CiteNScope — Scholarly Index & Analytics
Discover / Analytics RESEARCH INTELLIGENCE
CiteNScope / Analytics

Explore the evidence.
Understand the reach.

Research across participating journals · All insights follow your collection filters.

Compare journals ↗
OpenAlex coverage 100.0% · 3/3 recordsLast OpenAlex observation 22 Oct 2026, 01:10 UTC
PUBLICATIONS3In the selected collection
CROSSREF CITATIONS33/3 with known counts
OPENALEX CITATIONS33/3 with known counts
OPENALEX MEAN1.0Per article with a known count
Explore articles 3 →
Filter collection Publication years, search & more
Reset
topic: ICT in Developing Communities Remove ×
Your research collection

Output and reach

Publication activity alongside incoming citations.

Publication activity

Articles grouped by publication year

Publications

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.

View data & coverage

Citations received

OpenAlex · year of the citing work

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage

Research landscape

Leading affiliations and themes in this collection.

Full distributions & methodology ↓

Institutions

University of Venda33/3 records with data

Countries

South Africa33/3 records with data

Primary topics

ICT in Developing Communities33/3 records with data
Two perspectives on citations

Follow the research impact

Independent sources. Clear time scales.

Lifetime citations by publication year

Crossref and OpenAlex · separate totals for the same publication cohorts

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

Latest lifetime totals, grouped by the cited article’s year. These are not citations received in that year.

View data & coverage

Citations received each year

OpenAlex · incoming citation links grouped by citing-work year

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage
Annual history: 3/3 articles. Latest history observation: 2026-10-22T01:10:01.075193+00:00. Source totals are never added together.
Research side by side

Compare journals

Select journals to compare the same collection filters. Source totals stay separate. These measures describe research activity, not journal quality.

Leave all unchecked to include every matching journal. Selection affects only comparison charts.
Display range
Bussecon Review of Social SciencesInternational Journal of Research in Business and Social Science

Publications

Articles by publication year

View data & coverage

Crossref citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex · Citations received

By year of the citing work · 2017–2026

View data & coverage

2026 is year to date. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime charts share a citation scale. Unknown observations appear as gaps; known zero stays zero. Annual receipts use available OpenAlex histories and may not sum to lifetime totals. 0 undated publications excluded from publication-year charts.

Full analytics report All distributions, publications, comparisons & data provenance
3 MATCHING PUBLICATIONSExplore results →Export CSV ↓
INDEXED PUBLICATIONS3
CROSSREF CITATIONS3
CROSSREF · CITED PUBLICATIONS33.3%
CROSSREF · MEAN CITATIONS1.0

Crossref citation coverage: 3 / 3 publications (100.0%). Latest observation: 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC. Means and percentages use records with known counts.

OpenAlex / Separate citation source

A broader view of this research

DOI-matched OpenAlex observations for the same selected publications. These counts are separate from Crossref and are never added together.

OPENALEX CITATIONS3
DOI MATCH COVERAGE100.0%3 / 3 publications
MEAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY1.03 known · 0 unknown
MEDIAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY0

Observation range: 21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC — 22 Oct 2026 01:10 UTC. Missing matches are not zero citations. Previous observations may remain if a refresh fails or a DOI no longer matches.

OpenAlex citation distributionNo citations21–516–20021+0Unknown0

Institutions, countries & topics

OpenAlex affiliations and primary-topic classification. Each publication counts once per institution or country; multi-affiliated publications appear in multiple groups, so percentages can sum above 100%. Countries describe author affiliations, not nationality. Topics use one primary topic per publication.

Institutions

3 / 3 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 3 selected publications.

Countries

3 / 3 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 3 selected publications.

Primary topics

3 / 3 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 3 selected publications.

Citation year / OpenAlex

Citations received over time

Incoming citations to the selected publications, grouped by the year of the citing work. This is separate from lifetime citation totals grouped by the cited article’s publication year.

The publication filters above define which articles receive the citations. The citation-year range below only controls this chart and the incoming-citation comparison. Removing publication-year filters includes older articles’ incoming citations too.

Annual history available for 3 / 3 selected publications. Supported display window: 2017–2026; 2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Missing histories and years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—); partial coverage can understate totals.

Annual-history observations (UTC): 2026-10-21T07:23:04.028270+00:00 — 2026-10-22T01:10:01.075193+00:00. Older observations may be retained after failed or incomplete refreshes.

OpenAlex · Citations received by year

31.50 2017 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32018 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32019 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32020 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32021 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32022 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32023 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32024 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32025 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32026 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 3 · Annual history coverage 3/3 2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
View openalex · citations received by year data & coverage
Citation yearJournal / scopeOpenAlex · Citations received by yearPublicationsAnnual history known
2017All selected publications033/3
2018All selected publications033/3
2019All selected publications033/3
2020All selected publications033/3
2021All selected publications033/3
2022All selected publications033/3
2023All selected publications033/3
2024All selected publications033/3
2025All selected publications033/3
2026All selected publications333/3

Counts represent citation links, not unique citing papers across a journal: one paper citing two selected articles contributes two links. Older citations outside this window are excluded, so annual sums need not equal lifetime totals. OpenAlex methodology ↗

Crossref citation distribution

Latest Crossref totals for the selected publications; not citations received in the selected years.

Mean1.0
Median0
No citations21–516–20021+0Unknown0

Unknown counts are excluded from the mean, median and cited-publication rate.

Journal comparison

Same filters, source and counting rules across journals. Descriptive statistics, not a quality ranking.

Journal / publisherPublicationsCrossref citationsOpenAlex citationsOpenAlex coverageCrossref meanCrossref medianCrossref cited %*Crossref coverage
Bussecon Review of Social Sciences
Bussecon International Academy
1331/13.03100.01/1 · 100.0%
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science
SSBFNET
2002/20.00.00.02/2 · 100.0%

* Percentage among publications with a known citation count.

Explore publications

View all 3 →

Most cited · Crossref

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Overcoming digital barriers to African indigenous games in local communities

Glen Maimela · Thizwilondi Madima · Justice Makhanikhe

Bussecon Review of Social Sciences · 2024

Read abstract

This research paper delves into the pervasive issue of the digital divide within African indigenous communities, specifically focusing on access to African Indigenous digital games. Employing Participatory Action Research (PAR) as the primary data generation approach, this study emphasises the collaborative involvement of community members in identifying, understanding, and addressing the challenges they face. The philosophical foundation of Ubuntu, with its emphasis on interconnectedness, mutual care, and communal support, underpins the research methodology, ensuring that the study remains deeply rooted in African values and perspectives. The digital divide in African Indigenous communities is a multifaceted issue, stemming from various socio-economic, infrastructural, and educational barriers. These barriers hinder the effective dissemination and adoption of digital technologies, including digital games that are culturally significant and educational. By leveraging the principles of Ubuntu, the research engages community members as co-researchers, ensuring that their voices, experiences, and insights are integral to the study. This approach not only enhances the authenticity and relevance of the findings but also empowers the communities to take ownership of the solutions developed. The study advocates for the development of digital game centres in indigenous communities which may be used as centre for accessing digital African indigenous games.

DOI 10.36096/brss.v6i1.5523 Crossref citations3 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Digital Pathways to Community Justice: Mahosi, Social Media, and Gender-Based Violence Prevention in Vhembe District, South Africa

Konanani Constance Matambela · Rendani Tshifhumulo · Bernard Nthambeleni

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

This study examines how Mahosi (traditional leaders) in the Vhembe District of Limpopo Province use social media to address gender-based violence (GBV) within their communities. A qualitative design was employed, drawing on semi-structured interviews with ten Mahosi selected through purposive sampling. The findings show that platforms such as Facebook and WhatsApp are used to share anti-GBV messages, mobilise community meetings, and open discussions around violence, extending the reach and immediacy of community-based interventions. In doing so, digital engagement has contributed to increased openness around GBV and greater participation, particularly among younger community members. At the same time, the study identifies key challenges, including digital literacy gaps, unequal access to technology, confidentiality risks, and ethical concerns linked to the public nature of online communication. By foregrounding Mahosi as digital actors within community governance, the study highlights both the potential and limitations of integrating social media into GBV prevention. It concludes by emphasising the need for context-sensitive digital literacy initiatives and clear ethical guidelines to support responsible and inclusive community-based responses to GBV in rural South Africa.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v15i2.49520 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

The strategies to mitigate challenges associated with the preservation of Tshivenda proverbs through the use of ICT

Phathutshedzo Unarine Nevondo · Thizwilondi Madima · Justice Makhanikhe

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2025

Read abstract

This research seeks for strategies to mitigate challenges associated with preservation of Tshivenda proverbs through Information Communication Technology. Proverbs are valuable cultural practices of oral tradition, which used to empower the young generation on morals, norms, behaviour, education, and other African values. It has been noticed that due to modernisation and lack of preservation, proverbs have been abounded by the majority of Vhavenda youths, which seems to be resulting in moral degeneration because youth no longer acquire moral knowledge and skills through proverbs. This study grounded by Sankofa theory and Critical theory. This study used a qualitative research design and was exploratory in nature. Data was generated using semi structured interview as data collection method. The study’s finding shows that   use of information communication technology in preserving Tshivenda proverbs, this technology does not suit people who live in rural areas, since they are from poor family backgrounds who do not have access to smartphones, some are illiterate, and cannot read nor write and the issue of network problems become a big challenge on rural areas, since South Africa still developing area. The study recommends that there is a need for the Department of Sport, Arts and Culture should promote campaign on how to use digital devices. This will influence youth and community members to consider the significance of Tshivenda proverbs. The issue of digital inequality in the socio economic gap between those with access and without access to digital technology, must also addressed this gap includes awareness, adoption, knowledge, skills and ability to use digital technology

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v14i8.41690 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations

Selected results

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Digital Pathways to Community Justice: Mahosi, Social Media, and Gender-Based Violence Prevention in Vhembe District, South Africa

Konanani Constance Matambela · Rendani Tshifhumulo · Bernard Nthambeleni

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

This study examines how Mahosi (traditional leaders) in the Vhembe District of Limpopo Province use social media to address gender-based violence (GBV) within their communities. A qualitative design was employed, drawing on semi-structured interviews with ten Mahosi selected through purposive sampling. The findings show that platforms such as Facebook and WhatsApp are used to share anti-GBV messages, mobilise community meetings, and open discussions around violence, extending the reach and immediacy of community-based interventions. In doing so, digital engagement has contributed to increased openness around GBV and greater participation, particularly among younger community members. At the same time, the study identifies key challenges, including digital literacy gaps, unequal access to technology, confidentiality risks, and ethical concerns linked to the public nature of online communication. By foregrounding Mahosi as digital actors within community governance, the study highlights both the potential and limitations of integrating social media into GBV prevention. It concludes by emphasising the need for context-sensitive digital literacy initiatives and clear ethical guidelines to support responsible and inclusive community-based responses to GBV in rural South Africa.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v15i2.49520 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

The strategies to mitigate challenges associated with the preservation of Tshivenda proverbs through the use of ICT

Phathutshedzo Unarine Nevondo · Thizwilondi Madima · Justice Makhanikhe

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2025

Read abstract

This research seeks for strategies to mitigate challenges associated with preservation of Tshivenda proverbs through Information Communication Technology. Proverbs are valuable cultural practices of oral tradition, which used to empower the young generation on morals, norms, behaviour, education, and other African values. It has been noticed that due to modernisation and lack of preservation, proverbs have been abounded by the majority of Vhavenda youths, which seems to be resulting in moral degeneration because youth no longer acquire moral knowledge and skills through proverbs. This study grounded by Sankofa theory and Critical theory. This study used a qualitative research design and was exploratory in nature. Data was generated using semi structured interview as data collection method. The study’s finding shows that   use of information communication technology in preserving Tshivenda proverbs, this technology does not suit people who live in rural areas, since they are from poor family backgrounds who do not have access to smartphones, some are illiterate, and cannot read nor write and the issue of network problems become a big challenge on rural areas, since South Africa still developing area. The study recommends that there is a need for the Department of Sport, Arts and Culture should promote campaign on how to use digital devices. This will influence youth and community members to consider the significance of Tshivenda proverbs. The issue of digital inequality in the socio economic gap between those with access and without access to digital technology, must also addressed this gap includes awareness, adoption, knowledge, skills and ability to use digital technology

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v14i8.41690 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Overcoming digital barriers to African indigenous games in local communities

Glen Maimela · Thizwilondi Madima · Justice Makhanikhe

Bussecon Review of Social Sciences · 2024

Read abstract

This research paper delves into the pervasive issue of the digital divide within African indigenous communities, specifically focusing on access to African Indigenous digital games. Employing Participatory Action Research (PAR) as the primary data generation approach, this study emphasises the collaborative involvement of community members in identifying, understanding, and addressing the challenges they face. The philosophical foundation of Ubuntu, with its emphasis on interconnectedness, mutual care, and communal support, underpins the research methodology, ensuring that the study remains deeply rooted in African values and perspectives. The digital divide in African Indigenous communities is a multifaceted issue, stemming from various socio-economic, infrastructural, and educational barriers. These barriers hinder the effective dissemination and adoption of digital technologies, including digital games that are culturally significant and educational. By leveraging the principles of Ubuntu, the research engages community members as co-researchers, ensuring that their voices, experiences, and insights are integral to the study. This approach not only enhances the authenticity and relevance of the findings but also empowers the communities to take ownership of the solutions developed. The study advocates for the development of digital game centres in indigenous communities which may be used as centre for accessing digital African indigenous games.

DOI 10.36096/brss.v6i1.5523 Crossref citations3 OpenAlex citations

Data coverage & freshness

Source coverage refers to this result set; a publication may occur in several sources. Sync times refer to contributing journals.

Missing abstracts: 0 · Missing authors: 0 · Missing publication dates: 0 · Dates without day precision: 0

SourceMost recent successful journal syncLatest attempt
crossref21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
ojs-rest21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 06:46 UTC
oai-pmh20 Oct 2026 19:55 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 20 Oct 2026 19:50 UTC
openalex-enrichment21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
Full import history & methodology →