CiteNScope — Scholarly Index & Analytics
Discover / Analytics RESEARCH INTELLIGENCE
CiteNScope / Analytics

Explore the evidence.
Understand the reach.

Research across participating journals · All insights follow your collection filters.

Compare journals ↗
OpenAlex coverage 100.0% · 3/3 recordsLast OpenAlex observation 22 Oct 2026, 02:41 UTC
PUBLICATIONS3In the selected collection
CROSSREF CITATIONS73/3 with known counts
OPENALEX CITATIONS93/3 with known counts
OPENALEX MEAN3.0Per article with a known count
Explore articles 3 →
Filter collection Publication years, search & more
Reset
topic: Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights Remove ×
Your research collection

Output and reach

Publication activity alongside incoming citations.

Publication activity

Articles grouped by publication year

Publications

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.

View data & coverage

Citations received

OpenAlex · year of the citing work

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage

Research landscape

Leading affiliations and themes in this collection.

Full distributions & methodology ↓

Institutions

University of Venda33/3 records with data

Countries

South Africa33/3 records with data

Primary topics

Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights33/3 records with data
Two perspectives on citations

Follow the research impact

Independent sources. Clear time scales.

Lifetime citations by publication year

Crossref and OpenAlex · separate totals for the same publication cohorts

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

Latest lifetime totals, grouped by the cited article’s year. These are not citations received in that year.

View data & coverage

Citations received each year

OpenAlex · incoming citation links grouped by citing-work year

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage
Annual history: 3/3 articles. Latest history observation: 2026-10-22T02:41:30.374816+00:00. Source totals are never added together.
Research side by side

Compare journals

Select journals to compare the same collection filters. Source totals stay separate. These measures describe research activity, not journal quality.

Leave all unchecked to include every matching journal. Selection affects only comparison charts.
Display range
Bussecon Review of Social SciencesInternational Journal of Research in Business and Social Science

Publications

Articles by publication year

View data & coverage

Crossref citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex · Citations received

By year of the citing work · 2017–2026

View data & coverage

2026 is year to date. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime charts share a citation scale. Unknown observations appear as gaps; known zero stays zero. Annual receipts use available OpenAlex histories and may not sum to lifetime totals. 0 undated publications excluded from publication-year charts.

Full analytics report All distributions, publications, comparisons & data provenance
3 MATCHING PUBLICATIONSExplore results →Export CSV ↓
INDEXED PUBLICATIONS3
CROSSREF CITATIONS7
CROSSREF · CITED PUBLICATIONS66.7%
CROSSREF · MEAN CITATIONS2.33

Crossref citation coverage: 3 / 3 publications (100.0%). Latest observation: 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC. Means and percentages use records with known counts.

OpenAlex / Separate citation source

A broader view of this research

DOI-matched OpenAlex observations for the same selected publications. These counts are separate from Crossref and are never added together.

OPENALEX CITATIONS9
DOI MATCH COVERAGE100.0%3 / 3 publications
MEAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY3.03 known · 0 unknown
MEDIAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY1

Observation range: 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC — 22 Oct 2026 02:41 UTC. Missing matches are not zero citations. Previous observations may remain if a refresh fails or a DOI no longer matches.

OpenAlex citation distributionNo citations01–526–20121+0Unknown0

Institutions, countries & topics

OpenAlex affiliations and primary-topic classification. Each publication counts once per institution or country; multi-affiliated publications appear in multiple groups, so percentages can sum above 100%. Countries describe author affiliations, not nationality. Topics use one primary topic per publication.

Institutions

3 / 3 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 3 selected publications.

Countries

3 / 3 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 3 selected publications.

Primary topics

3 / 3 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 3 selected publications.

Citation year / OpenAlex

Citations received over time

Incoming citations to the selected publications, grouped by the year of the citing work. This is separate from lifetime citation totals grouped by the cited article’s publication year.

The publication filters above define which articles receive the citations. The citation-year range below only controls this chart and the incoming-citation comparison. Removing publication-year filters includes older articles’ incoming citations too.

Annual history available for 3 / 3 selected publications. Supported display window: 2017–2026; 2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Missing histories and years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—); partial coverage can understate totals.

Annual-history observations (UTC): 2026-10-21T07:22:59.244270+00:00 — 2026-10-22T02:41:30.374816+00:00. Older observations may be retained after failed or incomplete refreshes.

OpenAlex · Citations received by year

52.50 2017 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32018 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32019 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32020 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32021 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32022 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32023 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32024 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 3/32025 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 4 · Annual history coverage 3/32026 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 5 · Annual history coverage 3/3 2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
View openalex · citations received by year data & coverage
Citation yearJournal / scopeOpenAlex · Citations received by yearPublicationsAnnual history known
2017All selected publications033/3
2018All selected publications033/3
2019All selected publications033/3
2020All selected publications033/3
2021All selected publications033/3
2022All selected publications033/3
2023All selected publications033/3
2024All selected publications033/3
2025All selected publications433/3
2026All selected publications533/3

Counts represent citation links, not unique citing papers across a journal: one paper citing two selected articles contributes two links. Older citations outside this window are excluded, so annual sums need not equal lifetime totals. OpenAlex methodology ↗

Crossref citation distribution

Latest Crossref totals for the selected publications; not citations received in the selected years.

Mean2.33
Median1
No citations11–516–20121+0Unknown0

Unknown counts are excluded from the mean, median and cited-publication rate.

Journal comparison

Same filters, source and counting rules across journals. Descriptive statistics, not a quality ranking.

Journal / publisherPublicationsCrossref citationsOpenAlex citationsOpenAlex coverageCrossref meanCrossref medianCrossref cited %*Crossref coverage
Bussecon Review of Social Sciences
Bussecon International Academy
2122/20.50.550.02/2 · 100.0%
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science
SSBFNET
1671/16.06100.01/1 · 100.0%

* Percentage among publications with a known citation count.

Explore publications

View all 3 →

Most cited · Crossref

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Conflict resolution in indigenous communities: A social work perspective

Rakgwata Phoke Alpha · Sekgobela Tumelo

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2024

Read abstract

Indigenous communities possess rich traditions of conflict resolution rooted in their cultural values, collective decision-making, and community involvement. However, the imposition of Western legal frameworks and colonial histories has often disrupted these practices, leading to increased tensions and unresolved conflicts. This study explored conflict resolution within Indigenous communities, emphasizing the role of social work in facilitating culturally appropriate processes. The study employed a qualitative approach, incorporating interviews with Indigenous leaders, social workers, and community members, alongside a review of relevant literature on traditional practices and social work interventions. Social workers play a crucial role as facilitators, helping to navigate tensions and bridging gaps between traditional practices and contemporary needs. Challenges include a lack of cultural competency and the need for ongoing community engagement. The integration of Indigenous knowledge systems into conflict resolution practices enhance outcomes and foster healing. Social workers prioritize cultural humility and active listening, ensuring that Indigenous voices lead the resolution process. By supporting the reclamation of traditional conflict resolution methods and advocating for culturally sensitive practices, social workers empowered Indigenous communities, promote resilience, and facilitate more effective conflict resolution. This perspective underscores the necessity of collaboration, respect, and recognition of Indigenous sovereignty in all social work interventions.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v13i10.37896 Crossref citations7 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Reflections on implementing indigenous research paradigm and participatory action research: research with the indigenous people

Glen Maimela · Thizwilondi Madima · Justice Makhanikhe · Vhonani Netshandama

Bussecon Review of Social Sciences · 2024

Read abstract

Researchers continue to conduct research within South African indigenous communities pertaining indigenous knowledge with little consideration of the existing indigenous research methodologies. This little consideration continues to exist because these indigenous research methodologies are merely taught in universities and the approach that is often used by most university researchers in conducting research on indigenous communities has elements of coloniality such as power that rests on the researchers over the communities where communities are labelled as the researched than contributors. This paper provides reflections on the participatory action research study conducted on the lenses of indigenous research paradigm in Ga-Mamabolo in the Limpopo Province of South Africa. The reflections concludes that the indigenous research paradigm offers a suitable roadmap for conducting research in indigenous communities. The contradicting research language between the western and indigenous paradigm is presented to improve the practice of research in indigenous communities. Research in indigenous communities is often conducted with little or no consideration of collaboration with the indigenous people. Thus, this paper contends that the review of existing Western research ethics may lay a foundation for new ethics that are culturally sensitive and promoting collaboration on research that affects the indigenous people.

DOI 10.36096/brss.v6i2.5831 Crossref citations1 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Strategies of interfacing traditional health and western health in fight against Coronavirus

Favour Siema · Thizwilondi Madima · Justice Makhanikhe

Bussecon Review of Social Sciences · 2024

Read abstract

The study focused on strategies of interfacing traditional health and western in fight against Coronavirus. Experts contend that government agencies and health officials should collaborate with traditional healers rather than oppose them to successfully tackle COVID-19. Various stakeholders appear to be undermining South Africa's traditional health care system, which served as the indigenous people's major source of healthcare. The indigenous health care system and its methods are being demonized by youth and certain scientific institutions because they are linked to witchcraft and other wicked customs. The researcher noticed that, in the twenty-first century, there appeared to be an idea of interfacing Traditional Health Practices (THPs) with Western doctors. It appears that basic healthcare systems were provided by traditional medical professionals in civilizations prior to the arrival of colonialism. The objective of the study was as follows, to determine strategies of interfacing traditional health and western health in the fight against COVID-19, The study adopted an employ African healing theory and appreciative Inquiry. The study used a qualitative research design and was exploratory in nature. Data was generated using observation and semi-structured interviews as data collection instruments. The finding of the study showed that some people consult traditional healers during the night because they do not want to be seen, and some still believe that traditional healers consist of witchcraft. The study recommend that education could make our community conscious of the conventional health care system and work to make youth and scientific groups be able to know and understand the importance of traditional health care system, integration of traditional health and western healthcare system in the fight against coronavirus and Funding traditional health care system.

DOI 10.36096/brss.v6i2.5870 Crossref citations1 OpenAlex citations

Selected results

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Conflict resolution in indigenous communities: A social work perspective

Rakgwata Phoke Alpha · Sekgobela Tumelo

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2024

Read abstract

Indigenous communities possess rich traditions of conflict resolution rooted in their cultural values, collective decision-making, and community involvement. However, the imposition of Western legal frameworks and colonial histories has often disrupted these practices, leading to increased tensions and unresolved conflicts. This study explored conflict resolution within Indigenous communities, emphasizing the role of social work in facilitating culturally appropriate processes. The study employed a qualitative approach, incorporating interviews with Indigenous leaders, social workers, and community members, alongside a review of relevant literature on traditional practices and social work interventions. Social workers play a crucial role as facilitators, helping to navigate tensions and bridging gaps between traditional practices and contemporary needs. Challenges include a lack of cultural competency and the need for ongoing community engagement. The integration of Indigenous knowledge systems into conflict resolution practices enhance outcomes and foster healing. Social workers prioritize cultural humility and active listening, ensuring that Indigenous voices lead the resolution process. By supporting the reclamation of traditional conflict resolution methods and advocating for culturally sensitive practices, social workers empowered Indigenous communities, promote resilience, and facilitate more effective conflict resolution. This perspective underscores the necessity of collaboration, respect, and recognition of Indigenous sovereignty in all social work interventions.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v13i10.37896 Crossref citations7 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Reflections on implementing indigenous research paradigm and participatory action research: research with the indigenous people

Glen Maimela · Thizwilondi Madima · Justice Makhanikhe · Vhonani Netshandama

Bussecon Review of Social Sciences · 2024

Read abstract

Researchers continue to conduct research within South African indigenous communities pertaining indigenous knowledge with little consideration of the existing indigenous research methodologies. This little consideration continues to exist because these indigenous research methodologies are merely taught in universities and the approach that is often used by most university researchers in conducting research on indigenous communities has elements of coloniality such as power that rests on the researchers over the communities where communities are labelled as the researched than contributors. This paper provides reflections on the participatory action research study conducted on the lenses of indigenous research paradigm in Ga-Mamabolo in the Limpopo Province of South Africa. The reflections concludes that the indigenous research paradigm offers a suitable roadmap for conducting research in indigenous communities. The contradicting research language between the western and indigenous paradigm is presented to improve the practice of research in indigenous communities. Research in indigenous communities is often conducted with little or no consideration of collaboration with the indigenous people. Thus, this paper contends that the review of existing Western research ethics may lay a foundation for new ethics that are culturally sensitive and promoting collaboration on research that affects the indigenous people.

DOI 10.36096/brss.v6i2.5831 Crossref citations1 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Strategies of interfacing traditional health and western health in fight against Coronavirus

Favour Siema · Thizwilondi Madima · Justice Makhanikhe

Bussecon Review of Social Sciences · 2024

Read abstract

The study focused on strategies of interfacing traditional health and western in fight against Coronavirus. Experts contend that government agencies and health officials should collaborate with traditional healers rather than oppose them to successfully tackle COVID-19. Various stakeholders appear to be undermining South Africa's traditional health care system, which served as the indigenous people's major source of healthcare. The indigenous health care system and its methods are being demonized by youth and certain scientific institutions because they are linked to witchcraft and other wicked customs. The researcher noticed that, in the twenty-first century, there appeared to be an idea of interfacing Traditional Health Practices (THPs) with Western doctors. It appears that basic healthcare systems were provided by traditional medical professionals in civilizations prior to the arrival of colonialism. The objective of the study was as follows, to determine strategies of interfacing traditional health and western health in the fight against COVID-19, The study adopted an employ African healing theory and appreciative Inquiry. The study used a qualitative research design and was exploratory in nature. Data was generated using observation and semi-structured interviews as data collection instruments. The finding of the study showed that some people consult traditional healers during the night because they do not want to be seen, and some still believe that traditional healers consist of witchcraft. The study recommend that education could make our community conscious of the conventional health care system and work to make youth and scientific groups be able to know and understand the importance of traditional health care system, integration of traditional health and western healthcare system in the fight against coronavirus and Funding traditional health care system.

DOI 10.36096/brss.v6i2.5870 Crossref citations1 OpenAlex citations

Data coverage & freshness

Source coverage refers to this result set; a publication may occur in several sources. Sync times refer to contributing journals.

Missing abstracts: 0 · Missing authors: 0 · Missing publication dates: 0 · Dates without day precision: 0

SourceMost recent successful journal syncLatest attempt
crossref21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
ojs-rest21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 06:46 UTC
oai-pmh20 Oct 2026 19:55 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 20 Oct 2026 19:50 UTC
openalex-enrichment21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
Full import history & methodology →