CiteNScope — Scholarly Index & Analytics
Discover / Analytics RESEARCH INTELLIGENCE
CiteNScope / Analytics

Explore the evidence.
Understand the reach.

Research across participating journals · All insights follow your collection filters.

Compare journals ↗
OpenAlex coverage 100.0% · 2/2 recordsLast OpenAlex observation 21 Oct 2026, 00:22 UTC
PUBLICATIONS2In the selected collection
CROSSREF CITATIONS02/2 with known counts
OPENALEX CITATIONS02/2 with known counts
OPENALEX MEAN0.0Per article with a known count
Explore articles 2 →
Filter collection Publication years, search & more
Reset
topic: Management Systems and Quality Improvement Remove ×
Your research collection

Output and reach

Publication activity alongside incoming citations.

Publication activity

Articles grouped by publication year

Publications

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.

View data & coverage

Citations received

OpenAlex · year of the citing work

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage

Research landscape

Leading affiliations and themes in this collection.

Full distributions & methodology ↓

Institutions

No data available.

0/2 records with data

Countries

No data available.

0/2 records with data

Primary topics

Management Systems and Quality Improvement22/2 records with data
Two perspectives on citations

Follow the research impact

Independent sources. Clear time scales.

Lifetime citations by publication year

Crossref and OpenAlex · separate totals for the same publication cohorts

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

Latest lifetime totals, grouped by the cited article’s year. These are not citations received in that year.

View data & coverage

Citations received each year

OpenAlex · incoming citation links grouped by citing-work year

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage
Annual history: 2/2 articles. Latest history observation: 2026-10-21T00:22:05.413788+00:00. Source totals are never added together.
Research side by side

Compare journals

Compare across all journals →

Select journals to compare the same collection filters. Source totals stay separate. These measures describe research activity, not journal quality.

Leave all unchecked to include every matching journal. Selection affects only comparison charts.
Display range
International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies

Publications

Articles by publication year

View data & coverage

Crossref citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex · Citations received

By year of the citing work · 2017–2026

View data & coverage

2026 is year to date. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime charts share a citation scale. Unknown observations appear as gaps; known zero stays zero. Annual receipts use available OpenAlex histories and may not sum to lifetime totals. 0 undated publications excluded from publication-year charts.

Full analytics report All distributions, publications, comparisons & data provenance
2 MATCHING PUBLICATIONSExplore results →Export CSV ↓
INDEXED PUBLICATIONS2
CROSSREF CITATIONS0
CROSSREF · CITED PUBLICATIONS0.0%
CROSSREF · MEAN CITATIONS0.0

Crossref citation coverage: 2 / 2 publications (100.0%). Latest observation: 21 Oct 2026, 00:21 UTC. Means and percentages use records with known counts.

OpenAlex / Separate citation source

A broader view of this research

DOI-matched OpenAlex observations for the same selected publications. These counts are separate from Crossref and are never added together.

OPENALEX CITATIONS0
DOI MATCH COVERAGE100.0%2 / 2 publications
MEAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY0.02 known · 0 unknown
MEDIAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY0.0

Observation range: 21 Oct 2026 00:22 UTC — 21 Oct 2026 00:22 UTC. Missing matches are not zero citations. Previous observations may remain if a refresh fails or a DOI no longer matches.

OpenAlex citation distributionNo citations21–506–20021+0Unknown0

Institutions, countries & topics

OpenAlex affiliations and primary-topic classification. Each publication counts once per institution or country; multi-affiliated publications appear in multiple groups, so percentages can sum above 100%. Countries describe author affiliations, not nationality. Topics use one primary topic per publication.

Institutions

0 / 2 with data · 2 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 2 selected publications.

No verified institutions data for this selection.

Countries

0 / 2 with data · 2 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 2 selected publications.

No verified countries data for this selection.

Primary topics

2 / 2 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 2 selected publications.

Citation year / OpenAlex

Citations received over time

Incoming citations to the selected publications, grouped by the year of the citing work. This is separate from lifetime citation totals grouped by the cited article’s publication year.

The publication filters above define which articles receive the citations. The citation-year range below only controls this chart and the incoming-citation comparison. Removing publication-year filters includes older articles’ incoming citations too.

Annual history available for 2 / 2 selected publications. Supported display window: 2017–2026; 2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Missing histories and years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—); partial coverage can understate totals.

Annual-history observations (UTC): 2026-10-21T00:22:05.402346+00:00 — 2026-10-21T00:22:05.413788+00:00. Older observations may be retained after failed or incomplete refreshes.

OpenAlex · Citations received by year

10.50 2017 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 2/22018 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 2/22019 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 2/22020 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 2/22021 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 2/22022 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 2/22023 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 2/22024 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 2/22025 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 2/22026 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 2/2 2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
View openalex · citations received by year data & coverage
Citation yearJournal / scopeOpenAlex · Citations received by yearPublicationsAnnual history known
2017All selected publications022/2
2018All selected publications022/2
2019All selected publications022/2
2020All selected publications022/2
2021All selected publications022/2
2022All selected publications022/2
2023All selected publications022/2
2024All selected publications022/2
2025All selected publications022/2
2026All selected publications022/2

Counts represent citation links, not unique citing papers across a journal: one paper citing two selected articles contributes two links. Older citations outside this window are excluded, so annual sums need not equal lifetime totals. OpenAlex methodology ↗

Crossref citation distribution

Latest Crossref totals for the selected publications; not citations received in the selected years.

Mean0.0
Median0.0
No citations21–506–20021+0Unknown0

Unknown counts are excluded from the mean, median and cited-publication rate.

Journal comparison

Same filters, source and counting rules across journals. Descriptive statistics, not a quality ranking.

Journal / publisherPublicationsCrossref citationsOpenAlex citationsOpenAlex coverageCrossref meanCrossref medianCrossref cited %*Crossref coverage
International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies
SSBFNET
2002/20.00.00.02/2 · 100.0%

* Percentage among publications with a known citation count.

Explore publications

View all 2 →

Most cited · Crossref

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Quality Management Frameworks and Performance for Campus Extension Project

Twiringiyimana Alexandre · Amolo Elvis Juma Amolo

International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies · 2025

Read abstract

Quality Management frameworks (QMF) are structured systems driving the quality performance of the product or services that ensure products, services in project journey to excellence. Most of the extension project in HLIs in Rwanda are affected by the sub standardized implementation that leads to the close of HLI in the country. The purpose of the study was to establish the effect of quality management frameworks of Total Quality Management, Lean framework, ISO 9001 and Six Sigma on performance of Higher Learning Institution’s extension projects in Rwanda. The study was grounded on Total quality, Crosby’s Theory of Quality and Institutional theory. The study used descriptive survey and correlational research designs. Structured questionnaires and interview guide were used to collect data from 110 participants, selected through stratified, random and purposive sampling, from a target population of 167 stakeholders. The pilot study involved 12 respondents, representing 10% of the sample size. Validity was confirmed through expert evaluation, yielding a content validity index of 0.78 while Reliability was established using the split-half technique, achieving a Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.79. Descriptive and inferential statistics of Correlation and Regression were done at a significance level of 0.05 using SPSS version 30 while thematic content analysis of qualitative data was done for triangulation. The findings for four hypotheses were tested at ?=0.05 level of significance and the results were: Total Quality Management Framework (P=0.000<0.05); Lean Framework (P=0.000<0.05); Six Sigma Framework (P=0.000<0.05) and; ISO 9001 Framework (P=0.000<0.05) have no significant influence on performance of HLI extension projects were rejected. The study concludes that implementing a structured quality management framework significantly enhances the performance of campus extension projects. TQM contributes by fostering continuous improvement, stakeholder engagement, and employee involvement, ensuring quality service delivery. Lean methodologies help minimize inefficiencies and optimize resource utilization, leading to cost-effective project execution. Six Sigma’s emphasis on process control and data-driven decision-making enhances reliability, while ISO 9001 ensures adherence to internationally recognized quality standards, reinforcing institutional credibility and transparency. It is recommended to explore the comparative effectiveness of different quality management frameworks across higher learning institutions and assess the impact of digital transformation on quality management processes. Further research should also investigate the long-term sustainability of these frameworks and their influence on stakeholder satisfaction in institutional projects.

DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v14i1.40610 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Quality Management Practices for Improved Performance in Liquor Production Projects

Mukuru Patrick · Amolo Elvis Juma Amolo

International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies · 2025

Read abstract

Quality has long been an issue, even in terms of African traditional winemakers, they would go as far as meticulously producing high-quality alcohols to assure that they produce delightful drinks in celebration. However, in modern times, focus on health and economic pressures, has compromised quality in liquor production mostly motivated by profit and dilution measures. The study intends to investigate the effect of Quality Management Practices (QMPs) on performance of liquor production projects in Rulindo District, Rwanda, specifically, top management commitment, Stakeholder involvement, Customer focus and Employee empowerment. The study was grounded on two theories of Quality Management Theory and Performance Theory. A descriptive survey and correlation research designs were employed. The target population was 293 respondents, including Top Management representatives, Key regulatory bodies’ officers (RSB, RRA), Project Partners and Stakeholders (PSF, Rulindo district community leaders), Safety and Health Officers, out of which a sample size of 169 respondents was drawn using Solvin’s formula. Questionnaire, interview, and documentary analysis were used for data collection. A pilot study involving 17 participants was done. Validity was assessed using the Content Validity Index that yielded a value of 0.76 while reliability was measured through Cronbach’s Alpha, yielding a coefficient value of 0.76 which was above the minimum threshold of 0.7. Descriptive and inferential statistics of correlation and regression analysis were done at a significant level of 0.05 using SPSS version 28. The study adhered to ethical consideration, emphasizing on informed consent from participants, maintaining confidentiality, and ensuring anonymity throughout the research process. The findings for four hypotheses were tested at a significance level of ?=0.05, and the results were as follows: top management (P=0.000<0.05); stakeholder involvement (P=0.000<0.05); customer focus (P=0.000<0.05) and; employee empowerment (p=0.000<0.05) does not significantly influence project performance were all rejected. The study concludes that liquor production projects in Rulindo District benefit from top management commitment, stakeholder involvement, customer focus, and employee empowerment, which collectively drive performance improvements. The study recommended that liquor production projects emphasize leadership commitment, inclusive stakeholder participation, customer feedback mechanisms, and regular employee empowerment initiatives to sustain performance. Future research could explore qualitative insights, the long-term impact of these practices, and their applicability to other regions or industries.

DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v14i1.39660 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations

Selected results

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Quality Management Frameworks and Performance for Campus Extension Project

Twiringiyimana Alexandre · Amolo Elvis Juma Amolo

International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies · 2025

Read abstract

Quality Management frameworks (QMF) are structured systems driving the quality performance of the product or services that ensure products, services in project journey to excellence. Most of the extension project in HLIs in Rwanda are affected by the sub standardized implementation that leads to the close of HLI in the country. The purpose of the study was to establish the effect of quality management frameworks of Total Quality Management, Lean framework, ISO 9001 and Six Sigma on performance of Higher Learning Institution’s extension projects in Rwanda. The study was grounded on Total quality, Crosby’s Theory of Quality and Institutional theory. The study used descriptive survey and correlational research designs. Structured questionnaires and interview guide were used to collect data from 110 participants, selected through stratified, random and purposive sampling, from a target population of 167 stakeholders. The pilot study involved 12 respondents, representing 10% of the sample size. Validity was confirmed through expert evaluation, yielding a content validity index of 0.78 while Reliability was established using the split-half technique, achieving a Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.79. Descriptive and inferential statistics of Correlation and Regression were done at a significance level of 0.05 using SPSS version 30 while thematic content analysis of qualitative data was done for triangulation. The findings for four hypotheses were tested at ?=0.05 level of significance and the results were: Total Quality Management Framework (P=0.000<0.05); Lean Framework (P=0.000<0.05); Six Sigma Framework (P=0.000<0.05) and; ISO 9001 Framework (P=0.000<0.05) have no significant influence on performance of HLI extension projects were rejected. The study concludes that implementing a structured quality management framework significantly enhances the performance of campus extension projects. TQM contributes by fostering continuous improvement, stakeholder engagement, and employee involvement, ensuring quality service delivery. Lean methodologies help minimize inefficiencies and optimize resource utilization, leading to cost-effective project execution. Six Sigma’s emphasis on process control and data-driven decision-making enhances reliability, while ISO 9001 ensures adherence to internationally recognized quality standards, reinforcing institutional credibility and transparency. It is recommended to explore the comparative effectiveness of different quality management frameworks across higher learning institutions and assess the impact of digital transformation on quality management processes. Further research should also investigate the long-term sustainability of these frameworks and their influence on stakeholder satisfaction in institutional projects.

DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v14i1.40610 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Quality Management Practices for Improved Performance in Liquor Production Projects

Mukuru Patrick · Amolo Elvis Juma Amolo

International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies · 2025

Read abstract

Quality has long been an issue, even in terms of African traditional winemakers, they would go as far as meticulously producing high-quality alcohols to assure that they produce delightful drinks in celebration. However, in modern times, focus on health and economic pressures, has compromised quality in liquor production mostly motivated by profit and dilution measures. The study intends to investigate the effect of Quality Management Practices (QMPs) on performance of liquor production projects in Rulindo District, Rwanda, specifically, top management commitment, Stakeholder involvement, Customer focus and Employee empowerment. The study was grounded on two theories of Quality Management Theory and Performance Theory. A descriptive survey and correlation research designs were employed. The target population was 293 respondents, including Top Management representatives, Key regulatory bodies’ officers (RSB, RRA), Project Partners and Stakeholders (PSF, Rulindo district community leaders), Safety and Health Officers, out of which a sample size of 169 respondents was drawn using Solvin’s formula. Questionnaire, interview, and documentary analysis were used for data collection. A pilot study involving 17 participants was done. Validity was assessed using the Content Validity Index that yielded a value of 0.76 while reliability was measured through Cronbach’s Alpha, yielding a coefficient value of 0.76 which was above the minimum threshold of 0.7. Descriptive and inferential statistics of correlation and regression analysis were done at a significant level of 0.05 using SPSS version 28. The study adhered to ethical consideration, emphasizing on informed consent from participants, maintaining confidentiality, and ensuring anonymity throughout the research process. The findings for four hypotheses were tested at a significance level of ?=0.05, and the results were as follows: top management (P=0.000<0.05); stakeholder involvement (P=0.000<0.05); customer focus (P=0.000<0.05) and; employee empowerment (p=0.000<0.05) does not significantly influence project performance were all rejected. The study concludes that liquor production projects in Rulindo District benefit from top management commitment, stakeholder involvement, customer focus, and employee empowerment, which collectively drive performance improvements. The study recommended that liquor production projects emphasize leadership commitment, inclusive stakeholder participation, customer feedback mechanisms, and regular employee empowerment initiatives to sustain performance. Future research could explore qualitative insights, the long-term impact of these practices, and their applicability to other regions or industries.

DOI 10.20525/ijfbs.v14i1.39660 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations

Data coverage & freshness

Source coverage refers to this result set; a publication may occur in several sources. Sync times refer to contributing journals.

Missing abstracts: 0 · Missing authors: 0 · Missing publication dates: 0 · Dates without day precision: 0

SourceMost recent successful journal syncLatest attempt
crossref21 Oct 2026 00:21 UTC · ijfbscomplete · ijfbs · 21 Oct 2026 00:21 UTC
ojs-rest21 Oct 2026 00:21 UTC · ijfbscomplete · ijfbs · 21 Oct 2026 00:14 UTC
oai-pmh20 Oct 2026 19:56 UTC · ijfbscomplete · ijfbs · 20 Oct 2026 19:55 UTC
openalex-enrichment21 Oct 2026 00:22 UTC · ijfbscomplete · ijfbs · 21 Oct 2026 00:21 UTC
Full import history & methodology →