CiteNScope — Scholarly Index & Analytics
Discover / Analytics RESEARCH INTELLIGENCE
CiteNScope / Analytics

Explore the evidence.
Understand the reach.

Research across participating journals · All insights follow your collection filters.

Compare journals ↗
OpenAlex coverage 100.0% · 8/8 recordsLast OpenAlex observation 21 Oct 2026, 07:23 UTC
PUBLICATIONS8In the selected collection
CROSSREF CITATIONS568/8 with known counts
OPENALEX CITATIONS1038/8 with known counts
OPENALEX MEAN12.88Per article with a known count
Explore articles 8 →
Filter collection Publication years, search & more
Reset
topic: COVID-19 and Mental Health Remove ×
Your research collection

Output and reach

Publication activity alongside incoming citations.

Publication activity

Articles grouped by publication year

Publications

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.

View data & coverage

Citations received

OpenAlex · year of the citing work

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage

Research landscape

Leading affiliations and themes in this collection.

Full distributions & methodology ↓

Institutions

Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University2Cape Peninsula University of Technology1University of Johannesburg18/8 records with data

Countries

South Africa5China1Philippines18/8 records with data

Primary topics

COVID-19 and Mental Health88/8 records with data
Two perspectives on citations

Follow the research impact

Independent sources. Clear time scales.

Lifetime citations by publication year

Crossref and OpenAlex · separate totals for the same publication cohorts

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

Latest lifetime totals, grouped by the cited article’s year. These are not citations received in that year.

View data & coverage

Citations received each year

OpenAlex · incoming citation links grouped by citing-work year

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage
Annual history: 8/8 articles. Latest history observation: 2026-10-21T07:23:06.748412+00:00. Source totals are never added together.
Research side by side

Compare journals

Compare across all journals →

Select journals to compare the same collection filters. Source totals stay separate. These measures describe research activity, not journal quality.

Leave all unchecked to include every matching journal. Selection affects only comparison charts.
Display range
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science

Publications

Articles by publication year

View data & coverage

Crossref citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex · Citations received

By year of the citing work · 2017–2026

View data & coverage

2026 is year to date. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime charts share a citation scale. Unknown observations appear as gaps; known zero stays zero. Annual receipts use available OpenAlex histories and may not sum to lifetime totals. 0 undated publications excluded from publication-year charts.

Full analytics report All distributions, publications, comparisons & data provenance
8 MATCHING PUBLICATIONSExplore results →Export CSV ↓
INDEXED PUBLICATIONS8
CROSSREF CITATIONS56
CROSSREF · CITED PUBLICATIONS62.5%
CROSSREF · MEAN CITATIONS7.0

Crossref citation coverage: 8 / 8 publications (100.0%). Latest observation: 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC. Means and percentages use records with known counts.

OpenAlex / Separate citation source

A broader view of this research

DOI-matched OpenAlex observations for the same selected publications. These counts are separate from Crossref and are never added together.

OPENALEX CITATIONS103
DOI MATCH COVERAGE100.0%8 / 8 publications
MEAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY12.888 known · 0 unknown
MEDIAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY1.0

Observation range: 21 Oct 2026 00:49 UTC — 21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC. Missing matches are not zero citations. Previous observations may remain if a refresh fails or a DOI no longer matches.

OpenAlex citation distributionNo citations21–546–20121+1Unknown0

Institutions, countries & topics

OpenAlex affiliations and primary-topic classification. Each publication counts once per institution or country; multi-affiliated publications appear in multiple groups, so percentages can sum above 100%. Countries describe author affiliations, not nationality. Topics use one primary topic per publication.

Institutions

8 / 8 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 8 selected publications.

Countries

8 / 8 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 8 selected publications.

Primary topics

8 / 8 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 8 selected publications.

Citation year / OpenAlex

Citations received over time

Incoming citations to the selected publications, grouped by the year of the citing work. This is separate from lifetime citation totals grouped by the cited article’s publication year.

The publication filters above define which articles receive the citations. The citation-year range below only controls this chart and the incoming-citation comparison. Removing publication-year filters includes older articles’ incoming citations too.

Annual history available for 8 / 8 selected publications. Supported display window: 2017–2026; 2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Missing histories and years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—); partial coverage can understate totals.

Annual-history observations (UTC): 2026-10-21T00:49:33.070438+00:00 — 2026-10-21T07:23:06.748412+00:00. Older observations may be retained after failed or incomplete refreshes.

OpenAlex · Citations received by year

3316.50 2017 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 8/82018 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 8/82019 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 8/82020 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 5 · Annual history coverage 8/82021 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 33 · Annual history coverage 8/82022 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 18 · Annual history coverage 8/82023 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 18 · Annual history coverage 8/82024 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 20 · Annual history coverage 8/82025 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 8 · Annual history coverage 8/82026 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 1 · Annual history coverage 8/8 2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
View openalex · citations received by year data & coverage
Citation yearJournal / scopeOpenAlex · Citations received by yearPublicationsAnnual history known
2017All selected publications088/8
2018All selected publications088/8
2019All selected publications088/8
2020All selected publications588/8
2021All selected publications3388/8
2022All selected publications1888/8
2023All selected publications1888/8
2024All selected publications2088/8
2025All selected publications888/8
2026All selected publications188/8

Counts represent citation links, not unique citing papers across a journal: one paper citing two selected articles contributes two links. Older citations outside this window are excluded, so annual sums need not equal lifetime totals. OpenAlex methodology ↗

Crossref citation distribution

Latest Crossref totals for the selected publications; not citations received in the selected years.

Mean7.0
Median1.0
No citations31–536–20121+1Unknown0

Unknown counts are excluded from the mean, median and cited-publication rate.

Journal comparison

Same filters, source and counting rules across journals. Descriptive statistics, not a quality ranking.

Journal / publisherPublicationsCrossref citationsOpenAlex citationsOpenAlex coverageCrossref meanCrossref medianCrossref cited %*Crossref coverage
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science
SSBFNET
8561038/87.01.062.58/8 · 100.0%

* Percentage among publications with a known citation count.

Explore publications

View all 8 →

Most cited · Crossref

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Covid stress predicts depression, anxiety and stress symptoms of Filipino respondents

Renz Louis Trinidad Montano · Katarina Margarita Lacaran Acebes

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2020

Read abstract

Experiencing a pandemic and being quarantined have been proven to have debilitating effects in mental health. Some of the existing studies mentioned in this research have been conducted to assess the presence of possible mental health concerns brought about by the pandemic but most of these studies focused on the earlier phase of the pandemic. The present study focuses on the reported distress of the respondents who have been through a strict quarantine since March 2020 and are now experiencing a more relaxed lockdown. The objective of this research is to determine if COVID stress predicts common mental health concerns such as stress, depression and anxiety. A survey was conducted with 421 Filipino respondents ages 15 – 65 utilizing the COVID Stress Scales (CSS) by Taylor et al. (2020) and DASS-21. Correlational analysis was utilized showing the COVID Stress is a predictor of depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms. Then, comparative analyses were conducted to determine if differences of COVID stress across age groups, gender, occupation, and exposure. The results show that students and unemployed respondents are highly vulnerable to COVID stress and its mental health implications. Men and women did not significantly differ in distress. Surprisingly, those who have a COVID positive family member had the lowest COVID stress and DASS scores. There were 40.7% percent who experienced moderate to severe stress, 60.3% had moderate to severe anxiety and 53.1% of the respondents had moderate to severe depression. These findings show that the pandemic stress has debilitating effects on mental health. Common mental health concerns (e.g. depression and anxiety) may be highly prevalent due to the COVID-19 pandemic

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v9i4.77346 Crossref citations84 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

COVID19, mental wellbeing and work engagement

Syed Mudasser Abbas · Professor Liu Zhiqiang

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2020

Read abstract

The aim of this study is to explore how COVID-19 influences the mental health of old age employees by posing challenges to psychological resilience thus affecting their work engagement. The data was collected from three countries, China, Pakistan, and the UK, through eighteen semi-structured interviews. Three sub-themes emerged under the core theme of “psychological challenges”: “cognitive challenges”, “physical challenges”, and “behavioral challenges”. Similarly, “individual resilience” and “group resilience” emerged under the core theme of “psychological resilience”. The results showed that the mental health of old age employees without having any medical complications was also affected during the pandemic thus resulting in low work engagement. The data was collected from three countries namely China, Pakistan, and the UK. Furthermore, data were collected through telephonic interviews so some aspects of the study might be left unexplored which can only be possible through face to face interaction. This study, in line with the previous literature, indicate that challenges explored related to COVID-19 can significantly influence the mental wellbeing of aging employees. The study also encourages employers to understand the limitations of aging employees and develop flexible policies that can have a positive impact on work engagement. The study presents a novel approach contributing to the knowledge gap of COVID-19 impact on wellbeing and work engagement of healthy but senescent employees.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v9i4.7606 Crossref citations13 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Navigating COVID-related trauma during lockdown enforcement period

Suares Clovis Oukouomi Noutchie

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2024

Read abstract

In the face of the unprecedented challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, this article thoroughly explores the intricate landscape of COVID-related trauma and psychological distress experienced during lockdown enforcement, analyzing its origins and repercussions. By delving into individuals’ experiences throughout the lockdown period, the study investigates how lockdown measures con- tributed to heightened trauma and psychological distress, particularly focusing on triggers such as illness fear, disrupted routines, and social isolation. The profound impact of isolation and restrictions on mental health and well-being is scrutinized, revealing disparities among various demographic groups in enduring COVID-related trauma. The article underscores adaptive coping mechanisms, like virtual connections and creative outlets, while emphasizing the crucial role of mental health support in mitigating trauma effects. It also elucidates the amplified trauma resulting from pandemic uncertainty and lockdowns, highlighting technology’s role in alleviating distress. Cultural factors are examined, and the article concludes by offering recommendations for policymakers to integrate mental health services into crisis response plans, foster community resilience, and enhance public education on coping strategies to promote overall well-being during crises.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v13i3.32912 Crossref citations3 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Promoting the psychological health of married career women in the post-Covid-19 era

Foluso Adekanmbi · Wilfred Ukpere

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2023

Read abstract

This paper assesses the relational impacts of attitude towards organizational change (ATOC), perceived social support (PSS), teleworking (TW), and self-harming behaviors (SHB) on the psychological health (PH) of married career women (MCW) post-Covid-19. The sample for this research was extracted from six (6) work organizations in the Lagos and Oyo States of Nigeria. The participants were married career women who were employees within the study organizations. This study advocated a cross-sectional survey using self-reported questionnaires. 222 of the 240 questionnaires distributed were examinable and subject to statistical analysis using the Social Sciences Statistical Package (SPSS version 28). This study revealed a link between attitude toward organizational change and mental health. Additionally, it demonstrated a strong positive association between perceived social support and psychological health. It also mentioned the extent to which teleworking correlates with mental health. Further, it showed a negative association between self-harming behaviors and psychological health. Moreover, this study demonstrated the joint, potent, and substantial impacts of attitude towards organizational change, perceived social support, teleworking, and self-harming behaviors on the psychological health of married career women.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v12i5.26471 Crossref citations1 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

The effect of COVID-19 on students’ mental health during quarantine and isolation

Tiisetso Chuene · Seponono Raesibe Mampa · Teresa-Anne Mashego · Eric Maimela

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2023

Read abstract

The COVID-19 outbreak has resulted in a global public health and mental health disaster and a massive negative psychosocial experience for students. The counteractive measures are mainly on epidemiology, prevention, and management of the COVID-19 infection, with little attention on mental health. From this background, this study sought to assess the effect of COVID-19 on students’ mental health during quarantine and isolation. An exploratory qualitative research design was applied to determine how COVID-19 affected students' mental health during quarantine and isolation. Purposive sampling was used to obtain cases deemed rich in information to ensure that saturation was reached. Thus, 12 students participated in the study. Data was collected through semi-structured face-to-face interviews. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analysed using Tesch’s method of data analysis. The trustworthiness of data was ensured through credibility, dependability, confirmability, and transferability. The study revealed that participants experienced behavioural changes during quarantine and isolation. Irregular sleeping patterns, difficulty in sleeping, and decreased appetite were the behavioural changes that the participants reported. The study also highlighted the coping techniques used by the participants during their quarantine and isolation periods. Religion and support from healthcare workers, family, and friends were some coping strategies that most participants believed to be beneficial. It is concluded that the COVID-19 pandemic poses an unprecedented threat to students’ mental health during quarantine and isolation.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v12i2.23941 Crossref citations1 OpenAlex citations

Selected results

JOURNAL ARTICLE

The impact of Covid-19 on the mental health of nurses in primary healthcare facilities in Ekurhuleni South, Gauteng Province, South Africa

Mosidi Esther Mogotsi · Mathildah Mokgatle · Oluwafemi Omoniyi Oguntibeju

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

South Africa's primary health care relies on nurses, the largest healthcare profession. Thus, their mental health must be maintained. Due to the rising number of infectious illnesses and workload, COVID-19 has overburdened the public health system. Due to these demands, nurses worked long hours and burnt out. Recognising nurses' role in providing excellent PHC services to communities and protecting their mental health is crucial. It examined the mental health effects of COVID-19 on nurses in Ekurhuleni South sub-district primary healthcare institutions and identified mental health issues following exposure. A self-administered questionnaire was used to perform a quantitative, cross-sectional descriptive survey of 280 primary healthcare nurses in the South sub-district of Ekurhuleni. Every eligible nurse who was available for data collection was picked using sequential sampling. The data collection tool included socio-demographic data, health and COVID-19 profiles of nurses and their families, mental health profiles and the impact of COVID-19 on participants, and conventional depressive, anxiety, and insomnia screening measures. Analysing data with descriptive statistics and testing for associations with the Chi-squared test. Most of the 280 nurse participants—87.5%—were female. From 28 to 63, participants participated. 40.4 percent of participants were 38–47 years old, while 13.9% were 58 and older. They had 54.6% diplomas, 23.2% degrees, 18.2% certificates, and 3.9% postgraduate degrees. Eighty-five percent of nurses were professional, with a median of 16 years. Nursing staff were 77.1% COVID-19-positive and 79.29% quarantined. 67% of nurses' family members had COVID-19, and 53.9% had lost someone close to them. Pre-pandemic, 87.1% of nurses had no psychiatric history. A high prevalence of clinical depression, anxiety, and sleeplessness was found in nurses, especially professional nurses and those aged 38–47. Study found 72.86% of nurses had serious depression and 17.5% mild depression. Nurses had 63.2% severe anxiety, 28.6% moderate anxiety, and 8.2% mild anxiety. This distribution demonstrates that 91.8% of nurses had moderate to severe anxiety, and 71.4% had clinical sleeplessness, where 36.8% were severe, 34.6% moderate, and 27.1% subthreshold. Most nurses had clinical depression, anxiety, and sleeplessness risk. Nurses reported depression, anxiety, and insomnia after COVID-19 exposure. Knowing these patterns of mental health issues among nurses is essential for designing comprehensive mental health support measures to address the immediate and long-term consequences of COVID-19 on their mental health.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v15i2.47940 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Educational setbacks and psycho-emotional effects of the Covid-19 pandemic during clinical education of undergraduate nursing students, South-Africa

Viviane Ngomane · Hildeguard Jo-Anne Vink · Rirhandzu Friddah Mathevula

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

The pandemic has presented unprecedented challenges to healthcare and nursing education. Clinical exposure provides students the opportunity to acquire knowledge and prepare for their professional responsibilities. A high-quality, safe clinical learning environment is essential for fostering students' professional and academic development, which has been adversely affected by the global pandemic. To investigate the educational challenges and psycho-emotional impacts of the pandemic on the clinical teaching of undergraduate nursing students at a university in Gauteng, South Africa. A qualitative exploratory and descriptive technique was employed, utilising semi-structured face-to-face interviews that were audio recorded. Purposive sampling was utilised, and 25 persons expressed interest in participating; however, data saturation was achieved with 15 participants. Participation was voluntary, and participants' information was maintained in a confidential and private manner.  Thematic data analysis was conducted, revealing themes related to educational setbacks necessitating adjustments, including hybrid learning as an alternative clinical teaching and learning method, simulation as an alternative clinical teaching and learning method, extension of training, absenteeism from clinical areas, and NEI unpreparedness for the pandemic. The categories of Reluctance at clinical settings, Anxiety and Fear, Stress, Regret, and Loss of Hope constituted the theme of Psycho-emotional consequences. This research indicated that undergraduate nursing students encountered considerable educational challenges and psychological distress during clinical instruction amid the epidemic. Consequently, it is essential to raise awareness that NEIs should be better equipped for pandemics of this sort. It required all stakeholders to evaluate and formulate strategies for professional nursing education during pandemics in conjunction with students.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v14i9.45810 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Navigating COVID-related trauma during lockdown enforcement period

Suares Clovis Oukouomi Noutchie

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2024

Read abstract

In the face of the unprecedented challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, this article thoroughly explores the intricate landscape of COVID-related trauma and psychological distress experienced during lockdown enforcement, analyzing its origins and repercussions. By delving into individuals’ experiences throughout the lockdown period, the study investigates how lockdown measures con- tributed to heightened trauma and psychological distress, particularly focusing on triggers such as illness fear, disrupted routines, and social isolation. The profound impact of isolation and restrictions on mental health and well-being is scrutinized, revealing disparities among various demographic groups in enduring COVID-related trauma. The article underscores adaptive coping mechanisms, like virtual connections and creative outlets, while emphasizing the crucial role of mental health support in mitigating trauma effects. It also elucidates the amplified trauma resulting from pandemic uncertainty and lockdowns, highlighting technology’s role in alleviating distress. Cultural factors are examined, and the article concludes by offering recommendations for policymakers to integrate mental health services into crisis response plans, foster community resilience, and enhance public education on coping strategies to promote overall well-being during crises.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v13i3.32912 Crossref citations3 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Promoting the psychological health of married career women in the post-Covid-19 era

Foluso Adekanmbi · Wilfred Ukpere

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2023

Read abstract

This paper assesses the relational impacts of attitude towards organizational change (ATOC), perceived social support (PSS), teleworking (TW), and self-harming behaviors (SHB) on the psychological health (PH) of married career women (MCW) post-Covid-19. The sample for this research was extracted from six (6) work organizations in the Lagos and Oyo States of Nigeria. The participants were married career women who were employees within the study organizations. This study advocated a cross-sectional survey using self-reported questionnaires. 222 of the 240 questionnaires distributed were examinable and subject to statistical analysis using the Social Sciences Statistical Package (SPSS version 28). This study revealed a link between attitude toward organizational change and mental health. Additionally, it demonstrated a strong positive association between perceived social support and psychological health. It also mentioned the extent to which teleworking correlates with mental health. Further, it showed a negative association between self-harming behaviors and psychological health. Moreover, this study demonstrated the joint, potent, and substantial impacts of attitude towards organizational change, perceived social support, teleworking, and self-harming behaviors on the psychological health of married career women.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v12i5.26471 Crossref citations1 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

The effect of COVID-19 on students’ mental health during quarantine and isolation

Tiisetso Chuene · Seponono Raesibe Mampa · Teresa-Anne Mashego · Eric Maimela

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2023

Read abstract

The COVID-19 outbreak has resulted in a global public health and mental health disaster and a massive negative psychosocial experience for students. The counteractive measures are mainly on epidemiology, prevention, and management of the COVID-19 infection, with little attention on mental health. From this background, this study sought to assess the effect of COVID-19 on students’ mental health during quarantine and isolation. An exploratory qualitative research design was applied to determine how COVID-19 affected students' mental health during quarantine and isolation. Purposive sampling was used to obtain cases deemed rich in information to ensure that saturation was reached. Thus, 12 students participated in the study. Data was collected through semi-structured face-to-face interviews. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analysed using Tesch’s method of data analysis. The trustworthiness of data was ensured through credibility, dependability, confirmability, and transferability. The study revealed that participants experienced behavioural changes during quarantine and isolation. Irregular sleeping patterns, difficulty in sleeping, and decreased appetite were the behavioural changes that the participants reported. The study also highlighted the coping techniques used by the participants during their quarantine and isolation periods. Religion and support from healthcare workers, family, and friends were some coping strategies that most participants believed to be beneficial. It is concluded that the COVID-19 pandemic poses an unprecedented threat to students’ mental health during quarantine and isolation.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v12i2.23941 Crossref citations1 OpenAlex citations

Data coverage & freshness

Source coverage refers to this result set; a publication may occur in several sources. Sync times refer to contributing journals.

Missing abstracts: 0 · Missing authors: 0 · Missing publication dates: 0 · Dates without day precision: 0

SourceMost recent successful journal syncLatest attempt
crossref21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
ojs-rest21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 06:46 UTC
oai-pmh20 Oct 2026 19:55 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 20 Oct 2026 19:50 UTC
openalex-enrichment21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
Full import history & methodology →