Crossref and OpenAlex · separate totals for the same publication cohorts
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
Latest lifetime totals, grouped by the cited article’s year. These are not citations received in that year.
View data & coverage
Citations received each year
OpenAlex · incoming citation links grouped by citing-work year
OpenAlex
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
Annual history: 2/2 articles. Latest history observation: 2026-10-22T02:42:37.998059+00:00. Source totals are never added together.
Research side by side
Compare journals
Select journals to compare the same collection filters. Source totals stay separate. These measures describe research activity, not journal quality.
Display range
Bussecon Review of Social SciencesInternational Journal of Research in Business and Social Science
Publications
Articles by publication year
View data & coverage
Crossref citations
Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year
View data & coverage
OpenAlex citations
Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year
View data & coverage
OpenAlex · Citations received
By year of the citing work · 2017–2026
View data & coverage
2026 is year to date. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime charts share a citation scale. Unknown observations appear as gaps; known zero stays zero. Annual receipts use available OpenAlex histories and may not sum to lifetime totals. 0 undated publications excluded from publication-year charts.
Full analytics report All distributions, publications, comparisons & data provenance
Crossref citation coverage: 2 / 2 publications (100.0%). Latest observation: 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC. Means and percentages use records with known counts.
OpenAlex / Separate citation source
A broader view of this research
DOI-matched OpenAlex observations for the same selected publications. These counts are separate from Crossref and are never added together.
OPENALEX CITATIONS1
DOI MATCH COVERAGE100.0%2 / 2 publications
MEAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY0.52 known · 0 unknown
MEDIAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY0.5
Observation range: 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC — 22 Oct 2026 02:42 UTC. Missing matches are not zero citations. Previous observations may remain if a refresh fails or a DOI no longer matches.
OpenAlex affiliations and primary-topic classification. Each publication counts once per institution or country; multi-affiliated publications appear in multiple groups, so percentages can sum above 100%. Countries describe author affiliations, not nationality. Topics use one primary topic per publication.
Institutions
2 / 2 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 2 selected publications.
Citations are the latest recorded totals for articles published in each year, not citations received during that year. Crossref and OpenAlex remain separate and share the same citation scale. 2026 is incomplete; newer articles have had less time to receive citations.
0 undated publications excluded. Unknown citation counts are shown as —, never as zero. Partial coverage can understate totals; expand each table for known / total records.
Publications
View publications data & coverage
Publication year
Journal / scope
Publications
Publications
Crossref known
OpenAlex known
2020
All selected publications
1
1
1/1
1/1
2021
All selected publications
0
0
0/0
0/0
2022
All selected publications
0
0
0/0
0/0
2023
All selected publications
0
0
0/0
0/0
2024
All selected publications
1
1
1/1
1/1
Crossref citations
View crossref citations data & coverage
Publication year
Journal / scope
Crossref citations
Publications
Crossref known
OpenAlex known
2020
All selected publications
0
1
1/1
1/1
2021
All selected publications
—
0
0/0
0/0
2022
All selected publications
—
0
0/0
0/0
2023
All selected publications
—
0
0/0
0/0
2024
All selected publications
1
1
1/1
1/1
OpenAlex citations
View openalex citations data & coverage
Publication year
Journal / scope
OpenAlex citations
Publications
Crossref known
OpenAlex known
2020
All selected publications
0
1
1/1
1/1
2021
All selected publications
—
0
0/0
0/0
2022
All selected publications
—
0
0/0
0/0
2023
All selected publications
—
0
0/0
0/0
2024
All selected publications
1
1
1/1
1/1
Citation year / OpenAlex
Citations received over time
Incoming citations to the selected publications, grouped by the year of the citing work. This is separate from lifetime citation totals grouped by the cited article’s publication year.
The publication filters above define which articles receive the citations. The citation-year range below only controls this chart and the incoming-citation comparison. Removing publication-year filters includes older articles’ incoming citations too.
Annual history available for 2 / 2 selected publications. Supported display window: 2017–2026; 2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Missing histories and years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—); partial coverage can understate totals.
Annual-history observations (UTC): 2026-10-21T07:22:58.470820+00:00 — 2026-10-22T02:42:37.998059+00:00. Older observations may be retained after failed or incomplete refreshes.
OpenAlex · Citations received by year
View openalex · citations received by year data & coverage
Citation year
Journal / scope
OpenAlex · Citations received by year
Publications
Annual history known
2017
All selected publications
0
2
2/2
2018
All selected publications
0
2
2/2
2019
All selected publications
0
2
2/2
2020
All selected publications
0
2
2/2
2021
All selected publications
0
2
2/2
2022
All selected publications
0
2
2/2
2023
All selected publications
0
2
2/2
2024
All selected publications
0
2
2/2
2025
All selected publications
0
2
2/2
2026
All selected publications
1
2
2/2
Counts represent citation links, not unique citing papers across a journal: one paper citing two selected articles contributes two links. Older citations outside this window are excluded, so annual sums need not equal lifetime totals. OpenAlex methodology ↗
The health care system provides hope and livelihoods to its direct customers, who are the patients. The role of social innovation needs to take front and centre stage by authorities and practitioners tasked with decision-making and problem-solving tasks from a strategic perspective. The social innovation realm has demonstrated its ability to accelerate social value within public-oriented institutions. An interpretivism philosophical approach of qualitative methodology predicated on the inductive theory-building approach was undertaken to solicit empirical data from budget decision-making health practitioners. The research presented a thematic analytical evaluation of the data set from twelve participants holding various influential healthcare positions. The study's findings indicated a huge gap in integrating social innovation and associated entrepreneurial mindset. The procurement decision-making of produce and commodities could mitigate the social ills of joblessness, poverty and quality of life. Furthermore, the findings illuminated the lack of systemic resources and investment that could be driven by social innovation and entrepreneurial inclusion from the surrounding SMMEs. The multi-disciplinary approach will have to be a priority. At the same time, a tactically diverse strategic thrust from leadership and management could be a game-changer and a de-risking intervention in bolstering the local economic development for the SMMEs within the agricultural sector value chain.
Today, innovation appears as new ideas, creative ideas, new situations in the form of devices or methods. Innovation is also often seen as the implementation of better solutions that meet new requirements, specific needs, or current market needs. Social innovation has special importance among the forms of innovation. This study aims to evaluate social innovation applications for visually disabled citizens in local governments. This study also aims to conduct a registration service review for visually impaired citizens within the scope of social innovation. With the registration service, it is aimed to voice the books in line with the demands of visually impaired members through volunteer readers. This study also evaluates the IMM’s social innovation efforts that provide innovative solutions to their problems. Additionally, this study also evaluated audio libraries for visually impaired individuals, which help them to read books.
The health care system provides hope and livelihoods to its direct customers, who are the patients. The role of social innovation needs to take front and centre stage by authorities and practitioners tasked with decision-making and problem-solving tasks from a strategic perspective. The social innovation realm has demonstrated its ability to accelerate social value within public-oriented institutions. An interpretivism philosophical approach of qualitative methodology predicated on the inductive theory-building approach was undertaken to solicit empirical data from budget decision-making health practitioners. The research presented a thematic analytical evaluation of the data set from twelve participants holding various influential healthcare positions. The study's findings indicated a huge gap in integrating social innovation and associated entrepreneurial mindset. The procurement decision-making of produce and commodities could mitigate the social ills of joblessness, poverty and quality of life. Furthermore, the findings illuminated the lack of systemic resources and investment that could be driven by social innovation and entrepreneurial inclusion from the surrounding SMMEs. The multi-disciplinary approach will have to be a priority. At the same time, a tactically diverse strategic thrust from leadership and management could be a game-changer and a de-risking intervention in bolstering the local economic development for the SMMEs within the agricultural sector value chain.
Today, innovation appears as new ideas, creative ideas, new situations in the form of devices or methods. Innovation is also often seen as the implementation of better solutions that meet new requirements, specific needs, or current market needs. Social innovation has special importance among the forms of innovation. This study aims to evaluate social innovation applications for visually disabled citizens in local governments. This study also aims to conduct a registration service review for visually impaired citizens within the scope of social innovation. With the registration service, it is aimed to voice the books in line with the demands of visually impaired members through volunteer readers. This study also evaluates the IMM’s social innovation efforts that provide innovative solutions to their problems. Additionally, this study also evaluated audio libraries for visually impaired individuals, which help them to read books.