Publication activity
Articles grouped by publication year
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.
Research across participating journals · All insights follow your collection filters.
Publication activity alongside incoming citations.
Articles grouped by publication year
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
Leading affiliations and themes in this collection.
Full distributions & methodology ↓Independent sources. Clear time scales.
Crossref and OpenAlex · separate totals for the same publication cohorts
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
Latest lifetime totals, grouped by the cited article’s year. These are not citations received in that year.
OpenAlex · incoming citation links grouped by citing-work year
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
Select journals to compare the same collection filters. Source totals stay separate. These measures describe research activity, not journal quality.
Articles by publication year
Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year
Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year
By year of the citing work · 2017–2026
2026 is year to date. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime charts share a citation scale. Unknown observations appear as gaps; known zero stays zero. Annual receipts use available OpenAlex histories and may not sum to lifetime totals. 0 undated publications excluded from publication-year charts.
Crossref citation coverage: 6 / 6 publications (100.0%). Latest observation: 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC. Means and percentages use records with known counts.
DOI-matched OpenAlex observations for the same selected publications. These counts are separate from Crossref and are never added together.
Observation range: 21 Oct 2026 00:14 UTC — 21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC. Missing matches are not zero citations. Previous observations may remain if a refresh fails or a DOI no longer matches.
OpenAlex affiliations and primary-topic classification. Each publication counts once per institution or country; multi-affiliated publications appear in multiple groups, so percentages can sum above 100%. Countries describe author affiliations, not nationality. Topics use one primary topic per publication.
6 / 6 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 6 selected publications.
6 / 6 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 6 selected publications.
6 / 6 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 6 selected publications.
Citations are the latest recorded totals for articles published in each year, not citations received during that year. Crossref and OpenAlex remain separate and share the same citation scale. 2026 is incomplete; newer articles have had less time to receive citations.
0 undated publications excluded. Unknown citation counts are shown as —, never as zero. Partial coverage can understate totals; expand each table for known / total records.
| Publication year | Journal / scope | Publications | Publications | Crossref known | OpenAlex known |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | All selected publications | 1 | 1 | 1/1 | 1/1 |
| 2023 | All selected publications | 1 | 1 | 1/1 | 1/1 |
| 2024 | All selected publications | 1 | 1 | 1/1 | 1/1 |
| 2025 | All selected publications | 2 | 2 | 2/2 | 2/2 |
| 2026 | All selected publications | 1 | 1 | 1/1 | 1/1 |
| Publication year | Journal / scope | Crossref citations | Publications | Crossref known | OpenAlex known |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | All selected publications | 2 | 1 | 1/1 | 1/1 |
| 2023 | All selected publications | 3 | 1 | 1/1 | 1/1 |
| 2024 | All selected publications | 0 | 1 | 1/1 | 1/1 |
| 2025 | All selected publications | 0 | 2 | 2/2 | 2/2 |
| 2026 | All selected publications | 0 | 1 | 1/1 | 1/1 |
| Publication year | Journal / scope | OpenAlex citations | Publications | Crossref known | OpenAlex known |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | All selected publications | 4 | 1 | 1/1 | 1/1 |
| 2023 | All selected publications | 6 | 1 | 1/1 | 1/1 |
| 2024 | All selected publications | 1 | 1 | 1/1 | 1/1 |
| 2025 | All selected publications | 0 | 2 | 2/2 | 2/2 |
| 2026 | All selected publications | 0 | 1 | 1/1 | 1/1 |
Incoming citations to the selected publications, grouped by the year of the citing work. This is separate from lifetime citation totals grouped by the cited article’s publication year.
The publication filters above define which articles receive the citations. The citation-year range below only controls this chart and the incoming-citation comparison. Removing publication-year filters includes older articles’ incoming citations too.
Annual history available for 6 / 6 selected publications. Supported display window: 2017–2026; 2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Missing histories and years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—); partial coverage can understate totals.
Annual-history observations (UTC): 2026-10-21T00:14:33.542586+00:00 — 2026-10-21T07:23:01.332122+00:00. Older observations may be retained after failed or incomplete refreshes.
| Citation year | Journal / scope | OpenAlex · Citations received by year | Publications | Annual history known |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | All selected publications | 0 | 6 | 6/6 |
| 2018 | All selected publications | 0 | 6 | 6/6 |
| 2019 | All selected publications | 0 | 6 | 6/6 |
| 2020 | All selected publications | 0 | 6 | 6/6 |
| 2021 | All selected publications | 0 | 6 | 6/6 |
| 2022 | All selected publications | 0 | 6 | 6/6 |
| 2023 | All selected publications | 2 | 6 | 6/6 |
| 2024 | All selected publications | 3 | 6 | 6/6 |
| 2025 | All selected publications | 5 | 6 | 6/6 |
| 2026 | All selected publications | 1 | 6 | 6/6 |
Counts represent citation links, not unique citing papers across a journal: one paper citing two selected articles contributes two links. Older citations outside this window are excluded, so annual sums need not equal lifetime totals. OpenAlex methodology ↗
Publications by publication year. 2026 is an incomplete year.
| Period | Publications |
|---|---|
| 2022 | 1 |
| 2023 | 1 |
| 2024 | 1 |
| 2025 | 2 |
| 2026 | 1 |
Latest Crossref totals for the selected publications; not citations received in the selected years.
Unknown counts are excluded from the mean, median and cited-publication rate.
Same filters, source and counting rules across journals. Descriptive statistics, not a quality ranking.
| Journal / publisher | Publications | Crossref citations | OpenAlex citations | OpenAlex coverage | Crossref mean | Crossref median | Crossref cited %* | Crossref coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy Bussecon International Academy | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 1/1 · 100.0% |
| International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science SSBFNET | 5 | 5 | 11 | 5/5 | 1.0 | 0 | 40.0 | 5/5 · 100.0% |
* Percentage among publications with a known citation count.
Citizens with disabilities have the same rights as those without disabilities, and they are entitled to the same benefits as everyone else. Because of their mobility, people who do not have disabilities have greater access to public services. People with disabilities typically face difficulties in accessing government services due to the location of government offices, the physical structure of such offices, and the fact that they rely on others to access some of the services provided by the government. More government offices are located in urban areas, while the majority of people with disabilities live in rural areas, making it even more difficult for them to access government services such as health facilities, educational institutions, civic and social services. This paper examines what the South African government can do to make service delivery even more accessible to people with disabilities. To benefit this paper, the qualitative approach was used to collect data through a review of secondary sources.
The issue of people with disabilities or people who have different abilities is now known as "diffable" (differently-abled people) or now known as "disability" is a problem that on a practical level rarely gets the attention from the government, companies and community. In fact, the international community really appreciates and respects the protection of the human rights of persons with disabilities. This can be seen in the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities which is an international agreement on the protection of the rights of persons with disabilities. This international agreement was adopted on 13 December 2006 at the United Nations Headquarters in New York and opened for signature on 30 March 2007. Indonesia itself has signed the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities on 30 March 2007 and ratified on 30 November 2011. The implication is that the state is obliged to guarantee the fulfillment of the right of people with disabilities to find work. The rights for persons with disabilities do not only end there but also include the right to have a work area that is friendly to persons with disabilities. To fulfill these rights, companies are expected to implement corporate social responsibility policies. Corporate social responsibility is a business commitment to act ethically, operate legally and contribute to economic development along with improving the quality of life of its workforce. In this study, it will be discussed how the formulation of corporate social responsibility in the laws and regulations in Indonesia and how to fulfill facilities for disabled workers within the framework of corporate social responsibility policies.
This qualitative study examines significant educational challenges encountered by HIV/AIDS-infected rural female learners with physical disabilities in Zimbabwe amidst the severe impacts of El Niño-induced droughts. To capture nuanced perspectives of this marginalised group, researchers selected 16 participants based on specific criteria, including gender. The data collection process comprised two separate focus group discussions: one involving learners with disabilities and the other involving adult participants. This strategic approach seeks to reduce power imbalances and facilitate the expression of individual narratives by learners. The thematic analysis of the data identified two significant findings. Initially, individuals with physical disabilities and HIV/AIDS faced significant obstacles in obtaining educational resources, exacerbated by the intersectional effects of their disabilities, health conditions, and environmental challenges. Female learners encountered additional gender-related challenges, such as social stigma, insufficient family support, and heightened caregiving responsibilities at home, which further impeded their educational achievement and overall well-being. This study recommends the development of inclusive and comprehensive support programs that address the needs of learners with physical disabilities and HIV/AIDS, ensuring access to healthcare, assistive technologies, and tailored educational accommodations. The Ministry of Primary and Secondary Education should implement policies that offer flexible learning options and resource allocation for HIV/AIDS-affected rural female learners with disabilities during El Niño droughts, thereby ensuring their sustained access to education.
In an ideal liberal or representative democracy, the participation of every person in the democratic process is essential. Although prior research has examined political inclusion and exclusion from many perspectives within democracies, few studies have focused on the political involvement and representation of people living with disabilities (PLWDs) in Africa. This study addresses this deficiency. This study analysed the status of inclusivity in Africa, focussing on the political engagement and representation of persons living with disabilities (PLWDs) in the democratic process, as well as the factors influencing their inclusion or exclusion. The study employs an explanatory research design, utilising document and desk review/analysis with secondary data sources. The notion of political and democratic inclusion is utilised as an analytical framework. Research indicates that although numerous African nations have embraced various international and domestic laws safeguarding the political participation and representation rights of persons living with disabilities (PLWDs), many have merely offered superficial compliance with these regulations. Consequently, the political engagement and representation of PLWDs remain inadequate, reflecting a state of democratic instability across the continent. Factors such as low educational attainment and pervasive negative attitudes towards PLWDs persistently obstruct their political involvement and representation in Africa. It states that Africa has not yet fulfilled the ideal of political and democratic inclusion regarding the substantial and unimpeded participation of persons living with disabilities (PLWDs) in the continent's political and electoral processes, which contributes to the democratic instability in the region.
The education law and policies in Lesotho assert that all children have a right to education, however, the application of these frameworks have been slow when it comes to education provision for children with intellectual disabilities. This study explores parental perspectives on experiences of provision of education for children with intellectual disabilities in Lesotho. Data was collected using semi-structured interviews with parents of children with intellectual disabilities. The findings indicate that parents immensely valued education for its advantages, however, they were aware of and disappointed with the inequitable provision of education children with intellectual disabilities were offered, leading to lack of participation and dropouts. The study therefore highlights the need to amplify implementation of evidence-based practices that ensure effective access and provision of quality and equitable education for children with intellectual disabilities. Keywords: intellectual disabilities, provision of education, education experiences, parental perspectives, Lesotho
Disability and everything it encompass presents significant challenges to individuals, families, and communities worldwide. People with disabilities (PWD) are marginalized and excluded in most societies. Discrimination and prejudice towards PWD are compounded by poverty, lack of essential services and support, and sometimes a hostile and inaccessible environment. The distinctive contribution of this research is its original focus on obstacles to social inclusion in Limpopo Province, South Africa, drawn from the personal experiences of young adults with physical disabilities. The novel contribution of this study lies in its unique illumination of barriers to social inclusion in Limpopo Province, South Africa, through the lived experiences of young adults with physical disabilities. Despite advancements in disability rights legislation, empirical evidence suggests that social exclusion remains pervasive. Key barriers identified include structural, attitudinal, and environmental factors impeding full social participation. The research highlights infrastructural inadequacies, such as limited access to public transportation and poorly designed facilities, which restrict mobility and social engagement. Additionally, prevailing societal attitudes and stigma towards disabilities contribute to the marginalization of affected individuals, exacerbating feelings of isolation and disempowerment. The study adopted a qualitative design. Open-ended online questionnaires have been used as the primary data collection tool and methods to collect data from the 10 participants; this resulted after the findings indicated that the gathered data answered the research questions and achieved the study’s objectives. The selection of participants was secured through purposive sampling; the participants were selected based on the researcher’s judgment and the physical disability experiences. The findings of the research revealed a variety of challenges that people living with disabilities encounter in the Limpopo province. This research not only illuminates the perceived barriers to social but also emphasizes the collective responsibility of stakeholders to facilitate systemic changes toward social inclusion.
This qualitative study examines significant educational challenges encountered by HIV/AIDS-infected rural female learners with physical disabilities in Zimbabwe amidst the severe impacts of El Niño-induced droughts. To capture nuanced perspectives of this marginalised group, researchers selected 16 participants based on specific criteria, including gender. The data collection process comprised two separate focus group discussions: one involving learners with disabilities and the other involving adult participants. This strategic approach seeks to reduce power imbalances and facilitate the expression of individual narratives by learners. The thematic analysis of the data identified two significant findings. Initially, individuals with physical disabilities and HIV/AIDS faced significant obstacles in obtaining educational resources, exacerbated by the intersectional effects of their disabilities, health conditions, and environmental challenges. Female learners encountered additional gender-related challenges, such as social stigma, insufficient family support, and heightened caregiving responsibilities at home, which further impeded their educational achievement and overall well-being. This study recommends the development of inclusive and comprehensive support programs that address the needs of learners with physical disabilities and HIV/AIDS, ensuring access to healthcare, assistive technologies, and tailored educational accommodations. The Ministry of Primary and Secondary Education should implement policies that offer flexible learning options and resource allocation for HIV/AIDS-affected rural female learners with disabilities during El Niño droughts, thereby ensuring their sustained access to education.
In an ideal liberal or representative democracy, the participation of every person in the democratic process is essential. Although prior research has examined political inclusion and exclusion from many perspectives within democracies, few studies have focused on the political involvement and representation of people living with disabilities (PLWDs) in Africa. This study addresses this deficiency. This study analysed the status of inclusivity in Africa, focussing on the political engagement and representation of persons living with disabilities (PLWDs) in the democratic process, as well as the factors influencing their inclusion or exclusion. The study employs an explanatory research design, utilising document and desk review/analysis with secondary data sources. The notion of political and democratic inclusion is utilised as an analytical framework. Research indicates that although numerous African nations have embraced various international and domestic laws safeguarding the political participation and representation rights of persons living with disabilities (PLWDs), many have merely offered superficial compliance with these regulations. Consequently, the political engagement and representation of PLWDs remain inadequate, reflecting a state of democratic instability across the continent. Factors such as low educational attainment and pervasive negative attitudes towards PLWDs persistently obstruct their political involvement and representation in Africa. It states that Africa has not yet fulfilled the ideal of political and democratic inclusion regarding the substantial and unimpeded participation of persons living with disabilities (PLWDs) in the continent's political and electoral processes, which contributes to the democratic instability in the region.
The education law and policies in Lesotho assert that all children have a right to education, however, the application of these frameworks have been slow when it comes to education provision for children with intellectual disabilities. This study explores parental perspectives on experiences of provision of education for children with intellectual disabilities in Lesotho. Data was collected using semi-structured interviews with parents of children with intellectual disabilities. The findings indicate that parents immensely valued education for its advantages, however, they were aware of and disappointed with the inequitable provision of education children with intellectual disabilities were offered, leading to lack of participation and dropouts. The study therefore highlights the need to amplify implementation of evidence-based practices that ensure effective access and provision of quality and equitable education for children with intellectual disabilities. Keywords: intellectual disabilities, provision of education, education experiences, parental perspectives, Lesotho
Citizens with disabilities have the same rights as those without disabilities, and they are entitled to the same benefits as everyone else. Because of their mobility, people who do not have disabilities have greater access to public services. People with disabilities typically face difficulties in accessing government services due to the location of government offices, the physical structure of such offices, and the fact that they rely on others to access some of the services provided by the government. More government offices are located in urban areas, while the majority of people with disabilities live in rural areas, making it even more difficult for them to access government services such as health facilities, educational institutions, civic and social services. This paper examines what the South African government can do to make service delivery even more accessible to people with disabilities. To benefit this paper, the qualitative approach was used to collect data through a review of secondary sources.
Source coverage refers to this result set; a publication may occur in several sources. Sync times refer to contributing journals.
Missing abstracts: 0 · Missing authors: 0 · Missing publication dates: 0 · Dates without day precision: 0
| Source | Most recent successful journal sync | Latest attempt |
|---|---|---|
| crossref | 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbs | complete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC |
| ojs-rest | 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbs | complete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 06:46 UTC |
| oai-pmh | 20 Oct 2026 19:55 UTC · ijrbs | complete · ijrbs · 20 Oct 2026 19:50 UTC |
| openalex-enrichment | 21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC · ijrbs | complete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC |