CiteNScope — Scholarly Index & Analytics
Discover / Analytics RESEARCH INTELLIGENCE
CiteNScope / Analytics

Explore the evidence.
Understand the reach.

Research across participating journals · All insights follow your collection filters.

Compare journals ↗
OpenAlex coverage 100.0% · 8/8 recordsLast OpenAlex observation 22 Oct 2026, 06:07 UTC
PUBLICATIONS8In the selected collection
CROSSREF CITATIONS38/8 with known counts
OPENALEX CITATIONS68/8 with known counts
OPENALEX MEAN0.75Per article with a known count
Explore articles 8 →
Filter collection Publication years, search & more
Reset
topic: Mining and Resource Management Remove ×
Your research collection

Output and reach

Publication activity alongside incoming citations.

Publication activity

Articles grouped by publication year

Publications

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.

View data & coverage

Citations received

OpenAlex · year of the citing work

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage

Research landscape

Leading affiliations and themes in this collection.

Full distributions & methodology ↓

Institutions

University of Santo Tomas2Tshwane University of Technology1University of South Africa18/8 records with data

Countries

South Africa4Philippines2Tanzania28/8 records with data

Primary topics

Mining and Resource Management88/8 records with data
Two perspectives on citations

Follow the research impact

Independent sources. Clear time scales.

Lifetime citations by publication year

Crossref and OpenAlex · separate totals for the same publication cohorts

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

Latest lifetime totals, grouped by the cited article’s year. These are not citations received in that year.

View data & coverage

Citations received each year

OpenAlex · incoming citation links grouped by citing-work year

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage
Annual history: 8/8 articles. Latest history observation: 2026-10-22T06:07:50.604460+00:00. Source totals are never added together.
Research side by side

Compare journals

Select journals to compare the same collection filters. Source totals stay separate. These measures describe research activity, not journal quality.

Leave all unchecked to include every matching journal. Selection affects only comparison charts.
Display range
International Journal of Business Ecosystem & StrategyInternational Journal of Research in Business and Social Science

Publications

Articles by publication year

View data & coverage

Crossref citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex · Citations received

By year of the citing work · 2017–2026

View data & coverage

2026 is year to date. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime charts share a citation scale. Unknown observations appear as gaps; known zero stays zero. Annual receipts use available OpenAlex histories and may not sum to lifetime totals. 0 undated publications excluded from publication-year charts.

Full analytics report All distributions, publications, comparisons & data provenance
8 MATCHING PUBLICATIONSExplore results →Export CSV ↓
INDEXED PUBLICATIONS8
CROSSREF CITATIONS3
CROSSREF · CITED PUBLICATIONS12.5%
CROSSREF · MEAN CITATIONS0.38

Crossref citation coverage: 8 / 8 publications (100.0%). Latest observation: 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC. Means and percentages use records with known counts.

OpenAlex / Separate citation source

A broader view of this research

DOI-matched OpenAlex observations for the same selected publications. These counts are separate from Crossref and are never added together.

OPENALEX CITATIONS6
DOI MATCH COVERAGE100.0%8 / 8 publications
MEAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY0.758 known · 0 unknown
MEDIAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY0.5

Observation range: 21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC — 22 Oct 2026 06:07 UTC. Missing matches are not zero citations. Previous observations may remain if a refresh fails or a DOI no longer matches.

OpenAlex citation distributionNo citations41–546–20021+0Unknown0

Institutions, countries & topics

OpenAlex affiliations and primary-topic classification. Each publication counts once per institution or country; multi-affiliated publications appear in multiple groups, so percentages can sum above 100%. Countries describe author affiliations, not nationality. Topics use one primary topic per publication.

Citation year / OpenAlex

Citations received over time

Incoming citations to the selected publications, grouped by the year of the citing work. This is separate from lifetime citation totals grouped by the cited article’s publication year.

The publication filters above define which articles receive the citations. The citation-year range below only controls this chart and the incoming-citation comparison. Removing publication-year filters includes older articles’ incoming citations too.

Annual history available for 8 / 8 selected publications. Supported display window: 2017–2026; 2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Missing histories and years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—); partial coverage can understate totals.

Annual-history observations (UTC): 2026-10-21T07:23:00.734057+00:00 — 2026-10-22T06:07:50.604460+00:00. Older observations may be retained after failed or incomplete refreshes.

OpenAlex · Citations received by year

31.50 2017 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 8/82018 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 8/82019 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 8/82020 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 8/82021 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 1 · Annual history coverage 8/82022 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 8/82023 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 1 · Annual history coverage 8/82024 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 8/82025 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 1 · Annual history coverage 8/82026 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 3 · Annual history coverage 8/8 2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
View openalex · citations received by year data & coverage
Citation yearJournal / scopeOpenAlex · Citations received by yearPublicationsAnnual history known
2017All selected publications088/8
2018All selected publications088/8
2019All selected publications088/8
2020All selected publications088/8
2021All selected publications188/8
2022All selected publications088/8
2023All selected publications188/8
2024All selected publications088/8
2025All selected publications188/8
2026All selected publications388/8

Counts represent citation links, not unique citing papers across a journal: one paper citing two selected articles contributes two links. Older citations outside this window are excluded, so annual sums need not equal lifetime totals. OpenAlex methodology ↗

Crossref citation distribution

Latest Crossref totals for the selected publications; not citations received in the selected years.

Mean0.38
Median0.0
No citations71–516–20021+0Unknown0

Unknown counts are excluded from the mean, median and cited-publication rate.

Journal comparison

Same filters, source and counting rules across journals. Descriptive statistics, not a quality ranking.

Journal / publisherPublicationsCrossref citationsOpenAlex citationsOpenAlex coverageCrossref meanCrossref medianCrossref cited %*Crossref coverage
International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy
Bussecon International Academy
2002/20.00.00.02/2 · 100.0%
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science
SSBFNET
6366/60.50.016.76/6 · 100.0%

* Percentage among publications with a known citation count.

Explore publications

View all 8 →

Most cited · Crossref

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Contribution of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) practices to the wellbeing of communities around the North Mara Gold Mine in Tanzania

Immaculate Gillo · Odass Bilame · Emiliana Assenga

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2025

Read abstract

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) practices of privately owned mining companies have been argued to create benefits to communities’ wellbeing in areas of their operation. However, little is known on the CSR of partly owned government mining companies. Therefore, this paper ought to: examined the contribution of CSR practices of the North Mara Gold Mine in Tanzania to the wellbeing of communities living around the mine. Specifically, it examined and compared levels of household wellbeing before and after the implementation of CSR practices. The study used cross sectional research design and involved 358 households which were selected using systematic random sampling method. The wellbeing index was used to measure levels of wellbeing. Besides, the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test was used to compare wellbeing levels before and after the implementation of the CSR practices. The results revealed that the CSR practices of the North Mara Gold Mine company enabled people to own improved quality housing and valuable assets. Also, the household wellbeing index score was significantly higher after the implementation of the CSR practices. There was a significant difference in wellbeing levels (p<0.001) before and after the implementation of CSR practices. It is recommended that CSR plans to be integrated into company business operations and carefully monitored, evaluated and strictly audited regularly for effective community development.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v14i3.40533 Crossref citations3 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Disaggregating the effects of corporate social responsibility on community economic wellbeing in Tanzania’s mining sector

Nyanda J. Shuli · France A. Shayo · Chacha A. Matoka

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

This study examines the effects of disaggregated corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices on the economic wellbeing of host communities in Tanzania’s mining sector. Drawing on stakeholder theory, the study adopts a quantitative cross-sectional design using primary survey data collected from 393 respondents in three gold-mining regions - Geita, Mara, and Kagera, with 332 valid responses analysed using SmartPLS 4. The analysis focuses on the effects of economic, legal, ethical, and philanthropic CSR practices on community-level economic outcomes. The findings indicate that ethical, legal, and philanthropic CSR practices have positive and statistically significant effects on economic wellbeing, while economic CSR practices are not statistically significant. These findings suggest that while legal CSR practices contribute positively to economic wellbeing, their influence remains relatively modest, indicating that compliance-based interventions alone may not generate substantial household-level improvements. In contrast, responsible business conduct and community-oriented investments appear to exert a stronger and more direct influence on local development outcomes. The study contributes to the literature by providing empirical support for disaggregating CSR into distinct dimensions when assessing development outcomes in extractive industries and highlights the need to move beyond aggregate CSR measures toward more differentiated and context-sensitive analyses. From a policy and practice perspective, the findings underscore the importance of aligning CSR initiatives with community priorities and strengthening implementation frameworks to enhance their developmental impact in resource-dependent economies.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v15i4.52140 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

A qualitative study of factors driving and influencing unlawful mining in the City of Ekurhuleni

M.M. Lebea · J.T. Mofokeng · Dee Khosa

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

Unlawful mining poses a significant global challenge. It contributes to environmental degradation, corruption, and exploitation, with Africa being disproportionately affected. This qualitative, exploratory study investigated the factors that drive unlawful mining in Ekurhuleni, Gauteng, South Africa, in response to growing concerns about its substantial economic and social impacts. Through semi-structured interviews, 26 purposively selected participants from diverse backgrounds, including law enforcement and key stakeholders, provided varied perspectives. The findings consistently highlight unemployment and poverty as primary drivers that compel individuals to engage in illegal mining activities. The participants also emphasized the inherent dangers faced by illegal miners and the complex socio-economic dynamics that perpetuate this illicit enterprise. Critically, existing policing strategies were perceived as inadequate. The study concludes that effectively mitigating unlawful mining in Ekurhuleni requires comprehensive approaches that address underlying socio-economic vulnerabilities and foster active community involvement. This underscores the need for coordinated efforts to reduce its impacts and support local safety and development.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v15i3.44330 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Assessment of project management practices and sustainable development of oil producing communities: A tale of Ilaje Local Government Area, Ondo State, Nigeria

Adeniyi Odunayo Onafadeji · Dajili Christiana Ojone

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

This research investigates the influence of project management practices (PMP) on sustainable development among oil-producing villages in the Ilaje Local Government Area of Ondo State, Nigeria. This study examines the impact of Project Management Practices (PMPs)—including planning, implementation, monitoring, and evaluation—on the sustainable development (SD) dimensions of the environmental, economic, and social aspects of inhabitants in oil-producing areas within Ilaje LGA, Ondo State. Data were gathered from 154 household heads through structured questionnaires using a survey methodology and analysed with descriptive and inferential statistics, including multiple linear regression. The findings indicated a modest level of PMP, with Mean Index Scores between 2.14 and 2.44, signifying restricted community engagement. The results of the multiple linear regression indicate that the construct and implementation significantly impacted all three dimensions of sustainability: environmental, economic, and social. This indicates that financial benefits are received by the residents of the host community, notwithstanding their limited participation as casual workers during project execution. Nevertheless, oil companies exhibit minimal care for the aspirations of the populace concerning the impact of their projects on the local environment.  The study's geographic limitations restrict generalisability, indicating the necessity for further extensive comparative research. It advises oil companies to use inclusive project management frameworks that improve stakeholder engagement, therefore promoting sustainable socio-economic development and environmental stewardship in host communities

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v14i10.46540 Crossref citations1 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

The effects of social development and management programs (SMDP) of Philippine mining companies to the host communities

Jackie Lou Oliva Raborar · Elizabeth O. Recio

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2020

Read abstract

The study used a qualitative approach to gather data from the participants through the interview and focused group discussions (FGD).  The participants consisting of 30 for the interview and 11 for the FGD were asked to answer the questions using a semi-structured, open-ended interview guide.  The results of the interview and FGD were carefully examined using thematic analysis. The results show that as to the level of awareness of the host communities regarding the different SMDP of the mining companies, there is strong evidence on the high level of awareness of the respondents as to human resource development, enterprise development, assistance to infrastructure development, access to education, access to health services; and protections to respect of socio-cultural values. As to the level of agreement of the impact of the different SMDP implement by the mining companies, the respondents confirmed the positive effects of these programs in relation to education, health, social and cultural, and economic indicators. As to the perception of the respondents on the sustainability of the SMDP, except for the completeness of documents available in the designated SMDP offices in the communities, the respondents confirmed and agreed on the sustainability of the SMDP in terms of stakeholder groups relationship; company financial and management capacity; and compliance with the legal requirements.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v9i3.6830 Crossref citations1 OpenAlex citations

Selected results

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Impacts of Illegal Mining: Insights from Atok Residents in Limpopo Province, South Africa

Joline Ramadimetje Kgwedi · Wiseman Ntlhari Mathebula · Abigaile Globadra Masete · Katekani Sibise

International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2026

Read abstract

Illegal mining, particularly as carried out by Zama Zamas (informal artisanal miners), has become an escalating concern in South Africa, presenting multifaceted challenges to affected communities. This study investigates the localised impacts of illegal mining in Atok, a community situated in Limpopo Province, through the lived experiences and perceptions of its residents. Employing a qualitative research design, the study uncovers the profound socio-economic and environmental consequences resulting from unregulated mining activities. Key findings include widespread environmental degradation, disruption of local economic activities, compromised public health, and a notable rise in crime and insecurity. These outcomes not only undermine the well-being of residents but also impede sustainable development in the region. The research underscores the urgent need for coordinated interventions involving government entities, local authorities, and community stakeholders to rehabilitate affected areas, enforce existing mining legislation, and implement community-based development initiatives. The insights generated contribute to the broader discourse on illegal mining and offer policy-relevant recommendations for mitigating its adverse effects in South Africa and similar contexts globally.

DOI 10.36096/ijbes.v8i4.12820 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Examining the Relationship between Enterprise Risk management Practices and the Perceived Sustainability of the Emerging and Junior Mining Sector in South Africa

Crossman Mayavo

International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2026

Read abstract

The study sought to relationship between enterprise risk management practices (ERM) and perceived sustainability of emerging and junior mining sector in South Africa as it creates employments and mineral diversification. This sector remains vulnerable to various risks factors including financial and regulatory among others.  The objective of the study was to examine the relationship between enterprise risk management practices and perceived sustainability of emerging and junior mining sector in South Africa. The study was anchored upon the governance theory. The study adopted the use of a quantitative methodology with a cross-sectional design using a secondary data panel downloaded from Kaggle data repository. The sample size of the study was 500 which included 262 males and 238 females who work in different mining organisational sizes. Regression analysis and structural equation modeling were tested and run to test the hypothesised statements. The results of OLS regression model 1 show that ERM_Governance has a positive and significant effect on sustainability and ERM_Value shows a negative and significant association, and other ERM dimensions are positive but not statistically significant. OLS regression Model 2 for perceived socio-economic importance shows that ERM_learning is a positive and significant predictor of socio-economic importance, and other ERM dimensions are not significant in this model. On the SEM front, ERM practices exhibited strong positive effects on both perceived sector sustainability and socio-economic importance (p < 0.001). Perceived sector sustainability significantly mediated the relationship between ERM practices and socio-economic importance (p < 0.001). Additionally, organisations size and mining experience were found to significantly moderate the ERM-sustainability relationship (p < 0.05), indicating the presence of contextual effects within the emerging and junior mining sector. The theoretical implication suggests that ERM should be taken as a monolithic construct but rather as a set of complementary dimensions with distinct outcome pathways. Practically, the results imply that policymakers and mining executives should prioritise strong governance and accountability systems to enhance sustainability perceptions while simultaneously investing in learning and collaborative capabilities to maximise socio-economic impact.

DOI 10.36096/ijbes.v8i4.13500 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Disaggregating the effects of corporate social responsibility on community economic wellbeing in Tanzania’s mining sector

Nyanda J. Shuli · France A. Shayo · Chacha A. Matoka

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

This study examines the effects of disaggregated corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices on the economic wellbeing of host communities in Tanzania’s mining sector. Drawing on stakeholder theory, the study adopts a quantitative cross-sectional design using primary survey data collected from 393 respondents in three gold-mining regions - Geita, Mara, and Kagera, with 332 valid responses analysed using SmartPLS 4. The analysis focuses on the effects of economic, legal, ethical, and philanthropic CSR practices on community-level economic outcomes. The findings indicate that ethical, legal, and philanthropic CSR practices have positive and statistically significant effects on economic wellbeing, while economic CSR practices are not statistically significant. These findings suggest that while legal CSR practices contribute positively to economic wellbeing, their influence remains relatively modest, indicating that compliance-based interventions alone may not generate substantial household-level improvements. In contrast, responsible business conduct and community-oriented investments appear to exert a stronger and more direct influence on local development outcomes. The study contributes to the literature by providing empirical support for disaggregating CSR into distinct dimensions when assessing development outcomes in extractive industries and highlights the need to move beyond aggregate CSR measures toward more differentiated and context-sensitive analyses. From a policy and practice perspective, the findings underscore the importance of aligning CSR initiatives with community priorities and strengthening implementation frameworks to enhance their developmental impact in resource-dependent economies.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v15i4.52140 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

A qualitative study of factors driving and influencing unlawful mining in the City of Ekurhuleni

M.M. Lebea · J.T. Mofokeng · Dee Khosa

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

Unlawful mining poses a significant global challenge. It contributes to environmental degradation, corruption, and exploitation, with Africa being disproportionately affected. This qualitative, exploratory study investigated the factors that drive unlawful mining in Ekurhuleni, Gauteng, South Africa, in response to growing concerns about its substantial economic and social impacts. Through semi-structured interviews, 26 purposively selected participants from diverse backgrounds, including law enforcement and key stakeholders, provided varied perspectives. The findings consistently highlight unemployment and poverty as primary drivers that compel individuals to engage in illegal mining activities. The participants also emphasized the inherent dangers faced by illegal miners and the complex socio-economic dynamics that perpetuate this illicit enterprise. Critically, existing policing strategies were perceived as inadequate. The study concludes that effectively mitigating unlawful mining in Ekurhuleni requires comprehensive approaches that address underlying socio-economic vulnerabilities and foster active community involvement. This underscores the need for coordinated efforts to reduce its impacts and support local safety and development.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v15i3.44330 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Assessment of project management practices and sustainable development of oil producing communities: A tale of Ilaje Local Government Area, Ondo State, Nigeria

Adeniyi Odunayo Onafadeji · Dajili Christiana Ojone

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

This research investigates the influence of project management practices (PMP) on sustainable development among oil-producing villages in the Ilaje Local Government Area of Ondo State, Nigeria. This study examines the impact of Project Management Practices (PMPs)—including planning, implementation, monitoring, and evaluation—on the sustainable development (SD) dimensions of the environmental, economic, and social aspects of inhabitants in oil-producing areas within Ilaje LGA, Ondo State. Data were gathered from 154 household heads through structured questionnaires using a survey methodology and analysed with descriptive and inferential statistics, including multiple linear regression. The findings indicated a modest level of PMP, with Mean Index Scores between 2.14 and 2.44, signifying restricted community engagement. The results of the multiple linear regression indicate that the construct and implementation significantly impacted all three dimensions of sustainability: environmental, economic, and social. This indicates that financial benefits are received by the residents of the host community, notwithstanding their limited participation as casual workers during project execution. Nevertheless, oil companies exhibit minimal care for the aspirations of the populace concerning the impact of their projects on the local environment.  The study's geographic limitations restrict generalisability, indicating the necessity for further extensive comparative research. It advises oil companies to use inclusive project management frameworks that improve stakeholder engagement, therefore promoting sustainable socio-economic development and environmental stewardship in host communities

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v14i10.46540 Crossref citations1 OpenAlex citations

Data coverage & freshness

Source coverage refers to this result set; a publication may occur in several sources. Sync times refer to contributing journals.

Missing abstracts: 0 · Missing authors: 0 · Missing publication dates: 0 · Dates without day precision: 0

SourceMost recent successful journal syncLatest attempt
crossref21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
ojs-rest21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 06:46 UTC
oai-pmh20 Oct 2026 19:55 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 20 Oct 2026 19:50 UTC
openalex-enrichment21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
Full import history & methodology →