Publication activity
Articles grouped by publication year
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.
Research across participating journals · All insights follow your collection filters.
Publication activity alongside incoming citations.
Articles grouped by publication year
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
Leading affiliations and themes in this collection.
Full distributions & methodology ↓Independent sources. Clear time scales.
Crossref and OpenAlex · separate totals for the same publication cohorts
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
Latest lifetime totals, grouped by the cited article’s year. These are not citations received in that year.
OpenAlex · incoming citation links grouped by citing-work year
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
Select journals to compare the same collection filters. Source totals stay separate. These measures describe research activity, not journal quality.
Articles by publication year
Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year
Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year
By year of the citing work · 2017–2026
2026 is year to date. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime charts share a citation scale. Unknown observations appear as gaps; known zero stays zero. Annual receipts use available OpenAlex histories and may not sum to lifetime totals. 0 undated publications excluded from publication-year charts.
Crossref citation coverage: 4 / 4 publications (100.0%). Latest observation: 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC. Means and percentages use records with known counts.
DOI-matched OpenAlex observations for the same selected publications. These counts are separate from Crossref and are never added together.
Observation range: 21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC — 22 Oct 2026 02:08 UTC. Missing matches are not zero citations. Previous observations may remain if a refresh fails or a DOI no longer matches.
OpenAlex affiliations and primary-topic classification. Each publication counts once per institution or country; multi-affiliated publications appear in multiple groups, so percentages can sum above 100%. Countries describe author affiliations, not nationality. Topics use one primary topic per publication.
4 / 4 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 4 selected publications.
4 / 4 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 4 selected publications.
4 / 4 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 4 selected publications.
Citations are the latest recorded totals for articles published in each year, not citations received during that year. Crossref and OpenAlex remain separate and share the same citation scale. 2026 is incomplete; newer articles have had less time to receive citations.
0 undated publications excluded. Unknown citation counts are shown as —, never as zero. Partial coverage can understate totals; expand each table for known / total records.
| Publication year | Journal / scope | Publications | Publications | Crossref known | OpenAlex known |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | All selected publications | 4 | 4 | 4/4 | 4/4 |
| Publication year | Journal / scope | Crossref citations | Publications | Crossref known | OpenAlex known |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | All selected publications | 0 | 4 | 4/4 | 4/4 |
| Publication year | Journal / scope | OpenAlex citations | Publications | Crossref known | OpenAlex known |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | All selected publications | 0 | 4 | 4/4 | 4/4 |
Incoming citations to the selected publications, grouped by the year of the citing work. This is separate from lifetime citation totals grouped by the cited article’s publication year.
The publication filters above define which articles receive the citations. The citation-year range below only controls this chart and the incoming-citation comparison. Removing publication-year filters includes older articles’ incoming citations too.
Annual history available for 4 / 4 selected publications. Supported display window: 2017–2026; 2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Missing histories and years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—); partial coverage can understate totals.
Annual-history observations (UTC): 2026-10-21T07:23:05.940561+00:00 — 2026-10-22T02:08:49.324779+00:00. Older observations may be retained after failed or incomplete refreshes.
| Citation year | Journal / scope | OpenAlex · Citations received by year | Publications | Annual history known |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | All selected publications | 0 | 4 | 4/4 |
| 2018 | All selected publications | 0 | 4 | 4/4 |
| 2019 | All selected publications | 0 | 4 | 4/4 |
| 2020 | All selected publications | 0 | 4 | 4/4 |
| 2021 | All selected publications | 0 | 4 | 4/4 |
| 2022 | All selected publications | 0 | 4 | 4/4 |
| 2023 | All selected publications | 0 | 4 | 4/4 |
| 2024 | All selected publications | 0 | 4 | 4/4 |
| 2025 | All selected publications | 0 | 4 | 4/4 |
| 2026 | All selected publications | 0 | 4 | 4/4 |
Counts represent citation links, not unique citing papers across a journal: one paper citing two selected articles contributes two links. Older citations outside this window are excluded, so annual sums need not equal lifetime totals. OpenAlex methodology ↗
Publications by publication year. 2026 is an incomplete year.
| Period | Publications |
|---|---|
| 2026 | 4 |
Latest Crossref totals for the selected publications; not citations received in the selected years.
Unknown counts are excluded from the mean, median and cited-publication rate.
Same filters, source and counting rules across journals. Descriptive statistics, not a quality ranking.
| Journal / publisher | Publications | Crossref citations | OpenAlex citations | OpenAlex coverage | Crossref mean | Crossref median | Crossref cited %* | Crossref coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy Bussecon International Academy | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3/3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 3/3 · 100.0% |
| International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science SSBFNET | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 1/1 · 100.0% |
* Percentage among publications with a known citation count.
This study examines the impact of socioeconomic status (SES) on the academic performance of primary school learners in the Nzhelele West Circuit of Limpopo Province, South Africa. Despite national attempts to enhance educational results, considerable performance gaps remain, especially in rural and semi-rural areas. The study used a qualitative descriptive approach to acquire a thorough knowledge of the lived experiences of learners, parents, and teachers. Data was produced by semi-structured interviews and focus group discussion in chosen primary schools of communities with different socioeconomic backgrounds. The findings reveal the conditions of low-SES, which include unemployment, low parental education levels, poor learning materials and unstable family conditions, as those that result in obstacles that weaken the ability of learners to concentrate, attend school, have motivation, and perform well as learners. Among the problems that were emphasized by the participants was food insecurity, inadequate literacy provisions at home, and overcrowded families. The study found that SES has extensive effects on educational achievement and suggests context-sensitive intervention, such as enhanced school-community collaborations, parental empowerment programs, and special support programmes to eliminate SES-based obstacles. The results can help in gaining a better insight about the intricate nexus of SES and academic performance in rural South African primary school education
The purpose of the research was to explore how parents were engaged in the education of Grade 1 learners during the COVID-19 crisis in the Rakwadu 2 Circuit of Limpopo Province. On the 18th of March 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic led to the abrupt closure of all schools in South Africa. The closure of schools was a good move to prevent the virus from spreading among learners and teachers. The study was grounded in Bronfenbrenner's Ecological Systems theory, and the findings were discussed within this framework. An exploratory research design was used. This qualitative research study was conducted with 8 parents and 4 teachers, and data were collected through semi-structured interviews. The thematic analysis was used to analyse the collected data. Before the researchers gathered data, ethical steps, such as obtaining permission from the Department of Basic Education, principals, and teachers, were taken. Hence, the participants were assured of anonymity, confidentiality, the non-violation of their rights, safety, and no interruption to their teaching responsibilities. The findings demonstrated unique issues of a lack of parent involvement in the school environment. The study suggests that schools must provide practical examples to help parents teach their children at home.
The learning process of a new language implies many different aspects to be considered and one of those aspects is the social component, family and society, that is always present in the learning processes. It is important to get to know what those roles are in the specific social context; how families/caregivers are supporting their children and the connection these actions have with academic performance in the English first additional classroom. Thus, this, this paper addressed the following research question: What is the importance of parental input in English first additional language? The aim of the study is to explore parental input in English first additional language. Data was gathered through a systematic literature review, and during the search, only English language was the subject of teaching in settings where English is not the language of the majority. After screening the papers, settled for only those that met all inclusion criteria for data extraction and analysis. Findings revealed that that parents are their child’s first teachers; thus, their involvement in additional language development is critical in enhancing academic performance. As the children’s ?rst learning experiences are tied to their home environment, the parents are important in creating a favourable learning environment for their children. Also, parents who read books with their child before the child goes to school, particularly primary school, and parents who participate in their child’s reading and managing homework outside school hours are the best predictors of academic achievement. However, some parents in disadvantaged communities had literacy challenges, thus unmotivated to assist their children with homework, unlike the educated parents, especially in semi- and urban areas who possess some academic knowledge to manage EFAL homework.
In South Africa, Grade 10 subject streaming is a critical stage in secondary schooling that shapes learners' future educational and career opportunities. Informed subject choices align with Sustainable Development Goal 4 (Quality Education), which promotes inclusive and equitable learning opportunities. Although parental involvement is widely recognised as important during this transition, limited research has examined how parents in rural contexts prepare their children for subject-stream selection. Guided by Bronfenbrenner's Ecological Systems Theory, this study investigated whether and how parents prepare their children for Grade 10 subject streaming in rural secondary schools in the Vhembe District of Limpopo Province. A qualitative case study design was employed. Participants included parents of Grade 9 learners, learners, and educators responsible for subject guidance. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and document analysis and analysed using thematic analysis. The findings revealed that parental participation in subject selection was often procedural rather than informed. While some parents attempted to guide their children, many lacked adequate knowledge of subject streams, curriculum requirements, and their links to further study and career pathways. Document analysis further showed that subject-choice forms largely functioned as administrative tools requiring parental signatures, with limited explanatory information regarding subject requirements and career opportunities. Socioeconomic challenges, limited educational attainment, and weak school-parent communication further constrained parental involvement. As a result, learners frequently relied on Life Orientation teachers, peers, and personal interests when selecting subjects. The study concludes that parental preparation for Grade 10 subject streaming in rural schools remains limited and uneven. It recommends strengthening school-parent partnerships, providing parent-focused subject-choice guidance, involving parents more directly in career-guidance activities, and improving access to subject-selection information through clear and accessible communication.
In South Africa, Grade 10 subject streaming is a critical stage in secondary schooling that shapes learners' future educational and career opportunities. Informed subject choices align with Sustainable Development Goal 4 (Quality Education), which promotes inclusive and equitable learning opportunities. Although parental involvement is widely recognised as important during this transition, limited research has examined how parents in rural contexts prepare their children for subject-stream selection. Guided by Bronfenbrenner's Ecological Systems Theory, this study investigated whether and how parents prepare their children for Grade 10 subject streaming in rural secondary schools in the Vhembe District of Limpopo Province. A qualitative case study design was employed. Participants included parents of Grade 9 learners, learners, and educators responsible for subject guidance. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and document analysis and analysed using thematic analysis. The findings revealed that parental participation in subject selection was often procedural rather than informed. While some parents attempted to guide their children, many lacked adequate knowledge of subject streams, curriculum requirements, and their links to further study and career pathways. Document analysis further showed that subject-choice forms largely functioned as administrative tools requiring parental signatures, with limited explanatory information regarding subject requirements and career opportunities. Socioeconomic challenges, limited educational attainment, and weak school-parent communication further constrained parental involvement. As a result, learners frequently relied on Life Orientation teachers, peers, and personal interests when selecting subjects. The study concludes that parental preparation for Grade 10 subject streaming in rural schools remains limited and uneven. It recommends strengthening school-parent partnerships, providing parent-focused subject-choice guidance, involving parents more directly in career-guidance activities, and improving access to subject-selection information through clear and accessible communication.
The purpose of the research was to explore how parents were engaged in the education of Grade 1 learners during the COVID-19 crisis in the Rakwadu 2 Circuit of Limpopo Province. On the 18th of March 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic led to the abrupt closure of all schools in South Africa. The closure of schools was a good move to prevent the virus from spreading among learners and teachers. The study was grounded in Bronfenbrenner's Ecological Systems theory, and the findings were discussed within this framework. An exploratory research design was used. This qualitative research study was conducted with 8 parents and 4 teachers, and data were collected through semi-structured interviews. The thematic analysis was used to analyse the collected data. Before the researchers gathered data, ethical steps, such as obtaining permission from the Department of Basic Education, principals, and teachers, were taken. Hence, the participants were assured of anonymity, confidentiality, the non-violation of their rights, safety, and no interruption to their teaching responsibilities. The findings demonstrated unique issues of a lack of parent involvement in the school environment. The study suggests that schools must provide practical examples to help parents teach their children at home.
The learning process of a new language implies many different aspects to be considered and one of those aspects is the social component, family and society, that is always present in the learning processes. It is important to get to know what those roles are in the specific social context; how families/caregivers are supporting their children and the connection these actions have with academic performance in the English first additional classroom. Thus, this, this paper addressed the following research question: What is the importance of parental input in English first additional language? The aim of the study is to explore parental input in English first additional language. Data was gathered through a systematic literature review, and during the search, only English language was the subject of teaching in settings where English is not the language of the majority. After screening the papers, settled for only those that met all inclusion criteria for data extraction and analysis. Findings revealed that that parents are their child’s first teachers; thus, their involvement in additional language development is critical in enhancing academic performance. As the children’s ?rst learning experiences are tied to their home environment, the parents are important in creating a favourable learning environment for their children. Also, parents who read books with their child before the child goes to school, particularly primary school, and parents who participate in their child’s reading and managing homework outside school hours are the best predictors of academic achievement. However, some parents in disadvantaged communities had literacy challenges, thus unmotivated to assist their children with homework, unlike the educated parents, especially in semi- and urban areas who possess some academic knowledge to manage EFAL homework.
This study examines the impact of socioeconomic status (SES) on the academic performance of primary school learners in the Nzhelele West Circuit of Limpopo Province, South Africa. Despite national attempts to enhance educational results, considerable performance gaps remain, especially in rural and semi-rural areas. The study used a qualitative descriptive approach to acquire a thorough knowledge of the lived experiences of learners, parents, and teachers. Data was produced by semi-structured interviews and focus group discussion in chosen primary schools of communities with different socioeconomic backgrounds. The findings reveal the conditions of low-SES, which include unemployment, low parental education levels, poor learning materials and unstable family conditions, as those that result in obstacles that weaken the ability of learners to concentrate, attend school, have motivation, and perform well as learners. Among the problems that were emphasized by the participants was food insecurity, inadequate literacy provisions at home, and overcrowded families. The study found that SES has extensive effects on educational achievement and suggests context-sensitive intervention, such as enhanced school-community collaborations, parental empowerment programs, and special support programmes to eliminate SES-based obstacles. The results can help in gaining a better insight about the intricate nexus of SES and academic performance in rural South African primary school education
Source coverage refers to this result set; a publication may occur in several sources. Sync times refer to contributing journals.
Missing abstracts: 0 · Missing authors: 0 · Missing publication dates: 0 · Dates without day precision: 0
| Source | Most recent successful journal sync | Latest attempt |
|---|---|---|
| crossref | 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbs | complete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC |
| ojs-rest | 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbs | complete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 06:46 UTC |
| oai-pmh | 20 Oct 2026 19:55 UTC · ijrbs | complete · ijrbs · 20 Oct 2026 19:50 UTC |
| openalex-enrichment | 21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC · ijrbs | complete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC |