Publication activity
Articles grouped by publication year
Publications
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.
OpenAlex coverage 99.0% · 504/509 recordsLast OpenAlex observation 21 Oct 2026, 00:22 UTC
PUBLICATIONS509In the selected collection
CROSSREF CITATIONS937476/509 with known counts
OPENALEX CITATIONS2068504/509 with known counts
OPENALEX MEAN4.1Per article with a known count
Filter collection Publication years, search & more
Research in focus
Most cited articles
Top 5 in the selected collection · Ranked by Crossref lifetime citations. Only articles with at least one known citation are included; source totals are never combined.
- Profit Growth : Impact of Net Profit Margin, Gross Profit Margin and Total Assests Turnover
2020 · Talitha Nathaniela Nariswari · Nugi Mohammad Nugraha
46Crossref citations - Bank Specific and Macroeconomic Determinants of Commercial Bank Profitability: Empirical Evidence from Nigeria
2017 · Oluwaseyi Ebenezer Olalere · Wan Ahmad Bin Omar · Syahida Kamil
38Crossref citations - The Impact of Inflation on Economic Growth
2019 · Nexhat Kryeziu · Esat Ali Durguti
32Crossref citations - CAMELS-based Determinants for the Credit Rating of Turkish Deposit Banks
2015 · Serhat Yuksel · Hasan Dincer · Umit Hacioglu
29Crossref citations - Analysis of Impacts of Operational Risk Management Practices on Banks’ Financial Performance: Study of Selected Commercial Banks in Nigeria
2020 · Diekolola Oye
20Crossref citations
The journal at a glance
Output and reach
Publication activity alongside incoming citations.
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
OpenAlex
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
Research landscape
Leading affiliations and themes in this collection.
Full distributions & methodology ↓Institutions
University of Kigali12University of Prishtina10Universitas Widyatama8390/509 records with dataPrimary topics
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency70Corporate Finance and Governance34Monetary Policy and Economic Impact29504/509 records with dataTwo perspectives on citations
Follow the research impact
Independent sources. Clear time scales.
Lifetime citations by publication year
Crossref and OpenAlex · separate totals for the same publication cohorts
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
Latest lifetime totals, grouped by the cited article’s year. These are not citations received in that year.
View data & coverage
Citations received each year
OpenAlex · incoming citation links grouped by citing-work year
OpenAlex
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
Annual history: 504/509 articles. Latest history observation: 2026-10-21T00:22:06.636292+00:00. Source totals are never added together.
Research side by side
Compare journals
Select journals to compare the same collection filters. Source totals stay separate. These measures describe research activity, not journal quality.
Display range
International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies
Publications
Articles by publication year
View data & coverage
Crossref citations
Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year
View data & coverage
OpenAlex citations
Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year
View data & coverage
OpenAlex · Citations received
By year of the citing work · 2017–2026
View data & coverage
2026 is year to date. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime charts share a citation scale. Unknown observations appear as gaps; known zero stays zero. Annual receipts use available OpenAlex histories and may not sum to lifetime totals. 0 undated publications excluded from publication-year charts.
Full research profile All distributions, publications, comparisons & data provenance
INDEXED PUBLICATIONS509
CROSSREF CITATIONS937
CROSSREF · CITED PUBLICATIONS56.3%
CROSSREF · MEAN CITATIONS1.97
Crossref citation coverage: 476 / 509 publications (93.5%). Latest observation: 21 Oct 2026, 00:21 UTC. Means and percentages use records with known counts.
OpenAlex / Separate citation source
A broader view of this research
DOI-matched OpenAlex observations for the same selected publications. These counts are separate from Crossref and are never added together.
OPENALEX CITATIONS2068
DOI MATCH COVERAGE99.0%504 / 509 publications
MEAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY4.1504 known · 5 unknown
MEDIAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY1.0
Observation range: 21 Oct 2026 00:21 UTC — 21 Oct 2026 00:22 UTC. Missing matches are not zero citations. Previous observations may remain if a refresh fails or a DOI no longer matches.
Institutions, countries & topics
OpenAlex affiliations and primary-topic classification. Each publication counts once per institution or country; multi-affiliated publications appear in multiple groups, so percentages can sum above 100%. Countries describe author affiliations, not nationality. Topics use one primary topic per publication.
Institutions
390 / 509 with data · 119 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 509 selected publications.
University of Kigali12 2.4%University of Prishtina10 2.0%Universitas Widyatama8 1.6%Istanbul Medipol University7 1.4%Telkom University7 1.4%University of Dhaka6 1.2%Wichita State University6 1.2%Universitas Teknologi Yogyakarta6 1.2%The Co-operative University of Kenya6 1.2%University of KwaZulu-Natal6 1.2%University of Port Harcourt5 1.0%Menlo College5 1.0%Universitas Jambi5 1.0%University of Barishal5 1.0%Istanbul University5 1.0%University of Central Florida4 0.8%Poznań University of Economics and Business4 0.8%Public Authority for Applied Education and Training4 0.8%Kenyatta University4 0.8%Lebanese University4 0.8%University of South Africa4 0.8%IPB University4 0.8%Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology4 0.8%Islamic University of Indonesia4 0.8%Politeknik Negeri Malang4 0.8%Masinde Muliro University of Science and Technology4 0.8%Universitas Trisakti3 0.6%Open University of Sri Lanka3 0.6%University of the Witwatersrand3 0.6%University of Lagos3 0.6%University of Staffordshire3 0.6%Karatina University3 0.6%Krakow University of Economics3 0.6%Perbanas Institute3 0.6%Meru University of Science and Technology3 0.6%Varendra University3 0.6%Indian Institute of Management Indore3 0.6%Universiti Malaysia Sarawak3 0.6%Duhok Polytechnic University3 0.6%State University of New York at Oswego3 0.6%Ba Isago University3 0.6%Istanbul Commerce University3 0.6%University of Santo Tomas3 0.6%Beykent University3 0.6%State University of Malang2 0.4%Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah2 0.4%Tunis University2 0.4%Budapest University of Economics and Business2 0.4%Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona2 0.4%Cihan University-Erbil2 0.4%University of North Alabama2 0.4%Aichi University2 0.4%University of Mons2 0.4%Southwest University of Political Science & Law2 0.4%Ekiti State University2 0.4%University of Cape Coast2 0.4%University of Sfax2 0.4%University of Liège2 0.4%University of Georgia2 0.4%Binus University2 0.4%Universidade de São Paulo2 0.4%Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University2 0.4%Taibah University2 0.4%Universitas Jember2 0.4%Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta2 0.4%KCA University2 0.4%Pan Africa Christian University2 0.4%Kenya Methodist University2 0.4%University for Business and Technology2 0.4%Islamic Azad University, Marvdasht2 0.4%RISEBA University of Applied Sciences2 0.4%Bangladesh Bank2 0.4%Middle Technical University2 0.4%Jagannath University2 0.4%American University of Ras Al Khaimah2 0.4%Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta2 0.4%University of Priština - Kosovska Mitrovica2 0.4%Cihan University - Duhok2 0.4%SBS Swiss Business School2 0.4%Xavier Institute of Management and Entrepreneurship2 0.4%Faculty of Economics and Management of Sfax2 0.4%Z. H. Sikder University of Science and Technology2 0.4%Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Pancasetia2 0.4%Universitas Ekuitas Indonesia2 0.4%Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Indonesia Surabaya2 0.4%Taita Taveta University2 0.4%Obafemi Awolowo University2 0.4%University of Benin2 0.4%Universiti Teknologi MARA2 0.4%University of Sousse2 0.4%University of Rajshahi2 0.4%Citadel2 0.4%Garden City University College2 0.4%University of Stavanger2 0.4%Macquarie University2 0.4%Yeditepe University1 0.2%Swiss German University1 0.2%University of Finance and Administration1 0.2%Claremont McKenna College1 0.2%Islamic Azad University, Tehran1 0.2%Kozminski University1 0.2%Great Zimbabwe University1 0.2%Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi1 0.2%Michigan Technological University1 0.2%Higher Colleges of Technology1 0.2%Gonzaga University1 0.2%National University of Science and Technology1 0.2%Hunan University of Science and Technology1 0.2%Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul1 0.2%Tekirdağ Namık Kemal University1 0.2%Udayana University1 0.2%Sivas Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi1 0.2%Akwa Ibom State University1 0.2%Ahmadu Bello University1 0.2%Bahçeşehir University1 0.2%Lampung University1 0.2%University of Nairobi1 0.2%Reserve Bank of India1 0.2%Pennsylvania State University1 0.2%Islamic Azad University of Zanjan1 0.2%Tianjin University of Science and Technology1 0.2%National Bureau of Statistics of China1 0.2%Khadim Ali Shah Bukhari Institute of Technology1 0.2%Anadolu University1 0.2%Central Bank of Brazil1 0.2%Bandung Institute of Technology1 0.2%University of Baghdad1 0.2%University of Ghana1 0.2%Artvin Coruh University1 0.2%National Sun Yat-sen University1 0.2%Jimma University1 0.2%University of Buea1 0.2%Amman Arab University1 0.2%Cairo University1 0.2%Ankara University1 0.2%Jagannath University1 0.2%Universidade de Brasília1 0.2%Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad1 0.2%Army Medical University1 0.2%Tarbiat Modares University1 0.2%Central Connecticut State University1 0.2%Tribhuvan University1 0.2%Edinboro University1 0.2%University of Botswana1 0.2%International Islamic University Chittagong1 0.2%Mzumbe University1 0.2%St. Augustine University of Tanzania1 0.2%Mangosuthu University of Technology1 0.2%Strathmore University1 0.2%Lake Forest College1 0.2%University of Douala1 0.2%University of Iceland1 0.2%Shiraz University1 0.2%Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember1 0.2%University of New Mexico1 0.2%University of Alabama1 0.2%Wayamba University of Sri Lanka1 0.2%University of Brawijaya1 0.2%Mercu Buana University1 0.2%Lamar University1 0.2%Université de Dschang1 0.2%Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta1 0.2%Federal University of Technology1 0.2%Illinois Institute of Technology1 0.2%Lincoln University1 0.2%King Abdulaziz University1 0.2%Guangdong University of Foreign Studies1 0.2%Başkent University1 0.2%Zagazig University1 0.2%York University1 0.2%Majmaah University1 0.2%Utah Valley University1 0.2%Akdeniz University1 0.2%Saint Peter's University1 0.2%Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey1 0.2%Université Paris Cité1 0.2%Harbin Institute of Technology1 0.2%Kingston University London1 0.2%Nnamdi Azikiwe University1 0.2%University of Nizwa1 0.2%Northern State University1 0.2%California State University, San Marcos1 0.2%Stockton University1 0.2%Kırklareli University1 0.2%University of Mines and Technology1 0.2%California State University Los Angeles1 0.2%Islamic Azad University, Isfahan1 0.2%Hitit Üniversitesi1 0.2%Konya Food and Agriculture University1 0.2%Kumasi Technical University1 0.2%Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology1 0.2%The University of Dodoma1 0.2%University of Central Missouri1 0.2%University of Energy and Natural Resources1 0.2%University of Indonesia1 0.2%Takming University of Science and Technology1 0.2%Budapest University of Technology and Economics1 0.2%Omar Al-Mukhtar University1 0.2%Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University1 0.2%Landmark University1 0.2%Kaduna State University1 0.2%Bangladesh Air Force Shaheen College1 0.2%Pancasila University1 0.2%National University of Science and Technology1 0.2%Sol Plaatje University1 0.2%University of National Education1 0.2%Warmadewa University1 0.2%University of Benghazi1 0.2%Independent University, Bangladesh1 0.2%Nasarawa State University1 0.2%Tajen University1 0.2%Université du Québec en Outaouais1 0.2%Anna University, Chennai1 0.2%Nigerian Defence Academy1 0.2%Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte1 0.2%Universitas Halu Oleo1 0.2%Prague University of Economics and Business1 0.2%University of Hyderabad1 0.2%University of Uyo1 0.2%University of Calabar1 0.2%Islamic University1 0.2%Yıldız Technical University1 0.2%Universitas Madura1 0.2%Universitas Tabanan1 0.2%Capital University of Science and Technology1 0.2%UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya1 0.2%Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha1 0.2%Universitas Batam1 0.2%University of East1 0.2%Lahore Garrison University1 0.2%Universitas Merdeka Malang1 0.2%Universitas Muhammadiyah Jember1 0.2%University of Buraimi1 0.2%Kigali Independent University1 0.2%Prime University1 0.2%Banco Central del Uruguay1 0.2%Institute for Systems Analysis1 0.2%Xinqiao Hospital1 0.2%Islamic Azad University Yasuj1 0.2%University of Science and Technology, Meghalaya1 0.2%East–West University1 0.2%Council for Scientific and Industrial Research1 0.2%Ministry of Finance1 0.2%Trilogi University1 0.2%Universiti Teknologi MARA System1 0.2%Institut d'Economie Scientifique Et de Gestion1 0.2%Jumeira University1 0.2%Universitas Islam Malang1 0.2%Nile University of Nigeria1 0.2%Sampoerna University1 0.2%Forestry Research Institute of Ghana1 0.2%Institut Bisnis dan Informatika Kesatuan1 0.2%Cihan University Sulaimaniya1 0.2%Institut Agama Islam Negeri Parepare1 0.2%Universitas Teknologi Bandung1 0.2%University of Derna1 0.2%Erbil Polytechnic University1 0.2%Tirana Business University1 0.2%National University of Battambang1 0.2%ESOFT Uni1 0.2%Instituto Brasileiro de Ensino, Desenvolvimento e Pesquisa1 0.2%Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Negeri Majene1 0.2%Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Manajemen YKPN Yogyakarta1 0.2%Otoritas Jasa Keuangan1 0.2%Rowan University1 0.2%Maltepe University1 0.2%University of Florence1 0.2%Jahangirnagar University1 0.2%Mulawarman University1 0.2%Saint Louis University1 0.2%Christ University1 0.2%Université Félix Houphouët-Boigny1 0.2%Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne1 0.2%University of Bath1 0.2%Universidade Federal do Paraná1 0.2%Western Washington University1 0.2%Radford University1 0.2%Winona State University1 0.2%University of Ngaoundéré1 0.2%University of Duhok1 0.2%Middlesex University London1 0.2%University at Buffalo, State University of New York1 0.2%University of Sulaimani1 0.2%Universiti Malaysia Perlis1 0.2%De Montfort University1 0.2%Pakuan University1 0.2%Lead City University1 0.2%University of Detroit Mercy1 0.2%Makerere University1 0.2%University of Tabuk1 0.2%Coventry University1 0.2%Marmara University1 0.2%Premier University1 0.2%Adnan Menderes University1 0.2%Georgia Gwinnett College1 0.2%Tata Institute of Social Sciences1 0.2%Muğla University1 0.2%Stonehill College1 0.2%Erciyes University1 0.2%Metropolitan State University of Denver1 0.2%University of Gothenburg1 0.2%East West University1 0.2%Aalborg University1 0.2%University of Chittagong1 0.2%October University of Modern Sciences and Arts1 0.2%Ghana Communication Technology University1 0.2%Islamic Azad University of Najafabad1 0.2%Tunku Abdul Rahman University of Management and Technology1 0.2%Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman1 0.2%Bryan College1 0.2%Hasanuddin University1 0.2%University of the Aegean1 0.2%Lindenwood University1 0.2%Nelson Mandela University1 0.2%
Countries
390 / 509 with data · 119 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 509 selected publications.
Indonesia78 15.3%United States44 8.6%Turkey33 6.5%Kenya25 4.9%Bangladesh23 4.5%Nigeria21 4.1%South Africa16 3.1%Rwanda13 2.6%India12 2.4%XK12 2.4%Iraq10 2.0%Malaysia9 1.8%Britain (UK)8 1.6%Poland8 1.6%Ghana7 1.4%Tunisia7 1.4%China6 1.2%Brazil5 1.0%Saudi Arabia5 1.0%United Arab Emirates4 0.8%Belgium4 0.8%Botswana4 0.8%Iran4 0.8%Kuwait4 0.8%Lebanon4 0.8%Sri Lanka4 0.8%Pakistan4 0.8%Cameroon3 0.6%Philippines3 0.6%Tanzania3 0.6%Australia2 0.4%Canada2 0.4%Czech Republic2 0.4%Egypt2 0.4%Spain2 0.4%France2 0.4%Hungary2 0.4%Japan2 0.4%Latvia2 0.4%Libya2 0.4%Norway2 0.4%Oman2 0.4%Russia2 0.4%Taiwan2 0.4%Albania1 0.2%Côte d’Ivoire1 0.2%Denmark1 0.2%Ethiopia1 0.2%Greece1 0.2%Iceland1 0.2%Italy1 0.2%Jordan1 0.2%Cambodia1 0.2%Nepal1 0.2%New Zealand1 0.2%Sweden1 0.2%Uganda1 0.2%Uruguay1 0.2%Zimbabwe1 0.2%
Primary topics
504 / 509 with data · 5 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 509 selected publications.
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency70 13.8%Corporate Finance and Governance34 6.7%Monetary Policy and Economic Impact29 5.7%Financial Markets and Investment Strategies23 4.5%Islamic Finance and Banking Studies23 4.5%Construction Project Management and Performance20 3.9%Banking Sector Performance and Management19 3.7%Microfinance and Financial Inclusion17 3.3%Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance14 2.8%Financial Analysis and Corporate Governance12 2.4%Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting11 2.2%Technology Adoption and User Behaviour7 1.4%Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis7 1.4%Financial Distress and Bankruptcy Prediction7 1.4%Efficiency Analysis Using DEA6 1.2%Stock Market Forecasting Methods6 1.2%Corporate Taxation and Avoidance6 1.2%Working Capital and Financial Performance6 1.2%Accounting Theory and Financial Reporting6 1.2%Financial Literacy and Behavior6 1.2%Corporate Governance and Financial Management6 1.2%Market Dynamics and Volatility5 1.0%FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance5 1.0%Digital Transformation in Financial Services5 1.0%Accounting and Financial Management5 1.0%Stochastic processes and financial applications4 0.8%Global Financial Crisis and Policies4 0.8%Housing Market and Economics4 0.8%Credit Risk and Financial Regulations4 0.8%Risk Management in Financial Firms4 0.8%Economic Growth and Fiscal Policies4 0.8%Financial Reporting and Valuation Research4 0.8%Global trade and economics3 0.6%Customer Service Quality and Loyalty3 0.6%Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling3 0.6%Economic Growth and Productivity3 0.6%International Business and FDI3 0.6%Energy, Environment, Economic Growth3 0.6%Accounting and Organizational Management3 0.6%Local Government Finance and Decentralization3 0.6%Evaluation and Performance Assessment3 0.6%Insurance and Financial Risk Management3 0.6%Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds3 0.6%Consumer Behavior and Marketing Influence3 0.6%Multi-Criteria Decision Making2 0.4%Blockchain Technology Applications and Security2 0.4%International Development and Aid2 0.4%Taxation and Compliance Studies2 0.4%Emotional Intelligence and Performance2 0.4%Fiscal Policies and Political Economy2 0.4%Economic Theory and Policy2 0.4%Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems2 0.4%Natural Resources and Economic Development2 0.4%Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis2 0.4%Big Data and Business Intelligence2 0.4%Capital Investment and Risk Analysis2 0.4%Leadership and Management in Organizations2 0.4%Management Systems and Quality Improvement2 0.4%Employee Performance and Management2 0.4%Employee Performance and Leadership2 0.4%Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior1 0.2%Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research1 0.2%Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences1 0.2%European Union Policy and Governance1 0.2%Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics1 0.2%Healthcare Policy and Management1 0.2%Higher Education Governance and Development1 0.2%Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs1 0.2%Health Literacy and Information Accessibility1 0.2%Environmental Sustainability in Business1 0.2%Team Dynamics and Performance1 0.2%RFID technology advancements1 0.2%Corruption and Economic Development1 0.2%Gender Diversity and Inequality1 0.2%Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing1 0.2%Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis1 0.2%Healthcare Systems and Reforms1 0.2%Employee Performance and Motivation1 0.2%COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts1 0.2%Data Quality and Management1 0.2%Decision Support System Applications1 0.2%Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance1 0.2%Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation1 0.2%Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management1 0.2%Agricultural risk and resilience1 0.2%Private Equity and Venture Capital1 0.2%ERP Systems Implementation and Impact1 0.2%Public-Private Partnership Projects1 0.2%Colonialism, slavery, and trade1 0.2%Environmental and Social Impact Assessments1 0.2%Renewable energy and sustainable power systems1 0.2%Grey System Theory Applications1 0.2%European and International Contract Law1 0.2%Stress and Burnout Research1 0.2%Corporate Identity and Reputation1 0.2%Global Health Care Issues1 0.2%Economic and Fiscal Studies1 0.2%SMEs Development and Digital Marketing1 0.2%Global Financial Regulation and Crises1 0.2%Organizational Change and Leadership1 0.2%Local Governance and Development1 0.2%Marketing and Advertising Strategies1 0.2%Unemployment and Economic Growth1 0.2%Community and Sustainable Development1 0.2%Agricultural Economics and Practices1 0.2%Benford’s Law and Fraud Detection1 0.2%Financial Reporting and XBRL1 0.2%Contemporary and Historical Greek Studies1 0.2%Economic, financial, and policy analysis1 0.2%Global Politics and Economy1 0.2%Banking Systems and Strategies1 0.2%Post-Communist Economic and Political Transition1 0.2%Leadership, Behavior, and Decision-Making Studies1 0.2%
Yearly trendsCitations receivedCompare by yearPublication detailCitationsComparisonPublicationsOpenAlexInstitutions & topicsData coverage
Publication-year cohorts
Publications & citation trends
Citations are the latest recorded totals for articles published in each year, not citations received during that year. Crossref and OpenAlex remain separate and share the same citation scale. 2026 is incomplete; newer articles have had less time to receive citations.
0 undated publications excluded. Unknown citation counts are shown as —, never as zero. Partial coverage can understate totals; expand each table for known / total records.
Publications
View publications data & coverage
| Publication year | Journal / scope | Publications | Publications | Crossref known | OpenAlex known |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | All selected publications | 6 | 6 | 6/6 | 6/6 |
| 2013 | All selected publications | 29 | 29 | 29/29 | 29/29 |
| 2014 | All selected publications | 26 | 26 | 26/26 | 26/26 |
| 2015 | All selected publications | 15 | 15 | 15/15 | 15/15 |
| 2016 | All selected publications | 72 | 72 | 72/72 | 72/72 |
| 2017 | All selected publications | 20 | 20 | 20/20 | 20/20 |
| 2018 | All selected publications | 20 | 20 | 20/20 | 16/20 |
| 2019 | All selected publications | 35 | 35 | 35/35 | 35/35 |
| 2020 | All selected publications | 41 | 41 | 41/41 | 41/41 |
| 2021 | All selected publications | 44 | 44 | 44/44 | 44/44 |
| 2022 | All selected publications | 41 | 41 | 41/41 | 41/41 |
| 2023 | All selected publications | 33 | 33 | 33/33 | 33/33 |
| 2024 | All selected publications | 32 | 32 | 32/32 | 32/32 |
| 2025 | All selected publications | 70 | 70 | 62/70 | 70/70 |
| 2026 | All selected publications | 25 | 25 | 0/25 | 24/25 |
Crossref citations
View crossref citations data & coverage
| Publication year | Journal / scope | Crossref citations | Publications | Crossref known | OpenAlex known |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | All selected publications | 25 | 6 | 6/6 | 6/6 |
| 2013 | All selected publications | 56 | 29 | 29/29 | 29/29 |
| 2014 | All selected publications | 53 | 26 | 26/26 | 26/26 |
| 2015 | All selected publications | 55 | 15 | 15/15 | 15/15 |
| 2016 | All selected publications | 100 | 72 | 72/72 | 72/72 |
| 2017 | All selected publications | 86 | 20 | 20/20 | 20/20 |
| 2018 | All selected publications | 26 | 20 | 20/20 | 16/20 |
| 2019 | All selected publications | 96 | 35 | 35/35 | 35/35 |
| 2020 | All selected publications | 169 | 41 | 41/41 | 41/41 |
| 2021 | All selected publications | 82 | 44 | 44/44 | 44/44 |
| 2022 | All selected publications | 52 | 41 | 41/41 | 41/41 |
| 2023 | All selected publications | 62 | 33 | 33/33 | 33/33 |
| 2024 | All selected publications | 44 | 32 | 32/32 | 32/32 |
| 2025 | All selected publications | 31 | 70 | 62/70 | 70/70 |
| 2026 | All selected publications | — | 25 | 0/25 | 24/25 |
OpenAlex citations
View openalex citations data & coverage
| Publication year | Journal / scope | OpenAlex citations | Publications | Crossref known | OpenAlex known |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | All selected publications | 62 | 6 | 6/6 | 6/6 |
| 2013 | All selected publications | 139 | 29 | 29/29 | 29/29 |
| 2014 | All selected publications | 109 | 26 | 26/26 | 26/26 |
| 2015 | All selected publications | 167 | 15 | 15/15 | 15/15 |
| 2016 | All selected publications | 330 | 72 | 72/72 | 72/72 |
| 2017 | All selected publications | 206 | 20 | 20/20 | 20/20 |
| 2018 | All selected publications | 58 | 20 | 20/20 | 16/20 |
| 2019 | All selected publications | 180 | 35 | 35/35 | 35/35 |
| 2020 | All selected publications | 348 | 41 | 41/41 | 41/41 |
| 2021 | All selected publications | 193 | 44 | 44/44 | 44/44 |
| 2022 | All selected publications | 111 | 41 | 41/41 | 41/41 |
| 2023 | All selected publications | 84 | 33 | 33/33 | 33/33 |
| 2024 | All selected publications | 49 | 32 | 32/32 | 32/32 |
| 2025 | All selected publications | 32 | 70 | 62/70 | 70/70 |
| 2026 | All selected publications | 0 | 25 | 0/25 | 24/25 |
Citation year / OpenAlex
Citations received over time
Incoming citations to the selected publications, grouped by the year of the citing work. This is separate from lifetime citation totals grouped by the cited article’s publication year.
The publication filters above define which articles receive the citations. The citation-year range below only controls this chart and the incoming-citation comparison. Removing publication-year filters includes older articles’ incoming citations too.
Annual history available for 504 / 509 selected publications. Supported display window: 2017–2026; 2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Missing histories and years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—); partial coverage can understate totals.
Annual-history observations (UTC): 2026-10-21T00:21:59.414879+00:00 — 2026-10-21T00:22:06.636292+00:00. Older observations may be retained after failed or incomplete refreshes.
OpenAlex · Citations received by year
View openalex · citations received by year data & coverage
| Citation year | Journal / scope | OpenAlex · Citations received by year | Publications | Annual history known |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | All selected publications | 56 | 509 | 504/509 |
| 2018 | All selected publications | 89 | 509 | 504/509 |
| 2019 | All selected publications | 121 | 509 | 504/509 |
| 2020 | All selected publications | 155 | 509 | 504/509 |
| 2021 | All selected publications | 219 | 509 | 504/509 |
| 2022 | All selected publications | 255 | 509 | 504/509 |
| 2023 | All selected publications | 343 | 509 | 504/509 |
| 2024 | All selected publications | 327 | 509 | 504/509 |
| 2025 | All selected publications | 244 | 509 | 504/509 |
| 2026 | All selected publications | 133 | 509 | 504/509 |
Counts represent citation links, not unique citing papers across a journal: one paper citing two selected articles contributes two links. Older citations outside this window are excluded, so annual sums need not equal lifetime totals. OpenAlex methodology ↗
Publications by publication year. 2026 is an incomplete year.
View data table
| Period | Publications |
|---|---|
| 2012 | 6 |
| 2013 | 29 |
| 2014 | 26 |
| 2015 | 15 |
| 2016 | 72 |
| 2017 | 20 |
| 2018 | 20 |
| 2019 | 35 |
| 2020 | 41 |
| 2021 | 44 |
| 2022 | 41 |
| 2023 | 33 |
| 2024 | 32 |
| 2025 | 70 |
| 2026 | 25 |
Crossref citation distribution
Latest Crossref totals for the selected publications; not citations received in the selected years.
Mean1.97
Median1.0
Unknown counts are excluded from the mean, median and cited-publication rate.
Journal comparison
Same filters, source and counting rules across journals. Descriptive statistics, not a quality ranking.
| Journal / publisher | Publications | Crossref citations | OpenAlex citations | OpenAlex coverage | Crossref mean | Crossref median | Crossref cited %* | Crossref coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies SSBFNET | 509 | 937 | 2068 | 504/509 | 1.97 | 1.0 | 56.3 | 476/509 · 93.5% |
* Percentage among publications with a known citation count.
Most cited · Crossref
Profit Growth : Impact of Net Profit Margin, Gross Profit Margin and Total Assests Turnover
Read abstract
As an industry that has an important role for other industrial sectors, the plastic and packaging industry is the supply chain for consumer products. Behind the high industrial growth and the potential is still large, there are problems with plastic waste, consumption power, and changes in people's lifestyles that can affect the growth of the plastic and packaging industry. This study aims to determine how much impact the NPM (Net Profit Margin), GPM (Gross Profit Margin), TAT (Total Assets Turnover) on Profit Growth in the plastic and packaging industry sub-sector companies listed in IDX (Indonesia Stock Exchange) for the period 2014 to 2018. The method used in this study is a quantitative descriptive. The sampling technique used was purposive sampling in order to obtain a sample of 11 companies from a population of 12 companies. In the study the method of data analysis used the multiple linear regression analysis techniques by processing data using Eviews 8, because the data is not normally distributed, it uses the log transformation method. The results showed that simultaneously NPM (Net Profit Margin), GPM (Gross Profit Margin), TAT (Total Assets Turnover) had a significant effect on profit growth. And partially NPM (Net Profit Margin) has a significant effect on profit growth, while GPM (Gross Profit Margin) and TAT (Total Assets Turnover) have no significant effect on profit growth.
DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v9i4.93746 Crossref citations96 OpenAlex citations
Bank Specific and Macroeconomic Determinants of Commercial Bank Profitability: Empirical Evidence from Nigeria
Read abstract
The study examines the bank-specific and macroeconomic determinants of banks profitability in Nigeria analyzing audited financial reports of selected sixteen (16) commercial banks over the period of 2010 to 2015 making up to 96 observations. The study identified that existing studies are sketchy in developing economies even though many studies have emerge in developed economies. The bank profitability is measured by return on assets and return on equity as function of bank-specific and macroeconomic determinants. Using the balanced panel data set, the empirical results of the study shows that capital adequacy and liquidity have a positive and significant effect on bank profitability. However, efficiency ratio have a negative and significant effect on bank profitability. With regards to macroeconomic variable, GDP growth also have a positive and significant impact on banks profitability. The empirical results of the study suggested that banks can improve their profitability through increasing capital and liquidity, decreasing operating cost with conscious effort to maintain transparency in their operations. In addition, a good economic environment for financial institutions foster increase in bank profitability. Hence, the study recommends that further studies can expand the scope while extending to other industries as well.
DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v6i1.62738 Crossref citations85 OpenAlex citations
The Impact of Inflation on Economic Growth
Read abstract
The main purpose of this study is to investigate inflation rate and its impact on the growth rate or to GDP growth for Eurozone countries, using panel data for the period 1997-2017, on an annual basis with a total of 257 observations. For conducting the study, and achieving results, a multiple linear regression model with the least squares regression is used. Moreover, multiple linear regression analysis has been applied in order to investigate whether Inflation rate, as an independent variable, has any significant impact on economic growth. Consequently, in order to test the data used in the model we have applied diagnostic tests, such as Durbin-Watson test to analyze the correlation of serial correlation, as well as the Breusch-Pagan test for heteroskedasticity. The tests’ results give us strong indications that the model has no relation between of serial correlation and there is no heteroskedasticity either. The study conducted shows results generated from the model, and according to the econometric results indicate that Inflation rate has positive impact on the economic growth rate for euro area.
DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v8i1.29732 Crossref citations54 OpenAlex citations
CAMELS-based Determinants for the Credit Rating of Turkish Deposit Banks
Read abstract
This paper demonstrates the relationship between CAMELS ratios and credit ratings of deposit banks in Turkey. Annual data was used for the period between 2004 and 2014 in this study. Moreover, 20 deposit banks of Turkey were analyzed and 21 different ratios of CAMELS components were used. In addition to that, credit ratings of these banks were provided from Moody’s corporation or annual activity reports of the banks. After that, we created multi nominal logistic regression analysis in order to illustrate the relationship. The major finding in this study is that three components (Asset Quality, Management Quality, and Sensitivity to Market Risk) of CAMELS have effects on credit ratings whereas the ratios related to Capital Adequacy and Earnings are not effective. As a result, it was recommended that Turkish deposit banks should concentrate on the percentage of fixed assets and interest income to have a better rating. Moreover, having high market share with respect to total assets and lower interest expense are also other important points for this purpose. On the other hand, Turkish deposit banks should control the proportion of financial assets and increase the amount of FX liquid assets to prevent credit ratings to decrease. Additionally, market share of banks for loans should not reach at high level for this objective.
DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v4i4.3529 Crossref citations68 OpenAlex citations
Analysis of Impacts of Operational Risk Management Practices on Banks’ Financial Performance: Study of Selected Commercial Banks in Nigeria
Read abstract
Increase in losses borne by banks as a result of inadequate operational risk management practices and the adverse impact on banks’ financial performance has been a major concern to bank management and regulators. This study analysed the impact of operational risk management practices on the financial performance of commercial banks in Nigeria. 10-years (2008 - 2017) secondary data extracted from audited financial statements of selected commercial banks in Nigeria was used for the study. The data was analysed using the Linear Multiple Regression Model. The results showed that there is a positive relationship between operational risk management and the financial performance of banks. The findings revealed that sound operational risk management practices impact positively on the financial performance of banks. We, therefore, recommend that banks’ management should deploy adequate resources towards understanding operational risk to ensure sound operational risk management and improved financial performance of banks.
DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v9i1.63420 Crossref citations32 OpenAlex citations
Selected results
The Impact of Liquidity on Profitability of U.S. Commercial Banks: Evidence from Panel Data Analysis Using FDIC Call Reports
Read abstract
Maintaining adequate liquidity while preserving profitability remains a central challenge for commercial banks because liquid assets strengthen resilience but typically generate lower returns than loans and other earning assets. This study investigates the effect of liquidity on the profitability of U.S. commercial banks using 8,000 quarterly bank observations for 2010–2024. Profitability is measured by return on assets (ROA), with return on equity (ROE) used for robustness, while liquidity, capital adequacy, the loan-to-asset ratio, and bank size are modeled as explanatory variables. Pooled OLS, fixed-effects, and random-effects estimators are compared, and diagnostic tests support a two-way fixed-effects model with standard errors clustered by bank and quarter. The preferred estimates show that a one-percentage-point increase in the liquidity ratio reduces annualized ROA by 0.0183 percentage points (SE = 0.0031; p < 0.001). A one-standard-deviation rise in liquidity, equal to 5.52 percentage points, lowers ROA by approximately 0.101 percentage points, representing 9.2% of the sample mean ROA of 1.097%. Capital adequacy increases ROA by 0.0530 percentage points, and the loan-to-asset ratio increases it by 0.0148 percentage points, both at p < 0.001, whereas bank size is insignificant (β = 0.1008; p = 0.352). The ROE robustness model also yields a negative liquidity coefficient of −0.1074 (p < 0.001). The findings confirm a measurable liquidity–profitability trade-off and support risk-sensitive liquidity regulation that protects financial stability without encouraging persistently excessive holdings of low-yield liquid assets.
DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v15i4.5351N/A Crossref citations
Risk Asset Exposure and Bank Performance in Emerging Markets: Panel Evidence from Cameroon
Read abstract
This study examines whether risk asset exposure affects the financial performance of commercial banks in Cameroon, a bank-dominated economy of the Central African Economic and Monetary Community (CEMAC). Risk asset exposure is measured by lending intensity (the loan-to-deposit ratio) and credit expansion (annual loan growth), and performance by return on assets (ROA). The data form a balanced panel of ten commercial banks over 2014–2024, compiled from the prudential reporting system of the Central African Banking Commission (COBAC) as published by Cameroon's National Economic and Financial Committee. Bank fixed-effects regressions with bank-clustered standard errors are complemented by a wild-cluster bootstrap suited to few clusters, Driscoll–Kraay standard errors, lagged regressors, panel Granger non-causality tests and a within–between (Mundlak) decomposition that separates changes in a bank's own exposure from persistent differences between banks. The main findings are that (i) neither lending intensity nor credit expansion is significantly associated with profitability in any specification (bootstrap p = 0.81 and 0.30), and the confidence intervals exclude effects larger than about one percentage point of ROA; (ii) lending intensity is unrelated to profitability both within banks over time and between banks (between-effect bootstrap p = 0.88); and (iii) the COVID-19 years of 2020–2021 were associated with ROA about 0.70 percentage points lower (bootstrap p = 0.009). The results indicate a limited role for lending exposure, while significant bank fixed effects and the COVID-19 coefficient point to persistent bank heterogeneity and common systemic shocks. Because the sample comprises ten banks under a single regulator, the findings should be interpreted with caution.
DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v15i4.5090N/A Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
Effect of Project Monitoring and Evaluation Practices on Success of Rural School Feeding Program
Read abstract
Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) are fundamental processes that provide administrators, policymakers, and stakeholders with methods for learning from experience and improving implementation through the reallocation of resources. However, the success of these interventions depends heavily on effective project monitoring and evaluation (M&E) practices. This study therefore examined the effect of project monitoring and evaluation practices on the success of the rural school feeding program in Rutsiro District, Rwanda. The specific objectives were to determine the effect of an M&E baseline survey on the success of the rural school feeding program in Rutsiro District; analyze the effect of M&E planning on program success; assess the effect of M&E data management on program success; and evaluate the effect of M&E stakeholder involvement on program success. The study adopted both the Theory of Change and Utilization-Focused Evaluation. It used descriptive and correlational research designs and adopted a census approach involving 103 respondents, including 89 teachers, 10 staff members, two representatives of school feeding committees at the school level, and two SEIs. Data were collected through questionnaires, interviews, and document reviews. A pilot test was conducted with 10 respondents to determine the instrument's ability to produce consistent results over time. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics, including correlation and regression analyses. The findings revealed that all M&E components (baseline survey, planning, data management, and stakeholder involvement) had a strong and significant positive influence on program success. Respondents showed high levels of agreement, indicating that effective M&E practices improve decision-making, resource allocation, accountability, and overall program performance. The study concluded that well-implemented M&E systems are essential for enhancing the effectiveness, sustainability, and impact of rural school feeding programs. Based on these findings, the study recommends strengthening baseline surveys, improving M&E planning frameworks, enhancing data management systems, promoting active stakeholder involvement, and ensuring adequate resource allocation to support long-term program success.
DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v15i3.5332N/A Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
Inventory Management and Profitability: A study on Textiles Industry Listed in the DSE
Read abstract
Research Originality: This study investigates the relationship between inventory management and profitability within the textiles industry in Bangladesh, emphasizing the key factors that significantly enhance the industry's profitability. Research Objectives: This analysis investigates how various factors, including total assets, total equity, total revenue, share capital, retained earnings, finished items, work in progress, and raw materials, impact profit after tax (PAT). Research Methods: The data spans from 2011 to 2023 and encompasses 46 textile companies listed on the Dhaka Stock Exchange (DSE). To conduct this study, different models like Pooled Ordinary Least Square (POLS), Second Stage Least Square (2SLS), Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) are utilized. Empirical Results: Through the application of techniques including Pooled Ordinary Least Squares (POLS), Two-Stage Least Squares (2SLS), and the Generalized Method of Moments (GMM), we have established that total assets exhibit a significant negative correlation with PAT in both the POLS and 2SLS models. On the other hand, there is a notable positive correlation between total revenue and retained earnings on PAT across all 2SLS, POLS, and GMM models. The share capital shows a negative correlation with PAT in all three models: 2SLS, POLS, and GMM. The main independent variable, which is our fundamental focus, shows that finished goods have a positive correlation with PAT; however, this correlation lacks significance. The raw materials exhibited a negative correlation with PAT, and this relationship is significant. The correlation between Packing Materials and PAT is notably positive. This study highlights the importance of strategies that could facilitate sustainable growth in the textile industry.
DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v15i3.5322N/A Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
Evaluating the Impact of Monitoring and Evaluation Approaches on Agricultural Insurance Performance
Read abstract
The study was directed by the following specific objectives: (i) to examine the impact of the result-based approach on the performance of the National Agriculture Insurance Scheme, and (ii) to analyze the effect of the participatory approach on the performance of the scheme, and (iii) to investigate the role of the reflexive approach in enhancing the program’s outcomes. The theoretical framework drew on decision-making theory, agricultural insurance theory, and contingency theory. The target group for this study comprises roughly 1,463 people. From this group, a stratified sampling technique was been employed to select 313 respondents. Information for the research obtained via questionnaires, interviews, and document analysis, including monthly district reports. The instruments were pilot-tested, resulting in a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.94, which confirms strong reliability. Data analysis involved descriptive and inferential statistics, specifically correlation and regression at a 0.05 significance level, with the assistance of SPSS Version 28. Ethical standards was upheld by securing informed consent from participants and ensuring the confidentiality of all responses.
DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v15i3.4761N/A Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
Data coverage & freshness
Source coverage refers to this result set; a publication may occur in several sources. Sync times refer to contributing journals.
Crossref476of 509 selected recordsOJS API433of 509 selected recordsOAI-PMH440of 509 selected recordsXML0of 509 selected recordsOpenAlex504of 509 selected records
Missing abstracts: 0 · Missing authors: 0 · Missing publication dates: 0 · Dates without day precision: 0
| Source | Most recent successful journal sync | Latest attempt |
|---|---|---|
| crossref | 21 Oct 2026 00:21 UTC · ijfbs | complete · ijfbs · 21 Oct 2026 00:21 UTC |
| ojs-rest | 21 Oct 2026 00:21 UTC · ijfbs | complete · ijfbs · 21 Oct 2026 00:14 UTC |
| oai-pmh | 20 Oct 2026 19:56 UTC · ijfbs | complete · ijfbs · 20 Oct 2026 19:55 UTC |
| openalex-enrichment | 21 Oct 2026 00:22 UTC · ijfbs | complete · ijfbs · 21 Oct 2026 00:21 UTC |