Publication activity
Articles grouped by publication year
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.
Research across participating journals · All insights follow your collection filters.
Publication activity alongside incoming citations.
Articles grouped by publication year
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
Leading affiliations and themes in this collection.
Full distributions & methodology ↓Independent sources. Clear time scales.
Crossref and OpenAlex · separate totals for the same publication cohorts
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
Latest lifetime totals, grouped by the cited article’s year. These are not citations received in that year.
OpenAlex · incoming citation links grouped by citing-work year
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
Select journals to compare the same collection filters. Source totals stay separate. These measures describe research activity, not journal quality.
Articles by publication year
Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year
Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year
By year of the citing work · 2017–2026
2026 is year to date. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime charts share a citation scale. Unknown observations appear as gaps; known zero stays zero. Annual receipts use available OpenAlex histories and may not sum to lifetime totals. 0 undated publications excluded from publication-year charts.
Crossref citation coverage: 2 / 2 publications (100.0%). Latest observation: 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC. Means and percentages use records with known counts.
DOI-matched OpenAlex observations for the same selected publications. These counts are separate from Crossref and are never added together.
Observation range: 21 Oct 2026 00:14 UTC — 21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC. Missing matches are not zero citations. Previous observations may remain if a refresh fails or a DOI no longer matches.
OpenAlex affiliations and primary-topic classification. Each publication counts once per institution or country; multi-affiliated publications appear in multiple groups, so percentages can sum above 100%. Countries describe author affiliations, not nationality. Topics use one primary topic per publication.
2 / 2 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 2 selected publications.
2 / 2 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 2 selected publications.
2 / 2 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 2 selected publications.
Citations are the latest recorded totals for articles published in each year, not citations received during that year. Crossref and OpenAlex remain separate and share the same citation scale. 2026 is incomplete; newer articles have had less time to receive citations.
0 undated publications excluded. Unknown citation counts are shown as —, never as zero. Partial coverage can understate totals; expand each table for known / total records.
| Publication year | Journal / scope | Publications | Publications | Crossref known | OpenAlex known |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | All selected publications | 2 | 2 | 2/2 | 2/2 |
| Publication year | Journal / scope | Crossref citations | Publications | Crossref known | OpenAlex known |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | All selected publications | 0 | 2 | 2/2 | 2/2 |
| Publication year | Journal / scope | OpenAlex citations | Publications | Crossref known | OpenAlex known |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | All selected publications | 0 | 2 | 2/2 | 2/2 |
Incoming citations to the selected publications, grouped by the year of the citing work. This is separate from lifetime citation totals grouped by the cited article’s publication year.
The publication filters above define which articles receive the citations. The citation-year range below only controls this chart and the incoming-citation comparison. Removing publication-year filters includes older articles’ incoming citations too.
Annual history available for 2 / 2 selected publications. Supported display window: 2017–2026; 2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Missing histories and years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—); partial coverage can understate totals.
Annual-history observations (UTC): 2026-10-21T00:14:35.016736+00:00 — 2026-10-21T07:23:07.462669+00:00. Older observations may be retained after failed or incomplete refreshes.
| Citation year | Journal / scope | OpenAlex · Citations received by year | Publications | Annual history known |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | All selected publications | 0 | 2 | 2/2 |
| 2018 | All selected publications | 0 | 2 | 2/2 |
| 2019 | All selected publications | 0 | 2 | 2/2 |
| 2020 | All selected publications | 0 | 2 | 2/2 |
| 2021 | All selected publications | 0 | 2 | 2/2 |
| 2022 | All selected publications | 0 | 2 | 2/2 |
| 2023 | All selected publications | 0 | 2 | 2/2 |
| 2024 | All selected publications | 0 | 2 | 2/2 |
| 2025 | All selected publications | 0 | 2 | 2/2 |
| 2026 | All selected publications | 0 | 2 | 2/2 |
Counts represent citation links, not unique citing papers across a journal: one paper citing two selected articles contributes two links. Older citations outside this window are excluded, so annual sums need not equal lifetime totals. OpenAlex methodology ↗
Publications by publication year. 2026 is an incomplete year.
| Period | Publications |
|---|---|
| 2026 | 2 |
Latest Crossref totals for the selected publications; not citations received in the selected years.
Unknown counts are excluded from the mean, median and cited-publication rate.
Same filters, source and counting rules across journals. Descriptive statistics, not a quality ranking.
| Journal / publisher | Publications | Crossref citations | OpenAlex citations | OpenAlex coverage | Crossref mean | Crossref median | Crossref cited %* | Crossref coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy Bussecon International Academy | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 1/1 · 100.0% |
| International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science SSBFNET | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 1/1 · 100.0% |
* Percentage among publications with a known citation count.
The incorporation of digital technology has become a crucial emphasis in the pursuit of efficiency, quality, and sustainability in contemporary healthcare operations. This study offers a theory-driven comparative analysis of digital technology integration in hospitals throughout the United States and chosen African nations: Nigeria, Kenya, and South Africa, utilising the Diffusion of Innovation (DOI) theory as the principal analytical framework. This review synthesises evidence from secondary data, including peer-reviewed literature, policy documents, and institutional reports, regarding the influence of policy environments, infrastructural readiness, workforce capability, and governance structures on the adoption and integration of digital health technologies in various contexts. The results indicate that U.S. hospitals possess a sophisticated and developed digital ecosystem characterised by extensive utilisation of electronic health records, artificial intelligence-driven diagnostics, telehealth, and interoperable systems, primarily attributable to robust regulatory mandates and continuous investment. Conversely, hospitals in the chosen African nations exhibit inconsistent and fragmented integration, hampered by infrastructural deficiencies, restricted digital competencies, and regulatory inconsistencies, yet supported by adaptable mobile-first and open-source innovations. Utilising the principles of prominent diffusion theories relevant to drive contexts, the constructs of DOI (relative advantage, compatibility, complexity, trialability, and observability) delineate varied adoption trajectories and opportunities for contextualised policy learning. The study finds that the digital divide in healthcare must be reduced through measures that integrate technical methods with institutional capacity, governance frameworks, and workforce development to ensure equitable and sustainable implementation in healthcare.
This study aims to examine Type 2 diabetes care as a strategic health ecosystem and to identify how differences in ecosystem design and coordination strategies influence system-level performance across countries. A cross-national comparative strategy analysis is conducted using secondary data from international and national health statistics covering the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, Japan, China, India, and Taiwan during the period 2015–2024. The analysis is guided by an ecosystem-based strategic framework that integrates contextual system characteristics, core care strategies, and intermediate performance outcomes, including prevention orientation, accessibility of care resources, technological integration, coordination mechanisms, and community engagement. Multi-dimensional analytical and visualization techniques are applied to compare strategic configurations and performance patterns across national care ecosystems. The results reveal a continuous global increase in the prevalence of Type 2 diabetes, alongside substantial heterogeneity in care effectiveness across countries. Stronger ecosystem performance is associated with integrated care strategies, advanced digital coordination, stable primary care structures, and high accessibility supported by universal coverage and community-based networks. The study concludes that effective management of chronic disease depends not only on medical interventions but also on the strategic design and governance of healthcare ecosystems, emphasizing the importance of prevention-oriented strategies, digital maturity, reduction of access disparities, and localized ecosystem activation as critical levers for improving long-term system performance.
This study aims to examine Type 2 diabetes care as a strategic health ecosystem and to identify how differences in ecosystem design and coordination strategies influence system-level performance across countries. A cross-national comparative strategy analysis is conducted using secondary data from international and national health statistics covering the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, Japan, China, India, and Taiwan during the period 2015–2024. The analysis is guided by an ecosystem-based strategic framework that integrates contextual system characteristics, core care strategies, and intermediate performance outcomes, including prevention orientation, accessibility of care resources, technological integration, coordination mechanisms, and community engagement. Multi-dimensional analytical and visualization techniques are applied to compare strategic configurations and performance patterns across national care ecosystems. The results reveal a continuous global increase in the prevalence of Type 2 diabetes, alongside substantial heterogeneity in care effectiveness across countries. Stronger ecosystem performance is associated with integrated care strategies, advanced digital coordination, stable primary care structures, and high accessibility supported by universal coverage and community-based networks. The study concludes that effective management of chronic disease depends not only on medical interventions but also on the strategic design and governance of healthcare ecosystems, emphasizing the importance of prevention-oriented strategies, digital maturity, reduction of access disparities, and localized ecosystem activation as critical levers for improving long-term system performance.
The incorporation of digital technology has become a crucial emphasis in the pursuit of efficiency, quality, and sustainability in contemporary healthcare operations. This study offers a theory-driven comparative analysis of digital technology integration in hospitals throughout the United States and chosen African nations: Nigeria, Kenya, and South Africa, utilising the Diffusion of Innovation (DOI) theory as the principal analytical framework. This review synthesises evidence from secondary data, including peer-reviewed literature, policy documents, and institutional reports, regarding the influence of policy environments, infrastructural readiness, workforce capability, and governance structures on the adoption and integration of digital health technologies in various contexts. The results indicate that U.S. hospitals possess a sophisticated and developed digital ecosystem characterised by extensive utilisation of electronic health records, artificial intelligence-driven diagnostics, telehealth, and interoperable systems, primarily attributable to robust regulatory mandates and continuous investment. Conversely, hospitals in the chosen African nations exhibit inconsistent and fragmented integration, hampered by infrastructural deficiencies, restricted digital competencies, and regulatory inconsistencies, yet supported by adaptable mobile-first and open-source innovations. Utilising the principles of prominent diffusion theories relevant to drive contexts, the constructs of DOI (relative advantage, compatibility, complexity, trialability, and observability) delineate varied adoption trajectories and opportunities for contextualised policy learning. The study finds that the digital divide in healthcare must be reduced through measures that integrate technical methods with institutional capacity, governance frameworks, and workforce development to ensure equitable and sustainable implementation in healthcare.
Source coverage refers to this result set; a publication may occur in several sources. Sync times refer to contributing journals.
Missing abstracts: 0 · Missing authors: 0 · Missing publication dates: 0 · Dates without day precision: 0
| Source | Most recent successful journal sync | Latest attempt |
|---|---|---|
| crossref | 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbs | complete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC |
| ojs-rest | 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbs | complete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 06:46 UTC |
| oai-pmh | 20 Oct 2026 19:55 UTC · ijrbs | complete · ijrbs · 20 Oct 2026 19:50 UTC |
| openalex-enrichment | 21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC · ijrbs | complete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC |