Publication activity
Articles grouped by publication year
Publications
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.
CiteNScope / Analytics
Explore the evidence.
Understand the reach.
Research across participating journals · All insights follow your collection filters.
OpenAlex coverage 100.0% · 561/561 recordsLast OpenAlex observation 22 Oct 2026, 04:23 UTC
PUBLICATIONS561In the selected collection
CROSSREF CITATIONS1651561/561 with known counts
OPENALEX CITATIONS2664561/561 with known counts
OPENALEX MEAN4.75Per article with a known count
Filter collection Publication years, search & more
Your research collection
Output and reach
Publication activity alongside incoming citations.
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
OpenAlex
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
Research landscape
Leading affiliations and themes in this collection.
Full distributions & methodology ↓Institutions
University of Brawijaya51Islamic University of Indonesia34University of Johannesburg24533/561 records with dataPrimary topics
Employee Performance and Management25Customer Service Quality and Loyalty19Technology Adoption and User Behaviour17561/561 records with dataTwo perspectives on citations
Follow the research impact
Independent sources. Clear time scales.
Lifetime citations by publication year
Crossref and OpenAlex · separate totals for the same publication cohorts
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
Latest lifetime totals, grouped by the cited article’s year. These are not citations received in that year.
View data & coverage
Citations received each year
OpenAlex · incoming citation links grouped by citing-work year
OpenAlex
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
Annual history: 561/561 articles. Latest history observation: 2026-10-22T04:23:42.561386+00:00. Source totals are never added together.
Research side by side
Compare journals
Select journals to compare the same collection filters. Source totals stay separate. These measures describe research activity, not journal quality.
Display range
Bussecon Review of Social SciencesInternational Journal of Business Ecosystem & StrategyInternational Journal of Finance & Banking StudiesInternational Journal of Research in Business and Social Science
Publications
Articles by publication year
View data & coverage
Crossref citations
Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year
View data & coverage
OpenAlex citations
Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year
View data & coverage
OpenAlex · Citations received
By year of the citing work · 2017–2026
View data & coverage
2026 is year to date. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime charts share a citation scale. Unknown observations appear as gaps; known zero stays zero. Annual receipts use available OpenAlex histories and may not sum to lifetime totals. 0 undated publications excluded from publication-year charts.
Full analytics report All distributions, publications, comparisons & data provenance
INDEXED PUBLICATIONS561
CROSSREF CITATIONS1651
CROSSREF · CITED PUBLICATIONS69.0%
CROSSREF · MEAN CITATIONS2.94
Crossref citation coverage: 561 / 561 publications (100.0%). Latest observation: 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC. Means and percentages use records with known counts.
OpenAlex / Separate citation source
A broader view of this research
DOI-matched OpenAlex observations for the same selected publications. These counts are separate from Crossref and are never added together.
OPENALEX CITATIONS2664
DOI MATCH COVERAGE100.0%561 / 561 publications
MEAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY4.75561 known · 0 unknown
MEDIAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY3
Observation range: 21 Oct 2026 00:01 UTC — 22 Oct 2026 04:23 UTC. Missing matches are not zero citations. Previous observations may remain if a refresh fails or a DOI no longer matches.
Institutions, countries & topics
OpenAlex affiliations and primary-topic classification. Each publication counts once per institution or country; multi-affiliated publications appear in multiple groups, so percentages can sum above 100%. Countries describe author affiliations, not nationality. Topics use one primary topic per publication.
Institutions
533 / 561 with data · 28 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 561 selected publications.
University of Brawijaya51 9.1%Islamic University of Indonesia34 6.1%University of Johannesburg24 4.3%Walter Sisulu University24 4.3%University of South Africa19 3.4%Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia16 2.9%University of KwaZulu-Natal16 2.9%Durban University of Technology15 2.7%College of Business Education15 2.7%Tshwane University of Technology14 2.5%University of Limpopo14 2.5%Kenyatta University13 2.3%Mangosuthu University of Technology11 2.0%Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta11 2.0%Universitas Jambi9 1.6%North-West University9 1.6%Universitas Widyatama9 1.6%State University of Malang7 1.2%Karatina University7 1.2%University of the Free State7 1.2%Muhammadiyah University Purwokerto7 1.2%Divine Word College of Laoag7 1.2%Huazhong University of Science and Technology7 1.2%St. Paul's University6 1.1%Cape Peninsula University of Technology5 0.9%Khairun University5 0.9%Politeknik Negeri Malang5 0.9%University of Port Harcourt4 0.7%Universitas Trisakti4 0.7%Pan Africa Christian University4 0.7%Ibn Haldun University4 0.7%Trilogi University4 0.7%Ba Isago University4 0.7%University of Santo Tomas4 0.7%Padjadjaran University4 0.7%Mzumbe University3 0.5%China University of Political Science and Law3 0.5%University of Dhaka3 0.5%Nnamdi Azikiwe University3 0.5%Abdelmalek Essaâdi University3 0.5%Komar University of Science and Technology3 0.5%Pancasila University3 0.5%Laikipia University3 0.5%Warmadewa University3 0.5%Dedan Kimathi University of Technology3 0.5%Universitas Teknologi Yogyakarta3 0.5%Koforidua Technical University3 0.5%LSPR Institute of Communication and Business3 0.5%International Burch University3 0.5%University of Pretoria3 0.5%Masinde Muliro University of Science and Technology3 0.5%Tishk International University3 0.5%Open University of Tanzania3 0.5%I-Shou University3 0.5%University of Fort Hare2 0.4%University of Nigeria2 0.4%University of Zululand2 0.4%University of Nairobi2 0.4%Vaal University of Technology2 0.4%Duta Wacana Christian University2 0.4%Indonesia Open University2 0.4%State University of Medan2 0.4%IPB University2 0.4%Muhammadiyah University of Yogyakarta2 0.4%Government of South Africa2 0.4%Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology2 0.4%University of Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jawa Timur2 0.4%Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta2 0.4%International Islamic University Malaysia2 0.4%GNA University2 0.4%Arab Open University2 0.4%Universitas Mahasaraswati Denpasar2 0.4%Al-Zahra College for Women2 0.4%Universitas Prof Dr Moestopo2 0.4%Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Yogyakarta2 0.4%United States International University Africa2 0.4%Universitas Pertamina2 0.4%Koya University2 0.4%Lead City University2 0.4%Telkom University2 0.4%University of the Western Cape2 0.4%Ghana Communication Technology University2 0.4%University of Stavanger2 0.4%Jashore University of Science and Technology2 0.4%Namibia University of Science and Technology1 0.2%University of Palangka Raya1 0.2%University of Central Florida1 0.2%Baden-Wuerttemberg Cooperative State University1 0.2%Lovely Professional University1 0.2%Budapest University of Economics and Business1 0.2%Menlo College1 0.2%University of Jordan1 0.2%Western Illinois University1 0.2%Northern Border University1 0.2%Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul1 0.2%Udayana University1 0.2%Yogyakarta State University1 0.2%Southwest University of Political Science & Law1 0.2%Zhejiang Sci-Tech University1 0.2%National Bureau of Statistics of China1 0.2%Central Bank of Brazil1 0.2%Bandung Institute of Technology1 0.2%Universidade de Brasília1 0.2%Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad1 0.2%Army Medical University1 0.2%St. Augustine University of Tanzania1 0.2%National University of Lesotho1 0.2%Universitas Gadjah Mada1 0.2%Binus University1 0.2%Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember1 0.2%University of Sri Jayewardenepura1 0.2%Universidade de São Paulo1 0.2%Zhaoqing University1 0.2%Universitas Syiah Kuala1 0.2%President University1 0.2%Inha University1 0.2%York University1 0.2%University of the Witwatersrand1 0.2%University of Lagos1 0.2%Universitas Airlangga1 0.2%Bakrie University1 0.2%Universiti Malaysia Kelantan1 0.2%Universitas Negeri Surabaya1 0.2%Pentecost University College1 0.2%Kansas City Kansas Community College1 0.2%University of Indonesia1 0.2%Omar Al-Mukhtar University1 0.2%Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim1 0.2%Botho University1 0.2%Perbanas Institute1 0.2%Kiriri Women's University of Science and Technology1 0.2%Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa University1 0.2%Zetech University1 0.2%Shaoguan University1 0.2%Sol Plaatje University1 0.2%University of Barishal1 0.2%Universitas Borneo Tarakan1 0.2%Muhammadiyah University of Makassar1 0.2%École Nationale d'Administration Publique1 0.2%Nasarawa State University1 0.2%Université du Québec en Outaouais1 0.2%University of Malaya1 0.2%Universitas Halu Oleo1 0.2%University of Uyo1 0.2%Yıldız Technical University1 0.2%Mawlana Bhashani Science and Technology University1 0.2%UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya1 0.2%Zhejiang Financial College1 0.2%Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya1 0.2%Universitas Ma Chung1 0.2%Universitas Esa Unggul1 0.2%Ravensburg University of Cooperative Education1 0.2%CMR University1 0.2%Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang1 0.2%Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji1 0.2%Universitas Merdeka Malang1 0.2%Indonesia Defense University1 0.2%Banco Central del Uruguay1 0.2%Xinqiao Hospital1 0.2%Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya1 0.2%Universitas Batanghari1 0.2%Jagannath University1 0.2%Takoradi Technical University1 0.2%Universitas Muhammadiyah Cirebon1 0.2%Institute of Rural Development Planning1 0.2%Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara1 0.2%Universitas Sangga Buana YPKP1 0.2%Universitas Langlangbuana1 0.2%Universitas Sahid Jakarta1 0.2%Universitas Tunas Pembangunan1 0.2%Universitas Islam Malang1 0.2%State University of New York at Oswego1 0.2%Kurdistan Technical Institute1 0.2%Bomet University1 0.2%İstanbul Esenyurt Üniversitesi1 0.2%Institut Bisnis dan Informatika Kesatuan1 0.2%Federal University Dutse1 0.2%Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang1 0.2%Universitas Pelita Bangsa1 0.2%Politeknik Negeri Jember1 0.2%Waziri Umaru Federal Polytechnic, Birnin Kebbi1 0.2%Marondera University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology1 0.2%University of Derna1 0.2%Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan Yayasan Pendidikan Ujung Pandang1 0.2%PPM School of Management1 0.2%Universitas Dinamika Bangsa1 0.2%Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Pancasetia1 0.2%Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Adhyaksa1 0.2%Politeknik Negeri Bali1 0.2%Tangaza University1 0.2%Unicaf University Zambia1 0.2%Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kesehatan Pertamedika1 0.2%Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Y.A.I1 0.2%Institut Bisnis dan Informatika Kosgoro 19571 0.2%Universitas Islam Raden Rahmat Malang1 0.2%Universitas Ekuitas Indonesia1 0.2%FEU Diliman1 0.2%Ladoke Akintola University of Technology1 0.2%Saint Louis University1 0.2%Université Félix Houphouët-Boigny1 0.2%Feng Chia University1 0.2%Kocaeli Üniversitesi1 0.2%Universidade Federal do Paraná1 0.2%BRAC University1 0.2%Winona State University1 0.2%University of Ngaoundéré1 0.2%De Montfort University1 0.2%Pakuan University1 0.2%University of Aden1 0.2%Marmara University1 0.2%Zhejiang Gongshang University1 0.2%Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University1 0.2%Catholic University of Eastern Africa1 0.2%Sokoine University of Agriculture1 0.2%Bangladesh University of Textiles1 0.2%University of New England1 0.2%Citadel1 0.2%Galatasaray University1 0.2%Lindenwood University1 0.2%
Countries
533 / 561 with data · 28 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 561 selected publications.
Indonesia228 40.6%South Africa145 25.8%Kenya35 6.2%Tanzania23 4.1%China14 2.5%Nigeria13 2.3%Philippines11 2.0%Ghana9 1.6%Bangladesh8 1.4%Turkey7 1.2%United States7 1.2%Iraq6 1.1%Botswana5 0.9%India4 0.7%Malaysia4 0.7%Taiwan4 0.7%Bosnia & Herzegovina3 0.5%Canada3 0.5%Jordan3 0.5%Morocco3 0.5%Brazil2 0.4%Norway2 0.4%Oman2 0.4%Australia1 0.2%Côte d’Ivoire1 0.2%Cameroon1 0.2%Germany1 0.2%Britain (UK)1 0.2%Hungary1 0.2%Korea (South)1 0.2%Sri Lanka1 0.2%Lesotho1 0.2%Libya1 0.2%Namibia1 0.2%Saudi Arabia1 0.2%Uruguay1 0.2%Yemen1 0.2%Zambia1 0.2%Zimbabwe1 0.2%
Primary topics
561 / 561 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 561 selected publications.
Employee Performance and Management25 4.5%Customer Service Quality and Loyalty19 3.4%Technology Adoption and User Behaviour17 3.0%Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences12 2.1%Islamic Finance and Banking Studies12 2.1%Financial Literacy and Behavior12 2.1%Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies12 2.1%Employee Performance and Leadership12 2.1%Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior11 2.0%Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance11 2.0%Banking stability, regulation, efficiency10 1.8%Environmental Sustainability in Business10 1.8%Corporate Governance and Financial Management10 1.8%Consumer Behavior and Marketing Influence10 1.8%COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts8 1.4%Public Administration in Developing Nations8 1.4%Innovation and Knowledge Management7 1.2%Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification7 1.2%Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation7 1.2%Organizational Change and Leadership7 1.2%Monetary Policy and Economic Impact6 1.1%Corporate Finance and Governance6 1.1%Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting6 1.1%Microfinance and Financial Inclusion6 1.1%Leadership and Management in Organizations6 1.1%Financial Markets and Investment Strategies5 0.9%Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research5 0.9%Digital Marketing and Social Media5 0.9%Legal Studies and Policies5 0.9%Financial Analysis and Corporate Governance5 0.9%Education during COVID-19 pandemic5 0.9%Construction Project Management and Performance4 0.7%Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis4 0.7%Corruption and Economic Development4 0.7%Corporate Taxation and Avoidance4 0.7%Healthcare Systems and Reforms4 0.7%Economic Growth and Fiscal Policies4 0.7%Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies4 0.7%Banking Sector Performance and Management4 0.7%Science Education and Pedagogy3 0.5%Quality and Supply Management3 0.5%Sustainable Supply Chain Management3 0.5%Crime Patterns and Interventions3 0.5%E-Government and Public Services3 0.5%Ethics in Business and Education3 0.5%Market Dynamics and Volatility3 0.5%Policing Practices and Perceptions3 0.5%Taxation and Compliance Studies3 0.5%Sex work and related issues3 0.5%Financial Distress and Bankruptcy Prediction3 0.5%Family Business Performance and Succession3 0.5%Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy3 0.5%Criminal Justice and Penology3 0.5%Management and Organizational Practices3 0.5%Agriculture and Agroindustry Studies3 0.5%Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes2 0.4%Online and Blended Learning2 0.4%Traffic and Road Safety2 0.4%Economic Growth and Productivity2 0.4%International Business and FDI2 0.4%Family Dynamics and Relationships2 0.4%Work-Family Balance Challenges2 0.4%International Law and Human Rights2 0.4%Accounting and Organizational Management2 0.4%Occupational Health and Safety Research2 0.4%Environmental Education and Sustainability2 0.4%Gender Diversity and Inequality2 0.4%Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering2 0.4%Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing2 0.4%Academic integrity and plagiarism2 0.4%Education and Critical Thinking Development2 0.4%Higher Education and Employability2 0.4%Knowledge Management and Sharing2 0.4%Urban and Rural Development Challenges2 0.4%Risk Management in Financial Firms2 0.4%Stress and Burnout Research2 0.4%Space exploration and regulation2 0.4%Public Procurement and Policy2 0.4%Healthcare Quality and Management2 0.4%Qualitative Research Methods and Applications2 0.4%COVID-19 Prevention and Impact2 0.4%Community-based Tourism Development and Sustainability2 0.4%Local Governance and Development2 0.4%Marketing and Advertising Strategies2 0.4%Criminal Law and Policy2 0.4%Management and Optimization Techniques2 0.4%Benford’s Law and Fraud Detection2 0.4%Vocational and Entrepreneurial Education2 0.4%Communication and COVID-19 Impact2 0.4%Environmental Science and Water Management2 0.4%Legal and Policy Analysis in Indonesia2 0.4%Educational Technology and E-Learning2 0.4%Teacher Education and Leadership Studies1 0.2%EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning1 0.2%Reading and Literacy Development1 0.2%Global trade and economics1 0.2%Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques1 0.2%Labor market dynamics and wage inequality1 0.2%Global Maternal and Child Health1 0.2%Public Policy and Administration Research1 0.2%Higher Education Research Studies1 0.2%Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling1 0.2%Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis1 0.2%Migration and Labor Dynamics1 0.2%Efficiency Analysis Using DEA1 0.2%Intimate Partner and Family Violence1 0.2%Reproductive tract infections research1 0.2%Usability and User Interface Design1 0.2%Global Financial Crisis and Policies1 0.2%Social Media and Politics1 0.2%Design Education and Practice1 0.2%Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions1 0.2%Career Development and Diversity1 0.2%Information and Cyber Security1 0.2%Reliability and Maintenance Optimization1 0.2%Team Dynamics and Performance1 0.2%Disability Rights and Representation1 0.2%Evaluation of Teaching Practices1 0.2%Organic Food and Agriculture1 0.2%International Development and Aid1 0.2%Maritime Ports and Logistics1 0.2%Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue1 0.2%Smart Cities and Technologies1 0.2%Climate Change Communication and Perception1 0.2%Behavioral Health and Interventions1 0.2%Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics1 0.2%Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies1 0.2%Global trade, sustainability, and social impact1 0.2%Aviation Industry Analysis and Trends1 0.2%Workplace Violence and Bullying1 0.2%Organizational Management and Innovation1 0.2%Product Development and Customization1 0.2%Land Rights and Reforms1 0.2%Natural Resources and Economic Development1 0.2%Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions1 0.2%Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance1 0.2%Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis1 0.2%Private Equity and Venture Capital1 0.2%Employment and Welfare Studies1 0.2%FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance1 0.2%Cooperative Studies and Economics1 0.2%African cultural and philosophical studies1 0.2%African Education and Politics1 0.2%Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues1 0.2%Facilities and Workplace Management1 0.2%Renewable energy and sustainable power systems1 0.2%Emotional Labor in Professions1 0.2%Corporate Management and Leadership1 0.2%Workplace Spirituality and Leadership1 0.2%Insurance and Financial Risk Management1 0.2%Employer Branding and e-HRM1 0.2%Software Engineering and Design Patterns1 0.2%Corporate Insolvency and Governance1 0.2%Second Language Learning and Teaching1 0.2%Working Capital and Financial Performance1 0.2%Global Education and Multiculturalism1 0.2%Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies1 0.2%Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies1 0.2%Halal products and consumer behavior1 0.2%Themes in Literature Analysis1 0.2%Global Health Care Issues1 0.2%Human Resource and Talent Management1 0.2%Digital Innovation in Industries1 0.2%Business Strategies and Management Research1 0.2%School Leadership and Teacher Performance1 0.2%Maritime Security and History1 0.2%Education and Islamic Studies1 0.2%Human Rights and Development1 0.2%SMEs Development and Digital Marketing1 0.2%Asian Industrial and Economic Development1 0.2%Family and Matrimonial Law1 0.2%Health, Medicine and Society1 0.2%Legal and Social Justice Studies1 0.2%Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion1 0.2%Strategic Planning and Analysis1 0.2%Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds1 0.2%Business Strategies and Innovation1 0.2%African Studies and Ethnography1 0.2%Discrimination and Equality Law1 0.2%Competitive and Knowledge Intelligence1 0.2%Appreciative Inquiry and Organizational Change1 0.2%Teacher Professional Development and Motivation1 0.2%Accounting Theory and Financial Reporting1 0.2%Data Mining and Machine Learning Applications1 0.2%Education, Leadership, and Health Research1 0.2%Agricultural Development and Management1 0.2%Economic Development and Digital Transformation1 0.2%Community and Sustainable Development1 0.2%Accounting and Financial Management1 0.2%Publishing and Scholarly Communication1 0.2%Water Resources and Governance1 0.2%Environmental and sustainability education1 0.2%Journalism and Media Studies1 0.2%Critical and Liberation Pedagogy1 0.2%International Environmental Law and Policies1 0.2%Education and Labor Relations1 0.2%International Labor and Employment Law1 0.2%Organizational Strategy and Culture1 0.2%Educational Curriculum and Learning Methods1 0.2%Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law1 0.2%Educational Outcomes and Influences1 0.2%Indigenous and Place-Based Education1 0.2%Education in Rural Contexts1 0.2%Student Stress and Coping1 0.2%Economic and Technological Innovation1 0.2%Historical and Linguistic Studies1 0.2%Marriage and Family Dynamics1 0.2%Freedom of Expression and Defamation1 0.2%Quality of Life Measurement1 0.2%Education and Character Development1 0.2%Educational Technology in Learning1 0.2%Livestock Farming and Management1 0.2%
Yearly trendsCitations receivedCompare by yearPublication detailCitationsComparisonPublicationsOpenAlexInstitutions & topicsData coverage
Publication-year cohorts
Publications & citation trends
Citations are the latest recorded totals for articles published in each year, not citations received during that year. Crossref and OpenAlex remain separate and share the same citation scale. 2026 is incomplete; newer articles have had less time to receive citations.
0 undated publications excluded. Unknown citation counts are shown as —, never as zero. Partial coverage can understate totals; expand each table for known / total records.
Publications
View publications data & coverage
| Publication year | Journal / scope | Publications | Publications | Crossref known | OpenAlex known |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | All selected publications | 561 | 561 | 561/561 | 561/561 |
Crossref citations
View crossref citations data & coverage
| Publication year | Journal / scope | Crossref citations | Publications | Crossref known | OpenAlex known |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | All selected publications | 1651 | 561 | 561/561 | 561/561 |
OpenAlex citations
View openalex citations data & coverage
| Publication year | Journal / scope | OpenAlex citations | Publications | Crossref known | OpenAlex known |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | All selected publications | 2664 | 561 | 561/561 | 561/561 |
Citation year / OpenAlex
Citations received over time
Incoming citations to the selected publications, grouped by the year of the citing work. This is separate from lifetime citation totals grouped by the cited article’s publication year.
The publication filters above define which articles receive the citations. The citation-year range below only controls this chart and the incoming-citation comparison. Removing publication-year filters includes older articles’ incoming citations too.
Annual history available for 561 / 561 selected publications. Supported display window: 2017–2026; 2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Missing histories and years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—); partial coverage can understate totals.
Annual-history observations (UTC): 2026-10-21T00:01:59.961928+00:00 — 2026-10-22T04:23:42.561386+00:00. Older observations may be retained after failed or incomplete refreshes.
OpenAlex · Citations received by year
View openalex · citations received by year data & coverage
| Citation year | Journal / scope | OpenAlex · Citations received by year | Publications | Annual history known |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | All selected publications | 2 | 561 | 561/561 |
| 2018 | All selected publications | 2 | 561 | 561/561 |
| 2019 | All selected publications | 2 | 561 | 561/561 |
| 2020 | All selected publications | 1 | 561 | 561/561 |
| 2021 | All selected publications | 3 | 561 | 561/561 |
| 2022 | All selected publications | 157 | 561 | 561/561 |
| 2023 | All selected publications | 607 | 561 | 561/561 |
| 2024 | All selected publications | 855 | 561 | 561/561 |
| 2025 | All selected publications | 674 | 561 | 561/561 |
| 2026 | All selected publications | 351 | 561 | 561/561 |
Counts represent citation links, not unique citing papers across a journal: one paper citing two selected articles contributes two links. Older citations outside this window are excluded, so annual sums need not equal lifetime totals. OpenAlex methodology ↗
Publications by publication year. 2026 is an incomplete year.
View data table
| Period | Publications |
|---|---|
| 2022 | 561 |
Crossref citation distribution
Latest Crossref totals for the selected publications; not citations received in the selected years.
Mean2.94
Median1
Unknown counts are excluded from the mean, median and cited-publication rate.
Journal comparison
Same filters, source and counting rules across journals. Descriptive statistics, not a quality ranking.
| Journal / publisher | Publications | Crossref citations | OpenAlex citations | OpenAlex coverage | Crossref mean | Crossref median | Crossref cited %* | Crossref coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bussecon Review of Social Sciences Bussecon International Academy | 8 | 14 | 16 | 8/8 | 1.75 | 1.0 | 62.5 | 8/8 · 100.0% |
| International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy Bussecon International Academy | 35 | 109 | 185 | 35/35 | 3.11 | 2 | 62.9 | 35/35 · 100.0% |
| International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies SSBFNET | 41 | 52 | 111 | 41/41 | 1.27 | 0 | 46.3 | 41/41 · 100.0% |
| International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science SSBFNET | 477 | 1476 | 2352 | 477/477 | 3.09 | 2 | 71.5 | 477/477 · 100.0% |
* Percentage among publications with a known citation count.
Most cited · Crossref
Factors influencing data saturation in qualitative studies
Read abstract
This study aims to evaluate the factors that influence data saturation in qualitative studies. The study adopted a systematic literature review of 24 journal articles published between 2018 and 2022. The articles were obtained from a Google scholar database. The findings point to five factors that affect data saturation namely, pre-determined codes and themes, sample size, relevancy of research subjects (respondents), number of research methods, and length of data collection sessions. It is argued in this paper, therefore, that in order to attain data saturation, researchers should consider multiple factors that may affect data saturation in order to increase the validity of qualitative studies.
DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v11i4.1776120 Crossref citations166 OpenAlex citations
Strengths and weaknesses of qualitative research in social science studies
Read abstract
This study examines the strengths and limitations of 22 published journal articles by conducting a systematic literature review. The review revealed that the qualitative approach was flexible, offered in-depth and detailed information, allowed the use of multiple data collection methods and minimised the chance of having missing data. The approach was found (i) to integrate human touch, was cost-effective and was indeed the only option in some cases of research problems; (ii) to be prone to researchers’ subjectivity, involves complex data analysis, makes anonymity difficult and has limited scope in its generalizability, and (iii) to make replication of findings challenging, and the findings may be influenced by the researcher’s bias. It is concluded, therefore, that researchers should take necessary precautions when using the approach to ensure that the weaknesses of qualitative research do not bar them from achieving research objectives.
DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v11i6.192096 Crossref citations132 OpenAlex citations
UX/UI design of online learning platforms and their impact on learning: A review
Read abstract
The Covid-19 pandemic, a catalyst in embracing the online mode of learning, is one of the key motivating factors for a paradigm shift in curriculum development due to the increased focus and reliance on technology. For the effective education of tertiary students globally, a revised curriculum development integrated with the Learning Management Systems and other eLearning platforms or tools that support asynchronous learning play a key role. This study seeks to determine the influence of user experience and user interface design of e-learning platforms on learning experience in higher education. A systematic review of studies regarding usability of e-learning platforms at tertiary institutions was conducted to determine the common issues and successes. A snapshot of research over the last five years was used in a systematic review to determine the influence of UX/UI on eLearning concerning higher education. Using the ERIC and Google scholar databases of journals, and specific criteria for selection of publications, 25 articles were examined in this study. Findings indicate that focused attention on interface design and user experience of eLearning systems for effective learning is crucial.
DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v11i10.223639 Crossref citations45 OpenAlex citations
The impacts of social media influencer’s credibility attributes on gen Z purchase intention with brand image as mediation
Read abstract
Gen Z controls almost the entire population in the world with a total number of almost two billion people worldwide. This generation will be the largest consumer group in the world. In Indonesia itself, In 2020, Gen Z occupied the highest percentage of the population. Therefore, Gen Z is a potential target market that has a considerable influence on purchasing decisions. Based on the characteristics of Gen Z, who are digital natives, the use of social media is the right marketing strategy for consumers who are counted into Gen Z category. Promotional activities, as part of a marketing strategy, especially through social media require influencers as endorsers. This study aims to investigate the factors that influence the credibility attributes of social media influencers on the purchase intentions of Gen Z consumers. This study uses influencer credibility attributes (attractiveness, expertise, and trustworthiness) as independent variables that influence the purchase intention of Gen Z consumers with brand image as a mediation. This research is categorized as explanatory research. The respondents in this study were Gen Z who used Korean cosmetic products throughout Indonesia, the determination of the number of samples in this study used a purposive sampling technique with a sample of 210 respondents. The method of collecting data is using a questionnaire, the data is analyzed using PLS-SEM. The results showed that the three attributes of influencer credibility had a significant effect on the purchase intention of Gen Z. The three attributes of credibility had a significant effect on brand image, brand image had a significant effect on purchase intention. Brand image can provide a full mediating role in the relationship of influencer credibility to the purchase intention of Gen Z consumers. Local cosmetic industry players are expected to improve marketing strategies through online channels, especially social media by utilizing the right influencers as their endorsers, because it is proven in this study, credibility of social media influencers have a significant effect on the brand image of a product and the purchase intention of Gen Z consumers, so that the local cosmetic industry in Indonesia can compete with foreign cosmetic industries.
DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v11i5.189334 Crossref citations48 OpenAlex citations
Factors to consider when choosing data collection methods
Read abstract
Novice and experienced researchers may encounter numerous methodological challenges when it comes to data collection. Data have to be collected from the right sources using appropriate data collection tools to make research studies impactful. There are numerous data collection methods that researchers may use but not all methods are appropriate for all research studies. Choosing inappropriate research methods may result in invalid research findings and lead to erroneous conclusions. This means researchers have to carefully choose data collection methods to make their studies achieve their respective goals. This study intended to identify factors that researchers have to consider in choosing data collection methods. A systematic literature review was used to analyze 28 journal articles published between 2018 and 2022. From the analysis the study identified ten (10) factors that researchers have to consider in choosing data collection methods. These factors are; the research goal, the scope of the study, sample size, type of data, time and user-friendliness to the subjects. Other factors are research approach, safety and security of a researcher, the need for triangulation and theoretical framework. Before choosing methods for data collection, it is important to put into consideration these factors to increase the chances of achieving research objectives and answering research questions of research projects.
DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v11i5.184223 Crossref citations52 OpenAlex citations
Selected results
The impact of urbanization on housing shortages in Gaborone, Botswana
Read abstract
The unprecedented rate of urbanization across the world has led to increased demand for good, affordable housing. This research was conducted to ascertain the reasons and challenges of urbanization on housing shortages in Gaborone, Botswana. The focal point of this study was to assess the impact of urbanization on the demand of housing in Gaborone, Botswana. Thereafter the study recommended astute strategies desirable to curb the problem of urbanization and scarcity of accommodation in Gaborone. This research used a descriptive research design and distributed questionnaires to Gaborone residents during data collection. The researchers used stratified and clustered sampling methods. The study results indicated the need for better educational facilities and employment opportunities as the major causes of urbanization in Gaborone. Shortage of housing, high rentals and escalating land prices were also identified as some of the major challenges of urbanization in Gaborone. The study recommended that the government to introduce rent control measures to restrict rising prices, the private sector should be encouraged to further participate in the provision of accommodation for different income groups to be sold or leased at subsidized rates. The study also recommended the government to buy plenty of land and real estate, to reduce speculative behaviour of land barons.
DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v11i10.21154 Crossref citations4 OpenAlex citations
Interrogating the association between current account and economic complexity
Read abstract
The study was meant to provide a comparative analysis of the association between economic complexity and the current account performance for selected Sub-Saharan Africa and the BRICS group. Economic complexity measures the sophistication of a country’s productive structure by combining information on the diversity of a country (the number of products it exports), and the ubiquity of its products (the number of countries that export that product). The objective was to investigate whether a short- and long-term relationship exists through a Panel Autoregressive Distributed Lag (PARDL) for 1994 – 2018. Additionally, agricultural exports were also incorporated to measure against the economic complexity Index (ECI). On the current account-ECI relationship, the PARDL estimates exposed a positive and significant impact from ECI on the current account performance in both groups in the long run, while short-run results were insignificant. On the other hand, agricultural exports were an insignificant predictor of the current account in both groups in the long run. However, only the BRICS realised a significant negative contribution in the short-run. Hence, it is essential, especially the still developing selected SSA, to improve upon its ECI to facilitate a current account improvement better. There is a need to modernise the agricultural and agro-industries in the selected SSA. The region should harness the full potential of its agricultural sector and also the overall, abundance of raw resources to advance process-led products for the export market.
DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v11i10.20810 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
The interoperability of mobile phone technology as a way to improve immigrant entrepreneurship in South Africa
Read abstract
The paper seeks to illustrate the propinquity between mobile phone technology and the profitability of immigrant entrepreneurs’ businesses and whether there is a positive effect. The outcome should ascertain if mobile technology could be propounded as a credible source of competitive advantage. The paper uses a qualitative approach, using content analysis as the research design tool. Data analysis was done through the conceptual content analysis approach. Various online databases such as EBSCOhost, Google scholar, JSTOR, and Science Direct were accessed for literature. Different terms (keywords) such as; “Mobile phone technology”, “mobile marketing”, and “mobile payment” were searched. The data collected through a systematic literature review were compiled, analysed, and generated conclusions. This paper deduces that immigrant entrepreneurs stand to gain a competitive edge by using mobile phone technology, thereby improving business performance. Future researchers need to expand the scope of their study to other sectors and industries globally. The paper exhibits the significance of apps and websites as mobile technology tools that can positively impact business performance. This paper outlines how mobile technology is now an essential catalyst in the performance of various business sectors. Results are essential to app and website developers, entrepreneurs and the business society.
DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v11i10.20867 Crossref citations7 OpenAlex citations
Effect of accounting information and communication control on financial performance of Sacco’s in Kenya
Read abstract
The study sought to examine the effect of Accounting Information and Communication control on the financial performance of Sacco’s in Kenya. The study employed a mixed research design targeting 175 Sacco’s with 875 respondents. A purposive sampling technique was used to select the CEOs, Finance Managers, Risk Managers, ICT Managers and Internal auditors. Data were collected by the use of both primary and secondary techniques. Primary data collection was using questionnaires, while secondary data detailed document analysis of audited accounts to capture information on financial performance. A pilot study was conducted in Nairobi County. Content and construct validity were tested at a KMO value of 0.870, which signified that factor analysis was appropriate. Cronbach Alpha was applied to establish reliability, ranging from 0.859 for accounting information and communication control to 0.916 for financial performance. Data were analyzed by use of descriptive and inferential statistics. Descriptive analysis included; frequencies, Mean, Standard deviation and percentage, while inferential analysis involved regression analysis. The results showed a significant positive relationship between Accounting Information and Communication control and financial performance (r=0.661, P=0.000). Accounting Information and Communication control explained 43.7% (R2 =0.437) of variance in financial performance; the beta value for Accounting Information and Communication control from the regression model was 0.551 at p< 0.05. The study concluded that Accounting Information and Communication control has a significant positive effect on financial performance. The study recommended that SACCOs conduct periodic reviews of the effectiveness of its accounting information and communication system to ensure management receives timely, relevant, and reliable reports for decision-making.
DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v11i10.20890 Crossref citations1 OpenAlex citations
Differentiation strategies and tourism performance interplay
Read abstract
Tour operators have ensured the success of the Kenyan tourism sector, poised to contribute to achieving key government economic policies like the Tourism Agenda 2018-2022, the National Tourism Blueprint 2030, and the Big-Four Agenda. However, due to the volatility of the tourism industry, stiff competition, rigid tourism policies, and pandemics, tour operators’ performance has recorded a 2% steady decline since 2011. Therefore, this paper explores the upscaling of performance using a differentiation strategy among tour operator companies in Nairobi City County. The study followed a descriptive design approach, with the balanced scorecard and Porter’s generic strategies forming the theoretical basis. Fifteen (15) company owners and 210 managers participated in the study. Data were collected using structured questionnaires and interviews. Stratified simple random sampling was used to sample respondents from the companies while purposive sampling was used to select company owners. Data collected were analyzed in SPSS (Ver.26) using descriptive statistics to infer variable characteristics. Inferential statistics; Pearson correlation, ANOVA, and simple linear regression were used to detect the strength of the relationship and test the hypothesis. Correlation analysis revealed a strong positive relationship between differentiation strategy and organizational performance (r=0.77, P=0.000), leading to the rejection of the null hypothesis. Regression analysis revealed an adjusted R2(0.602) indicating that differentiation strategy explains 60.2% of organizational performance’s variation (b=0.594, P=.000). The study recommends that tour operator companies should develop innovative packages based on place and price and significantly invest in R&D to enhance a strong brand for optimal performance. This study provides policymakers with an avenue to scrutinize levels of organizational performance using a strategic management approach.
DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v11i10.21000 Crossref citations2 OpenAlex citations
Data coverage & freshness
Source coverage refers to this result set; a publication may occur in several sources. Sync times refer to contributing journals.
Crossref561of 561 selected recordsOJS API535of 561 selected recordsOAI-PMH561of 561 selected recordsXML0of 561 selected recordsOpenAlex561of 561 selected records
Missing abstracts: 0 · Missing authors: 0 · Missing publication dates: 0 · Dates without day precision: 0
| Source | Most recent successful journal sync | Latest attempt |
|---|---|---|
| crossref | 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbs | complete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC |
| ojs-rest | 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbs | complete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 06:46 UTC |
| oai-pmh | 20 Oct 2026 19:56 UTC · ijfbs | complete · ijfbs · 20 Oct 2026 19:55 UTC |
| openalex-enrichment | 21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC · ijrbs | complete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC |