CiteNScope — Scholarly Index & Analytics
Discover / Analytics RESEARCH INTELLIGENCE
CiteNScope / Analytics

Explore the evidence.
Understand the reach.

Research across participating journals · All insights follow your collection filters.

Compare journals ↗
OpenAlex coverage 100.0% · 11/11 recordsLast OpenAlex observation 22 Oct 2026, 10:56 UTC
PUBLICATIONS11In the selected collection
CROSSREF CITATIONS1111/11 with known counts
OPENALEX CITATIONS1511/11 with known counts
OPENALEX MEAN1.36Per article with a known count
Explore articles 11 →
Filter collection Publication years, search & more
Reset
topic: Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques Remove ×
Your research collection

Output and reach

Publication activity alongside incoming citations.

Publication activity

Articles grouped by publication year

Publications

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.

View data & coverage

Citations received

OpenAlex · year of the citing work

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage

Research landscape

Leading affiliations and themes in this collection.

Full distributions & methodology ↓

Institutions

University of Venda3Walter Sisulu University2University of Fort Hare111/11 records with data

Countries

South Africa10Botswana111/11 records with data

Primary topics

Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques1111/11 records with data
Two perspectives on citations

Follow the research impact

Independent sources. Clear time scales.

Lifetime citations by publication year

Crossref and OpenAlex · separate totals for the same publication cohorts

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

Latest lifetime totals, grouped by the cited article’s year. These are not citations received in that year.

View data & coverage

Citations received each year

OpenAlex · incoming citation links grouped by citing-work year

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage
Annual history: 11/11 articles. Latest history observation: 2026-10-22T10:56:29.563166+00:00. Source totals are never added together.
Research side by side

Compare journals

Select journals to compare the same collection filters. Source totals stay separate. These measures describe research activity, not journal quality.

Leave all unchecked to include every matching journal. Selection affects only comparison charts.
Display range
International Journal of Business Ecosystem & StrategyInternational Journal of Research in Business and Social Science

Publications

Articles by publication year

View data & coverage

Crossref citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex · Citations received

By year of the citing work · 2017–2026

View data & coverage

2026 is year to date. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime charts share a citation scale. Unknown observations appear as gaps; known zero stays zero. Annual receipts use available OpenAlex histories and may not sum to lifetime totals. 0 undated publications excluded from publication-year charts.

Full analytics report All distributions, publications, comparisons & data provenance
11 MATCHING PUBLICATIONSExplore results →Export CSV ↓
INDEXED PUBLICATIONS11
CROSSREF CITATIONS11
CROSSREF · CITED PUBLICATIONS36.4%
CROSSREF · MEAN CITATIONS1.0

Crossref citation coverage: 11 / 11 publications (100.0%). Latest observation: 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC. Means and percentages use records with known counts.

OpenAlex / Separate citation source

A broader view of this research

DOI-matched OpenAlex observations for the same selected publications. These counts are separate from Crossref and are never added together.

OPENALEX CITATIONS15
DOI MATCH COVERAGE100.0%11 / 11 publications
MEAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY1.3611 known · 0 unknown
MEDIAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY0

Observation range: 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC — 22 Oct 2026 10:56 UTC. Missing matches are not zero citations. Previous observations may remain if a refresh fails or a DOI no longer matches.

OpenAlex citation distributionNo citations61–546–20121+0Unknown0

Institutions, countries & topics

OpenAlex affiliations and primary-topic classification. Each publication counts once per institution or country; multi-affiliated publications appear in multiple groups, so percentages can sum above 100%. Countries describe author affiliations, not nationality. Topics use one primary topic per publication.

Institutions

11 / 11 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 11 selected publications.

Countries

11 / 11 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 11 selected publications.

Primary topics

11 / 11 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 11 selected publications.

Citation year / OpenAlex

Citations received over time

Incoming citations to the selected publications, grouped by the year of the citing work. This is separate from lifetime citation totals grouped by the cited article’s publication year.

The publication filters above define which articles receive the citations. The citation-year range below only controls this chart and the incoming-citation comparison. Removing publication-year filters includes older articles’ incoming citations too.

Annual history available for 11 / 11 selected publications. Supported display window: 2017–2026; 2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Missing histories and years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—); partial coverage can understate totals.

Annual-history observations (UTC): 2026-10-21T07:22:46.756513+00:00 — 2026-10-22T10:56:29.563166+00:00. Older observations may be retained after failed or incomplete refreshes.

OpenAlex · Citations received by year

63.00 2017 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 11/112018 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 11/112019 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 11/112020 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 11/112021 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 11/112022 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 11/112023 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 4 · Annual history coverage 11/112024 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 2 · Annual history coverage 11/112025 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 6 · Annual history coverage 11/112026 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 3 · Annual history coverage 11/11 2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
View openalex · citations received by year data & coverage
Citation yearJournal / scopeOpenAlex · Citations received by yearPublicationsAnnual history known
2017All selected publications01111/11
2018All selected publications01111/11
2019All selected publications01111/11
2020All selected publications01111/11
2021All selected publications01111/11
2022All selected publications01111/11
2023All selected publications41111/11
2024All selected publications21111/11
2025All selected publications61111/11
2026All selected publications31111/11

Counts represent citation links, not unique citing papers across a journal: one paper citing two selected articles contributes two links. Older citations outside this window are excluded, so annual sums need not equal lifetime totals. OpenAlex methodology ↗

Crossref citation distribution

Latest Crossref totals for the selected publications; not citations received in the selected years.

Mean1.0
Median0
No citations71–536–20121+0Unknown0

Unknown counts are excluded from the mean, median and cited-publication rate.

Journal comparison

Same filters, source and counting rules across journals. Descriptive statistics, not a quality ranking.

Journal / publisherPublicationsCrossref citationsOpenAlex citationsOpenAlex coverageCrossref meanCrossref medianCrossref cited %*Crossref coverage
International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy
Bussecon International Academy
3013/30.000.03/3 · 100.0%
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science
SSBFNET
811148/81.380.550.08/8 · 100.0%

* Percentage among publications with a known citation count.

Explore publications

View all 11 →

Most cited · Crossref

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Technological pedagogical content knowledge for twenty-first century learning skills

Oluwatoyin Ayodele Ajani

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2024

Read abstract

The advent of Industry 5.0 marks a pivotal moment in global industry, characterized by the fusion of advanced technologies and human-centred approaches. Embedding Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) into teacher training becomes imperative in Africa, where the demand for skilled professionals is burgeoning. This study delves into the transformative potential of TPACK for African educators, emphasizing its role in equipping them with skills to prepare students for Industry 5.0 demands. Through a systematic literature review spanning from 2000 to 2024, this research examines TPACK's multifaceted dimensions and its relevance to twenty-first-century learning skills in Africa. It scrutinizes how emerging technologies like artificial intelligence reshape pedagogical practices and content delivery in African educational contexts. Furthermore, it explores TPACK's ability to empower teachers in nurturing critical thinking, problem-solving, and digital literacy among students, essential for navigating the complexities of Industry 5.0. The findings underscore the necessity for tailored professional development programs integrating TPACK into African teacher training curricula. Moreover, the research stresses the importance of contextualizing TPACK within the socio-economic and cultural realities of African classrooms to ensure its efficacy. Additionally, the study highlights the pivotal roles of government policies and educational institutions in providing necessary support and resources for widespread TPACK adoption among educators. This research advocates for a paradigm shift in African teacher education, highlighting TPACK's centrality in preparing educators for Industry 5.0 challenges and opportunities. By equipping teachers with adept technology integration skills, African nations can foster innovative and globally competitive learners poised to thrive in the fourth industrial revolution.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v13i4.33556 Crossref citations6 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Exploring the effects of technology integration in the learning and teaching of mathematics

Thabisa Maqoqa

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2023

Read abstract

This paper presents the effects of technology integration in the learning and teaching of Mathematics in first- and second-year mathematics students. The technology-based learning environment has been the demand in groundwork learning to shape a more active approach to students' learning process. The South African government has made an obligation to advance its people's Information and Communication Technology (ICT) skills and to connect the digital gap by targeting previously disadvantaged groups. The interpretive approach was used with face-to-face interviews to collect data from ten participants. Six participants were interviewed by the lecturers teaching mathematics and four students doing mathematics in one of the rural universities in the Eastern Cape. Findings confirmed that (i) Teacher technology competence and lack of resources are barriers to technology learning implementation. (ii) Consequently, it became evident that learners had a robust positive perception of computer usage in Mathematics learning and teaching even though almost all had little or no access to computers in their schools. It is recommended that the university should ensure that all students have the data card loaded with uncapped data for learning and teaching to run smoothly.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v12i2.23863 Crossref citations5 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Grade 3 teachers’ understanding of the implemented mathematics curriculum content

Charlotte Myriam Moshala Galane · Simon Bhekumuzi Khoza

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2023

Read abstract

This pragmatic action research explores Grade 3 teachers’ understanding of the implemented mathematics curriculum content. Exploring teachers’ understanding of the mathematics curriculum content is required because understanding of content determines how teachers teach, the resources they use, and how teachers assess. It should be noted that, over time, curriculum reforms take place; and these reforms impact not only on teachers’ knowledge, expertise, or motivation, but also on their understanding. Understanding, as synthesised by the researcher, is a planned, prescribed system of presenting one’s thoughts and expertise regarding a particular subject; in this case, mathematics. In exploring this phenomenon, six Grade 3 teachers from Nkangala District in Mpumalanga were purposefully sampled to be part of this study. Data was generated through two phases of reflective activities, observations, interviews, and a focus-group discussion. To answer the two research questions of this study, the generated data was analysed guided by the natural identity framework themes. Findings revealed that teachers’ understanding of the implemented mathematics curriculum content is mostly informed by a combination of their need to comply with the prescripts of policy and higher authority, common understanding to appease their societal needs, and individual understanding based on their experiences and beliefs. The study drew the conclusion that, for teachers to embrace the three propositions of understanding and  identities, teachers’ natural understanding identity should be promoted. This identity is underpinned by reflective practice and adaptation to what works in their day-to-day practice as teachers.  

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v12i7.28071 Crossref citations1 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Practitioners’ challenges in the application of conceptions of mathematical knowledge in the foundation phase mathematics learning

Neliswa Gqoli · Chinedu Okeke · Christian Ugwuanyi

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2022

Read abstract

This study used a qualitative research design to examine the difficulties faced by ECD practitioners when applying their mathematical expertise to improve young children's arithmetic learning. Five practitioners were selected from among the five ECD centers using a purposive sampling method for the study. Semi-structured interview questions were employed to collect the data. The construction of themes and sub-themes resulted from analyzing the collected data thematically. According to the research's findings, early childhood educators face difficulties due to their limited grasp of mathematical language, lack of classroom environments conducive to children learning mathematics, and lack of experience incorporating play into their instruction. It was discovered that some practitioners struggled to get kids interested in learning the language since they don't know how to communicate and take a long time to educate because they don't pay attention in class and forget rapidly. Based on the findings of this research, there is a need for proper in-service training of the practitioners, as was the provision of adequate space for the ECD centers.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v11i8.20531 Crossref citations2 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Developing foundation phase mathematics pre-service teachers at a University in the Eastern Cape province, South Africa: Teaching number sense

Nondwe Cynthia Phelokazi Ngibe

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

The Foundation Phase is a crucial stage of learning, where learners gain a basic understanding of number sense. The mathematics curriculum for the Foundation Phase includes five content areas, and the content area, numbers, operations, and relationships covers more than half of the curriculum. Pre-service teachers receive training on content to have a thorough conceptual understanding of basic mathematical concepts, as well as pedagogical content knowledge specific to this phase. The purpose of this study was to enhance pre-service teachers’ understanding of number sense and how to teach it. The study employed a constructivist-based framework because such a framework integrates pedagogical content knowledge and mathematical knowledge for teaching. Such a framework supports exploration of how student teachers build their understanding of teaching through experience, reflection and social interaction. The instrument used for data collection was the document analysis, where a sample of 20 scripts was used. Data was collected from a rural university situated in the Eastern Cape, and a case study design was utilized. The researcher chose the method of content analysis to interpret data because this method entails dividing the content into themes, which are then classified into categories and then codes. The findings reveal that pre-service teachers could not define some mathematics concepts correctly. The study thus recommends encouraging student teachers to develop their ability to explain mathematical concepts using proper mathematical language. Additionally, integrating technology into their teaching practice is advised to support more effective instruction of number sense to young learners.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v15i3.45980 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations

Selected results

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Leveraging Digital Transformation Tools to Enhance Conceptual Understanding in Secondary School Mathematics: A Systematic Review of Pedagogy, Equity and Human Capital Development

Thabisa Maqoqa

International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2026

Read abstract

Digital transformation tools are increasingly promoted as strategic resources for improving mathematics learning, yet their contribution to conceptual understanding remains uneven across school systems. This systematic literature review examines how dynamic mathematics software, virtual manipulatives, adaptive learning systems, educational games and collaborative digital environments enhance conceptual understanding in secondary school mathematics. Guided by constructivist learning theory, cognitive load theory, socio-cultural theory and technological pedagogical content knowledge, the review synthesises peer-reviewed literature published between 2015 and 2025, supported by PRISMA-informed searching, screening and thematic analysis. The final synthesis shows that digital tools support conceptual understanding when they enable multiple representations, dynamic visualisation, feedback-rich exploration, personalised pathways and mathematical discourse. However, these benefits are conditional rather than automatic. Teacher digital-pedagogical competence, assessment alignment, cognitive design quality, learner language, infrastructure and equitable access mediate whether digital transformation becomes meaningful learning or merely tool substitution. The review contributes to business and social science scholarship by positioning the digital transformation of mathematics as an educational, social equity, and human capital development issue. It argues that secondary mathematics systems require coherent investment in teacher capability, curriculum redesign, responsible data use and inclusive infrastructure. The paper concludes that digital transformation should be governed as a pedagogical and systemic reform process, not as a technological intervention alone.

DOI 10.36096/ijbes.v8i5.13810 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Integrating Tshivenda into Early Mathematics Instruction: Benefits and Challenges in Foundation Phase Schools in Vhembe District, Limpopo Province, South Africa

Matodzi Sikhwari

International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2026

Read abstract

Early mathematical competence provides the foundation for learners' cognitive development, problem-solving, and later academic achievement. Despite South Africa's commitment to mother-tongue-based education, many young learners continue to experience difficulties in mathematics because instruction is frequently mediated through English or inconsistent bilingual practices before learners develop adequate proficiency in the language of learning and teaching. This linguistic mismatch is particularly evident in rural schools, where it constrains conceptual understanding, mathematical communication, and learner participation. This study explored the benefits and challenges of integrating Tshivenda into early mathematics instruction in rural primary schools in the Vhembe District of Limpopo Province, South Africa. Guided by the interpretivist paradigm, the study adopted a qualitative multiple-case study design. Purposive sampling was used to select 24 participants, comprising 16 teachers, 4 Heads of Department, and 4 school principals, from 4 rural primary schools. Data were generated through semi-structured interviews, classroom observations, and document analysis and analysed using Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis. Trustworthiness was ensured through triangulation, member checking, prolonged engagement, peer debriefing, reflexive journaling, and an audit trail. The findings revealed that integrating Tshivenda strengthened learners' conceptual understanding by connecting mathematical concepts with familiar linguistic and cultural experiences while promoting learner participation, confidence, mathematical discourse, and collaborative problem-solving. However, implementation remained constrained by limited mathematical terminology, inadequate teaching and learning resources, insufficient teacher preparation for multilingual pedagogy, and challenges associated with the transition to English in Grade 4. The study recommends developing standardised mathematical terminology, expanding culturally responsive instructional resources, strengthening continuous teacher professional development, and promoting collaboration among universities, language specialists, curriculum developers, and the Department of Basic Education to advance equitable, multilingual, and culturally responsive mathematics education.

DOI 10.36096/ijbes.v8i5.15340 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Developing foundation phase mathematics pre-service teachers at a University in the Eastern Cape province, South Africa: Teaching number sense

Nondwe Cynthia Phelokazi Ngibe

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

The Foundation Phase is a crucial stage of learning, where learners gain a basic understanding of number sense. The mathematics curriculum for the Foundation Phase includes five content areas, and the content area, numbers, operations, and relationships covers more than half of the curriculum. Pre-service teachers receive training on content to have a thorough conceptual understanding of basic mathematical concepts, as well as pedagogical content knowledge specific to this phase. The purpose of this study was to enhance pre-service teachers’ understanding of number sense and how to teach it. The study employed a constructivist-based framework because such a framework integrates pedagogical content knowledge and mathematical knowledge for teaching. Such a framework supports exploration of how student teachers build their understanding of teaching through experience, reflection and social interaction. The instrument used for data collection was the document analysis, where a sample of 20 scripts was used. Data was collected from a rural university situated in the Eastern Cape, and a case study design was utilized. The researcher chose the method of content analysis to interpret data because this method entails dividing the content into themes, which are then classified into categories and then codes. The findings reveal that pre-service teachers could not define some mathematics concepts correctly. The study thus recommends encouraging student teachers to develop their ability to explain mathematical concepts using proper mathematical language. Additionally, integrating technology into their teaching practice is advised to support more effective instruction of number sense to young learners.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v15i3.45980 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

The effect of teaching mathematics using home language in the foundation phase

Lusani Randima · Lebongang Steven Shirindzi · Matodzi Godfrey Sikhwari

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

Language plays a crucial role in helping young learners understand mathematical concepts, particularly in the Foundation Phase where learners are still developing both language and numeracy skills. In multilingual contexts such as South Africa, many learners are taught in English while speaking different languages at home, which may create challenges in learning mathematics. This study examined the effect of teaching mathematics using learners’ home language in rural primary schools in the Vhembe District, Limpopo Province. A qualitative research approach was adopted, using interviews and classroom observations to collect data. Ten Foundation Phase teachers from five schools were purposively selected to participate in the study. The data were analysed using thematic analysis to identify key patterns and themes. Ethical principles, including informed consent and confidentiality, were observed to protect participants. The findings revealed that teaching mathematics in the home language improved learners’ understanding of mathematical concepts, increased classroom participation, and enhanced learners’ confidence. Learners performed better when taught in a language they understood well. The study therefore recommends that schools and the Department of Basic Education support the use of home languages in the teaching of mathematics in the Foundation Phase and provide appropriate resources and teacher training to enhance effective implementation.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v15i2.49250 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Student teachers’ beliefs about mathematics teaching in initial teacher education programmes: Implications for equity and social justice

Fhatuwani Ravhuhali · Lutendo Nendauni

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

In this conceptual paper, we examine student teachers’ beliefs about mathematics teaching within Initial Teacher Education (ITE) programmes, also referred to as Teacher Education programmes, focusing on the implications for equity and social justice in mathematics education, particularly in the South African context. Drawing on existing literature, we examine how student teachers’ beliefs shape their approach to teaching mathematics and the potential consequences for fostering inclusive and equitable learning environments. We highlight the importance of challenging traditional views of mathematics as a fixed, abstract discipline, advocating for a dynamic, culturally responsive, and contextually relevant understanding of the subject. We argue that ITE programmes should actively address and interrogate student teachers’ beliefs and attitudes towards mathematics, incorporating critical pedagogy and reflective practices to prepare educators who can help to address inequities inherent in the South African educational system. Additionally, we call for future research to explore the long-term impact of ITE on teacher practices, the role of school contexts in shaping teacher beliefs, and the integration of technology to support equity in mathematics education. Ultimately, our paper contributes to a deeper understanding of how student teachers’ beliefs about mathematics can influence their teaching practices and advance the broader goals of equity and social justice in education.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v15i1.47180 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations

Data coverage & freshness

Source coverage refers to this result set; a publication may occur in several sources. Sync times refer to contributing journals.

Missing abstracts: 0 · Missing authors: 0 · Missing publication dates: 0 · Dates without day precision: 0

SourceMost recent successful journal syncLatest attempt
crossref21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
ojs-rest21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 06:46 UTC
oai-pmh20 Oct 2026 19:55 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 20 Oct 2026 19:50 UTC
openalex-enrichment21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
Full import history & methodology →