CiteNScope — Scholarly Index & Analytics
Journals / IJRBS RESEARCH PROFILE

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science

ISSN 2147-4478 • Journal website ↗

Compare journals ↗
OpenAlex coverage 0.0% · 0/2 recordsLast OpenAlex observation not available
PUBLICATIONS2In the selected collection
CROSSREF CITATIONS—0/2 with known counts
OPENALEX CITATIONS—0/2 with known counts
OPENALEX MEAN—Per article with a known count
Explore articles 2 →
Filter collection Publication years, search & more
Reset
Research in focus

Most cited articles

Top 5 in the selected collection · Ranked by OpenAlex lifetime citations. Only articles with at least one known citation are included; source totals are never combined.

  1. No cited articles match the selected source and filters.
The journal at a glance

Output and reach

Publication activity alongside incoming citations.

Publication activity

Articles grouped by publication year

Publications

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.

View data & coverage

Citations received

OpenAlex · year of the citing work

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage

Research landscape

Leading affiliations and themes in this collection.

Full distributions & methodology ↓

Institutions

No data available.

0/2 records with data

Countries

No data available.

0/2 records with data

Primary topics

No data available.

0/2 records with data
Two perspectives on citations

Follow the research impact

Independent sources. Clear time scales.

Lifetime citations by publication year

Crossref and OpenAlex · separate totals for the same publication cohorts

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

Latest lifetime totals, grouped by the cited article’s year. These are not citations received in that year.

View data & coverage

Citations received each year

OpenAlex · incoming citation links grouped by citing-work year

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage
Annual history: 0/2 articles. Latest history observation: not yet available. Source totals are never added together.
Research side by side

Compare journals

Compare across all journals →

Select journals to compare the same collection filters. Source totals stay separate. These measures describe research activity, not journal quality.

Leave all unchecked to include every matching journal. Selection affects only comparison charts.
Display range
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science

Publications

Articles by publication year

View data & coverage

Crossref citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex · Citations received

By year of the citing work · 2017–2026

View data & coverage

2026 is year to date. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime charts share a citation scale. Unknown observations appear as gaps; known zero stays zero. Annual receipts use available OpenAlex histories and may not sum to lifetime totals. 0 undated publications excluded from publication-year charts.

Full research profile All distributions, publications, comparisons & data provenance
2 MATCHING PUBLICATIONSExplore results →Export CSV ↓
INDEXED PUBLICATIONS2
CROSSREF CITATIONS—
CROSSREF · CITED PUBLICATIONS—
CROSSREF · MEAN CITATIONS—

Crossref citation coverage: 0 / 2 publications (0.0%). Latest observation: Not yet available. Means and percentages use records with known counts.

OpenAlex / Separate citation source

A broader view of this research

DOI-matched OpenAlex observations for the same selected publications. These counts are separate from Crossref and are never added together.

OPENALEX CITATIONS—
DOI MATCH COVERAGE0.0%0 / 2 publications
MEAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY—0 known · 2 unknown
MEDIAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY—

Observation range: Not available — Not available. Missing matches are not zero citations. Previous observations may remain if a refresh fails or a DOI no longer matches.

OpenAlex citation distributionNo citations01–506–20021+0Unknown2

Institutions, countries & topics

OpenAlex affiliations and primary-topic classification. Each publication counts once per institution or country; multi-affiliated publications appear in multiple groups, so percentages can sum above 100%. Countries describe author affiliations, not nationality. Topics use one primary topic per publication.

Institutions

0 / 2 with data · 2 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 2 selected publications.

No verified institutions data for this selection.

Countries

0 / 2 with data · 2 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 2 selected publications.

No verified countries data for this selection.

Primary topics

0 / 2 with data · 2 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 2 selected publications.

No verified primary topics data for this selection.

Citation year / OpenAlex

Citations received over time

Incoming citations to the selected publications, grouped by the year of the citing work. This is separate from lifetime citation totals grouped by the cited article’s publication year.

The publication filters above define which articles receive the citations. The citation-year range below only controls this chart and the incoming-citation comparison. Removing publication-year filters includes older articles’ incoming citations too.

Annual history available for 0 / 2 selected publications. Supported display window: 2017–2026; 2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Missing histories and years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—); partial coverage can understate totals.

OpenAlex · Citations received by year

10.50 —2017 · All selected publications: no known count—2018 · All selected publications: no known count—2019 · All selected publications: no known count—2020 · All selected publications: no known count—2021 · All selected publications: no known count—2022 · All selected publications: no known count—2023 · All selected publications: no known count—2024 · All selected publications: no known count—2025 · All selected publications: no known count—2026 · All selected publications: no known count 2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
View openalex · citations received by year data & coverage
Citation yearJournal / scopeOpenAlex · Citations received by yearPublicationsAnnual history known
2017All selected publications—20/2
2018All selected publications—20/2
2019All selected publications—20/2
2020All selected publications—20/2
2021All selected publications—20/2
2022All selected publications—20/2
2023All selected publications—20/2
2024All selected publications—20/2
2025All selected publications—20/2
2026All selected publications—20/2

Counts represent citation links, not unique citing papers across a journal: one paper citing two selected articles contributes two links. Older citations outside this window are excluded, so annual sums need not equal lifetime totals. OpenAlex methodology ↗

Crossref citation distribution

Latest Crossref totals for the selected publications; not citations received in the selected years.

Mean—
Median—
No citations01–506–20021+0Unknown2

Unknown counts are excluded from the mean, median and cited-publication rate.

Journal comparison

Same filters, source and counting rules across journals. Descriptive statistics, not a quality ranking.

Journal / publisherPublicationsCrossref citationsOpenAlex citationsOpenAlex coverageCrossref meanCrossref medianCrossref cited %*Crossref coverage
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science
SSBFNET
2——0/2———0/2 · 0.0%

* Percentage among publications with a known citation count.

Explore publications

View all 2 →

Most cited · Crossref

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Challenges and opportunities of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in business management and accounting curriculum: A systematic literature review

Ngobese, Nokuthula · Madwe, Mziwendoda Cyprian · Vezi-Magigaba, Makhosazana Faith

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

This study explores the challenges and opportunities of infusing artificial intelligence into university business management and accounting education. Although artificial intelligence holds transformative potential for revolutionising business, management and accounting curriculum, its integration is constrained by low digital literacy among educators, ethical concerns, and inadequate institutional preparedness. This study reviewed twelve peer-reviewed articles published between 2015 and 2025 from the Scopus and ScienceDirect using PRISMA 2020 guidelines. The review reported five themes, namely artificial intelligence’ transformative role in business management and accounting education, ethical and academic integrity issues, artificial intelligence literacy as crucial skills, institutional and pedagogical readiness, and the need to balance human and artificial intelligence input in teaching and learning. The findings imply that higher education institutions must invest in training of educators and must align curriculum with AI use and professional ethics.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v15i1.4665N/A Crossref citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Teachers' challenges in supporting grade 7 learners with reading difficulties in inclusive settings

Mahetlana, Nthabiseng Istorina · Mavuso, Mubi Frieda

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2025

Read abstract

The ability to read is crucial for academic success, yet many learners experience difficulties in attaining the skill. This article reports on challenges experienced by teachers in supporting Grade 7 learners with reading difficulties in English First Additional Language. A qualitative research approach and case study research design guided the study. Purposive sampling included twenty English First Additional Language (EFAL) teachers who are also members of the School Based Support Team (SBST) from four primary schools in the Gauteng East District. Data was collected through individual and focus group interviews, which were audio recorded and analyzed using thematic data analysis. The results indicate that teachers experienced challenges such as insufficient time, work overload, overcrowded classrooms, policy on progression of learners, lack of interest and motivation, lack of reading resources and lack of parental involvement, as such participants viewed these challenges as barriers to learning support processes. The study recommends scheduling individual reading support sessions and hiring more teachers to assist with language teaching. The policy on the progression of learners could be reviewed and integrated as part of continuous teacher training. Schools should budget for reading resources, while parents are encouraged to attend workshops and meetings, and get resources to assist their children with reading at home. Furthermore, collaboration between schools and communities is recommended to promote inclusivity in schools. These findings underscore the urgent need for systemic change to support inclusive education. Addressing the identified barriers requires not only the intervention from the school but also broader educational policy reform. The study highlights the importance of aligning policy with practice to ensure that no learner is left behind, thereby fostering a more inclusive and equitable educational environment.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v14i4.4016N/A Crossref citations

Selected results

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Challenges and opportunities of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in business management and accounting curriculum: A systematic literature review

Ngobese, Nokuthula · Madwe, Mziwendoda Cyprian · Vezi-Magigaba, Makhosazana Faith

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

This study explores the challenges and opportunities of infusing artificial intelligence into university business management and accounting education. Although artificial intelligence holds transformative potential for revolutionising business, management and accounting curriculum, its integration is constrained by low digital literacy among educators, ethical concerns, and inadequate institutional preparedness. This study reviewed twelve peer-reviewed articles published between 2015 and 2025 from the Scopus and ScienceDirect using PRISMA 2020 guidelines. The review reported five themes, namely artificial intelligence’ transformative role in business management and accounting education, ethical and academic integrity issues, artificial intelligence literacy as crucial skills, institutional and pedagogical readiness, and the need to balance human and artificial intelligence input in teaching and learning. The findings imply that higher education institutions must invest in training of educators and must align curriculum with AI use and professional ethics.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v15i1.4665N/A Crossref citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Teachers' challenges in supporting grade 7 learners with reading difficulties in inclusive settings

Mahetlana, Nthabiseng Istorina · Mavuso, Mubi Frieda

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2025

Read abstract

The ability to read is crucial for academic success, yet many learners experience difficulties in attaining the skill. This article reports on challenges experienced by teachers in supporting Grade 7 learners with reading difficulties in English First Additional Language. A qualitative research approach and case study research design guided the study. Purposive sampling included twenty English First Additional Language (EFAL) teachers who are also members of the School Based Support Team (SBST) from four primary schools in the Gauteng East District. Data was collected through individual and focus group interviews, which were audio recorded and analyzed using thematic data analysis. The results indicate that teachers experienced challenges such as insufficient time, work overload, overcrowded classrooms, policy on progression of learners, lack of interest and motivation, lack of reading resources and lack of parental involvement, as such participants viewed these challenges as barriers to learning support processes. The study recommends scheduling individual reading support sessions and hiring more teachers to assist with language teaching. The policy on the progression of learners could be reviewed and integrated as part of continuous teacher training. Schools should budget for reading resources, while parents are encouraged to attend workshops and meetings, and get resources to assist their children with reading at home. Furthermore, collaboration between schools and communities is recommended to promote inclusivity in schools. These findings underscore the urgent need for systemic change to support inclusive education. Addressing the identified barriers requires not only the intervention from the school but also broader educational policy reform. The study highlights the importance of aligning policy with practice to ensure that no learner is left behind, thereby fostering a more inclusive and equitable educational environment.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v14i4.4016N/A Crossref citations

Data coverage & freshness

Source coverage refers to this result set; a publication may occur in several sources. Sync times refer to contributing journals.

Missing abstracts: 0 · Missing authors: 0 · Missing publication dates: 0 · Dates without day precision: 0

SourceMost recent successful journal syncLatest attempt
crossref21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
ojs-rest21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 06:46 UTC
oai-pmh20 Oct 2026 19:55 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 20 Oct 2026 19:50 UTC
openalex-enrichment21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
Full import history & methodology →