CiteNScope — Scholarly Index & Analytics
Discover / Analytics RESEARCH INTELLIGENCE
CiteNScope / Analytics

Explore the evidence.
Understand the reach.

Research across participating journals · All insights follow your collection filters.

Compare journals ↗
OpenAlex coverage 100.0% · 3/3 recordsLast OpenAlex observation 22 Oct 2026, 02:30 UTC
PUBLICATIONS3In the selected collection
CROSSREF CITATIONS43/3 with known counts
OPENALEX CITATIONS53/3 with known counts
OPENALEX MEAN1.67Per article with a known count
Explore articles 3 →
Filter collection Publication years, search & more
Reset
topic: Higher Education Research Studies Remove ×
Your research collection

Output and reach

Publication activity alongside incoming citations.

Publication activity

Articles grouped by publication year

Publications

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.

View data & coverage

Citations received

OpenAlex · year of the citing work

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage

Research landscape

Leading affiliations and themes in this collection.

Full distributions & methodology ↓

Institutions

North-West University2University of Venda13/3 records with data

Countries

South Africa33/3 records with data

Primary topics

Higher Education Research Studies33/3 records with data
Two perspectives on citations

Follow the research impact

Independent sources. Clear time scales.

Lifetime citations by publication year

Crossref and OpenAlex · separate totals for the same publication cohorts

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

Latest lifetime totals, grouped by the cited article’s year. These are not citations received in that year.

View data & coverage

Citations received each year

OpenAlex · incoming citation links grouped by citing-work year

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage
Annual history: 3/3 articles. Latest history observation: 2026-10-22T02:30:21.027276+00:00. Source totals are never added together.
Research side by side

Compare journals

Select journals to compare the same collection filters. Source totals stay separate. These measures describe research activity, not journal quality.

Leave all unchecked to include every matching journal. Selection affects only comparison charts.
Display range
International Journal of Business Ecosystem & StrategyInternational Journal of Research in Business and Social Science

Publications

Articles by publication year

View data & coverage

Crossref citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex · Citations received

By year of the citing work · 2017–2026

View data & coverage

2026 is year to date. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime charts share a citation scale. Unknown observations appear as gaps; known zero stays zero. Annual receipts use available OpenAlex histories and may not sum to lifetime totals. 0 undated publications excluded from publication-year charts.

Full analytics report All distributions, publications, comparisons & data provenance
3 MATCHING PUBLICATIONSExplore results →Export CSV ↓
INDEXED PUBLICATIONS3
CROSSREF CITATIONS4
CROSSREF · CITED PUBLICATIONS100.0%
CROSSREF · MEAN CITATIONS1.33

Crossref citation coverage: 3 / 3 publications (100.0%). Latest observation: 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC. Means and percentages use records with known counts.

OpenAlex / Separate citation source

A broader view of this research

DOI-matched OpenAlex observations for the same selected publications. These counts are separate from Crossref and are never added together.

OPENALEX CITATIONS5
DOI MATCH COVERAGE100.0%3 / 3 publications
MEAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY1.673 known · 0 unknown
MEDIAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY2

Observation range: 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC — 22 Oct 2026 02:30 UTC. Missing matches are not zero citations. Previous observations may remain if a refresh fails or a DOI no longer matches.

OpenAlex citation distributionNo citations01–536–20021+0Unknown0

Institutions, countries & topics

OpenAlex affiliations and primary-topic classification. Each publication counts once per institution or country; multi-affiliated publications appear in multiple groups, so percentages can sum above 100%. Countries describe author affiliations, not nationality. Topics use one primary topic per publication.

Institutions

3 / 3 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 3 selected publications.

Countries

3 / 3 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 3 selected publications.

Primary topics

3 / 3 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 3 selected publications.

Citation year / OpenAlex

Citations received over time

Incoming citations to the selected publications, grouped by the year of the citing work. This is separate from lifetime citation totals grouped by the cited article’s publication year.

The publication filters above define which articles receive the citations. The citation-year range below only controls this chart and the incoming-citation comparison. Removing publication-year filters includes older articles’ incoming citations too.

Annual history available for 3 / 3 selected publications. Supported display window: 2017–2026; 2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Missing histories and years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—); partial coverage can understate totals.

Annual-history observations (UTC): 2026-10-21T07:22:54.187290+00:00 — 2026-10-22T02:30:21.027276+00:00. Older observations may be retained after failed or incomplete refreshes.

OpenAlex · Citations received by year

21.00 2017 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32018 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32019 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32020 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32021 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32022 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32023 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32024 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 2 · Annual history coverage 3/32025 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 1 · Annual history coverage 3/32026 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 2 · Annual history coverage 3/3 2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
View openalex · citations received by year data & coverage
Citation yearJournal / scopeOpenAlex · Citations received by yearPublicationsAnnual history known
2017All selected publications033/3
2018All selected publications033/3
2019All selected publications033/3
2020All selected publications033/3
2021All selected publications033/3
2022All selected publications033/3
2023All selected publications033/3
2024All selected publications233/3
2025All selected publications133/3
2026All selected publications233/3

Counts represent citation links, not unique citing papers across a journal: one paper citing two selected articles contributes two links. Older citations outside this window are excluded, so annual sums need not equal lifetime totals. OpenAlex methodology ↗

Crossref citation distribution

Latest Crossref totals for the selected publications; not citations received in the selected years.

Mean1.33
Median1
No citations01–536–20021+0Unknown0

Unknown counts are excluded from the mean, median and cited-publication rate.

Journal comparison

Same filters, source and counting rules across journals. Descriptive statistics, not a quality ranking.

Journal / publisherPublicationsCrossref citationsOpenAlex citationsOpenAlex coverageCrossref meanCrossref medianCrossref cited %*Crossref coverage
International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy
Bussecon International Academy
1111/11.01100.01/1 · 100.0%
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science
SSBFNET
2342/21.51.5100.02/2 · 100.0%

* Percentage among publications with a known citation count.

Explore publications

View all 3 →

Most cited · Crossref

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Exploring the impact of the Extended Curriculum Programme (ECP) as a crucial motivating landing space

Georgina Mokganya · Innocent Zitha

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2024

Read abstract

The smooth transition of students into higher education is crucial for laying a strong foundation for success at the university level. This paper investigated students’ perceptions and responses to enrolling in an Extended Curriculum Programme (ECP) and lecturers’ efforts to motivate students and understand the factors that may hinder student success. To achieve this, the research utilised a mixed methods approach, incorporating both qualitative and quantitative dimensions. The researchers purposefully selected 150 ECP students enrolled in the 2024 academic year. Data collection involved the use of free listing techniques and semi-structured interviews, which allowed for a comprehensive understanding of the students' experiences. The collected research data was organised, transcribed, and analysed using thematic analysis, ensuring a systematic and in-depth exploration of the data. Additionally, the findings were statistically analysed using Microsoft Excel to compare the challenges faced based on gender and age, providing a nuanced understanding of the factors influencing student transition. The students, while enthusiastic about their university experience, also expressed feelings of being lost and overwhelmed during their transition. Many students, particularly those who linked their early academic performance to future opportunities, felt unprepared for independent study at the university, which was distressing. Ignoring such experiences and the lack of a sense of belonging can hinder students' academic success. Therefore, it is crucial for lecturers to identify students’ emotions early and implement supportive strategies, such as a well-planned orientation program, recognition, and rewards for high-achieving students. The paper recommends strategies and techniques that should be implemented to facilitate a smoother transition for students into higher education.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v13i10.37932 Crossref citations2 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Factors contributing to gender disparities in academic achievement at a tertiary institution in Botswana

Aastha Ahuja · Tendayi Garutsa

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2024

Read abstract

This study seeks to explore the factors contributing to gender disparities in academic achievement among tertiary students at an educational institution in Botswana. While academic achievement among male and female students has garnered increased attention, limited research has focused on the tertiary level. Employing a transformative qualitative research approach, the study utilized in-depth interviews and documentary analysis for data collection. Thematic Content Analysis was employed for data analysis. Results indicated that, although male students outperformed female students in all subjects, the gender gap was not significantly pronounced. Factors affecting female students included biological aspects such as menstruation, mood swings, menstrual pain, and absenteeism, along with challenges related to unplanned pregnancies, psychological stress due to financial strain, and economic difficulties. The study recommends the implementation of an Intersectional Gender Mainstreaming Framework in higher education institutions to address gender gaps in academic achievement.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v13i2.31501 Crossref citations2 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Mitigating the costs of failure: NSFAS challenges and the need for an undergraduate grade reform in South African universities

Suares Clovis Oukouomi Noutchie

International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2024

Read abstract

This paper examines the financial and psychological impacts of the current grade system in South African universities, particularly on students funded by the National Student Financial Aid Scheme (NSFAS). The system, designed to enhance the quality of education by ensuring students grasp core concepts before advancing, often extends the duration of study for student. This extension leads to significant financial burdens, including additional tuition fees, accommodation costs, and subsistence expenses. The rigid structure of grading can prevent students from progressing in their programs, as failing a core module often disqualifies them from taking multiple subsequent modules. The literature review highlights international practices and the unique socio-economic context of South Africa. Findings reveal that the system contributes to high dropout rates, increased student debt, and psychological distress. This paper argues for a reform in the grading system, suggesting a cap at 40% pass, instead of 50% pass for progression at undergraduate level, which would alleviate some of these pressures. Discussions focus on the potential benefits of such a reform, including reduced financial strain on NSFAS, improved student retention, and better mental health outcomes. The conclusion reiterates the necessity of policy changes to create a more equitable and sustainable higher education system. By addressing these challenges, South African universities can ensure that more students complete their degrees in a timely manner, benefiting both the students and the broader economy.

DOI 10.36096/ijbes.v6i4.5781 Crossref citations1 OpenAlex citations

Selected results

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Exploring the impact of the Extended Curriculum Programme (ECP) as a crucial motivating landing space

Georgina Mokganya · Innocent Zitha

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2024

Read abstract

The smooth transition of students into higher education is crucial for laying a strong foundation for success at the university level. This paper investigated students’ perceptions and responses to enrolling in an Extended Curriculum Programme (ECP) and lecturers’ efforts to motivate students and understand the factors that may hinder student success. To achieve this, the research utilised a mixed methods approach, incorporating both qualitative and quantitative dimensions. The researchers purposefully selected 150 ECP students enrolled in the 2024 academic year. Data collection involved the use of free listing techniques and semi-structured interviews, which allowed for a comprehensive understanding of the students' experiences. The collected research data was organised, transcribed, and analysed using thematic analysis, ensuring a systematic and in-depth exploration of the data. Additionally, the findings were statistically analysed using Microsoft Excel to compare the challenges faced based on gender and age, providing a nuanced understanding of the factors influencing student transition. The students, while enthusiastic about their university experience, also expressed feelings of being lost and overwhelmed during their transition. Many students, particularly those who linked their early academic performance to future opportunities, felt unprepared for independent study at the university, which was distressing. Ignoring such experiences and the lack of a sense of belonging can hinder students' academic success. Therefore, it is crucial for lecturers to identify students’ emotions early and implement supportive strategies, such as a well-planned orientation program, recognition, and rewards for high-achieving students. The paper recommends strategies and techniques that should be implemented to facilitate a smoother transition for students into higher education.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v13i10.37932 Crossref citations2 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Mitigating the costs of failure: NSFAS challenges and the need for an undergraduate grade reform in South African universities

Suares Clovis Oukouomi Noutchie

International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2024

Read abstract

This paper examines the financial and psychological impacts of the current grade system in South African universities, particularly on students funded by the National Student Financial Aid Scheme (NSFAS). The system, designed to enhance the quality of education by ensuring students grasp core concepts before advancing, often extends the duration of study for student. This extension leads to significant financial burdens, including additional tuition fees, accommodation costs, and subsistence expenses. The rigid structure of grading can prevent students from progressing in their programs, as failing a core module often disqualifies them from taking multiple subsequent modules. The literature review highlights international practices and the unique socio-economic context of South Africa. Findings reveal that the system contributes to high dropout rates, increased student debt, and psychological distress. This paper argues for a reform in the grading system, suggesting a cap at 40% pass, instead of 50% pass for progression at undergraduate level, which would alleviate some of these pressures. Discussions focus on the potential benefits of such a reform, including reduced financial strain on NSFAS, improved student retention, and better mental health outcomes. The conclusion reiterates the necessity of policy changes to create a more equitable and sustainable higher education system. By addressing these challenges, South African universities can ensure that more students complete their degrees in a timely manner, benefiting both the students and the broader economy.

DOI 10.36096/ijbes.v6i4.5781 Crossref citations1 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Factors contributing to gender disparities in academic achievement at a tertiary institution in Botswana

Aastha Ahuja · Tendayi Garutsa

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2024

Read abstract

This study seeks to explore the factors contributing to gender disparities in academic achievement among tertiary students at an educational institution in Botswana. While academic achievement among male and female students has garnered increased attention, limited research has focused on the tertiary level. Employing a transformative qualitative research approach, the study utilized in-depth interviews and documentary analysis for data collection. Thematic Content Analysis was employed for data analysis. Results indicated that, although male students outperformed female students in all subjects, the gender gap was not significantly pronounced. Factors affecting female students included biological aspects such as menstruation, mood swings, menstrual pain, and absenteeism, along with challenges related to unplanned pregnancies, psychological stress due to financial strain, and economic difficulties. The study recommends the implementation of an Intersectional Gender Mainstreaming Framework in higher education institutions to address gender gaps in academic achievement.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v13i2.31501 Crossref citations2 OpenAlex citations

Data coverage & freshness

Source coverage refers to this result set; a publication may occur in several sources. Sync times refer to contributing journals.

Missing abstracts: 0 · Missing authors: 0 · Missing publication dates: 0 · Dates without day precision: 0

SourceMost recent successful journal syncLatest attempt
crossref21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
ojs-rest21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 06:46 UTC
oai-pmh20 Oct 2026 19:55 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 20 Oct 2026 19:50 UTC
openalex-enrichment21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
Full import history & methodology →