Publication activity
Articles grouped by publication year
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.
Research across participating journals · All insights follow your collection filters.
New articles are checked daily. Citation sources are refreshed monthly. All times below are UTC. A successful check may find no new publications.
Publication activity alongside incoming citations.
Articles grouped by publication year
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
Leading affiliations and themes in this collection.
Full distributions & methodology ↓Independent sources. Clear time scales.
Crossref and OpenAlex · separate totals for the same publication cohorts
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
Latest lifetime totals, grouped by the cited article’s year. These are not citations received in that year.
OpenAlex · incoming citation links grouped by citing-work year
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
Select journals to compare the same collection filters. Source totals stay separate. These measures describe research activity, not journal quality.
Articles by publication year
Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year
Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year
By year of the citing work · 2017–2026
2026 is year to date. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime charts share a citation scale. Unknown observations appear as gaps; known zero stays zero. Annual receipts use available OpenAlex histories and may not sum to lifetime totals. 0 undated publications excluded from publication-year charts.
Crossref citation coverage: 1903 / 1903 publications (100.0%). Latest observation: 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC. Means and percentages use records with known counts.
DOI-matched OpenAlex observations for the same selected publications. These counts are separate from Crossref and are never added together.
Observation range: 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC — 05 Nov 2026 08:06 UTC. Missing matches are not zero citations. Previous observations may remain if a refresh fails or a DOI no longer matches.
OpenAlex affiliations and primary-topic classification. Each publication counts once per institution or country; multi-affiliated publications appear in multiple groups, so percentages can sum above 100%. Countries describe author affiliations, not nationality. Topics use one primary topic per publication.
1783 / 1903 with data · 120 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 1903 selected publications.
1783 / 1903 with data · 120 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 1903 selected publications.
1903 / 1903 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 1903 selected publications.
Citations are the latest recorded totals for articles published in each year, not citations received during that year. Crossref and OpenAlex remain separate and share the same citation scale. 2026 is incomplete; newer articles have had less time to receive citations.
0 undated publications excluded. Unknown citation counts are shown as —, never as zero. Partial coverage can understate totals; expand each table for known / total records.
| Publication year | Journal / scope | Publications | Publications | Crossref known | OpenAlex known |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | All selected publications | 1 | 1 | 1/1 | 1/1 |
| 2012 | All selected publications | 4 | 4 | 4/4 | 4/4 |
| 2013 | All selected publications | 25 | 25 | 25/25 | 25/25 |
| 2014 | All selected publications | 30 | 30 | 30/30 | 30/30 |
| 2015 | All selected publications | 17 | 17 | 17/17 | 17/17 |
| 2016 | All selected publications | 57 | 57 | 57/57 | 57/57 |
| 2017 | All selected publications | 28 | 28 | 28/28 | 28/28 |
| 2018 | All selected publications | 21 | 21 | 21/21 | 21/21 |
| 2019 | All selected publications | 97 | 97 | 97/97 | 97/97 |
| 2020 | All selected publications | 145 | 145 | 145/145 | 145/145 |
| 2021 | All selected publications | 185 | 185 | 185/185 | 185/185 |
| 2022 | All selected publications | 330 | 330 | 330/330 | 330/330 |
| 2023 | All selected publications | 344 | 344 | 344/344 | 344/344 |
| 2024 | All selected publications | 360 | 360 | 360/360 | 360/360 |
| 2025 | All selected publications | 225 | 225 | 225/225 | 225/225 |
| 2026 | All selected publications | 34 | 34 | 34/34 | 34/34 |
| Publication year | Journal / scope | Crossref citations | Publications | Crossref known | OpenAlex known |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | All selected publications | 0 | 1 | 1/1 | 1/1 |
| 2012 | All selected publications | 5 | 4 | 4/4 | 4/4 |
| 2013 | All selected publications | 27 | 25 | 25/25 | 25/25 |
| 2014 | All selected publications | 35 | 30 | 30/30 | 30/30 |
| 2015 | All selected publications | 11 | 17 | 17/17 | 17/17 |
| 2016 | All selected publications | 64 | 57 | 57/57 | 57/57 |
| 2017 | All selected publications | 26 | 28 | 28/28 | 28/28 |
| 2018 | All selected publications | 23 | 21 | 21/21 | 21/21 |
| 2019 | All selected publications | 116 | 97 | 97/97 | 97/97 |
| 2020 | All selected publications | 203 | 145 | 145/145 | 145/145 |
| 2021 | All selected publications | 251 | 185 | 185/185 | 185/185 |
| 2022 | All selected publications | 474 | 330 | 330/330 | 330/330 |
| 2023 | All selected publications | 583 | 344 | 344/344 | 344/344 |
| 2024 | All selected publications | 623 | 360 | 360/360 | 360/360 |
| 2025 | All selected publications | 343 | 225 | 225/225 | 225/225 |
| 2026 | All selected publications | 40 | 34 | 34/34 | 34/34 |
| Publication year | Journal / scope | OpenAlex citations | Publications | Crossref known | OpenAlex known |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | All selected publications | 4 | 1 | 1/1 | 1/1 |
| 2012 | All selected publications | 10 | 4 | 4/4 | 4/4 |
| 2013 | All selected publications | 63 | 25 | 25/25 | 25/25 |
| 2014 | All selected publications | 81 | 30 | 30/30 | 30/30 |
| 2015 | All selected publications | 28 | 17 | 17/17 | 17/17 |
| 2016 | All selected publications | 158 | 57 | 57/57 | 57/57 |
| 2017 | All selected publications | 65 | 28 | 28/28 | 28/28 |
| 2018 | All selected publications | 58 | 21 | 21/21 | 21/21 |
| 2019 | All selected publications | 241 | 97 | 97/97 | 97/97 |
| 2020 | All selected publications | 355 | 145 | 145/145 | 145/145 |
| 2021 | All selected publications | 460 | 185 | 185/185 | 185/185 |
| 2022 | All selected publications | 840 | 330 | 330/330 | 330/330 |
| 2023 | All selected publications | 815 | 344 | 344/344 | 344/344 |
| 2024 | All selected publications | 745 | 360 | 360/360 | 360/360 |
| 2025 | All selected publications | 357 | 225 | 225/225 | 225/225 |
| 2026 | All selected publications | 44 | 34 | 34/34 | 34/34 |
Incoming citations to the selected publications, grouped by the year of the citing work. This is separate from lifetime citation totals grouped by the cited article’s publication year.
The publication filters above define which articles receive the citations. The citation-year range below only controls this chart and the incoming-citation comparison. Removing publication-year filters includes older articles’ incoming citations too.
Annual history available for 1903 / 1903 selected publications. Supported display window: 2017–2026; 2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Missing histories and years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—); partial coverage can understate totals.
Annual-history observations (UTC): 2026-10-21T07:22:43.065674+00:00 — 2026-11-05T08:06:18.755898+00:00. Older observations may be retained after failed or incomplete refreshes.
| Citation year | Journal / scope | OpenAlex · Citations received by year | Publications | Annual history known |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | All selected publications | 23 | 1903 | 1903/1903 |
| 2018 | All selected publications | 35 | 1903 | 1903/1903 |
| 2019 | All selected publications | 62 | 1903 | 1903/1903 |
| 2020 | All selected publications | 108 | 1903 | 1903/1903 |
| 2021 | All selected publications | 162 | 1903 | 1903/1903 |
| 2022 | All selected publications | 300 | 1903 | 1903/1903 |
| 2023 | All selected publications | 573 | 1903 | 1903/1903 |
| 2024 | All selected publications | 915 | 1903 | 1903/1903 |
| 2025 | All selected publications | 1105 | 1903 | 1903/1903 |
| 2026 | All selected publications | 990 | 1903 | 1903/1903 |
Counts represent citation links, not unique citing papers across a journal: one paper citing two selected articles contributes two links. Older citations outside this window are excluded, so annual sums need not equal lifetime totals. OpenAlex methodology ↗
Publications by publication year. 2026 is an incomplete year.
| Period | Publications |
|---|---|
| 2011 | 1 |
| 2012 | 4 |
| 2013 | 25 |
| 2014 | 30 |
| 2015 | 17 |
| 2016 | 57 |
| 2017 | 28 |
| 2018 | 21 |
| 2019 | 97 |
| 2020 | 145 |
| 2021 | 185 |
| 2022 | 330 |
| 2023 | 344 |
| 2024 | 360 |
| 2025 | 225 |
| 2026 | 34 |
Latest Crossref totals for the selected publications; not citations received in the selected years.
Unknown counts are excluded from the mean, median and cited-publication rate.
Same filters, source and counting rules across journals. Descriptive statistics, not a quality ranking.
| Journal / publisher | Publications | Crossref citations | OpenAlex citations | OpenAlex coverage | Crossref mean | Crossref median | Crossref cited %* | Crossref coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bussecon Review of Social Sciences Bussecon International Academy | 42 | 68 | 85 | 42/42 | 1.62 | 1.0 | 78.6 | 42/42 · 100.0% |
| International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy Bussecon International Academy | 252 | 421 | 531 | 252/252 | 1.67 | 1.0 | 88.5 | 252/252 · 100.0% |
| International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies SSBFNET | 232 | 266 | 529 | 232/232 | 1.15 | 1.0 | 70.7 | 232/232 · 100.0% |
| International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science SSBFNET | 1377 | 2069 | 3179 | 1377/1377 | 1.5 | 1 | 81.3 | 1377/1377 · 100.0% |
* Percentage among publications with a known citation count.
Over the years, there have been huge variations in the growth performances of the economies in SSA. Whilst these disparities can be attributed to a wide range of factors, it is generally understood that differences in their economic structures explain the capacity for generating growth and absorbing shocks during a recession. This study contributes to literature by examining the impact of institutional quality and financial development on economic growth in low- and middle-income countries. Data was obtained from the World Bank and covered the period from 1975 to 2020. The study employed an ARDL model to establish both short and long run dynamics in the two sub samples. The study confirmed both short and long run causality from financial and institutional quality to growth. Institutional quality enhances growth in both low- and middle-income countries in the long run. Whilst the direction of the impact is the same, the magnitude of the impact of institutional quality is different within the two categories. Institutional quality plays a more significant role in low-income countries compared to middle income economies. The study brings out potential financial fragility and systemic risks in financial institutions among countries in SSA. Policies that enhance the quality, consistency, and uniformity of legal reasoning in judicial decisions are ideal. Reducing the risk profile for investments may enhance the flow of credit to the private sector by financial institutions.
Bu çal??mada Türkiye’de pay senetleri fiyatlar? ile döviz kurlar? aras?ndaki ili?ki, VAR metodu (vektör oto regresyon modeli) kullan?larak ara?t?r?lm??t?r. Döviz kurlar? ve pay senedi fiyatlar?ndan olu?an de?i?kenler aras?nda do?rusal bir ba??nt? olup olmad???n?n tespiti amac?yla bu model kullan?lm??t?r. Bu amaçla, döviz kurlar?, B?ST Banka ve B?ST S?nai endeksleri ele al?nm??t?r. Veriler Ocak 2011’den Aral?k 2014’e kadar olan döneme ait günlük de?i?meleri içermektedir. Türkiye’de en fazla i?lem yap?lan döviz kurlar? ABD dolar? ve Euro oldu?u için, bu kurlar tercih edilmi?tir.
The purpose of this paper is to investigate the influence of cultural forces that shape social influence with a look at Hofstede’s cultural dimensions of power distance, uncertainty avoidance, and individualism. The direct effect of these cultural dimensions on social influence is investigated. To measure social influence, this paper relies on the dimensions of Hofstede. A multiple regression analysis is applied to answer the hypotheses. The research design adopted for the research was quantitative, and the method used to collect data was an online survey. A self-administered questionnaire was developed and distributed to the targeted respondents for obtaining primary data.The respondents involved were 340 SMEs in the urban area of Harare province in Zimbabwe. A nonprobability convenience sampling method was used for the study. Hofstede’s cultural factors of power distance, individualism, and uncertainty avoidance were used as the independent variables that moderate social influence.
This paper aims to examine the impact of Covid-19 pandemic on stock markets. This paper also analyses the stock market cointegration of selected global equity indices that performed better and have a quick speed of recovery during the pandemic. This paper also questions how increasing uncertainty and volatility deters investors’ perception of the diversification of equity investments. The dataset for the selected 12 global equity indices has been used from Thompson Reuters’s EIKON database in a given period of time between 2010 and 2021. This paper employs Vector Error Correction Models to assess the relationship among the selected global equity indices. Findings demonstrate that (i) there is an adverse impact of Covid-19 on the Global Equity markets, (ii) there is a clear sign of cointegration in global equity indices, (ii) investors can benefit from investing in particular equity indices that have exhibited quick speed of recovery from the pandemic records lows. The findings finally provide a strong foundation for constructing a resilient equity portfolio in a highly uncertain market environment.
This study aims to identify the convergence of financial sector development and the effect of macroeconomic variables on each financial sector development indicator in Asia. The sample used consists of 24 countries in Asia during the period 2010-2018. Identification of convergence using ?-convergence absolute and conditional. Indicators are used to represent the development of the financial sector namely private credit, liquid liabilities, stock market capitalization, and stock market turnover. Empirical evidence was based on the Generalized Method of Moment (GMM) estimation technique. The results showed that there was convergence in Asia and that macroeconomic variables had a significant effect on the development of the financial sector.
This study examines how formal and informal institutional pressures influence public sector financial reporting quality in Ghana. Despite ongoing public financial management reforms, challenges such as weak enforcement of standards, inconsistent disclosures, and limited transparency continue to undermine reporting quality. Existing research has largely emphasised technical and administrative determinants, with limited attention to the role of institutional pressures in shaping reporting behaviour. Grounded in Institutional Theory, the study adopts a quantitative approach and collects data from 344 senior finance officers across ministries, departments, and agencies in Ghana. Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) is employed to analyse the relationships between regulatory environment, government structure, societal expectations, stakeholder expectations, and financial reporting quality. The results indicate that government structure and societal expectations significantly enhance financial reporting quality, while the regulatory environment and stakeholder expectations have no significant direct effects. The study contributes to institutional theory by demonstrating that formal and informal pressures exert unequal influence in a developing-country public sector context. It also extends public sector accounting literature by providing large-sample empirical evidence from Ghana. The findings suggest that improving reporting quality requires strengthening governance structures, enhancing civic accountability mechanisms, and improving enforcement capacity.
This study examines the long-run relationship between foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows and institutional quality within the Arab Maghreb Union (AMU), focusing on Algeria, Mauritania, Morocco, and Tunisia over the period 2002–2019. Drawing on institutional theories of FDI, the analysis employs governance indicators such as political stability, control of corruption, government effectiveness, regulatory quality, and rule of law to assess their influence on investment dynamics. Using panel unit root and cointegration tests, the study confirms the existence of a stable long-term equilibrium among the variables. The Fully Modified Ordinary Least Squares (FMOLS) estimator is applied to quantify these relationships. Empirical results indicate that control of corruption, political stability, and regulatory quality exert significant positive effects on FDI inflows, even after accounting for macroeconomic controls. Conversely, government effectiveness and rule of law show no statistically significant impact in the presence of the macroeconomic control variables. These findings underscore the critical role of institutional quality in shaping the investment climate of AMU economies. Policy implications suggest that targeted reforms such as strengthening anti-corruption frameworks, enhancing political stability, and improving regulatory governance can bolster institutional credibility, mitigate investment risk, and attract sustainable FDI to the region.
The study examines how quality of governance influences the Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) inflows in Sub-Saharan Africa. The study adopts a quantitative research strategy that utilises panel data of selected countries during 28 years, that is, 1996-2023. Indicators of governance like Government Effectiveness (GE), Political Stability and Absence of Violence (AV), Rule of Law (RL), Regulatory Quality (RQ) and Voice and Accountability (VA). The findings indicate that Strong Governance frameworks significantly enhance FDI inflows in Sub-Saharan Africa. VA was found to be a very strong positive determinant. GE and PS were also found to have negative relationships in within-country analyses. The IFRS adoption, being a uniform variable throughout the sampled countries, was observed to increase investor confidence. These results imply that the improvement of governance are synergies that help to establish the stable, transparent, and predictable environment sought by investors. Thus, policymakers can improve the governance systems and provide citizen involvement in order to boost foreign investment and attract sustainable capital and economic growth in the region.
Gender-based violence (GBV) against women is one of the most widespread and long-established social issues in South Africa that is conditioned by historical, cultural, and structural factors that have created a normalized environment of male dominance and accepted different types of gendered violence. This study provides a sociological explanation of GBV in terms of power and patriarchy and structural inequality area and how these interconnected factors create and maintain violence in intimate relationships, families, and the broader social institution. Using the feminist theory, intersectionality and sociological theory of power relations, the research questions the role of cultural norms, economic dependence, socialisation process as well as institutional failures in causing high incidences of violence against women. However, even after the enactment of progressive laws, including Domestic Violence Act, Sexual Offences Act, etc, the lived conditions of women still portray the vulnerabilities of the system to historical disparities, deep-rooted patriarchal philosophies and gender hierarchies. A qualitative research design was used to gather the data, where in-depth interviews, focus group and documentary analysis of women who have experienced GBV, community members and key informants including social workers, activists and legal practitioners were used to collect data. It shows that the patriarchal systems of power exist on a variety of levels family, community, cultural and institutional to naturalize violence, victimize the victim, and absolve the criminal. Results participants affirm the importance of social norms of masculinity, poverty, inequality in access to resources, and inadequate institutional responses in perpetuating fear, dependence, and subsequent exposure to violence within women. In addition, the study demonstrates how the combination of poverty, race, rurality, and social support services worsen the vulnerability of women, which leads to a reflexive relationship in which violence turns into an individual and societal problem. This study concludes that GBV in South Africa cannot be examined solely as the instances of violence but should be examined as the expression of unequal power relations, which can be found within social structures. The solution to GBV would therefore have to be multi-level and involves efforts to confront patriarchal norms, foster community accountability, bolster legal protection, and increase socio-economic opportunities of women. The results add to the existing pool of sociological research on the topic of gender and violence, providing an important insight into the reasons why GBV continues to be a problem and the changes in the structure that are required in order to mitigate it.
The globalized and technologically advanced business environment presents significant challenges to small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), which play a critical role in national economic growth and innovation. These challenges include strategic orientation, effective resource allocation, and adapting to changing markets, often resulting in premature business failure. Therefore, the paper reviews recent literature on how tangible resources such as financial capital, physical assets, and technology influence SME growth, focusing on studies from the past decade that apply frameworks like the Resource-Based View. A systematic literature review was conducted, involving a comprehensive search of academic databases. Thematic analysis was applied to synthesize the findings on resource impact and management in SMEs. The review revealed that financial capital, physical assets, and technological infrastructure significantly influence SME growth. However, the extent of impact varies across contexts, depending on managerial capabilities, access to finance, and market conditions. Addressing this gap, the article aims to inform both theory and practice on SME sustainability and development and suggests avenues for future research.
Source coverage refers to this result set; a publication may occur in several sources. Sync times refer to contributing journals.
Missing abstracts: 0 · Missing authors: 0 · Missing publication dates: 0 · Dates without day precision: 0
| Source | Most recent successful journal sync | Latest attempt |
|---|---|---|
| Not available · | Not run | |
| Not available · | Not run | |
| Not available · | Not run | |
| Not available · | Not run |