CiteNScope — Scholarly Index & Analytics
Discover / Analytics RESEARCH INTELLIGENCE
CiteNScope / Analytics

Explore the evidence.
Understand the reach.

Research across participating journals · All insights follow your collection filters.

Compare journals ↗
OpenAlex coverage 100.0% · 21/21 recordsLast OpenAlex observation 29 Oct 2026, 17:07 UTC
PUBLICATIONS21In the selected collection
CROSSREF CITATIONS121/21 with known counts
OPENALEX CITATIONS021/21 with known counts
OPENALEX MEAN0.0Per article with a known count
Explore articles 21 →
Filter collection Publication years, search & more
Reset
country: China Remove ×
Your research collection

Output and reach

Publication activity alongside incoming citations.

Publication activity

Articles grouped by publication year

Publications

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.

View data & coverage

Citations received

OpenAlex · year of the citing work

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage
Two perspectives on citations

Follow the research impact

Independent sources. Clear time scales.

Lifetime citations by publication year

Crossref and OpenAlex · separate totals for the same publication cohorts

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

Latest lifetime totals, grouped by the cited article’s year. These are not citations received in that year.

View data & coverage

Citations received each year

OpenAlex · incoming citation links grouped by citing-work year

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage
Annual history: 21/21 articles. Latest history observation: 2026-10-29T17:07:54.448508+00:00. Source totals are never added together.
Research side by side

Compare journals

Select journals to compare the same collection filters. Source totals stay separate. These measures describe research activity, not journal quality.

Leave all unchecked to include every matching journal. Selection affects only comparison charts.
Display range
International Journal of Business Ecosystem & StrategyInternational Journal of Finance & Banking StudiesInternational Journal of Research in Business and Social Science

Publications

Articles by publication year

View data & coverage

Crossref citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex · Citations received

By year of the citing work · 2017–2026

View data & coverage

2026 is year to date. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime charts share a citation scale. Unknown observations appear as gaps; known zero stays zero. Annual receipts use available OpenAlex histories and may not sum to lifetime totals. 0 undated publications excluded from publication-year charts.

Full analytics report All distributions, publications, comparisons & data provenance
21 MATCHING PUBLICATIONSExplore results →Export CSV ↓
INDEXED PUBLICATIONS21
CROSSREF CITATIONS1
CROSSREF · CITED PUBLICATIONS4.8%
CROSSREF · MEAN CITATIONS0.05

Crossref citation coverage: 21 / 21 publications (100.0%). Latest observation: 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC. Means and percentages use records with known counts.

OpenAlex / Separate citation source

A broader view of this research

DOI-matched OpenAlex observations for the same selected publications. These counts are separate from Crossref and are never added together.

OPENALEX CITATIONS0
DOI MATCH COVERAGE100.0%21 / 21 publications
MEAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY0.021 known · 0 unknown
MEDIAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY0

Observation range: 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC — 29 Oct 2026 17:07 UTC. Missing matches are not zero citations. Previous observations may remain if a refresh fails or a DOI no longer matches.

OpenAlex citation distributionNo citations211–506–20021+0Unknown0

Institutions, countries & topics

OpenAlex affiliations and primary-topic classification. Each publication counts once per institution or country; multi-affiliated publications appear in multiple groups, so percentages can sum above 100%. Countries describe author affiliations, not nationality. Topics use one primary topic per publication.

Institutions

21 / 21 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 21 selected publications.

Countries

21 / 21 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 21 selected publications.

Primary topics

21 / 21 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 21 selected publications.

Citation year / OpenAlex

Citations received over time

Incoming citations to the selected publications, grouped by the year of the citing work. This is separate from lifetime citation totals grouped by the cited article’s publication year.

The publication filters above define which articles receive the citations. The citation-year range below only controls this chart and the incoming-citation comparison. Removing publication-year filters includes older articles’ incoming citations too.

Annual history available for 21 / 21 selected publications. Supported display window: 2017–2026; 2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Missing histories and years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—); partial coverage can understate totals.

Annual-history observations (UTC): 2026-10-21T07:22:45.277624+00:00 — 2026-10-29T17:07:54.448508+00:00. Older observations may be retained after failed or incomplete refreshes.

OpenAlex · Citations received by year

10.50 2017 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 21/212018 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 21/212019 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 21/212020 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 21/212021 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 21/212022 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 21/212023 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 21/212024 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 21/212025 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 21/212026 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 21/21 2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
View openalex · citations received by year data & coverage
Citation yearJournal / scopeOpenAlex · Citations received by yearPublicationsAnnual history known
2017All selected publications02121/21
2018All selected publications02121/21
2019All selected publications02121/21
2020All selected publications02121/21
2021All selected publications02121/21
2022All selected publications02121/21
2023All selected publications02121/21
2024All selected publications02121/21
2025All selected publications02121/21
2026All selected publications02121/21

Counts represent citation links, not unique citing papers across a journal: one paper citing two selected articles contributes two links. Older citations outside this window are excluded, so annual sums need not equal lifetime totals. OpenAlex methodology ↗

Crossref citation distribution

Latest Crossref totals for the selected publications; not citations received in the selected years.

Mean0.05
Median0
No citations201–516–20021+0Unknown0

Unknown counts are excluded from the mean, median and cited-publication rate.

Journal comparison

Same filters, source and counting rules across journals. Descriptive statistics, not a quality ranking.

Journal / publisherPublicationsCrossref citationsOpenAlex citationsOpenAlex coverageCrossref meanCrossref medianCrossref cited %*Crossref coverage
International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy
Bussecon International Academy
2002/20.00.00.02/2 · 100.0%
International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies
SSBFNET
2002/20.00.00.02/2 · 100.0%
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science
SSBFNET
171017/170.0605.917/17 · 100.0%

* Percentage among publications with a known citation count.

Explore publications

View all 21 →

Most cited · Crossref

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Why does task conflict influence team creativity?

Muhammad Kamran Khan · Maria Shafi · Shakeel Khan · Waseem Khan

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2020

Read abstract

Although task conflict is usually seen to be beneficial to team creativity, the relationship is still unclear because of the mixed results. This research investigated why task conflicts resulted in some positive outcomes in terms of team creativity. Drawing on minority dissent theory, this study examined the conflict-creativity relationship by focusing on the mediating role of team reflexivity. We collected the sample data from 338 employees and 67 supervisors (67 teams) across three different sectors (banking, pharmaceuticals, and insurance) in Pakistan to support our hypotheses. We used bootstrapping analysis and the Sobel test to check for the mediation analysis. The results indicated that task conflict increases team reflexivity, team reflexivity facilitated team creativity, and thus, task conflict positively influenced team creativity via team reflexivity. The theoretical and practical implications of this study plus future directions are further discussed.    

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v9i2.6311 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

The Market Impact of New Auditing Standards in China

Xiancong Wu · Richard Skolnik · Hongxiu Luo

International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies · 2022

Read abstract

To improve audit reports' transparency and information content, China implemented new auditing standards in 2017.  The standards, which include disclosing key audit matters, were applied to A+H share companies in 2017 and A-share companies in 2018.  This paper uses A+H-share companies as the experimental group and A-share companies as the control group and applies the difference-in-differences method to test the market response to the new auditing standards.  We find a statistically significant positive cumulative abnormal return (CAR) during the report release event window for the A+H share companies.  The results indicate a greater investor reaction to the release of audit reports under the new standards implying that the audit reforms enhanced the information of the reports.  Furthermore, the positive CAR indicates that the reports reassured investors that the audit did not reveal significant problems or that existing weaknesses were addressed.  We also found a statistically insignificant difference in the volatility of stock prices during the event window for the experimental and control group. 

DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v11i1.15440 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

The Impacts of China's Shadow Banking Credit Creation on the Effectiveness of Monetary Policy

Huiyi Zhang · Richard Skolnik · Yu Han · Jinpei Wu

International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies · 2020

Read abstract

This paper researches the impact that shadow banking in China has upon credit creation and the potential effectiveness of monetary policy. Using a credit creation model, we derive the effect that shadow banking has upon the money multiplier and the money supply. The model shows that shadow banking can change the money multiplier, potentially increasing it during an expansion and decreasing it during a contraction. Introducing shadow banking in a CC-LM model results in a shift of the CC and LM curves resulting in a higher equilibrium output. A vector autoregressive model is used to empirically estimate the impact of shadow banking deposits' growth rate on the growth rates of the broad money supply, GDP, and the CPI. The results show that shadow banking's credit creation function in China has a pro-cyclical characteristic, potentially reducing the money supply's controllability and increasing the difficulty in effectively regulating monetary policy. This paper introduces shadow banking into the currency creation process of traditional commercial banks, accounting for the reserve requirement ratio, the excess reserve ratio, the shadow bank leakage rate, and the reserved deduction rate. Future research can determine whether coordinating monetary policy and leverage ratio regulation mitigates the impact of shadow banking. Another area of research is how the shadow banking of non-financial companies affect monetary policy.

DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v9i4.8990 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Digital platform capabilities and agility: The role of technological uncertainty in SMEs

Saba Hafeez · Ding Xiu-Hao

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

The research aims to explore the impact of digital platform integration and reconstruction capabilities on organizational agility (mediator) and ESG performance of small and medium size enterprises of Pakistan. The study also examines the moderating role of technology uncertainty between digital platform capabilities and organizational agility that further leads to ESG performance. Data is collected from 300 firms while industries include; IT, Manufacturing, Textiles, Electronics, and Automobile in eight big cities of Pakistan and the respondents are middle and senior managers. Data was analyzed using the software; SPSS (reliability analysis) and R Studio (version 4.5.2), Structural Equation modeling (SEM) and regression Analysis. The study used Resource-Based View and Dynamic Capability Theory to see the role of digital platform capabilities, organization agility and uncertain technology conditions’ on ESG. The findings of this research are that such organizations with agility perform better on the ESG dimensions. First, this study takes a capability perspective to explore the impact of digital platform integration and reconstruction capability on Organizational agility, which extends the related studies taking digital perspective. Second, the inner mechanism between organizational agility and firm ESG performance is revealed where organizational agility works as a bridge for ESG performance. Third, the relationship between digital platform capabilities and organizational agility is exposed by the moderation of technology uncertainty. Where technology uncertainty positively moderates the relationship between digital platform capabilities and organizational agility.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v15i2.48320 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Organizational agility as a dynamic capability for improving ESG performance of SMEs

Saba Hafeez · Ding Xiu-Hao

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

Purpose of this research is to examine the relationship between organizational agility (OA) and the Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance of firms. Specifically, it seeks to understand the organizational agility and agility in various industries of Pakistani firms including some control variables e.g. firm size, firm age, industry and city. Data is collected from 300 firms of Pakistan and the respondents are middle and senior managers. R studio is used to analyze data (version 4.5.2). The analysis techniques include; descriptive statistical, correlation, reliability, validity, Common Method Variance (CMV), Structural Equation modeling (SEM) and regression (including control variables). Data is collected from the industries of IT, Manufacturing, Textiles, Electronics, and Automobile, in eight cities of Pakistan. Results show that there exists a positive relationship between organizational agility and firm ESG Performance. This study contributes to the literature by the importance of organizational agility as a dynamic capability in achieving ESG goals, providing new directions for future research and practical recommendations for policymakers and industry leaders.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v15i2.48580 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations

Selected results

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Digital platform capabilities and agility: The role of technological uncertainty in SMEs

Saba Hafeez · Ding Xiu-Hao

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

The research aims to explore the impact of digital platform integration and reconstruction capabilities on organizational agility (mediator) and ESG performance of small and medium size enterprises of Pakistan. The study also examines the moderating role of technology uncertainty between digital platform capabilities and organizational agility that further leads to ESG performance. Data is collected from 300 firms while industries include; IT, Manufacturing, Textiles, Electronics, and Automobile in eight big cities of Pakistan and the respondents are middle and senior managers. Data was analyzed using the software; SPSS (reliability analysis) and R Studio (version 4.5.2), Structural Equation modeling (SEM) and regression Analysis. The study used Resource-Based View and Dynamic Capability Theory to see the role of digital platform capabilities, organization agility and uncertain technology conditions’ on ESG. The findings of this research are that such organizations with agility perform better on the ESG dimensions. First, this study takes a capability perspective to explore the impact of digital platform integration and reconstruction capability on Organizational agility, which extends the related studies taking digital perspective. Second, the inner mechanism between organizational agility and firm ESG performance is revealed where organizational agility works as a bridge for ESG performance. Third, the relationship between digital platform capabilities and organizational agility is exposed by the moderation of technology uncertainty. Where technology uncertainty positively moderates the relationship between digital platform capabilities and organizational agility.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v15i2.48320 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Organizational agility as a dynamic capability for improving ESG performance of SMEs

Saba Hafeez · Ding Xiu-Hao

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

Purpose of this research is to examine the relationship between organizational agility (OA) and the Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance of firms. Specifically, it seeks to understand the organizational agility and agility in various industries of Pakistani firms including some control variables e.g. firm size, firm age, industry and city. Data is collected from 300 firms of Pakistan and the respondents are middle and senior managers. R studio is used to analyze data (version 4.5.2). The analysis techniques include; descriptive statistical, correlation, reliability, validity, Common Method Variance (CMV), Structural Equation modeling (SEM) and regression (including control variables). Data is collected from the industries of IT, Manufacturing, Textiles, Electronics, and Automobile, in eight cities of Pakistan. Results show that there exists a positive relationship between organizational agility and firm ESG Performance. This study contributes to the literature by the importance of organizational agility as a dynamic capability in achieving ESG goals, providing new directions for future research and practical recommendations for policymakers and industry leaders.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v15i2.48580 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Humans still touch hearts: Why human streamers spark more empathy and desire than AI in live commerce<i>?</i>

Madina Khudaykulova · Yuanqiong He

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

This paper aims to evaluate how the type of streamer (human vs. AI) influences consumer desire in live-streaming commerce through socio-cognitive and motivational mechanisms. Building on the CASA framework, Self-Determination Theory (SDT), and the Model of Goal-Directed Behavior (MGB), this study examines whether human and AI streamers differentially generate perceived empathy, which then activates intrinsic and extrinsic motivations leading to consumer desire. This paper also aims to test whether personal involvement and skepticism moderate the empathy–motivation pathway. A between-subjects experimental design was used to randomly assign participants to view identical livestreaming scripts presented by either a human or a humanoid AI streamer. Data from all 277 Chinese livestreaming participants were analyzed using PLS-SEM. The key findings show that (i) perceived empathy is significantly higher for human streamers than AI streamers, (ii) perceived empathy significantly boosts intrinsic motivation and consumer desire, with a smaller effect on extrinsic motivation, and (iii) intrinsic motivation, but not extrinsic motivation, is a significant predictor of consumer desire. Additionally, personal involvement strengthens the link between empathy and intrinsic motivation, while skepticism weakens the motivational pathways—especially in AI-based interactions. This research reveals that empathy is the main psychological link between streamer identity and consumer desire, and that intrinsic motivation is the dominant mechanism driving consumer engagement in live commerce, grounded in warmth and relatedness. The findings also indicate that emotional authenticity and the fulfillment of psychological needs remain crucial determinants of consumer desire, even in AI-mediated retail. Practical implications include enhancing empathetic communication and balancing the use of human and AI streamers in digital commerce.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v14i10.47120 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

A study on the pathways to enhance the effectiveness of contemporary youth student organizations: Based on the understanding, prediction, and management of individual thought and behavior

Xiaokun Guo

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

Youth student organizations, particularly Student Union Branches, play a vital role in ideological development and talent cultivation within Chinese higher education. Operating within a unique socio-educational context, these organizations must navigate the complex challenge of enhancing organizational effectiveness while ensuring ideological alignment. This study adopts a mixed-methods approach, combining surveys of 127 student cadres with in-depth case studies of 6 Student Union Branches, to investigate how sophisticated mechanisms for understanding, predicting, and managing individual thoughts and behaviors can improve organizational outcomes. The research proposes an integrated U-P-M (Understanding-Prediction-Management) framework. This includes a multi-layered understanding mechanism based on dynamic monitoring, dialogue, and data insight; a prediction mechanism utilizing intelligent forecasting and proactive intervention; and a management mechanism combining value guidance, organizational optimization, and environmental shaping. Quantitative results show that Student Union Branches implementing the systematic U-P-M framework achieved significant gains: a 28% increase in organizational belonging, a 35% rise in activity participation, and a 42% improvement in task execution efficiency. Qualitative findings further reveal contextual implementation challenges and success factors. This study contributes an evidence-based theoretical framework and reproducible pathways for enhancing youth student organization effectiveness within China's specific educational environment. It highlights the delicate balance between organizational autonomy and ideological conformity, offering valuable insights for educational administrators and student affairs professionals seeking to foster high-quality organizational development.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v14i9.46320 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Factors influencing corporate environmental reporting amongst mining companies in developing countries.

Thabani Ncube · Wedzerai S Musvoto · Martha Matashu

International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2025

Read abstract

The study sought to investigate the factors influencing environmental reporting in developing countries. This has been necessited by the inconsistances and non compliant to regulations and laws of environmental reporting among the developing countries. Through examining the factors that influence environmental reporting the study hope to establish context based solutions to the challenge of environmental reporting. The study used a quantitative research method and factor analysis to establish the factors influencing environmental reporting. It was discovered that there are seven key factors influencing environmental reporting among Southern African Development Community (SADC) countries. These factors are: regulatory drivers, risk management drivers, market drivers, management influence drivers, strategic communication drivers, value creation drivers and legitimacy drivers. The study also revealed that there are several sub-factors that influencing environmental reporting under each key factor identified. The study concluded that environmental reporting influenced by the seven key factors. The study recommends that SADC sought for in-depth understanding of factors influencing environmental reporting. This is because understanding of the factors affecting environmental reporting is essential for the formulation and reporting that that satisfies stakeholders' requirements.

DOI 10.36096/ijbes.v7i5.9570 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations

Data coverage & freshness

Source coverage refers to this result set; a publication may occur in several sources. Sync times refer to contributing journals.

Missing abstracts: 0 · Missing authors: 0 · Missing publication dates: 0 · Dates without day precision: 0

SourceMost recent successful journal syncLatest attempt
crossref21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
ojs-rest21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 06:46 UTC
oai-pmh20 Oct 2026 19:56 UTC · ijfbscomplete · ijfbs · 20 Oct 2026 19:55 UTC
openalex-enrichment21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
Full import history & methodology →