Explore the evidence.
Understand the reach.

This research investigates how dynamic capabilities contribute to improving public sector performance and the degree to which strategic management facilitates their implementation. This research employs Dynamic Capabilities Theory (DCT) to assess the impact of sensing (identifying and interpreting opportunities and threats), seizing (mobilising resources to capitalise on opportunities), and transformation (realigning structures, processes, and assets to adapt to change) on organisational performance. A quantitative, non-experimental correlational research design was utilised, employing structured surveys from 193 respondents in key public energy sector enterprises in Malawi. The findings indicate that sensing and transformation capabilities substantially improve performance, while seizing capability alone does not exert a direct influence unless combined with other strategic processes. The interplay between sensing and seizing underscores the necessity for public enterprises to both identify opportunities and implement effective actions in response. Organisational capability has emerged as a vital factor, highlighting the significance of workforce competence and institutional adaptability in enhancing performance. This study advances the theory of DCT by illustrating its relevance in public sector governance constraints and presents a quantitative framework for evaluating dynamic capabilities. Policy recommendations involve enhancing seizing capability by overcoming internal bureaucratic obstacles, promoting an adaptive organisational culture, advancing leadership development, and incorporating data-driven decision-making. These measures aim to empower public enterprises to effectively manage complexity, increase responsiveness, and attain

Project leadership is still an active research topic. In the oil and gas industry, mega projects cost millions of dollars to execute, and project delays can lead to avoidable losses when exemplary leadership behaviour is adopted. The challenges impacting project performance can be resolved through efficient and effective leadership. The cost of project financing increases with delays in project completion, reducing project cost-benefit value, and escalating exposure of the environment to more damages from project activities. Eighty-two case studies in the literature were reviewed, and the salient attributes of project success were outlined. From the findings, we advocate for a leadership structure that recognizes the unique roles of project leadership with more emphasis on enhancing the team's effectiveness, hence Path-Goal Leadership. This study is premised on the oil and gas industry because it is currently the major driver of the Nigerian economy; hence effective project leadership can save the nation huge costs from project delays in this sector.

E-procurement is a dynamic process that involves the seamless integration of various online activities, such as order creation, supplier selection, contract signing, and product delivery, all facilitated by the Internet. Governments worldwide are increasingly emphasizing the importance of effective electronic procurement systems in promoting transparency, accountability, and efficiency in public procurement processes, where taxpayer funds are utilized.  In Zambia, despite significant efforts by the government to promote the adoption of electronic procurement systems, such as e-procurement, challenges persist in ensuring their effectiveness. The failure to address the effectiveness of e-procurement within the Ministry of Health could have severe consequences. Inadequate adherence to procurement laws and regulations, as evidenced by the ZPPA report, may lead to inefficiencies, delays in procurement processes, and mis-allocation of resources. These inefficiencies can ultimately compromise the quality and availability of healthcare services, negatively impacting patient outcomes and public health. Additionally, the inability to harness the potential benefits of e-procurement, such as cost savings and streamlined processes, may perpetuate resource wastage and hinder efforts to improve healthcare delivery in Zambia. The main objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of E-procurement systems at the Ministry of Health.  The research philosophy for this study adopted a Quantitative approach that emphasized the practical utility of research methods in addressing the research problem. The findings of the study showed that the evaluation of the e-procurement system within the Ministry yielded a comprehensive understanding of its current performance and highlighted areas needing improvement. The e-procurement system has generally been well-received by the majority of respondents, reflecting its positive impact on procurement processes. Users have rated the system as effective in streamlining operations, enhancing procurement efficiency, and being user-friendly. Based on the comprehensive analysis and findings of the study, the following recommendations were proposed to enhance the effectiveness of the e-procurement system within the Ministry: Enhance Communication, Boost Supplier Participation, Improve Supplier Responsiveness, Strengthen Data Security and Privacy Controls and Increase Transparency. By addressing these recommendations, the Ministry can significantly improve the effectiveness of its e-procurement system, leading to more efficient procurement processes, greater satisfaction among stakeholders, and a more streamlined and secure procurement environment. In practice, the study offered actionable insights for healthcare practitioners and industry professionals involved in supply chain management. From a policy perspective, the study informed the development of evidence-based policies within the Ministry of Health and other relevant governmental bodies

The purpose of this study was to establish the use of strategic thinking variables in a public university, the University of Zambia. Nine constructs of strategic thinking variables in this study are framed as strategic thinking general, thinking in time, intently focused, systems perspective, intelligent opportunism, hypothesis-driven, reframing, reflecting, and environmental analysis. A qualitative research design encompassing a review of documents and archival records, direct observation, and sense-making informed the evidence gathered in this study. The pre-strategic thinking phase covers the period 1966 to 1993, while the nascent strategic thinking phase covers the period 1994 to 2012 and the evolutionary strategic thinking phase covers the period 2013 to 2022. The findings of this study have revealed that in the pre-strategic thinking phase, the University was guided by the national development agenda for human capital development. The absence of an Institutional strategic plan and associated strategy documents points to a disconnection between optimal strategy and the strategic intentions of the University managers. In both the nascent strategic thinking phase and the evolutionary phase, significant gaps exist in the utilization of strategic thinking variables thinking in time, reframing, reflecting, environmental analysis, focused intent, and intelligent opportunism. This study suggests the University of Zambia should engage employees in the use of strategic thinking variables, with a view to increasing the chances of organizational success. Further, it seems possible that the hitherto limited use of strategic thinking as a practice in the University of Zambia may be hindering the achievement of organizational set goals. Through this conceptualization, this paper has attempted to fill a gap in strategic thinking literature as it pertains to public universities

This study investigates the impact of public procurement procedures on the efficacy of public projects within Zambia's Ministry of Infrastructure, Housing and Urban Development (MIHUD) and the Ministry of Local Government and Rural Development (MLGRD).  Inefficient procurement methods, characterised by delays, cost overruns, and inferior project quality, have impeded the successful execution of public projects, especially in infrastructure and rural development.  The research is to evaluate the impact of Supplier Qualification Screening (SQS), Competitive Bidding (CB), and Supplier Evaluation (SE) on project performance.  A quantitative research methodology was utilised, employing a survey-based descriptive design to gather data from 120 procurement experts and project managers within the designated ministries.  Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) was employed to examine the correlations between procurement methods and project outcomes.  The results demonstrate that SQS and CB enhance project performance by facilitating timely delivery and cost effectiveness.  Nonetheless, SE exerted a detrimental impact, indicating that too rigorous evaluation processes may result in delays and impede project accomplishment.  Hypothesis testing validated these findings, corroborating the alternative hypotheses for SQS and CB, however SE demonstrated an inverse correlation with project outcomes.  The report advocates for the fortification of regulatory frameworks, the augmentation of capacity-building programs, the rectification of bureaucratic inefficiencies, and the encouragement of e-procurement platform usage to enhance procurement efficiency.  A review of supplier evaluation procedures is essential to avert needless delays in project execution.  The study's results have substantial implications for procurement reforms and efficiency enhancements in Zambia.  Improving openness, accountability, and stakeholder collaboration in procurement procedures can result in superior project outcomes, fostering national infrastructure development and socio-economic advancement, especially in rural regions.  Enhancing procurement policies and using digital solutions will be crucial in developing a more efficient and accountable public procurement system.

This research investigates how dynamic capabilities contribute to improving public sector performance and the degree to which strategic management facilitates their implementation. This research employs Dynamic Capabilities Theory (DCT) to assess the impact of sensing (identifying and interpreting opportunities and threats), seizing (mobilising resources to capitalise on opportunities), and transformation (realigning structures, processes, and assets to adapt to change) on organisational performance. A quantitative, non-experimental correlational research design was utilised, employing structured surveys from 193 respondents in key public energy sector enterprises in Malawi. The findings indicate that sensing and transformation capabilities substantially improve performance, while seizing capability alone does not exert a direct influence unless combined with other strategic processes. The interplay between sensing and seizing underscores the necessity for public enterprises to both identify opportunities and implement effective actions in response. Organisational capability has emerged as a vital factor, highlighting the significance of workforce competence and institutional adaptability in enhancing performance. This study advances the theory of DCT by illustrating its relevance in public sector governance constraints and presents a quantitative framework for evaluating dynamic capabilities. Policy recommendations involve enhancing seizing capability by overcoming internal bureaucratic obstacles, promoting an adaptive organisational culture, advancing leadership development, and incorporating data-driven decision-making. These measures aim to empower public enterprises to effectively manage complexity, increase responsiveness, and attain

This study investigates the impact of public procurement procedures on the efficacy of public projects within Zambia's Ministry of Infrastructure, Housing and Urban Development (MIHUD) and the Ministry of Local Government and Rural Development (MLGRD).  Inefficient procurement methods, characterised by delays, cost overruns, and inferior project quality, have impeded the successful execution of public projects, especially in infrastructure and rural development.  The research is to evaluate the impact of Supplier Qualification Screening (SQS), Competitive Bidding (CB), and Supplier Evaluation (SE) on project performance.  A quantitative research methodology was utilised, employing a survey-based descriptive design to gather data from 120 procurement experts and project managers within the designated ministries.  Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) was employed to examine the correlations between procurement methods and project outcomes.  The results demonstrate that SQS and CB enhance project performance by facilitating timely delivery and cost effectiveness.  Nonetheless, SE exerted a detrimental impact, indicating that too rigorous evaluation processes may result in delays and impede project accomplishment.  Hypothesis testing validated these findings, corroborating the alternative hypotheses for SQS and CB, however SE demonstrated an inverse correlation with project outcomes.  The report advocates for the fortification of regulatory frameworks, the augmentation of capacity-building programs, the rectification of bureaucratic inefficiencies, and the encouragement of e-procurement platform usage to enhance procurement efficiency.  A review of supplier evaluation procedures is essential to avert needless delays in project execution.  The study's results have substantial implications for procurement reforms and efficiency enhancements in Zambia.  Improving openness, accountability, and stakeholder collaboration in procurement procedures can result in superior project outcomes, fostering national infrastructure development and socio-economic advancement, especially in rural regions.  Enhancing procurement policies and using digital solutions will be crucial in developing a more efficient and accountable public procurement system.

E-procurement is a dynamic process that involves the seamless integration of various online activities, such as order creation, supplier selection, contract signing, and product delivery, all facilitated by the Internet. Governments worldwide are increasingly emphasizing the importance of effective electronic procurement systems in promoting transparency, accountability, and efficiency in public procurement processes, where taxpayer funds are utilized.  In Zambia, despite significant efforts by the government to promote the adoption of electronic procurement systems, such as e-procurement, challenges persist in ensuring their effectiveness. The failure to address the effectiveness of e-procurement within the Ministry of Health could have severe consequences. Inadequate adherence to procurement laws and regulations, as evidenced by the ZPPA report, may lead to inefficiencies, delays in procurement processes, and mis-allocation of resources. These inefficiencies can ultimately compromise the quality and availability of healthcare services, negatively impacting patient outcomes and public health. Additionally, the inability to harness the potential benefits of e-procurement, such as cost savings and streamlined processes, may perpetuate resource wastage and hinder efforts to improve healthcare delivery in Zambia. The main objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of E-procurement systems at the Ministry of Health.  The research philosophy for this study adopted a Quantitative approach that emphasized the practical utility of research methods in addressing the research problem. The findings of the study showed that the evaluation of the e-procurement system within the Ministry yielded a comprehensive understanding of its current performance and highlighted areas needing improvement. The e-procurement system has generally been well-received by the majority of respondents, reflecting its positive impact on procurement processes. Users have rated the system as effective in streamlining operations, enhancing procurement efficiency, and being user-friendly. Based on the comprehensive analysis and findings of the study, the following recommendations were proposed to enhance the effectiveness of the e-procurement system within the Ministry: Enhance Communication, Boost Supplier Participation, Improve Supplier Responsiveness, Strengthen Data Security and Privacy Controls and Increase Transparency. By addressing these recommendations, the Ministry can significantly improve the effectiveness of its e-procurement system, leading to more efficient procurement processes, greater satisfaction among stakeholders, and a more streamlined and secure procurement environment. In practice, the study offered actionable insights for healthcare practitioners and industry professionals involved in supply chain management. From a policy perspective, the study informed the development of evidence-based policies within the Ministry of Health and other relevant governmental bodies

The study assessed the possibility of accounting fraud among Zambian listed companies with a focus on the mining sector and the relationship between related party transactions (RPTs) and financial statement manipulation (FSM). The financial statements (2012 to 2020) of listed companies were analysed to detect accounting fraud using the M-score and the Z-score. Descriptive statistics were used to explain the extent of FSM. The Chi-Square test of independence was employed to test the relationship between FSM and RPTs. Both the Z-Score and M-Score indicate that the mining companies were possibly involved in FSM. There is a relationship between the FSM and RPTs. The Total Accruals to Total Assets, Days in Sales in Receivables Index and Sales Growth Index show that revenue and profits were the most manipulated. The RPTs disclosures were the lowest for mining companies. Relevant authorities should not neglect FSM as a form of fraud despite the routine external audit of financial statements. There is the potential loss of tax revenue through accounting fraud.

This study evaluates resources allocated for risk management by business organisations (financial and non-financial firms) in developing countries, using Zambia as a case study. Primary data collected from 158 organisations were analysed using MegaStat. The findings revealed that the majority (54.5%) of organisations, especially non-financial institutions, only commit resources to risk mitigation on an Adhoc or post-event basis, while 45.5% showed a budgeted approach. A significant part of the budgeted 45.5% was used for risk management activities, and 54.5% was used for regular daily operations. Despite this variation, all organisations engaged reported a significant expenditure on risk management, at least on Adhoc. At 4 degrees of freedom (df), which was one less than the total number of possible outcomes, a non-parametric test for significance yielded a scientific P-value of 1.57e-0.7, (a numerical magnitude of 0.0014, P< 0.05). This suggests that the correlation and pattern of the findings were not random or by chance, but they carried a statistical significance. The study's main findings demonstrate that some business organisations in Zambia and other developing countries incur significant expenditure with a higher portion of their budgets to respond to risk management needs. Business organisations which do not have formal risk structures do so informally due to pressure from emerging business risks. The findings also indicated that financial institutions in developing countries allocate more resources towards risk management than non-financial institutions. The Phi coefficient (degree of association) was 0.486, showing a moderately significant relationship between the variables (risk management and resource allocation). Business organisations in Zambia and other developing nations must develop sound risk mitigation plans and allocate resources for risk management.