CiteNScope — Scholarly Index & Analytics
Discover / Analytics RESEARCH INTELLIGENCE
CiteNScope / Analytics

Explore the evidence.
Understand the reach.

Research across participating journals · All insights follow your collection filters.

Compare journals ↗
OpenAlex coverage 100.0% · 9/9 recordsLast OpenAlex observation 22 Oct 2026, 14:26 UTC
PUBLICATIONS9In the selected collection
CROSSREF CITATIONS79/9 with known counts
OPENALEX CITATIONS159/9 with known counts
OPENALEX MEAN1.67Per article with a known count
Explore articles 9 →
Filter collection Publication years, search & more
Reset
topic: Higher Education Research Studies Remove ×
Your research collection

Output and reach

Publication activity alongside incoming citations.

Publication activity

Articles grouped by publication year

Publications

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.

View data & coverage

Citations received

OpenAlex · year of the citing work

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage

Research landscape

Leading affiliations and themes in this collection.

Full distributions & methodology ↓

Institutions

University of Venda5Central University of Technology1Mangosuthu University of Technology19/9 records with data

Countries

South Africa8Turkey19/9 records with data

Primary topics

Higher Education Research Studies99/9 records with data
Two perspectives on citations

Follow the research impact

Independent sources. Clear time scales.

Lifetime citations by publication year

Crossref and OpenAlex · separate totals for the same publication cohorts

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

Latest lifetime totals, grouped by the cited article’s year. These are not citations received in that year.

View data & coverage

Citations received each year

OpenAlex · incoming citation links grouped by citing-work year

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage
Annual history: 9/9 articles. Latest history observation: 2026-10-22T14:26:21.204991+00:00. Source totals are never added together.
Research side by side

Compare journals

Compare across all journals →

Select journals to compare the same collection filters. Source totals stay separate. These measures describe research activity, not journal quality.

Leave all unchecked to include every matching journal. Selection affects only comparison charts.
Display range
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science

Publications

Articles by publication year

View data & coverage

Crossref citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex · Citations received

By year of the citing work · 2017–2026

View data & coverage

2026 is year to date. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime charts share a citation scale. Unknown observations appear as gaps; known zero stays zero. Annual receipts use available OpenAlex histories and may not sum to lifetime totals. 0 undated publications excluded from publication-year charts.

Full analytics report All distributions, publications, comparisons & data provenance
9 MATCHING PUBLICATIONSExplore results →Export CSV ↓
INDEXED PUBLICATIONS9
CROSSREF CITATIONS7
CROSSREF · CITED PUBLICATIONS44.4%
CROSSREF · MEAN CITATIONS0.78

Crossref citation coverage: 9 / 9 publications (100.0%). Latest observation: 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC. Means and percentages use records with known counts.

OpenAlex / Separate citation source

A broader view of this research

DOI-matched OpenAlex observations for the same selected publications. These counts are separate from Crossref and are never added together.

OPENALEX CITATIONS15
DOI MATCH COVERAGE100.0%9 / 9 publications
MEAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY1.679 known · 0 unknown
MEDIAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY0

Observation range: 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC — 22 Oct 2026 14:26 UTC. Missing matches are not zero citations. Previous observations may remain if a refresh fails or a DOI no longer matches.

OpenAlex citation distributionNo citations51–536–20121+0Unknown0

Institutions, countries & topics

OpenAlex affiliations and primary-topic classification. Each publication counts once per institution or country; multi-affiliated publications appear in multiple groups, so percentages can sum above 100%. Countries describe author affiliations, not nationality. Topics use one primary topic per publication.

Institutions

9 / 9 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 9 selected publications.

Countries

9 / 9 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 9 selected publications.

Primary topics

9 / 9 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 9 selected publications.

Citation year / OpenAlex

Citations received over time

Incoming citations to the selected publications, grouped by the year of the citing work. This is separate from lifetime citation totals grouped by the cited article’s publication year.

The publication filters above define which articles receive the citations. The citation-year range below only controls this chart and the incoming-citation comparison. Removing publication-year filters includes older articles’ incoming citations too.

Annual history available for 9 / 9 selected publications. Supported display window: 2017–2026; 2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Missing histories and years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—); partial coverage can understate totals.

Annual-history observations (UTC): 2026-10-21T07:22:44.537622+00:00 — 2026-10-22T14:26:21.204991+00:00. Older observations may be retained after failed or incomplete refreshes.

OpenAlex · Citations received by year

31.50 2017 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 9/92018 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 2 · Annual history coverage 9/92019 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 9/92020 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 1 · Annual history coverage 9/92021 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 2 · Annual history coverage 9/92022 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 1 · Annual history coverage 9/92023 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 2 · Annual history coverage 9/92024 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 3 · Annual history coverage 9/92025 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 1 · Annual history coverage 9/92026 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 1 · Annual history coverage 9/9 2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
View openalex · citations received by year data & coverage
Citation yearJournal / scopeOpenAlex · Citations received by yearPublicationsAnnual history known
2017All selected publications099/9
2018All selected publications299/9
2019All selected publications099/9
2020All selected publications199/9
2021All selected publications299/9
2022All selected publications199/9
2023All selected publications299/9
2024All selected publications399/9
2025All selected publications199/9
2026All selected publications199/9

Counts represent citation links, not unique citing papers across a journal: one paper citing two selected articles contributes two links. Older citations outside this window are excluded, so annual sums need not equal lifetime totals. OpenAlex methodology ↗

Crossref citation distribution

Latest Crossref totals for the selected publications; not citations received in the selected years.

Mean0.78
Median0
No citations51–546–20021+0Unknown0

Unknown counts are excluded from the mean, median and cited-publication rate.

Journal comparison

Same filters, source and counting rules across journals. Descriptive statistics, not a quality ranking.

Journal / publisherPublicationsCrossref citationsOpenAlex citationsOpenAlex coverageCrossref meanCrossref medianCrossref cited %*Crossref coverage
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science
SSBFNET
97159/90.78044.49/9 · 100.0%

* Percentage among publications with a known citation count.

Explore publications

View all 9 →

Most cited · Crossref

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Satisfaction and Academic Engagement among Undergraduate Students

Burcu Özgen Özaslan Caliskan · Burcu Adigüzel Mercangöz

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2013

Read abstract


 
 
 Academic engagement used to refer to the extent to which students identify with and value schooling outcomes, and participate in academic and non-academic school activities. This study aims to investigate the academic engagement and satisfaction from the school among the university students. The data is taken from the undergraduate students in School of Transportation & Logistics in Istanbul University. We used a questionnaire that consisted of two parts. First part of the questionnaire is about to measure the students’ academic engagement that is improved by Schaufeli et al. Second part of the questionnaire is about to measure the students’ satisfaction from the school. K-means cluster analysis is used to determine two groups of students, group the students in to two clusters based on their school satisfaction scores. We named these two groups as “satisfied” and “unsatisfied” students. Secondly we investigate the relationships between the satisfaction scores and the academic engagement. By means of T Test we investigate whether the academic engagement differs between the clusters that are determined according to the students’ satisfaction scores. Finally we found that academic engagement differs according to the identified clusters.
 
 

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v2i4.833 Crossref citations8 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Exploring the impact of the Extended Curriculum Programme (ECP) as a crucial motivating landing space

Georgina Mokganya · Innocent Zitha

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2024

Read abstract

The smooth transition of students into higher education is crucial for laying a strong foundation for success at the university level. This paper investigated students’ perceptions and responses to enrolling in an Extended Curriculum Programme (ECP) and lecturers’ efforts to motivate students and understand the factors that may hinder student success. To achieve this, the research utilised a mixed methods approach, incorporating both qualitative and quantitative dimensions. The researchers purposefully selected 150 ECP students enrolled in the 2024 academic year. Data collection involved the use of free listing techniques and semi-structured interviews, which allowed for a comprehensive understanding of the students' experiences. The collected research data was organised, transcribed, and analysed using thematic analysis, ensuring a systematic and in-depth exploration of the data. Additionally, the findings were statistically analysed using Microsoft Excel to compare the challenges faced based on gender and age, providing a nuanced understanding of the factors influencing student transition. The students, while enthusiastic about their university experience, also expressed feelings of being lost and overwhelmed during their transition. Many students, particularly those who linked their early academic performance to future opportunities, felt unprepared for independent study at the university, which was distressing. Ignoring such experiences and the lack of a sense of belonging can hinder students' academic success. Therefore, it is crucial for lecturers to identify students’ emotions early and implement supportive strategies, such as a well-planned orientation program, recognition, and rewards for high-achieving students. The paper recommends strategies and techniques that should be implemented to facilitate a smoother transition for students into higher education.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v13i10.37932 Crossref citations2 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Factors contributing to gender disparities in academic achievement at a tertiary institution in Botswana

Aastha Ahuja · Tendayi Garutsa

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2024

Read abstract

This study seeks to explore the factors contributing to gender disparities in academic achievement among tertiary students at an educational institution in Botswana. While academic achievement among male and female students has garnered increased attention, limited research has focused on the tertiary level. Employing a transformative qualitative research approach, the study utilized in-depth interviews and documentary analysis for data collection. Thematic Content Analysis was employed for data analysis. Results indicated that, although male students outperformed female students in all subjects, the gender gap was not significantly pronounced. Factors affecting female students included biological aspects such as menstruation, mood swings, menstrual pain, and absenteeism, along with challenges related to unplanned pregnancies, psychological stress due to financial strain, and economic difficulties. The study recommends the implementation of an Intersectional Gender Mainstreaming Framework in higher education institutions to address gender gaps in academic achievement.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v13i2.31501 Crossref citations2 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Utilization of student support services by undergraduate students in Nursing Education Institutions in South Africa

Thembekile Purity Skakane-Masango · Ntombifikile Gloria Mtshali · Sandiso Ngcobo

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2022

Read abstract

This article aimed to investigate the availability and utilization of support services by undergraduate (UG) students in a nursing education institution in South Africa. The article employed a quantitative non-experimental descriptive design, using a self-administered questionnaire, to collect data from 118 participants selected through a non-probability random sampling method. The IBM SPSS software was utilized for data analysis, frequencies to illustrate the availability and utilization of student support services and Spearman’s correlation test to determine the relationship between variables. The results showed high awareness of 82.1% to 91.3% for the remedial programs, availability of lecturers for appointments, medical services, and compulsory orientation. Positive correlations were observed between service utilization, school type, place of origin, and parent employment status. The results reflected areas where student support can be improved to address this problem, from pre-enrolment to graduation. There is a need to improve awareness and utilization of the available student support programs through policy formulation and quality enhancement programs for impact and improvement.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v11i8.21241 Crossref citations3 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Harnessing survey insights from mentoring and tutorship (MenTut) student support programme to advance student well-being and academic success

Fhatuwani Ravhuhali · Takalani Yolanda Tshililo

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

In an era where data-driven approaches are increasingly shaping decision-making in higher education, a notable gap remains in the use of survey methodologies specifically designed to inform and enhance student support initiatives. Despite the growing emphasis on evidence-based practices, few studies have systematically utilized survey data to inform institutional strategies and enhance student outcomes. This survey paper employs the Theory of Student Involvement and Appreciative Inquiry (AI) as a theoretical lens to guide the exploration of student support and enhance the MenTut programme, aiming to improve student wellbeing and success within our institution. Data were primarily collected from 1,446 undergraduates (mentees) who consented to the use of the data collected. A questionnaire with five (5) closed-ended Likert scale question items and one open-ended question was shared via Microsoft Forms to explore students’ experiences with MenTut. Closed-ended questions were analysed to provide descriptive graphs, while one open-ended question was thematically analysed. Although the findings show that many undergraduate students (mentees) were satisfied with the tutorial sessions offered, some concerns were raised regarding inadequate infrastructure, venue constraints, tutor communication and delivery, engagement and active learning, as well as tutors’ attitudes and professionalism. Drawing from findings, the paper recommends administering systematic and subsequent surveys each semester to evaluate the effectiveness of student support initiatives and to facilitate ongoing, data-informed improvements to the program. This paper concludes by proposing an Academic and Reflective Enhancement Theoretical Lens (ARETL) that could be adopted to enhance any student support programme in higher education institutions.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v15i1.47150 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations

Selected results

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Harnessing survey insights from mentoring and tutorship (MenTut) student support programme to advance student well-being and academic success

Fhatuwani Ravhuhali · Takalani Yolanda Tshililo

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

In an era where data-driven approaches are increasingly shaping decision-making in higher education, a notable gap remains in the use of survey methodologies specifically designed to inform and enhance student support initiatives. Despite the growing emphasis on evidence-based practices, few studies have systematically utilized survey data to inform institutional strategies and enhance student outcomes. This survey paper employs the Theory of Student Involvement and Appreciative Inquiry (AI) as a theoretical lens to guide the exploration of student support and enhance the MenTut programme, aiming to improve student wellbeing and success within our institution. Data were primarily collected from 1,446 undergraduates (mentees) who consented to the use of the data collected. A questionnaire with five (5) closed-ended Likert scale question items and one open-ended question was shared via Microsoft Forms to explore students’ experiences with MenTut. Closed-ended questions were analysed to provide descriptive graphs, while one open-ended question was thematically analysed. Although the findings show that many undergraduate students (mentees) were satisfied with the tutorial sessions offered, some concerns were raised regarding inadequate infrastructure, venue constraints, tutor communication and delivery, engagement and active learning, as well as tutors’ attitudes and professionalism. Drawing from findings, the paper recommends administering systematic and subsequent surveys each semester to evaluate the effectiveness of student support initiatives and to facilitate ongoing, data-informed improvements to the program. This paper concludes by proposing an Academic and Reflective Enhancement Theoretical Lens (ARETL) that could be adopted to enhance any student support programme in higher education institutions.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v15i1.47150 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Fostering student engagement and learning through the MenTut programme in higher education

Takalani Yolanda Tshililo · Fhatuwani Ravhuhali · Hlayisani Mboweni

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

This qualitative study explores the MenTut Programme’s role in  fostering student engagement and academic success in higher education, using Leach and Zepke’s (2011) engagement framework. Thematic analysis of Mentee feedback reveals an enhanced understanding of complex content, improved assessment preparation, and increased self-directed learning. The programme fosters collaborative and supportive environments, enhancing academic confidence and retention, particularly among underrepresented students. The proposed MenTut Engagement Framework integrates student voices into programme design, offering a model for equitable support. This study provides insights for academic practitioners to enhance student outcomes

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v15i1.46200 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Shared living, shared burdens: A case of the university of Venda exploring the impact of cohabitation on students’ financial stability

Ramatswi Talifhani Trevor · Phoke Alpha Rakgwata · Decent Munzhelele Zwivhuya

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2025

Read abstract

The rising costs of higher education have placed increasing financial pressure on students, with living expenses often becoming a significant burden. Many students struggle to balance tuition fees, academic responsibilities, and personal living costs, leading to financial stress and even delayed graduation. The aim of the research was to explore how sharing living expenses through cohabitation can alleviate financial burdens for students and offer broader economic benefits. The study investigated the financial advantages of cohabitation, focusing on how shared costs, such as rent, utilities, and food, contribute to financial stability and improved quality of life for students. The study adopted qualitative approach to get an in-depth exploration of how sharing living expense alleviate the financial burdens of students.  Through interviews with students who share living spaces, the research examined how cohabitation influences the financial well-being, academic performance, and overall mental health of students. The study explored the impact of shared living arrangements on fostering social connections and emotional support, which may further enhance students' academic and personal development. The study has provided valuable insights for students, higher education institutions, and policymakers seeking to address student financial burdens and improve student well-being through more affordable housing options.  

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v14i6.40580 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

The registration conundrum: A sociological perception into the experiences of first-year students at the University of Venda in South Africa

Phoke Alpha Rakgwata · Talifhani Trevor Ramatswi · Decent Munzhelele

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2025

Read abstract

First-year students confront various difficulties when they move to higher education, especially in South African universities, which have a heterogeneous socio-economic environment. This study examined the "registration conundrum" students encounter while investigating the sociological factors affecting their experiences during this crucial beginning stage. A mixed-methods approach was used to record the depth and breadth of first-year students' experiences, integrating qualitative interviews with quantitative questionnaires. Ten first-year University of Venda students participated in the study, which provided detailed information about the participants' emotional and personal experiences during the registration procedure. Purposive sampling was used to choose the participants. Findings indicated that inadequate access to resources, bureaucratic inefficiencies, and socio-economic inequality significantly heightened stress and anxiety levels among students, leading to delayed academic engagement. The study also emphasized how race, gender, and class intersect to influence students' registration experiences and how those experiences affect their academic achievement and social integration. According to the research, to improve educational equity and accessibility, higher education institutions must implement inclusive and flexible registration procedures that consider the particular difficulties faced by first-year students. In addition to illuminating the subtleties of student experiences, this sociological viewpoint advocates for legislative changes meant to enhance South Africa's higher education system. The study complied with ethical standards for privacy, anonymity, informed consent, confidentiality, and harm avoidance.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v14i4.39690 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

The influence of caring pedagogy on student success and access in one school of education in South Africa

Kgomotlokoa Thaba-Nkadimene · Duduzile Mzindle · Cephas Makwara · Mamothibe Thamae

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2025

Read abstract

The conception and focus of Siyaphumelela Project were on the promotion of student success through the support programmes rolled out by the university’s support units. For the past ten years of the Siyaphumelela Project’s life, academic departments were left out, and they were not involved when data was elicited from student. The primary objective of this conceptual paper was to offer a critical analysis of the impact of Siyaphumelela Project on student access and success and how caring pedagogy influenced student learning and success in one school of teacher education in South Africa. We used Caring Pedagogy as a frame of reference in reflecting on building relationships, compassionate classrooms and promoting student learning. In this study we used desktop research.  Firstly, data identified that faculties and units are operating in silos instead of building solid relationships. Secondly, the research findings identified a need to create compassionate classrooms and caring environments. As part of conclusion, the paper recommends the case Teacher Education to adopt Caring Pedagogy perspectives and holistic and inclusive and integrated and empathetic approach. Furthermore, to foster within Siyaphumelela Project compassionate classrooms and caring environment that promotes collegial and collaborative working space and fosters student learning and success.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v14i3.38470 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations

Data coverage & freshness

Source coverage refers to this result set; a publication may occur in several sources. Sync times refer to contributing journals.

Missing abstracts: 0 · Missing authors: 0 · Missing publication dates: 0 · Dates without day precision: 0

SourceMost recent successful journal syncLatest attempt
crossref21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
ojs-rest21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 06:46 UTC
oai-pmh20 Oct 2026 19:55 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 20 Oct 2026 19:50 UTC
openalex-enrichment21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
Full import history & methodology →