Publication activity
Articles grouped by publication year
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.
Research across participating journals · All insights follow your collection filters.
Publication activity alongside incoming citations.
Articles grouped by publication year
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
Leading affiliations and themes in this collection.
Full distributions & methodology ↓Independent sources. Clear time scales.
Crossref and OpenAlex · separate totals for the same publication cohorts
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
Latest lifetime totals, grouped by the cited article’s year. These are not citations received in that year.
OpenAlex · incoming citation links grouped by citing-work year
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
Select journals to compare the same collection filters. Source totals stay separate. These measures describe research activity, not journal quality.
Articles by publication year
Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year
Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year
By year of the citing work · 2017–2026
2026 is year to date. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime charts share a citation scale. Unknown observations appear as gaps; known zero stays zero. Annual receipts use available OpenAlex histories and may not sum to lifetime totals. 0 undated publications excluded from publication-year charts.
Crossref citation coverage: 3 / 3 publications (100.0%). Latest observation: 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC. Means and percentages use records with known counts.
DOI-matched OpenAlex observations for the same selected publications. These counts are separate from Crossref and are never added together.
Observation range: 21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC — 21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC. Missing matches are not zero citations. Previous observations may remain if a refresh fails or a DOI no longer matches.
OpenAlex affiliations and primary-topic classification. Each publication counts once per institution or country; multi-affiliated publications appear in multiple groups, so percentages can sum above 100%. Countries describe author affiliations, not nationality. Topics use one primary topic per publication.
3 / 3 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 3 selected publications.
3 / 3 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 3 selected publications.
3 / 3 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 3 selected publications.
Citations are the latest recorded totals for articles published in each year, not citations received during that year. Crossref and OpenAlex remain separate and share the same citation scale. 2026 is incomplete; newer articles have had less time to receive citations.
0 undated publications excluded. Unknown citation counts are shown as —, never as zero. Partial coverage can understate totals; expand each table for known / total records.
| Publication year | Journal / scope | Publications | Publications | Crossref known | OpenAlex known |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | All selected publications | 3 | 3 | 3/3 | 3/3 |
| Publication year | Journal / scope | Crossref citations | Publications | Crossref known | OpenAlex known |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | All selected publications | 0 | 3 | 3/3 | 3/3 |
| Publication year | Journal / scope | OpenAlex citations | Publications | Crossref known | OpenAlex known |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | All selected publications | 0 | 3 | 3/3 | 3/3 |
Incoming citations to the selected publications, grouped by the year of the citing work. This is separate from lifetime citation totals grouped by the cited article’s publication year.
The publication filters above define which articles receive the citations. The citation-year range below only controls this chart and the incoming-citation comparison. Removing publication-year filters includes older articles’ incoming citations too.
Annual history available for 3 / 3 selected publications. Supported display window: 2017–2026; 2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Missing histories and years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—); partial coverage can understate totals.
Annual-history observations (UTC): 2026-10-21T07:23:06.720471+00:00 — 2026-10-21T07:23:08.963249+00:00. Older observations may be retained after failed or incomplete refreshes.
| Citation year | Journal / scope | OpenAlex · Citations received by year | Publications | Annual history known |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | All selected publications | 0 | 3 | 3/3 |
| 2018 | All selected publications | 0 | 3 | 3/3 |
| 2019 | All selected publications | 0 | 3 | 3/3 |
| 2020 | All selected publications | 0 | 3 | 3/3 |
| 2021 | All selected publications | 0 | 3 | 3/3 |
| 2022 | All selected publications | 0 | 3 | 3/3 |
| 2023 | All selected publications | 0 | 3 | 3/3 |
| 2024 | All selected publications | 0 | 3 | 3/3 |
| 2025 | All selected publications | 0 | 3 | 3/3 |
| 2026 | All selected publications | 0 | 3 | 3/3 |
Counts represent citation links, not unique citing papers across a journal: one paper citing two selected articles contributes two links. Older citations outside this window are excluded, so annual sums need not equal lifetime totals. OpenAlex methodology ↗
Publications by publication year. 2026 is an incomplete year.
| Period | Publications |
|---|---|
| 2026 | 3 |
Latest Crossref totals for the selected publications; not citations received in the selected years.
Unknown counts are excluded from the mean, median and cited-publication rate.
Same filters, source and counting rules across journals. Descriptive statistics, not a quality ranking.
| Journal / publisher | Publications | Crossref citations | OpenAlex citations | OpenAlex coverage | Crossref mean | Crossref median | Crossref cited %* | Crossref coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science SSBFNET | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3/3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 3/3 · 100.0% |
* Percentage among publications with a known citation count.
This article critically examines how contemporary child protection systems are shaped by risk-averse practice cultures, structural inequality, cultural dissonance, and uneven investment in family-based preventive interventions. Using an integrative literature review, the article synthesizes empirical studies, policy analyses, programme evaluations, and theoretical scholarship published between 2000 and 2024, with selected foundational works included where they remain conceptually central. Guided by ecological systems theory and critical social work theory, the review argues that child removal is often framed as an individual family failure, while the wider conditions that produce family vulnerability, including poverty, racism, colonial histories, housing insecurity, disability, substance-use-related need, and inadequate service access, are insufficiently addressed. The synthesis shows that poor, Black, Indigenous, and other marginalized families are disproportionately drawn into child protection systems, often through neglect allegations that are closely linked to material hardship. At the same time, evidence from family preservation, home visiting, family group conferencing, and community-based support models indicates that many children can be kept safe when families receive timely, relational, culturally responsive, and adequately resourced assistance. The article, therefore, calls for a shift from surveillance and separation toward prevention, family preservation, and social justice-oriented practice. It concludes that child protection reform requires not only improved practice tools, but also policy, funding, and accountability systems that value family integrity, cultural belonging, and long-term child and family well-being.
Youth leaving the foster care system frequently encounter several obstacles on their path to independence, such as restricted access to housing, work, education, and emotional support. Once they leave foster care, these obstacles may make it more difficult for them to become self-sufficient. The purpose of this study is to investigate how young people leaving foster care deal with these obstacles and demonstrate resiliency in their quest for autonomy. In this study, a qualitative research approach was used. Data saturation was reached with a total of 18 foster care leavers using a purposive sample technique. The information was gathered using a semi-structured interview schedule. The findings highlight that youths in Tshwane who leave foster care demonstrate resilience, place a high value on education and employment, rely on their faith and social network, and gain independence via practical help and collaboration between social workers and caregivers. The study suggests that foster care leavers should be granted access to education, vocational training, and life skills programmes. Social workers and caregivers should work closely together to provide regular direction and useful help, as well as provide access to counselling, mentorship, and emotional support. Comprehensive transitional strategies must be created as well to assist foster care leavers in becoming independent.
Foster care was instituted as a child protection mechanism in South Africa at the dawn of democracy, offering vulnerable and orphaned children alternative placement alternatives to stay with their relatives. Orphans living with HIV derive significant benefits from this placement, as their grandmothers provide essential support, enabling them to experience love, care, and safety. This study sought to examine foster parents caring for children in foster care who are living with HIV and AIDS. The study was grounded in resilience theory. A qualitative technique was utilised to collect comprehensive data, supported by phenomenological, exploratory, descriptive, and contextual study approaches. This technique facilitated an understanding of caregiving among 16 participants by providing insight into their ideas, emotions, and experiences. The study utilised foster parents as a sample, gathering their experiences through semi-structured interviews. Data analysis was conducted using the five steps delineated by Yin. This research examines four key themes: financial difficulty, diagnostic unawareness, challenges in disclosure, and psychosocial support and resilience. Despite various challenges, carers shown perseverance in foster caregiving. Participants depended on their spiritual convictions, healthcare, and psychosocial assistance from social workers and healthcare professionals. This paper elaborates on the available research about foster parents and children living with HIV/AIDS from a social work perspective. The recommendations aim to strengthen current support systems and enhance social functioning among carers and foster children..
This article critically examines how contemporary child protection systems are shaped by risk-averse practice cultures, structural inequality, cultural dissonance, and uneven investment in family-based preventive interventions. Using an integrative literature review, the article synthesizes empirical studies, policy analyses, programme evaluations, and theoretical scholarship published between 2000 and 2024, with selected foundational works included where they remain conceptually central. Guided by ecological systems theory and critical social work theory, the review argues that child removal is often framed as an individual family failure, while the wider conditions that produce family vulnerability, including poverty, racism, colonial histories, housing insecurity, disability, substance-use-related need, and inadequate service access, are insufficiently addressed. The synthesis shows that poor, Black, Indigenous, and other marginalized families are disproportionately drawn into child protection systems, often through neglect allegations that are closely linked to material hardship. At the same time, evidence from family preservation, home visiting, family group conferencing, and community-based support models indicates that many children can be kept safe when families receive timely, relational, culturally responsive, and adequately resourced assistance. The article, therefore, calls for a shift from surveillance and separation toward prevention, family preservation, and social justice-oriented practice. It concludes that child protection reform requires not only improved practice tools, but also policy, funding, and accountability systems that value family integrity, cultural belonging, and long-term child and family well-being.
Youth leaving the foster care system frequently encounter several obstacles on their path to independence, such as restricted access to housing, work, education, and emotional support. Once they leave foster care, these obstacles may make it more difficult for them to become self-sufficient. The purpose of this study is to investigate how young people leaving foster care deal with these obstacles and demonstrate resiliency in their quest for autonomy. In this study, a qualitative research approach was used. Data saturation was reached with a total of 18 foster care leavers using a purposive sample technique. The information was gathered using a semi-structured interview schedule. The findings highlight that youths in Tshwane who leave foster care demonstrate resilience, place a high value on education and employment, rely on their faith and social network, and gain independence via practical help and collaboration between social workers and caregivers. The study suggests that foster care leavers should be granted access to education, vocational training, and life skills programmes. Social workers and caregivers should work closely together to provide regular direction and useful help, as well as provide access to counselling, mentorship, and emotional support. Comprehensive transitional strategies must be created as well to assist foster care leavers in becoming independent.
Foster care was instituted as a child protection mechanism in South Africa at the dawn of democracy, offering vulnerable and orphaned children alternative placement alternatives to stay with their relatives. Orphans living with HIV derive significant benefits from this placement, as their grandmothers provide essential support, enabling them to experience love, care, and safety. This study sought to examine foster parents caring for children in foster care who are living with HIV and AIDS. The study was grounded in resilience theory. A qualitative technique was utilised to collect comprehensive data, supported by phenomenological, exploratory, descriptive, and contextual study approaches. This technique facilitated an understanding of caregiving among 16 participants by providing insight into their ideas, emotions, and experiences. The study utilised foster parents as a sample, gathering their experiences through semi-structured interviews. Data analysis was conducted using the five steps delineated by Yin. This research examines four key themes: financial difficulty, diagnostic unawareness, challenges in disclosure, and psychosocial support and resilience. Despite various challenges, carers shown perseverance in foster caregiving. Participants depended on their spiritual convictions, healthcare, and psychosocial assistance from social workers and healthcare professionals. This paper elaborates on the available research about foster parents and children living with HIV/AIDS from a social work perspective. The recommendations aim to strengthen current support systems and enhance social functioning among carers and foster children..
Source coverage refers to this result set; a publication may occur in several sources. Sync times refer to contributing journals.
Missing abstracts: 0 · Missing authors: 0 · Missing publication dates: 0 · Dates without day precision: 0
| Source | Most recent successful journal sync | Latest attempt |
|---|---|---|
| crossref | 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbs | complete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC |
| ojs-rest | 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbs | complete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 06:46 UTC |
| oai-pmh | 20 Oct 2026 19:55 UTC · ijrbs | complete · ijrbs · 20 Oct 2026 19:50 UTC |
| openalex-enrichment | 21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC · ijrbs | complete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC |