CiteNScope — Scholarly Index & Analytics
Discover / Analytics RESEARCH INTELLIGENCE
CiteNScope / Analytics

Explore the evidence.
Understand the reach.

Research across participating journals · All insights follow your collection filters.

Compare journals ↗
OpenAlex coverage 100.0% · 6/6 recordsLast OpenAlex observation 22 Oct 2026, 07:59 UTC
PUBLICATIONS6In the selected collection
CROSSREF CITATIONS135/6 with known counts
OPENALEX CITATIONS206/6 with known counts
OPENALEX MEAN3.33Per article with a known count
Explore articles 6 →
Filter collection Publication years, search & more
Reset
topic: Team Dynamics and Performance Remove ×
Your research collection

Output and reach

Publication activity alongside incoming citations.

Publication activity

Articles grouped by publication year

Publications

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.

View data & coverage

Citations received

OpenAlex · year of the citing work

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage

Research landscape

Leading affiliations and themes in this collection.

Full distributions & methodology ↓

Institutions

State University of Semarang1Karatina University1Iqra National University15/6 records with data

Countries

China1Indonesia1Kenya15/6 records with data

Primary topics

Team Dynamics and Performance66/6 records with data
Two perspectives on citations

Follow the research impact

Independent sources. Clear time scales.

Lifetime citations by publication year

Crossref and OpenAlex · separate totals for the same publication cohorts

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

Latest lifetime totals, grouped by the cited article’s year. These are not citations received in that year.

View data & coverage

Citations received each year

OpenAlex · incoming citation links grouped by citing-work year

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage
Annual history: 6/6 articles. Latest history observation: 2026-10-22T07:59:09.262870+00:00. Source totals are never added together.
Research side by side

Compare journals

Select journals to compare the same collection filters. Source totals stay separate. These measures describe research activity, not journal quality.

Leave all unchecked to include every matching journal. Selection affects only comparison charts.
Display range
International Journal of Finance & Banking StudiesInternational Journal of Research in Business and Social Science

Publications

Articles by publication year

View data & coverage

Crossref citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex · Citations received

By year of the citing work · 2017–2026

View data & coverage

2026 is year to date. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime charts share a citation scale. Unknown observations appear as gaps; known zero stays zero. Annual receipts use available OpenAlex histories and may not sum to lifetime totals. 0 undated publications excluded from publication-year charts.

Full analytics report All distributions, publications, comparisons & data provenance
6 MATCHING PUBLICATIONSExplore results →Export CSV ↓
INDEXED PUBLICATIONS6
CROSSREF CITATIONS13
CROSSREF · CITED PUBLICATIONS80.0%
CROSSREF · MEAN CITATIONS2.6

Crossref citation coverage: 5 / 6 publications (83.3%). Latest observation: 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC. Means and percentages use records with known counts.

OpenAlex / Separate citation source

A broader view of this research

DOI-matched OpenAlex observations for the same selected publications. These counts are separate from Crossref and are never added together.

OPENALEX CITATIONS20
DOI MATCH COVERAGE100.0%6 / 6 publications
MEAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY3.336 known · 0 unknown
MEDIAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY0.0

Observation range: 22 Oct 2026 01:28 UTC — 22 Oct 2026 07:59 UTC. Missing matches are not zero citations. Previous observations may remain if a refresh fails or a DOI no longer matches.

OpenAlex citation distributionNo citations41–516–20121+0Unknown0

Institutions, countries & topics

OpenAlex affiliations and primary-topic classification. Each publication counts once per institution or country; multi-affiliated publications appear in multiple groups, so percentages can sum above 100%. Countries describe author affiliations, not nationality. Topics use one primary topic per publication.

Institutions

5 / 6 with data · 1 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 6 selected publications.

Countries

5 / 6 with data · 1 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 6 selected publications.

Primary topics

6 / 6 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 6 selected publications.

Citation year / OpenAlex

Citations received over time

Incoming citations to the selected publications, grouped by the year of the citing work. This is separate from lifetime citation totals grouped by the cited article’s publication year.

The publication filters above define which articles receive the citations. The citation-year range below only controls this chart and the incoming-citation comparison. Removing publication-year filters includes older articles’ incoming citations too.

Annual history available for 6 / 6 selected publications. Supported display window: 2017–2026; 2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Missing histories and years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—); partial coverage can understate totals.

Annual-history observations (UTC): 2026-10-22T01:28:17.071517+00:00 — 2026-10-22T07:59:09.262870+00:00. Older observations may be retained after failed or incomplete refreshes.

OpenAlex · Citations received by year

52.50 2017 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 1 · Annual history coverage 6/62018 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 1 · Annual history coverage 6/62019 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 1 · Annual history coverage 6/62020 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 3 · Annual history coverage 6/62021 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 1 · Annual history coverage 6/62022 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 2 · Annual history coverage 6/62023 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 3 · Annual history coverage 6/62024 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 5 · Annual history coverage 6/62025 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 2 · Annual history coverage 6/62026 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 6/6 2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
View openalex · citations received by year data & coverage
Citation yearJournal / scopeOpenAlex · Citations received by yearPublicationsAnnual history known
2017All selected publications166/6
2018All selected publications166/6
2019All selected publications166/6
2020All selected publications366/6
2021All selected publications166/6
2022All selected publications266/6
2023All selected publications366/6
2024All selected publications566/6
2025All selected publications266/6
2026All selected publications066/6

Counts represent citation links, not unique citing papers across a journal: one paper citing two selected articles contributes two links. Older citations outside this window are excluded, so annual sums need not equal lifetime totals. OpenAlex methodology ↗

Crossref citation distribution

Latest Crossref totals for the selected publications; not citations received in the selected years.

Mean2.6
Median1
No citations11–536–20121+0Unknown1

Unknown counts are excluded from the mean, median and cited-publication rate.

Journal comparison

Same filters, source and counting rules across journals. Descriptive statistics, not a quality ranking.

Journal / publisherPublicationsCrossref citationsOpenAlex citationsOpenAlex coverageCrossref meanCrossref medianCrossref cited %*Crossref coverage
International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies
SSBFNET
1—01/1———0/1 · 0.0%
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science
SSBFNET
513205/52.6180.05/5 · 100.0%

* Percentage among publications with a known citation count.

Explore publications

View all 6 →

Most cited · Crossref

JOURNAL ARTICLE

The Relationship between Teamwork and Organizational Trust

Musab Isik · Kursad Timuroglu · Yussuf Aliyev

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2015

Read abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between teamwork and organizational trust. In the implementation section the data from the survey of 250 workers is employed in call centers in Erzurum by using relevant statistical methods. Consequently, it is found that there is a positive and significant relationship between teamwork and organizational trust. Thus, the hypothesis of the study is supported as it was expected. Besides, it is found that there are positive and significant relationships between communication, openness to innovation, participation-trust in teamwork and organizational trust, trust in management, trust in co-workers, and trust in workplace.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v4i1.338 Crossref citations17 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Diversity perspectives in teamwork

Nanik Suryani · Ade Rustiana · Muhsin Muhsin · Wisudani Rahmaningtyas

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2019

Read abstract

This study aims to examine the implementation of diversity in different work teams. The observed aspects include the process of recruitment, cooperation between members, educational background, and division of workload. This research using a qualitative approach, interviews were conducted with 20 informants from 6 work teams. This study concludes that (i) the recruitment process was the absolute right of the leadership, (ii) Some work teams need members who have an educational background that is appropriate to their field of work, (iii) several junior lecturers complained about the quantity of work that was not comparable to other team members.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v9i1.6073 Crossref citations3 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Why does task conflict influence team creativity?

Muhammad Kamran Khan · Maria Shafi · Shakeel Khan · Waseem Khan

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2020

Read abstract

Although task conflict is usually seen to be beneficial to team creativity, the relationship is still unclear because of the mixed results. This research investigated why task conflicts resulted in some positive outcomes in terms of team creativity. Drawing on minority dissent theory, this study examined the conflict-creativity relationship by focusing on the mediating role of team reflexivity. We collected the sample data from 338 employees and 67 supervisors (67 teams) across three different sectors (banking, pharmaceuticals, and insurance) in Pakistan to support our hypotheses. We used bootstrapping analysis and the Sobel test to check for the mediation analysis. The results indicated that task conflict increases team reflexivity, team reflexivity facilitated team creativity, and thus, task conflict positively influenced team creativity via team reflexivity. The theoretical and practical implications of this study plus future directions are further discussed.    

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v9i2.6311 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Formalization Structure and Team Creativity in High Tech Firms

Rodney Manyike

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2019

Read abstract

This research paper investigated the effect of the role of formalization structure on team creativity mediated by task conflict. The object of this research is high tech organizations in China, while the subject is 417 employees in 67 teams and 55 team leaders. Data was gathered through a questionnaire in two waves, first, through the employees’ survey questionnaires administered to team members and three months later to team leaders. The measurements were assessed using the Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) in SPSS, and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was conducted using AMOS version 23. A multiple linear regression model was fitted to the data to test how far structure affects team creativity using the SPSS 24.0 version. Findings indicated that the formalization structure affects team creativity, and that task conflict mediated the relationship between formalization structure and team creativity. Thus, teams with a formalization structure have moderate task conflict, which in turn contribution towards team creativity.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v8i4.3061 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Effect of team diversity on team cohesion in faith-based organizations

Kabiru Wanjiku · David Gichuhi · Peter Mwaura

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2022

Read abstract

Team diversity management helps to improve the cohesion of a team and ultimately, organizational development is enhanced. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of team diversity management on team cohesion at St. Martin Catholic Social Apostolate, Kenya. The study adopted a descriptive research design. The target population for the study was 115 employees at the St. Martin Catholic Social Apostolate in Kenya. Stratified and simple random sampling procedures were used to sample 92 employees. Data was collected using a questionnaire and the collected data was analyzed through the use of the Statistical Package for Social Scientists (SPSS) version 21. Descriptive statistical analysis involved the calculation of percentages and frequencies while inferential statistical analysis involved Pearson correlation in establishing the association of the variables under investigation. and Chi-square tests. Data was presented in the form of tables and charts. Qualitative data were analysed thematically and presented in the form of narratives. The study ensured that ethical considerations were adhered to. The study found a statistically significant relationship between team diversity management and team cohesion (p<0.05). The study concludes that each team member is held accountable for their activities and the decisions they make regarding the team and is included in team activities. The study recommends that the team leaders ensure that all team members are included in all team activities. This can be achieved through creating environments and opportunities that allow the team members to provide their opinions openly.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v11i6.20290 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations

Selected results

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Project Team Management and Operational Performance in Tea Processing 

Gaspard, Nshimyimana · Amolo, Amolo Elvis Juma

International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies · 2025

Read abstract

This study aimed to examine the influence of team management approaches, specifically team structuring, leadership, motivation, and communication, on the performance of tea processing projects in Rwanda. The study is grounded in Belbin’s Team Role Theory and the Iron Triangle Model and adopted descriptive and correlational research designs. The target population included 185 respondents, comprising factory staff, supervisors, team leaders, and officials from NAEB, MINAGRI, and the Rwanda Tea Growers Cooperative. Data were collected using structured questionnaires and interviews. A pilot test was conducted with 19 respondents to determine the instrument's ability to produce consistent results over time. Validity and Reliability testing of the research instrument yielded 0.78 and a Cronbach’s Alpha of 0.79 from pilot results, confirming the instrument's validity and reliability respectively. Data analysis involved descriptive and inferential statistics, including Pearson correlation and regression, using SPSS version 28 at a 0.05 significance level. 

DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v14i4.4759N/A Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Effect of team diversity on team cohesion in faith-based organizations

Kabiru Wanjiku · David Gichuhi · Peter Mwaura

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2022

Read abstract

Team diversity management helps to improve the cohesion of a team and ultimately, organizational development is enhanced. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of team diversity management on team cohesion at St. Martin Catholic Social Apostolate, Kenya. The study adopted a descriptive research design. The target population for the study was 115 employees at the St. Martin Catholic Social Apostolate in Kenya. Stratified and simple random sampling procedures were used to sample 92 employees. Data was collected using a questionnaire and the collected data was analyzed through the use of the Statistical Package for Social Scientists (SPSS) version 21. Descriptive statistical analysis involved the calculation of percentages and frequencies while inferential statistical analysis involved Pearson correlation in establishing the association of the variables under investigation. and Chi-square tests. Data was presented in the form of tables and charts. Qualitative data were analysed thematically and presented in the form of narratives. The study ensured that ethical considerations were adhered to. The study found a statistically significant relationship between team diversity management and team cohesion (p<0.05). The study concludes that each team member is held accountable for their activities and the decisions they make regarding the team and is included in team activities. The study recommends that the team leaders ensure that all team members are included in all team activities. This can be achieved through creating environments and opportunities that allow the team members to provide their opinions openly.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v11i6.20290 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Why does task conflict influence team creativity?

Muhammad Kamran Khan · Maria Shafi · Shakeel Khan · Waseem Khan

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2020

Read abstract

Although task conflict is usually seen to be beneficial to team creativity, the relationship is still unclear because of the mixed results. This research investigated why task conflicts resulted in some positive outcomes in terms of team creativity. Drawing on minority dissent theory, this study examined the conflict-creativity relationship by focusing on the mediating role of team reflexivity. We collected the sample data from 338 employees and 67 supervisors (67 teams) across three different sectors (banking, pharmaceuticals, and insurance) in Pakistan to support our hypotheses. We used bootstrapping analysis and the Sobel test to check for the mediation analysis. The results indicated that task conflict increases team reflexivity, team reflexivity facilitated team creativity, and thus, task conflict positively influenced team creativity via team reflexivity. The theoretical and practical implications of this study plus future directions are further discussed.    

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v9i2.6311 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Diversity perspectives in teamwork

Nanik Suryani · Ade Rustiana · Muhsin Muhsin · Wisudani Rahmaningtyas

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2019

Read abstract

This study aims to examine the implementation of diversity in different work teams. The observed aspects include the process of recruitment, cooperation between members, educational background, and division of workload. This research using a qualitative approach, interviews were conducted with 20 informants from 6 work teams. This study concludes that (i) the recruitment process was the absolute right of the leadership, (ii) Some work teams need members who have an educational background that is appropriate to their field of work, (iii) several junior lecturers complained about the quantity of work that was not comparable to other team members.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v9i1.6073 Crossref citations3 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Formalization Structure and Team Creativity in High Tech Firms

Rodney Manyike

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2019

Read abstract

This research paper investigated the effect of the role of formalization structure on team creativity mediated by task conflict. The object of this research is high tech organizations in China, while the subject is 417 employees in 67 teams and 55 team leaders. Data was gathered through a questionnaire in two waves, first, through the employees’ survey questionnaires administered to team members and three months later to team leaders. The measurements were assessed using the Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) in SPSS, and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was conducted using AMOS version 23. A multiple linear regression model was fitted to the data to test how far structure affects team creativity using the SPSS 24.0 version. Findings indicated that the formalization structure affects team creativity, and that task conflict mediated the relationship between formalization structure and team creativity. Thus, teams with a formalization structure have moderate task conflict, which in turn contribution towards team creativity.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v8i4.3061 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations

Data coverage & freshness

Source coverage refers to this result set; a publication may occur in several sources. Sync times refer to contributing journals.

Missing abstracts: 0 · Missing authors: 0 · Missing publication dates: 0 · Dates without day precision: 0

SourceMost recent successful journal syncLatest attempt
crossref21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
ojs-rest21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 06:46 UTC
oai-pmh20 Oct 2026 19:56 UTC · ijfbscomplete · ijfbs · 20 Oct 2026 19:55 UTC
openalex-enrichment21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
Full import history & methodology →