / 237 publications
MEAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY6.2237 known · 0 unknown
MEDIAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY3

Observation range: 22 Oct 2026 00:57 UTC — 01 Nov 2026 13:28 UTC. Missing matches are not zero citations. Previous observations may remain if a refresh fails or a DOI no longer matches.

OpenAlex citation distributionNo citations351–51296–205721+16Unknown0

Institutions, countries & topics

OpenAlex affiliations and primary-topic classification. Each publication counts once per institution or country; multi-affiliated publications appear in multiple groups, so percentages can sum above 100%. Countries describe author affiliations, not nationality. Topics use one primary topic per publication.

Institutions

226 / 237 with data · 11 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 237 selected publications.

University of Brawijaya30 12.7%Karatina University16 6.8%Huazhong University of Science and Technology16 6.8%St. Paul's University12 5.1%Universitas Widyatama11 4.6%University of Nairobi7 3.0%University of Santo Tomas5 2.1%Kenyatta University4 1.7%Universitas Halu Oleo4 1.7%University of Nottingham3 1.3%University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus3 1.3%University of Dhaka3 1.3%Universitas Jember3 1.3%Universiti Malaysia Sarawak3 1.3%University of Benin3 1.3%Technical University of Kenya2 0.8%TU Wien2 0.8%King Abdulaziz University2 0.8%President University2 0.8%Universitas Airlangga2 0.8%Wenzao Ursuline University of Languages2 0.8%Muhammadiyah University of Yogyakarta2 0.8%University of Guayaquil2 0.8%Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology2 0.8%University of Barishal2 0.8%Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya2 0.8%Universitas Esa Unggul2 0.8%Ibn Haldun University2 0.8%Muhammadiyah University Purwokerto2 0.8%Kisii University2 0.8%Nile University of Nigeria2 0.8%University of Priština - Kosovska Mitrovica2 0.8%Faculty of Economics and Management of Sfax2 0.8%The Co-operative University of Kenya2 0.8%Divine Word College of Laoag2 0.8%Boğaziçi University2 0.8%Mulawarman University2 0.8%Sultan Qaboos University2 0.8%Istanbul Commerce University2 0.8%Istanbul University2 0.8%Beykent University2 0.8%University of Rajshahi2 0.8%Garden City University College2 0.8%Kastamonu University2 0.8%Yeditepe University1 0.4%University of Port Harcourt1 0.4%Swiss German University1 0.4%University of Central Florida1 0.4%Menlo College1 0.4%Indonesian National Institute of Aeronautics and Space1 0.4%Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona1 0.4%University of Science and Technology of China1 0.4%Alliant University1 0.4%Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli University1 0.4%Lampung University1 0.4%Universiti Putra Malaysia1 0.4%Memorial University of Newfoundland1 0.4%Tianjin University of Science and Technology1 0.4%State University of New York1 0.4%Avrasya University1 0.4%University of Cape Coast1 0.4%Nanchang University1 0.4%Public Authority for Applied Education and Training1 0.4%Moi University1 0.4%Universitas Trisakti1 0.4%Universitas Jambi1 0.4%National Taiwan University of Science and Technology1 0.4%Tribhuvan University1 0.4%North South University1 0.4%Lebanese University1 0.4%Strathmore University1 0.4%Queen Mary University of London1 0.4%Tunghai University1 0.4%Gomal University1 0.4%Universitas Syiah Kuala1 0.4%The University of Texas at Arlington1 0.4%University of Lagos1 0.4%State University of Medan1 0.4%Université Paris Cité1 0.4%Nnamdi Azikiwe University1 0.4%IPB University1 0.4%Taibah University1 0.4%Accra Technical University1 0.4%Izmir Kâtip Çelebi University1 0.4%University of Pavia1 0.4%Jenderal Soedirman University1 0.4%South Eastern Kenya University1 0.4%National University Bangladesh1 0.4%Africa International University1 0.4%Lyceum of the Philippines University1 0.4%California Miramar University1 0.4%Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology1 0.4%İstanbul Nişantaşı Üniversitesi1 0.4%Comilla University1 0.4%University of Energy and Natural Resources1 0.4%Istanbul Medipol University1 0.4%Accra Institute of Technology1 0.4%Iqra National University1 0.4%Laikipia University1 0.4%Meru University of Science and Technology1 0.4%University of Kigali1 0.4%University of Benghazi1 0.4%Tajen University1 0.4%University of Zambia1 0.4%Islamic University of Indonesia1 0.4%University of Peshawar1 0.4%Kenya Methodist University1 0.4%University of Catania1 0.4%Wichita State University1 0.4%Yıldız Technical University1 0.4%University for Business and Technology1 0.4%University of Lay Adventists of Kigali1 0.4%Universitas Tribhuwana Tunggadewi1 0.4%Universitas Wisnuwardhana Malang1 0.4%Council for Scientific and Industrial Research1 0.4%Universitas Teknologi Yogyakarta1 0.4%Bandung Islamic University1 0.4%Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Yogyakarta1 0.4%United States International University Africa1 0.4%Universitas Hindu Indonesia1 0.4%Lambung Mangkurat University1 0.4%University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee1 0.4%State University of New York at Oswego1 0.4%Forestry Research Institute of Ghana1 0.4%Catholic University in Erbil1 0.4%International Vision University1 0.4%Ignatius Ajuru University of Education1 0.4%Protestant University of Rwanda1 0.4%Federal College of Education (Technical) Asaba1 0.4%Politeknik Negeri Bali1 0.4%Seiyun University1 0.4%Dhaka School of Economics1 0.4%Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne1 0.4%University of Osijek1 0.4%Ariel University1 0.4%Afyon Kocatepe University1 0.4%Nottingham Trent University1 0.4%Camilo José Cela University1 0.4%Ravenshaw University1 0.4%University at Buffalo, State University of New York1 0.4%SUNY Plattsburgh1 0.4%De Montfort University1 0.4%Coventry University1 0.4%University of Prishtina1 0.4%University of Brescia1 0.4%Universiti Teknologi MARA1 0.4%King Khalid University1 0.4%Aalborg University1 0.4%University of Chittagong1 0.4%Ghana Communication Technology University1 0.4%Hasanuddin University1 0.4%

Countries

225 / 237 with data · 12 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 237 selected publications.

Primary topics

237 / 237 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 237 selected publications.

Banking stability, regulation, efficiency13 5.5%Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior11 4.6%Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance9 3.8%Employee Performance and Management8 3.4%Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting6 2.5%Financial Analysis and Corporate Governance6 2.5%International Business and FDI5 2.1%Microfinance and Financial Inclusion5 2.1%Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences4 1.7%Technology Adoption and User Behaviour4 1.7%Customer Service Quality and Loyalty4 1.7%Taxation and Compliance Studies4 1.7%Food Safety and Hygiene4 1.7%Working Capital and Financial Performance4 1.7%Management and Organizational Practices4 1.7%Corporate Governance and Financial Management4 1.7%Monetary Policy and Economic Impact3 1.3%Corporate Finance and Governance3 1.3%COVID-19 and Mental Health3 1.3%Market Dynamics and Volatility3 1.3%COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts3 1.3%Digital Transformation in Financial Services3 1.3%Financial Literacy and Behavior3 1.3%Economic Growth and Productivity2 0.8%Work-Family Balance Challenges2 0.8%Environmental Sustainability in Business2 0.8%Ethics in Business and Education2 0.8%Islamic Finance and Banking Studies2 0.8%Credit Risk and Financial Regulations2 0.8%Financial Distress and Bankruptcy Prediction2 0.8%Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis2 0.8%Legal Studies and Policies2 0.8%Mining and Resource Management2 0.8%Public-Private Partnership Projects2 0.8%Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation2 0.8%Evaluation and Performance Assessment2 0.8%African Education and Politics2 0.8%Digital literacy in education2 0.8%Insurance and Financial Risk Management2 0.8%Stress and Burnout Research2 0.8%Human Resource and Talent Management2 0.8%Legal and Social Justice Studies2 0.8%Marketing and Advertising Strategies2 0.8%Banking Sector Performance and Management2 0.8%Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies2 0.8%Organizational Leadership and Management Strategies2 0.8%Innovation and Knowledge Management1 0.4%Teacher Education and Leadership Studies1 0.4%Financial Markets and Investment Strategies1 0.4%Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research1 0.4%scientometrics and bibliometrics research1 0.4%Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification1 0.4%Quality and Supply Management1 0.4%Innovations in Medical Education1 0.4%Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis1 0.4%Migration and Labor Dynamics1 0.4%Efficiency Analysis Using DEA1 0.4%Construction Project Management and Performance1 0.4%Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis1 0.4%Reproductive Health and Contraception1 0.4%Digital Marketing and Social Media1 0.4%Housing Market and Economics1 0.4%Disaster Management and Resilience1 0.4%Intellectual Property and Patents1 0.4%E-Government and Public Services1 0.4%Team Dynamics and Performance1 0.4%Evaluation of Teaching Practices1 0.4%Corruption and Economic Development1 0.4%Gender Diversity and Inequality1 0.4%Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering1 0.4%Stock Market Forecasting Methods1 0.4%Cultural Industries and Urban Development1 0.4%Homelessness and Social Issues1 0.4%Academic integrity and plagiarism1 0.4%Corporate Taxation and Avoidance1 0.4%Innovative Teaching Methods1 0.4%Healthcare Systems and Reforms1 0.4%Behavioral Health and Interventions1 0.4%Employee Performance and Motivation1 0.4%Conflict Management and Negotiation1 0.4%Organizational Management and Innovation1 0.4%Copyright and Intellectual Property1 0.4%Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences1 0.4%Family Business Performance and Succession1 0.4%Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets1 0.4%Capital Investment and Risk Analysis1 0.4%Technology Use by Older Adults1 0.4%Cooperative Studies and Economics1 0.4%Renewable energy and sustainable power systems1 0.4%Educational Innovations and Challenges1 0.4%Economic Growth and Fiscal Policies1 0.4%Digital Economy and Work Transformation1 0.4%Public Administration in Developing Nations1 0.4%Oil Palm Production and Sustainability1 0.4%Space exploration and regulation1 0.4%Leadership and Management in Organizations1 0.4%Competency Development and Evaluation1 0.4%School Leadership and Teacher Performance1 0.4%Agriculture and Agroindustry Studies1 0.4%Internet of Things and AI1 0.4%Economic and Fiscal Studies1 0.4%Community-based Tourism Development and Sustainability1 0.4%Strategic Planning and Analysis1 0.4%Local Governance and Development1 0.4%Teacher Professional Development and Motivation1 0.4%Accounting Theory and Financial Reporting1 0.4%Religion, Society, and Development1 0.4%Community and Sustainable Development1 0.4%Accounting and Financial Management1 0.4%Management and Performance Evaluation1 0.4%Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability1 0.4%Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts1 0.4%Education and Labor Relations1 0.4%Cultural and political discourse analysis1 0.4%Intellectual Property Law1 0.4%Employment, Labor, and Gender Studies1 0.4%Military and Defense Studies1 0.4%Economic and Technological Innovation1 0.4%Migration, Racism, and Human Rights1 0.4%Biotechnology and Related Fields1 0.4%Educational Technology in Learning1 0.4%
Citation year / OpenAlex

Citations received over time

Incoming citations to the selected publications, grouped by the year of the citing work. This is separate from lifetime citation totals grouped by the cited article’s publication year.

The publication filters above define which articles receive the citations. The citation-year range below only controls this chart and the incoming-citation comparison. Removing publication-year filters includes older articles’ incoming citations too.

Annual history available for 237 / 237 selected publications. Supported display window: 2017–2026; 2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Missing histories and years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—); partial coverage can understate totals.

Annual-history observations (UTC): 2026-10-22T00:57:01.508726+00:00 — 2026-11-01T13:28:49.409819+00:00. Older observations may be retained after failed or incomplete refreshes.

OpenAlex · Citations received by year

363181.50 2017 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 237/2372018 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 237/2372019 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 2 · Annual history coverage 237/2372020 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 48 · Annual history coverage 237/2372021 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 177 · Annual history coverage 237/2372022 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 266 · Annual history coverage 237/2372023 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 363 · Annual history coverage 237/2372024 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 306 · Annual history coverage 237/2372025 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 211 · Annual history coverage 237/2372026 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 97 · Annual history coverage 237/237 2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
View openalex · citations received by year data & coverage
Citation yearJournal / scopeOpenAlex · Citations received by yearPublicationsAnnual history known
2017All selected publications0237237/237
2018All selected publications0237237/237
2019All selected publications2237237/237
2020All selected publications48237237/237
2021All selected publications177237237/237
2022All selected publications266237237/237
2023All selected publications363237237/237
2024All selected publications306237237/237
2025All selected publications211237237/237
2026All selected publications97237237/237

Counts represent citation links, not unique citing papers across a journal: one paper citing two selected articles contributes two links. Older citations outside this window are excluded, so annual sums need not equal lifetime totals. OpenAlex methodology ↗

Crossref citation distribution

Latest Crossref totals for the selected publications; not citations received in the selected years.

Mean3.07
Median1
No citations661–51356–203321+3Unknown0

Unknown counts are excluded from the mean, median and cited-publication rate.

Journal comparison

Same filters, source and counting rules across journals. Descriptive statistics, not a quality ranking.

Journal / publisherPublicationsCrossref citationsOpenAlex citationsOpenAlex coverageCrossref meanCrossref medianCrossref cited %*Crossref coverage
International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies
SSBFNET
4116934841/414.12280.541/41 · 100.0%
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science
SSBFNET
1965591122196/1962.851.070.4196/196 · 100.0%

* Percentage among publications with a known citation count.

Explore publications

View all 237 →

Most cited · Crossref

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Profit Growth : Impact of Net Profit Margin, Gross Profit Margin and Total Assests Turnover

Talitha Nathaniela Nariswari · Nugi Mohammad Nugraha

International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies · 2020

Read abstract

As an industry that has an important role for other industrial sectors, the plastic and packaging industry is the supply chain for consumer products. Behind the high industrial growth and the potential is still large, there are problems with plastic waste, consumption power, and changes in people's lifestyles that can affect the growth of the plastic and packaging industry. This study aims to determine how much impact the NPM (Net Profit Margin), GPM (Gross Profit Margin), TAT (Total Assets Turnover) on Profit Growth in the plastic and packaging industry sub-sector companies listed in IDX (Indonesia Stock Exchange) for the period 2014 to 2018. The method used in this study is a quantitative descriptive. The sampling technique used was purposive sampling in order to obtain a sample of 11 companies from a population of 12 companies. In the study the method of data analysis used the multiple linear regression analysis techniques by processing data using Eviews 8, because the data is not normally distributed, it uses the log transformation method. The results showed that simultaneously NPM (Net Profit Margin), GPM (Gross Profit Margin), TAT (Total Assets Turnover) had a significant effect on profit growth. And partially NPM (Net Profit Margin) has a significant effect on profit growth, while GPM (Gross Profit Margin) and TAT (Total Assets Turnover) have no significant effect on profit growth.

DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v9i4.93746 Crossref citations96 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Covid stress predicts depression, anxiety and stress symptoms of Filipino respondents

Renz Louis Trinidad Montano · Katarina Margarita Lacaran Acebes

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2020

Read abstract

Experiencing a pandemic and being quarantined have been proven to have debilitating effects in mental health. Some of the existing studies mentioned in this research have been conducted to assess the presence of possible mental health concerns brought about by the pandemic but most of these studies focused on the earlier phase of the pandemic. The present study focuses on the reported distress of the respondents who have been through a strict quarantine since March 2020 and are now experiencing a more relaxed lockdown. The objective of this research is to determine if COVID stress predicts common mental health concerns such as stress, depression and anxiety. A survey was conducted with 421 Filipino respondents ages 15 – 65 utilizing the COVID Stress Scales (CSS) by Taylor et al. (2020) and DASS-21. Correlational analysis was utilized showing the COVID Stress is a predictor of depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms. Then, comparative analyses were conducted to determine if differences of COVID stress across age groups, gender, occupation, and exposure. The results show that students and unemployed respondents are highly vulnerable to COVID stress and its mental health implications. Men and women did not significantly differ in distress. Surprisingly, those who have a COVID positive family member had the lowest COVID stress and DASS scores. There were 40.7% percent who experienced moderate to severe stress, 60.3% had moderate to severe anxiety and 53.1% of the respondents had moderate to severe depression. These findings show that the pandemic stress has debilitating effects on mental health. Common mental health concerns (e.g. depression and anxiety) may be highly prevalent due to the COVID-19 pandemic

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v9i4.77346 Crossref citations84 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Perception and prediction of intention to use online banking systems

Sk Alamgir Hossain · Yukun Bao · Najmul Hasan · Md Farijul Islam

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2020

Read abstract

Online banking has become a vital instrument for delivering quality and easily reached banking services at the lowest possible time with ensuring affordability both for customers and service providers. Although this banking has huge potentials and benefits, the successful adoption of online banking remains a significant challenge in the context of an emerging economy like Bangladesh. The purpose of this empirical study is to investigate the factors influencing the online banking services adoption in Bangladesh by using the extended Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) with government support and risk factors. A questionnaire survey method was used to collect data from 380 banking customers.  To analyse the collected survey data and test the set of hypothesis, a structural equation modelling (SEM) method was used with the help of SmartPLS3 package. The results illustrate that perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, attitude towards use, government support positively influence the intention to use as well as the intention to use positively impact on intention to continue to the adoption of online banking services. However, the relationship between risk and intention to use was statistically insignificant. Finally, the findings may assist banking professionals and programmers to develop and design successful policies regarding online banking services to boost this service industry in the future.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v9i1.59121 Crossref citations28 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Analysis of Impacts of Operational Risk Management Practices on Banks’ Financial Performance: Study of Selected Commercial Banks in Nigeria

Diekolola Oye

International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies · 2020

Read abstract

Increase in losses borne by banks as a result of inadequate operational risk management practices and the adverse impact on banks’ financial performance has been a major concern to bank management and regulators. This study analysed the impact of operational risk management practices on the financial performance of commercial banks in Nigeria. 10-years (2008 - 2017) secondary data extracted from audited financial statements of selected commercial banks in Nigeria was used for the study. The data was analysed using the Linear Multiple Regression Model. The results showed that there is a positive relationship between operational risk management and the financial performance of banks. The findings revealed that sound operational risk management practices impact positively on the financial performance of banks. We, therefore, recommend that banks’ management should deploy adequate resources towards understanding operational risk to ensure sound operational risk management and improved financial performance of banks.

DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v9i1.63420 Crossref citations32 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Effect of tax penalties, tax audit, and taxpayers awareness on corporate taxpayers’ compliance moderated by compliance intentions

Nida Putri Rahmayanti · Sutrisno Sutrisno T. · Yeney Widya Prihatiningtias

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2020

Read abstract

This study aims to empirically examine the impact of tax penalties, tax audits, and taxpayers’ awareness of corporate taxpayer compliance and the role of compliant intentions as the moderating variable in its correlation. The analytical method used is the Multiple Linear Regression (Multiple Regression Analysis) and the Moderated Regression Analysis (MRA). The population of this study is the corporate taxpayers in North Banjarmasin Tax Office in 2019 with a sample of 142 corporate rate taxpayers. The sampling method used is convenience sampling. The results show that tax penalties, tax audits, and taxpayers’ awareness positively affect corporate taxpayer compliance. However, the compliant intention is unable to moderate the effect of fines, tax audits, and taxpayers’ awareness toward corporate taxpayer compliance. This is due to the applied penalties and tax audits following the taxation laws and the corporate taxpayer’s awareness of the importance of taxation as the source of state income. The purposes of this research are to provide inputs and references for the tax authorities and taxpayers, to examine further about tax penalties and tax audits that have been implemented, and to raise awareness among taxpayers for complying with taxes. Then, this research is influenced by external factors and internal factors, namely penalty sanctions, tax audits, and awareness of taxpayers who make taxpayers compliant with taxes, so that the presence or absence of intentions will continue to make taxpayers obedient to taxes.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v9i2.63318 Crossref citations41 OpenAlex citations

Selected results

JOURNAL ARTICLE

The Influence of Fraud Risk Management on Fraud Occurrence in Kenyan listed Companies

Severinah Wanjiru Mwangi · James Ndegwa

International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies · 2020

Read abstract

This study sought to establish the influence of fraud risk management practices in regard to preventive, detective and corrective controls on the level of fraud occurrence on listed firms in Kenya. This is because limited research had been conducted in the context of listed firms in Kenya and limited attention paid on how corrective controls influences fraud occurrence. A causal research design was applied. Data was obtained from a sample of 275 senior managers by using structured questionnaires. The findings revealed that only preventive and corrective controls had a profound negative effect on the degree of fraud occurrence on listed companies in Kenya. Conversely, detective controls did not considerably reduce fraud occurrence on listed companies in Kenya. The key implication of the findings noted by this study is that the proper implication of the most effectual anti-fraud measures can only be realized when the management are committed to do so. Additionally, corrective controls must be seriously looked into as an effective strategy of curbing fraud since they indeed are instrumental in curbing fraud. Future studies should be extended to the public sector in regard to the government ministries and the distinctive partitions of the private sector such as the insurance, real estate, manufacturing, automobile sectors among others respectively. Moreover, future studies can explore how firm size in terms of asset size or employee size moderates the relationship between fraud risk management practices and the level of fraud occurrence.

DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v9i4.9437 Crossref citations13 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Seasoned Equity Offerings and Stock Price Crash Risk

Rodney D. Boehme · Veljko Fotak · Anthony May

International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies · 2020

Read abstract

Using a large sample of U.S. firms during 1987–2011, we find robust evidence that the issuance of seasoned equity is associated with abnormally high future stock price crash risk. The association between seasoned equity offerings and crash risk is stronger among offerings that involve the sale of secondary shares (existing shares sold by insiders or large blockholders). We also find that recent seasoned equity issuers are far less likely to experience sudden positive price jumps relative to firms that have not recently issued equity. Our findings of elevated crash risk and diminished jump risk, when taken together, are consistent with a heightened propensity for firms to hoard bad news but not good news when issuing equity.

DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v9i4.9612 Crossref citations3 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

A Study on Financial Performance of the Jordanian Commercial Banks using the CAMEL Model and Panel Data Approach

Jamil Al Zaidanin

International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies · 2020

Read abstract

The purpose of this research paper is to extensively investigate and examine the effect of the CAMEL model variables on the profitability and financial soundness of the thirteen Jordanian commercial banks for the period of 2013 to 2019, the primary data were collected from the published audited financial reports of the Jordanian commercial banks. The study uses CAMEL model variables of Capital adequacy, Asset Quality, Management efficiency, Earnings ability, and Liquidity management to rank banks as per their overall performance and measuring their effect on banks’ profitability measures of Return on Assets and Return on Equity separately through applying the fixed effect regression model. It is concluded that the ranking approach shows that Bank of Jordan was in the top position followed by the Capital Bank of Jordan. Jordan Ahli Bank was in the lowest rank in most positions. Furthermore, the empirical results indicates that Non-Interest Income to Total Assets and Net Interest Income to Total Loans and Advances have significant positive relationships with both profitability measures whereas cost to Total Income and Non-Interest Income to Total Assets have strong negative relationships with the profitability measures. In addition, Equity to Total Assets has strong negative relationship with ROE. The study suggests that Jordanian commercial banks can improve their profitability through the concentration on main activities, efficiently managing their capital adequacy, maintaining high quality level of lending policy, and utilization of full assets. Additionally, the current study recommends conducting more studies on banks’ performance determinants with an expanded scope and using more financial models besides the CAMEL model.

DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v9i4.9788 Crossref citations23 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Influence of Board Characteristics on Financial Distress of Deposit Taking SACCOs in Nairobi County, Kenya

Halldess nguta Munene · James Ndegwa N. · Thomas Senaji A. · Kenneth Mugambi

International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies · 2020

Read abstract

The importance of Savings and Credit Cooperatives (SACCOs) cannot be underestimated. Despite their importance, they are faced with numerous challenges among them financial distress which threatens their very existence. The current research sought to establish the role of board characteristics in the financial distress suffered by Deposit Taking SACCOs in Nairobi County. The study is anchored inter alia on Agency Theory. Descriptive research design was adopted while Nairobi County was purposively chosen and a census was carried out on deposit taking SACCOs in the county. Secondary data was collected from SASRA using a data collection sheet and a panel data analysis performed using STATA software. The findings were presented using tables. The study concluded that there was a relationship between board characteristics and financial distress of Deposit Taking SACCOs where board composition, board education and board tenure have statistically significant and negative influence on financial distress. In conclusion SACCOs need to have lean boards, Board composition should also be improved by including more women on boards, there should be more inclusion of members with high and relevant education credentials, and SACCOs should have term limits for their members while an analysis too based on the Altman’s Z score models should be adopted for SACCOs. Another research may be carried out to establish other factors causing financial distress and how to turn around the SACCOs already in distress.

DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v9i4.9482 Crossref citations8 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Why do citizens use e-tax system?

Md Faridur Rahman · Md. Shamim Talukder · Yang Lanrong · Abul Khayer

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2020

Read abstract

Among the various online services provided by the government, e-tax system is one of the commonly used e-government platforms, which offers significant benefits to government and citizens by reducing costs, eliminate human errors, and reduce the turnaround time for processing income tax returns. Despite these plausible benefits, some reservations have been articulated regarding the continuance usage intention of e-tax system. Thus, we investigate the most critical factors of e-tax continuance usage in this paper. We developed an integrated theoretical model based on the technology continuance theory (TCT) extended with social influence and perceived risk. The proposed conceptual model was empirically validated with data collected from a sample of 345 e-tax service users in Bangladesh. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) was employed to analyze the collected data. The study findings suggest that user satisfaction, perceived usefulness, and attitude have a direct impact on continuance usage intention where confirmation, ease of use and social influence have indirect influence on continuance usage intention of e-tax system. This paper discusses some contributions to theory and practice based on our findings

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v9i7.9467 Crossref citations8 OpenAlex citations

Data coverage & freshness

Source coverage refers to this result set; a publication may occur in several sources. Sync times refer to contributing journals.

Missing abstracts: 0 · Missing authors: 0 · Missing publication dates: 0 · Dates without day precision: 0

SourceMost recent successful journal syncLatest attempt
crossref21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
ojs-rest21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 06:46 UTC
oai-pmh20 Oct 2026 19:56 UTC · ijfbscomplete · ijfbs · 20 Oct 2026 19:55 UTC
openalex-enrichment21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
Full import history & methodology →