CiteNScope — Scholarly Index & Analytics
Discover / Analytics RESEARCH INTELLIGENCE
CiteNScope / Analytics

Explore the evidence.
Understand the reach.

Research across participating journals · All insights follow your collection filters.

Compare journals ↗
OpenAlex coverage 100.0% · 5/5 recordsLast OpenAlex observation 22 Oct 2026, 13:15 UTC
PUBLICATIONS5In the selected collection
CROSSREF CITATIONS05/5 with known counts
OPENALEX CITATIONS05/5 with known counts
OPENALEX MEAN0.0Per article with a known count
Explore articles 5 →
Filter collection Publication years, search & more
Reset
topic: Education during COVID-19 pandemic Remove ×
Your research collection

Output and reach

Publication activity alongside incoming citations.

Publication activity

Articles grouped by publication year

Publications

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.

View data & coverage

Citations received

OpenAlex · year of the citing work

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage

Research landscape

Leading affiliations and themes in this collection.

Full distributions & methodology ↓

Institutions

University of South Africa2University of Fort Hare1Durban University of Technology15/5 records with data

Countries

South Africa55/5 records with data

Primary topics

Education during COVID-19 pandemic55/5 records with data
Two perspectives on citations

Follow the research impact

Independent sources. Clear time scales.

Lifetime citations by publication year

Crossref and OpenAlex · separate totals for the same publication cohorts

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

Latest lifetime totals, grouped by the cited article’s year. These are not citations received in that year.

View data & coverage

Citations received each year

OpenAlex · incoming citation links grouped by citing-work year

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage
Annual history: 5/5 articles. Latest history observation: 2026-10-22T13:15:39.316004+00:00. Source totals are never added together.
Research side by side

Compare journals

Select journals to compare the same collection filters. Source totals stay separate. These measures describe research activity, not journal quality.

Leave all unchecked to include every matching journal. Selection affects only comparison charts.
Display range
International Journal of Business Ecosystem & StrategyInternational Journal of Research in Business and Social Science

Publications

Articles by publication year

View data & coverage

Crossref citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex · Citations received

By year of the citing work · 2017–2026

View data & coverage

2026 is year to date. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime charts share a citation scale. Unknown observations appear as gaps; known zero stays zero. Annual receipts use available OpenAlex histories and may not sum to lifetime totals. 0 undated publications excluded from publication-year charts.

Full analytics report All distributions, publications, comparisons & data provenance
5 MATCHING PUBLICATIONSExplore results →Export CSV ↓
INDEXED PUBLICATIONS5
CROSSREF CITATIONS0
CROSSREF · CITED PUBLICATIONS0.0%
CROSSREF · MEAN CITATIONS0.0

Crossref citation coverage: 5 / 5 publications (100.0%). Latest observation: 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC. Means and percentages use records with known counts.

OpenAlex / Separate citation source

A broader view of this research

DOI-matched OpenAlex observations for the same selected publications. These counts are separate from Crossref and are never added together.

OPENALEX CITATIONS0
DOI MATCH COVERAGE100.0%5 / 5 publications
MEAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY0.05 known · 0 unknown
MEDIAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY0

Observation range: 21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC — 22 Oct 2026 13:15 UTC. Missing matches are not zero citations. Previous observations may remain if a refresh fails or a DOI no longer matches.

OpenAlex citation distributionNo citations51–506–20021+0Unknown0

Institutions, countries & topics

OpenAlex affiliations and primary-topic classification. Each publication counts once per institution or country; multi-affiliated publications appear in multiple groups, so percentages can sum above 100%. Countries describe author affiliations, not nationality. Topics use one primary topic per publication.

Institutions

5 / 5 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 5 selected publications.

Countries

5 / 5 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 5 selected publications.

Primary topics

5 / 5 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 5 selected publications.

Citation year / OpenAlex

Citations received over time

Incoming citations to the selected publications, grouped by the year of the citing work. This is separate from lifetime citation totals grouped by the cited article’s publication year.

The publication filters above define which articles receive the citations. The citation-year range below only controls this chart and the incoming-citation comparison. Removing publication-year filters includes older articles’ incoming citations too.

Annual history available for 5 / 5 selected publications. Supported display window: 2017–2026; 2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Missing histories and years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—); partial coverage can understate totals.

Annual-history observations (UTC): 2026-10-21T07:23:05.888321+00:00 — 2026-10-22T13:15:39.316004+00:00. Older observations may be retained after failed or incomplete refreshes.

OpenAlex · Citations received by year

10.50 2017 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 5/52018 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 5/52019 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 5/52020 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 5/52021 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 5/52022 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 5/52023 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 5/52024 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 5/52025 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 5/52026 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 5/5 2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
View openalex · citations received by year data & coverage
Citation yearJournal / scopeOpenAlex · Citations received by yearPublicationsAnnual history known
2017All selected publications055/5
2018All selected publications055/5
2019All selected publications055/5
2020All selected publications055/5
2021All selected publications055/5
2022All selected publications055/5
2023All selected publications055/5
2024All selected publications055/5
2025All selected publications055/5
2026All selected publications055/5

Counts represent citation links, not unique citing papers across a journal: one paper citing two selected articles contributes two links. Older citations outside this window are excluded, so annual sums need not equal lifetime totals. OpenAlex methodology ↗

Crossref citation distribution

Latest Crossref totals for the selected publications; not citations received in the selected years.

Mean0.0
Median0
No citations51–506–20021+0Unknown0

Unknown counts are excluded from the mean, median and cited-publication rate.

Journal comparison

Same filters, source and counting rules across journals. Descriptive statistics, not a quality ranking.

Journal / publisherPublicationsCrossref citationsOpenAlex citationsOpenAlex coverageCrossref meanCrossref medianCrossref cited %*Crossref coverage
International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy
Bussecon International Academy
1001/10.000.01/1 · 100.0%
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science
SSBFNET
4004/40.00.00.04/4 · 100.0%

* Percentage among publications with a known citation count.

Explore publications

View all 5 →

Most cited · Crossref

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Exploring COVID-19 disruptions and adaptation in teaching and learning at a South African historically disadvantaged university

Neziswa Lucia Petshwa · Tando Rulashe · Kutu Sam Ramolobe

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

This study examines the impact of COVID-19 on a historically disadvantaged university in South Africa’s Eastern Cape, focusing on challenges faced by staff and students during the transition to online learning. Using a qualitative case study approach within an interpretivist paradigm, data were gathered through semi-structured interviews with 20 purposively selected participants. Thematic analysis was applied. The shift to online learning amplified existing inequalities, with limited infrastructure, low digital literacy, and poor connectivity hindering access, especially in rural areas. The study calls for inclusive quality assurance frameworks that address technological and socio-emotional needs. The study offers empirical insight into digital learning challenges at disadvantaged institutions and informs policy on building equitable, student-centred post-pandemic higher education systems rooted in social justice. The study recommends improved digital infrastructure, equitable access to devices and connectivity, and enhanced support for staff and students. It urges institutions to adopt flexible, inclusive teaching models to ensure resilience and equity in digital education.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v15i2.44250 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Reconceptualizing the culture of teaching and learning in South African open distance e-learning institutions: the impact of remote work

Thabiso Zitha

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

The Covid-19 pandemic accelerated the global shift to remote work, disrupting conventional operations across sectors, including higher education. For South Africa’s Open Distance and e-Learning (ODeL) institutions, the pandemic revealed both their readiness for remote engagement and the gaps between ODeL’s theoretical promise and its operational reality. This study aimed to explore how remote work has reshaped the culture of teaching and learning within South African ODeL institutions, with particular attention to staff, students, and institutional practices. Adopting a qualitative, secondary-data approach, the study drew on published scholarship, policy reports, and media sources, with data thematically analysed to identify patterns of change. The findings demonstrate that remote work enhanced flexibility, creativity, and continuity in ODeL, enabling teaching, learning, and administration to continue effectively outside the physical campus. However, it also exposed sharp inequalities in digital readiness, as many students and staff struggled with poor connectivity, high data costs, limited digital literacy, and work–life imbalances. While these challenges mirror global trends, they were intensified in South Africa by persistent socio-economic inequalities and infrastructural constraints. The study concludes that remote work has transformative potential but is sustainable only if supported by policy, investment in digital infrastructure, ongoing training, and hybrid models of delivery

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v15i1.45760 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Impact of COVID-19 on the management of teaching and learning strategies in secondary schools within the Hlanganani North Circuit, Vhembe District

Ivy Vutlhari Bila · Shonisani Agnes Mulovhedzi

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

COVID-19 is an illness associated with severe respiratory conditions, including pneumonia. Its widespread impact disrupted educational systems internationally. In South Africa, schools were provisionally closed as a preventive measure to limit the spread of the virus, leading to important changes in teaching and learning practices. This study aimed to investigate how COVID-19 impacted the management of teaching and learning strategies in secondary schools within the Hlanganani North Circuit of Vhembe District. A qualitative research approach was adopted, utilising interviews, observations, and document analysis to gather data. Participants were chosen through purposive sampling and included three principals, three deputy principals, and three departmental heads, all serving as members of their respective school management teams. The study focused on three schools, with each school contributing one principal, one deputy principal, and one departmental head. The findings revealed that school leaders come across difficulties in adopting new teaching approaches, largely due to limited technological skills and knowledge. Important challenges identified included inadequate training and a lack of resources, which hindered the ability to sustain effective teaching and learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study recommended that the Department of Education should distribute resources and invest in the necessary infrastructure needed to support the digital transformation of education. It also concluded that providing training opportunities would help school managers strengthen their knowledge and skills associated with effective teaching and learning

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v14i10.46880 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Silence in the virtual classroom: A reflective, collaborative response to student passivity

James Ojochenemi David

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

This study critically examines an educator’s response to student passivity and reduced engagement in online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic, drawing on collaborative action research conducted with a team of module facilitators. The sudden shift to remote instruction introduced significant pedagogical challenges, particularly in under-resourced higher education institutions in South Africa, where digital access limitations and reduced student participation negatively impacted learning outcomes. Using a retrospective collaborative autoethnographic approach, the study reflects teaching practices during this period, highlighting the complexities of encouraging active participation in virtual environments. Based on observed data, the analysis questions the effectiveness of targeted interventions—including structured peer interaction, real-time feedback, and personalised check-ins—aimed at increasing student engagement and reducing disengagement. Through repeated cycles of reflection and adaptation, the educator emphasises the importance of collegial collaboration in improving online teaching methods. The findings deepen understanding of engagement patterns in remote learning and offer practical insights for improving pedagogical responsiveness in resource-limited settings.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v14i10.46790 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Pre-Conditions Required for Online Teaching and Learning Implementation at the Durban University of Technology Business School

Anne Govindasamy · Veena Parbo Rawjee · Sean Sean Jugmohan · Faith Tinonetsana

International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2026

Read abstract

The rapid shift to online teaching and learning (OTL) during and after the COVID-19 pandemic exposed significant institutional and infrastructural challenges in higher education. While existing research has examined experiences of emergency remote teaching, limited attention has been given to systematically identifying the foundational pre-conditions necessary for sustainable OTL implementation, particularly within business school contexts in developing settings. This study aimed to identify the pre-conditions required for effective OTL implementation at the Durban University of Technology Business School (DBS). A mixed-methods approach was adopted, combining quantitative survey data (n = 82) with qualitative open-ended responses. Quantitative data were analysed using exploratory factor analysis, reliability testing and chi-square goodness-of-fit tests, while qualitative data were examined through thematic analysis. The findings reveal strong convergence between quantitative and qualitative results. Structural barriers, mostly related to internet connectivity, device access and staff development, emerged as the most critical pre-conditions. Participants also emphasised digital skills, stable power supply and institutional support as foundational requirements. The study contributes empirical evidence on institutional readiness for OTL and provides a structured framework for prioritising infrastructure, capacity building and support systems in similar higher education contexts.

DOI 10.36096/ijbes.v8i4.12390 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations

Selected results

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Pre-Conditions Required for Online Teaching and Learning Implementation at the Durban University of Technology Business School

Anne Govindasamy · Veena Parbo Rawjee · Sean Sean Jugmohan · Faith Tinonetsana

International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2026

Read abstract

The rapid shift to online teaching and learning (OTL) during and after the COVID-19 pandemic exposed significant institutional and infrastructural challenges in higher education. While existing research has examined experiences of emergency remote teaching, limited attention has been given to systematically identifying the foundational pre-conditions necessary for sustainable OTL implementation, particularly within business school contexts in developing settings. This study aimed to identify the pre-conditions required for effective OTL implementation at the Durban University of Technology Business School (DBS). A mixed-methods approach was adopted, combining quantitative survey data (n = 82) with qualitative open-ended responses. Quantitative data were analysed using exploratory factor analysis, reliability testing and chi-square goodness-of-fit tests, while qualitative data were examined through thematic analysis. The findings reveal strong convergence between quantitative and qualitative results. Structural barriers, mostly related to internet connectivity, device access and staff development, emerged as the most critical pre-conditions. Participants also emphasised digital skills, stable power supply and institutional support as foundational requirements. The study contributes empirical evidence on institutional readiness for OTL and provides a structured framework for prioritising infrastructure, capacity building and support systems in similar higher education contexts.

DOI 10.36096/ijbes.v8i4.12390 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Exploring COVID-19 disruptions and adaptation in teaching and learning at a South African historically disadvantaged university

Neziswa Lucia Petshwa · Tando Rulashe · Kutu Sam Ramolobe

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

This study examines the impact of COVID-19 on a historically disadvantaged university in South Africa’s Eastern Cape, focusing on challenges faced by staff and students during the transition to online learning. Using a qualitative case study approach within an interpretivist paradigm, data were gathered through semi-structured interviews with 20 purposively selected participants. Thematic analysis was applied. The shift to online learning amplified existing inequalities, with limited infrastructure, low digital literacy, and poor connectivity hindering access, especially in rural areas. The study calls for inclusive quality assurance frameworks that address technological and socio-emotional needs. The study offers empirical insight into digital learning challenges at disadvantaged institutions and informs policy on building equitable, student-centred post-pandemic higher education systems rooted in social justice. The study recommends improved digital infrastructure, equitable access to devices and connectivity, and enhanced support for staff and students. It urges institutions to adopt flexible, inclusive teaching models to ensure resilience and equity in digital education.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v15i2.44250 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Reconceptualizing the culture of teaching and learning in South African open distance e-learning institutions: the impact of remote work

Thabiso Zitha

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

The Covid-19 pandemic accelerated the global shift to remote work, disrupting conventional operations across sectors, including higher education. For South Africa’s Open Distance and e-Learning (ODeL) institutions, the pandemic revealed both their readiness for remote engagement and the gaps between ODeL’s theoretical promise and its operational reality. This study aimed to explore how remote work has reshaped the culture of teaching and learning within South African ODeL institutions, with particular attention to staff, students, and institutional practices. Adopting a qualitative, secondary-data approach, the study drew on published scholarship, policy reports, and media sources, with data thematically analysed to identify patterns of change. The findings demonstrate that remote work enhanced flexibility, creativity, and continuity in ODeL, enabling teaching, learning, and administration to continue effectively outside the physical campus. However, it also exposed sharp inequalities in digital readiness, as many students and staff struggled with poor connectivity, high data costs, limited digital literacy, and work–life imbalances. While these challenges mirror global trends, they were intensified in South Africa by persistent socio-economic inequalities and infrastructural constraints. The study concludes that remote work has transformative potential but is sustainable only if supported by policy, investment in digital infrastructure, ongoing training, and hybrid models of delivery

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v15i1.45760 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Impact of COVID-19 on the management of teaching and learning strategies in secondary schools within the Hlanganani North Circuit, Vhembe District

Ivy Vutlhari Bila · Shonisani Agnes Mulovhedzi

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

COVID-19 is an illness associated with severe respiratory conditions, including pneumonia. Its widespread impact disrupted educational systems internationally. In South Africa, schools were provisionally closed as a preventive measure to limit the spread of the virus, leading to important changes in teaching and learning practices. This study aimed to investigate how COVID-19 impacted the management of teaching and learning strategies in secondary schools within the Hlanganani North Circuit of Vhembe District. A qualitative research approach was adopted, utilising interviews, observations, and document analysis to gather data. Participants were chosen through purposive sampling and included three principals, three deputy principals, and three departmental heads, all serving as members of their respective school management teams. The study focused on three schools, with each school contributing one principal, one deputy principal, and one departmental head. The findings revealed that school leaders come across difficulties in adopting new teaching approaches, largely due to limited technological skills and knowledge. Important challenges identified included inadequate training and a lack of resources, which hindered the ability to sustain effective teaching and learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study recommended that the Department of Education should distribute resources and invest in the necessary infrastructure needed to support the digital transformation of education. It also concluded that providing training opportunities would help school managers strengthen their knowledge and skills associated with effective teaching and learning

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v14i10.46880 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Silence in the virtual classroom: A reflective, collaborative response to student passivity

James Ojochenemi David

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

This study critically examines an educator’s response to student passivity and reduced engagement in online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic, drawing on collaborative action research conducted with a team of module facilitators. The sudden shift to remote instruction introduced significant pedagogical challenges, particularly in under-resourced higher education institutions in South Africa, where digital access limitations and reduced student participation negatively impacted learning outcomes. Using a retrospective collaborative autoethnographic approach, the study reflects teaching practices during this period, highlighting the complexities of encouraging active participation in virtual environments. Based on observed data, the analysis questions the effectiveness of targeted interventions—including structured peer interaction, real-time feedback, and personalised check-ins—aimed at increasing student engagement and reducing disengagement. Through repeated cycles of reflection and adaptation, the educator emphasises the importance of collegial collaboration in improving online teaching methods. The findings deepen understanding of engagement patterns in remote learning and offer practical insights for improving pedagogical responsiveness in resource-limited settings.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v14i10.46790 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations

Data coverage & freshness

Source coverage refers to this result set; a publication may occur in several sources. Sync times refer to contributing journals.

Missing abstracts: 0 · Missing authors: 0 · Missing publication dates: 0 · Dates without day precision: 0

SourceMost recent successful journal syncLatest attempt
crossref21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
ojs-rest21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 06:46 UTC
oai-pmh20 Oct 2026 19:55 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 20 Oct 2026 19:50 UTC
openalex-enrichment21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
Full import history & methodology →