Publication activity
Articles grouped by publication year
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.
ISSN 2147-4478 • Journal website ↗
Top 5 in the selected collection · Ranked by Crossref lifetime citations. Only articles with at least one known citation are included; source totals are never combined.
Publication activity alongside incoming citations.
Articles grouped by publication year
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
Leading affiliations and themes in this collection.
Full distributions & methodology ↓No data available.
0/2 records with dataNo data available.
0/2 records with dataNo data available.
0/2 records with dataIndependent sources. Clear time scales.
Crossref and OpenAlex · separate totals for the same publication cohorts
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
Latest lifetime totals, grouped by the cited article’s year. These are not citations received in that year.
OpenAlex · incoming citation links grouped by citing-work year
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
Select journals to compare the same collection filters. Source totals stay separate. These measures describe research activity, not journal quality.
Articles by publication year
Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year
Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year
By year of the citing work · 2017–2026
2026 is year to date. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime charts share a citation scale. Unknown observations appear as gaps; known zero stays zero. Annual receipts use available OpenAlex histories and may not sum to lifetime totals. 0 undated publications excluded from publication-year charts.
Crossref citation coverage: 0 / 2 publications (0.0%). Latest observation: Not yet available. Means and percentages use records with known counts.
DOI-matched OpenAlex observations for the same selected publications. These counts are separate from Crossref and are never added together.
Observation range: Not available — Not available. Missing matches are not zero citations. Previous observations may remain if a refresh fails or a DOI no longer matches.
OpenAlex affiliations and primary-topic classification. Each publication counts once per institution or country; multi-affiliated publications appear in multiple groups, so percentages can sum above 100%. Countries describe author affiliations, not nationality. Topics use one primary topic per publication.
0 / 2 with data · 2 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 2 selected publications.
No verified institutions data for this selection.
0 / 2 with data · 2 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 2 selected publications.
No verified countries data for this selection.
0 / 2 with data · 2 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 2 selected publications.
No verified primary topics data for this selection.
Citations are the latest recorded totals for articles published in each year, not citations received during that year. Crossref and OpenAlex remain separate and share the same citation scale. 2026 is incomplete; newer articles have had less time to receive citations.
0 undated publications excluded. Unknown citation counts are shown as —, never as zero. Partial coverage can understate totals; expand each table for known / total records.
| Publication year | Journal / scope | Publications | Publications | Crossref known | OpenAlex known |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | All selected publications | 1 | 1 | 0/1 | 0/1 |
| 2026 | All selected publications | 1 | 1 | 0/1 | 0/1 |
| Publication year | Journal / scope | Crossref citations | Publications | Crossref known | OpenAlex known |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | All selected publications | — | 1 | 0/1 | 0/1 |
| 2026 | All selected publications | — | 1 | 0/1 | 0/1 |
| Publication year | Journal / scope | OpenAlex citations | Publications | Crossref known | OpenAlex known |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | All selected publications | — | 1 | 0/1 | 0/1 |
| 2026 | All selected publications | — | 1 | 0/1 | 0/1 |
Incoming citations to the selected publications, grouped by the year of the citing work. This is separate from lifetime citation totals grouped by the cited article’s publication year.
The publication filters above define which articles receive the citations. The citation-year range below only controls this chart and the incoming-citation comparison. Removing publication-year filters includes older articles’ incoming citations too.
Annual history available for 0 / 2 selected publications. Supported display window: 2017–2026; 2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Missing histories and years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—); partial coverage can understate totals.
| Citation year | Journal / scope | OpenAlex · Citations received by year | Publications | Annual history known |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | All selected publications | — | 2 | 0/2 |
| 2018 | All selected publications | — | 2 | 0/2 |
| 2019 | All selected publications | — | 2 | 0/2 |
| 2020 | All selected publications | — | 2 | 0/2 |
| 2021 | All selected publications | — | 2 | 0/2 |
| 2022 | All selected publications | — | 2 | 0/2 |
| 2023 | All selected publications | — | 2 | 0/2 |
| 2024 | All selected publications | — | 2 | 0/2 |
| 2025 | All selected publications | — | 2 | 0/2 |
| 2026 | All selected publications | — | 2 | 0/2 |
Counts represent citation links, not unique citing papers across a journal: one paper citing two selected articles contributes two links. Older citations outside this window are excluded, so annual sums need not equal lifetime totals. OpenAlex methodology ↗
Publications by publication year. 2026 is an incomplete year.
| Period | Publications |
|---|---|
| 2025 | 1 |
| 2026 | 1 |
Latest Crossref totals for the selected publications; not citations received in the selected years.
Unknown counts are excluded from the mean, median and cited-publication rate.
Same filters, source and counting rules across journals. Descriptive statistics, not a quality ranking.
| Journal / publisher | Publications | Crossref citations | OpenAlex citations | OpenAlex coverage | Crossref mean | Crossref median | Crossref cited %* | Crossref coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science SSBFNET | 2 | — | — | 0/2 | — | — | — | 0/2 · 0.0% |
* Percentage among publications with a known citation count.
This study explores the challenges and opportunities of infusing artificial intelligence into university business management and accounting education. Although artificial intelligence holds transformative potential for revolutionising business, management and accounting curriculum, its integration is constrained by low digital literacy among educators, ethical concerns, and inadequate institutional preparedness. This study reviewed twelve peer-reviewed articles published between 2015 and 2025 from the Scopus and ScienceDirect using PRISMA 2020 guidelines. The review reported five themes, namely artificial intelligence’ transformative role in business management and accounting education, ethical and academic integrity issues, artificial intelligence literacy as crucial skills, institutional and pedagogical readiness, and the need to balance human and artificial intelligence input in teaching and learning. The findings imply that higher education institutions must invest in training of educators and must align curriculum with AI use and professional ethics.
The ability to read is crucial for academic success, yet many learners experience difficulties in attaining the skill. This article reports on challenges experienced by teachers in supporting Grade 7 learners with reading difficulties in English First Additional Language. A qualitative research approach and case study research design guided the study. Purposive sampling included twenty English First Additional Language (EFAL) teachers who are also members of the School Based Support Team (SBST) from four primary schools in the Gauteng East District. Data was collected through individual and focus group interviews, which were audio recorded and analyzed using thematic data analysis. The results indicate that teachers experienced challenges such as insufficient time, work overload, overcrowded classrooms, policy on progression of learners, lack of interest and motivation, lack of reading resources and lack of parental involvement, as such participants viewed these challenges as barriers to learning support processes. The study recommends scheduling individual reading support sessions and hiring more teachers to assist with language teaching. The policy on the progression of learners could be reviewed and integrated as part of continuous teacher training. Schools should budget for reading resources, while parents are encouraged to attend workshops and meetings, and get resources to assist their children with reading at home. Furthermore, collaboration between schools and communities is recommended to promote inclusivity in schools. These findings underscore the urgent need for systemic change to support inclusive education. Addressing the identified barriers requires not only the intervention from the school but also broader educational policy reform. The study highlights the importance of aligning policy with practice to ensure that no learner is left behind, thereby fostering a more inclusive and equitable educational environment.
This study explores the challenges and opportunities of infusing artificial intelligence into university business management and accounting education. Although artificial intelligence holds transformative potential for revolutionising business, management and accounting curriculum, its integration is constrained by low digital literacy among educators, ethical concerns, and inadequate institutional preparedness. This study reviewed twelve peer-reviewed articles published between 2015 and 2025 from the Scopus and ScienceDirect using PRISMA 2020 guidelines. The review reported five themes, namely artificial intelligence’ transformative role in business management and accounting education, ethical and academic integrity issues, artificial intelligence literacy as crucial skills, institutional and pedagogical readiness, and the need to balance human and artificial intelligence input in teaching and learning. The findings imply that higher education institutions must invest in training of educators and must align curriculum with AI use and professional ethics.
The ability to read is crucial for academic success, yet many learners experience difficulties in attaining the skill. This article reports on challenges experienced by teachers in supporting Grade 7 learners with reading difficulties in English First Additional Language. A qualitative research approach and case study research design guided the study. Purposive sampling included twenty English First Additional Language (EFAL) teachers who are also members of the School Based Support Team (SBST) from four primary schools in the Gauteng East District. Data was collected through individual and focus group interviews, which were audio recorded and analyzed using thematic data analysis. The results indicate that teachers experienced challenges such as insufficient time, work overload, overcrowded classrooms, policy on progression of learners, lack of interest and motivation, lack of reading resources and lack of parental involvement, as such participants viewed these challenges as barriers to learning support processes. The study recommends scheduling individual reading support sessions and hiring more teachers to assist with language teaching. The policy on the progression of learners could be reviewed and integrated as part of continuous teacher training. Schools should budget for reading resources, while parents are encouraged to attend workshops and meetings, and get resources to assist their children with reading at home. Furthermore, collaboration between schools and communities is recommended to promote inclusivity in schools. These findings underscore the urgent need for systemic change to support inclusive education. Addressing the identified barriers requires not only the intervention from the school but also broader educational policy reform. The study highlights the importance of aligning policy with practice to ensure that no learner is left behind, thereby fostering a more inclusive and equitable educational environment.
Source coverage refers to this result set; a publication may occur in several sources. Sync times refer to contributing journals.
Missing abstracts: 0 · Missing authors: 0 · Missing publication dates: 0 · Dates without day precision: 0
| Source | Most recent successful journal sync | Latest attempt |
|---|---|---|
| crossref | 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbs | complete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC |
| ojs-rest | 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbs | complete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 06:46 UTC |
| oai-pmh | 20 Oct 2026 19:55 UTC · ijrbs | complete · ijrbs · 20 Oct 2026 19:50 UTC |
| openalex-enrichment | 21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC · ijrbs | complete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC |