CiteNScope — Scholarly Index & Analytics
Journals / IJRBS RESEARCH PROFILE

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science

ISSN 2147-4478 • Journal website ↗

Compare journals ↗
OpenAlex coverage 100.0% · 425/425 recordsLast OpenAlex observation 27 Oct 2026, 19:06 UTC
PUBLICATIONS425In the selected collection
CROSSREF CITATIONS2406425/425 with known counts
OPENALEX CITATIONS4286425/425 with known counts
OPENALEX MEAN10.08Per article with a known count
Explore articles 425 →
Filter collection Publication years, search & more
Reset
Research in focus

Most cited articles

Top 5 in the selected collection · Ranked by OpenAlex lifetime citations. Only articles with at least one known citation are included; source totals are never combined.

  1. 20OpenAlex citations
  2. 20OpenAlex citations
  3. 20OpenAlex citations
  4. 20OpenAlex citations
  5. The influence factors of tax avoidance in Indonesia

    2021 · Rosida Ibrahim · Sutrisno T · M Khoiru Rusydi

    20OpenAlex citations
The journal at a glance

Output and reach

Publication activity alongside incoming citations.

Publication activity

Articles grouped by publication year

Publications

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.

View data & coverage

Citations received

OpenAlex · year of the citing work

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage
Two perspectives on citations

Follow the research impact

Independent sources. Clear time scales.

Lifetime citations by publication year

Crossref and OpenAlex · separate totals for the same publication cohorts

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

Latest lifetime totals, grouped by the cited article’s year. These are not citations received in that year.

View data & coverage

Citations received each year

OpenAlex · incoming citation links grouped by citing-work year

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage
Annual history: 425/425 articles. Latest history observation: 2026-10-27T19:06:12.523450+00:00. Source totals are never added together.
Research side by side

Compare journals

Compare across all journals →

Select journals to compare the same collection filters. Source totals stay separate. These measures describe research activity, not journal quality.

Leave all unchecked to include every matching journal. Selection affects only comparison charts.
Display range
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science

Publications

Articles by publication year

View data & coverage

Crossref citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex · Citations received

By year of the citing work · 2017–2026

View data & coverage

2026 is year to date. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime charts share a citation scale. Unknown observations appear as gaps; known zero stays zero. Annual receipts use available OpenAlex histories and may not sum to lifetime totals. 0 undated publications excluded from publication-year charts.

Full research profile All distributions, publications, comparisons & data provenance
425 MATCHING PUBLICATIONSExplore results →Export CSV ↓
INDEXED PUBLICATIONS425
CROSSREF CITATIONS2406
CROSSREF · CITED PUBLICATIONS98.1%
CROSSREF · MEAN CITATIONS5.66

Crossref citation coverage: 425 / 425 publications (100.0%). Latest observation: 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC. Means and percentages use records with known counts.

OpenAlex / Separate citation source

A broader view of this research

DOI-matched OpenAlex observations for the same selected publications. These counts are separate from Crossref and are never added together.

OPENALEX CITATIONS4286
DOI MATCH COVERAGE100.0%425 / 425 publications
MEAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY10.08425 known · 0 unknown
MEDIAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY9

Observation range: 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC — 27 Oct 2026 19:06 UTC. Missing matches are not zero citations. Previous observations may remain if a refresh fails or a DOI no longer matches.

OpenAlex citation distributionNo citations01–506–2042521+0Unknown0

Institutions, countries & topics

OpenAlex affiliations and primary-topic classification. Each publication counts once per institution or country; multi-affiliated publications appear in multiple groups, so percentages can sum above 100%. Countries describe author affiliations, not nationality. Topics use one primary topic per publication.

Institutions

401 / 425 with data · 24 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 425 selected publications.

University of Brawijaya49 11.5%Huazhong University of Science and Technology24 5.6%Islamic University of Indonesia22 5.2%University of Johannesburg18 4.2%University of South Africa14 3.3%Durban University of Technology14 3.3%University of Zululand10 2.4%Karatina University9 2.1%United States International University Africa8 1.9%Nile University of Nigeria8 1.9%University of Limpopo8 1.9%Muhammadiyah University Purwokerto7 1.6%Walter Sisulu University7 1.6%University of KwaZulu-Natal7 1.6%Cape Peninsula University of Technology6 1.4%University of the Free State6 1.4%Istanbul Medipol University6 1.4%Divine Word College of Laoag6 1.4%Mangosuthu University of Technology5 1.2%University of Santo Tomas5 1.2%University of Nairobi4 0.9%President University4 0.9%Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya4 0.9%Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta4 0.9%College of Business Education4 0.9%Ba Isago University4 0.9%Istanbul University4 0.9%Tshwane University of Technology3 0.7%Duta Wacana Christian University3 0.7%Universitas Jambi3 0.7%Kenyatta University3 0.7%Chulalongkorn University3 0.7%National University of Lesotho3 0.7%North-West University3 0.7%Ibn Haldun University3 0.7%Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara3 0.7%Universitas Widyatama3 0.7%LSPR Institute of Communication and Business3 0.7%Marmara University3 0.7%University of Rajshahi3 0.7%Padjadjaran University3 0.7%State University of Malang2 0.5%Alliant University2 0.5%Bahçeşehir University2 0.5%University of Nottingham2 0.5%University of International Business and Economics2 0.5%Universitas Trisakti2 0.5%Mansoura University2 0.5%Hefei University of Technology2 0.5%China University of Political Science and Law2 0.5%Huazhong Agricultural University2 0.5%Muhammadiyah University of Yogyakarta2 0.5%Abdelmalek Essaâdi University2 0.5%Konya Food and Agriculture University2 0.5%Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim2 0.5%Pancasila University2 0.5%MANCOSA2 0.5%University of Barishal2 0.5%Yıldız Technical University2 0.5%International Islamic University Malaysia2 0.5%St. Paul's University2 0.5%Universitas Tribhuwana Tunggadewi2 0.5%Lebanese French University2 0.5%Istanbul Commerce University2 0.5%BRAC University2 0.5%Hacettepe University2 0.5%University of Reading2 0.5%Beykent University2 0.5%University of the Western Cape2 0.5%University of Port Harcourt1 0.2%University of Palangka Raya1 0.2%Rajamangala University of Technology1 0.2%Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah1 0.2%Gebze Technical University1 0.2%Jatiya Kabi Kazi Nazrul Islam University1 0.2%Tarumanagara University1 0.2%University of Fort Hare1 0.2%Western Illinois University1 0.2%University of Nigeria1 0.2%Mohammed V University1 0.2%University of Science and Technology of China1 0.2%Bahauddin Zakariya University1 0.2%Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli University1 0.2%UNESCO1 0.2%Cihan University-Erbil1 0.2%Vaal University of Technology1 0.2%Doğuş University1 0.2%MEF University1 0.2%Bacha Khan University1 0.2%Zhejiang Sci-Tech University1 0.2%Avrasya University1 0.2%Sultan Idris Education University1 0.2%Jimma University1 0.2%University of Mostar1 0.2%University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus1 0.2%North South University1 0.2%Mzumbe University1 0.2%University of Sargodha1 0.2%Queensland University of Technology1 0.2%University of Greater Manchester1 0.2%University of Georgia1 0.2%National University of Singapore1 0.2%Queen Mary University of London1 0.2%Gomal University1 0.2%University of the Punjab1 0.2%BRAC1 0.2%Karabük University1 0.2%Mercu Buana University1 0.2%Zhaoqing University1 0.2%King Abdulaziz University1 0.2%Universitas Syiah Kuala1 0.2%Government College University, Faisalabad1 0.2%Riphah International University1 0.2%Wuhan University of Technology1 0.2%Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University1 0.2%State University of Medan1 0.2%Ahi Evran University1 0.2%Universitas Airlangga1 0.2%University of Dhaka1 0.2%Nnamdi Azikiwe University1 0.2%Jenderal Soedirman University1 0.2%Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology1 0.2%Sriwijaya University1 0.2%Dzemal Bijedic University of Mostar1 0.2%Africa International University1 0.2%Botswana Accountancy College1 0.2%Government of South Africa1 0.2%Komar University of Science and Technology1 0.2%Comilla University1 0.2%HITEC University1 0.2%China University of Geosciences1 0.2%Perbanas Institute1 0.2%Khairun University1 0.2%Shaoguan University1 0.2%Laikipia University1 0.2%Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta1 0.2%Pan Africa Christian University1 0.2%Nasarawa State University1 0.2%University of Florida1 0.2%University of Zambia1 0.2%University of Malaya1 0.2%Universitas Persada Indonesia Yayasan Administrasi Indonesia1 0.2%GNA University1 0.2%Universitas Indo Global Mandiri1 0.2%Islamic University of Riau1 0.2%Kigali Independent University1 0.2%Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa1 0.2%Universitas Patria Artha1 0.2%Arab Open University1 0.2%Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya1 0.2%Universitas Mahasaraswati Denpasar1 0.2%Universitas Darul Ulum1 0.2%International University of Batam1 0.2%Universitas Wisnuwardhana Malang1 0.2%Ministry of Finance1 0.2%Trilogi University1 0.2%Universitas Sangga Buana YPKP1 0.2%Universitas Langlangbuana1 0.2%Koforidua Technical University1 0.2%Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Yogyakarta1 0.2%Preston University1 0.2%Universitas Hindu Indonesia1 0.2%National College of Business Administration and Economics1 0.2%Government College University, Lahore1 0.2%Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang1 0.2%Protestant University of Rwanda1 0.2%Faculty of Economics and Management of Sfax1 0.2%University of Kotli, Azad Jammu and Kashmir1 0.2%Dhaka Chamber of Commerce & Industry1 0.2%PPM School of Management1 0.2%Bajkul Milani Mahavidyalaya1 0.2%Army Institute of Business Administration, Savar1 0.2%Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Adhyaksa1 0.2%Politeknik Negeri Bali1 0.2%Universitas Sebelas April1 0.2%Seiyun University1 0.2%STMIK TIME1 0.2%Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Y.A.I1 0.2%Institut Bisnis dan Informatika Kosgoro 19571 0.2%Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Professional Manajemen College Indonesia1 0.2%Universitas Dharma AUB Surakarta1 0.2%FEU Diliman1 0.2%Boğaziçi University1 0.2%Rowan University1 0.2%Ladoke Akintola University of Technology1 0.2%Addis Ababa University1 0.2%Sultan Qaboos University1 0.2%Feng Chia University1 0.2%Koya University1 0.2%International Burch University1 0.2%Nottingham Trent University1 0.2%Atatürk University1 0.2%Lead City University1 0.2%University of Tabuk1 0.2%Midlands State University1 0.2%Drexel University1 0.2%Rajarata University of Sri Lanka1 0.2%Zhejiang Gongshang University1 0.2%University of Venda1 0.2%Bangladesh University of Textiles1 0.2%Telkom University1 0.2%Bucharest University of Economic Studies1 0.2%University of New England1 0.2%Tishk International University1 0.2%King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang1 0.2%National Cheng Kung University1 0.2%Southern Taiwan University of Science and Technology1 0.2%Bangladesh University of Professionals1 0.2%Hasanuddin University1 0.2%Kastamonu University1 0.2%Nelson Mandela University1 0.2%

Countries

400 / 425 with data · 25 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 425 selected publications.

Primary topics

425 / 425 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 425 selected publications.

Employee Performance and Management32 7.5%Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior19 4.5%Technology Adoption and User Behaviour16 3.8%Customer Service Quality and Loyalty16 3.8%Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences12 2.8%Employee Performance and Leadership11 2.6%Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance9 2.1%Financial Literacy and Behavior9 2.1%Public Administration in Developing Nations8 1.9%Corporate Governance and Financial Management8 1.9%Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting7 1.6%Environmental Sustainability in Business7 1.6%Corporate Taxation and Avoidance7 1.6%Consumer Behavior and Marketing Influence7 1.6%Innovation and Knowledge Management6 1.4%Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research6 1.4%Islamic Finance and Banking Studies6 1.4%Consumer Retail Behavior Studies6 1.4%COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts6 1.4%Human Resource and Talent Management6 1.4%Monetary Policy and Economic Impact5 1.2%Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification5 1.2%Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis5 1.2%Digital Marketing and Social Media5 1.2%Taxation and Compliance Studies5 1.2%Work-Family Balance Challenges4 0.9%Microfinance and Financial Inclusion4 0.9%FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance4 0.9%Working Capital and Financial Performance4 0.9%Education during COVID-19 pandemic4 0.9%Banking stability, regulation, efficiency3 0.7%Online and Blended Learning3 0.7%Quality and Supply Management3 0.7%Ethics in Business and Education3 0.7%Academic integrity and plagiarism3 0.7%Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation3 0.7%Employer Branding and e-HRM3 0.7%Teacher Professional Development and Motivation3 0.7%Teacher Education and Leadership Studies2 0.5%Corporate Finance and Governance2 0.5%Global trade and economics2 0.5%Traffic and Road Safety2 0.5%Intimate Partner and Family Violence2 0.5%Economic Growth and Productivity2 0.5%International Business and FDI2 0.5%Disaster Management and Resilience2 0.5%Occupational Health and Safety Research2 0.5%E-Government and Public Services2 0.5%Gender Diversity and Inequality2 0.5%Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering2 0.5%Smart Cities and Technologies2 0.5%Higher Education and Employability2 0.5%Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management2 0.5%Public-Private Partnership Projects2 0.5%Financial Analysis and Corporate Governance2 0.5%African Education and Politics2 0.5%Economic Growth and Fiscal Policies2 0.5%Halal products and consumer behavior2 0.5%Stress and Burnout Research2 0.5%Public Procurement and Policy2 0.5%School Leadership and Teacher Performance2 0.5%Organizational Change and Leadership2 0.5%Linguistic and Sociocultural Studies2 0.5%Local Economic Development and Planning2 0.5%Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society2 0.5%Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies2 0.5%EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning1 0.2%Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes1 0.2%Multi-Criteria Decision Making1 0.2%Science Education and Pedagogy1 0.2%scientometrics and bibliometrics research1 0.2%Reading and Literacy Development1 0.2%Electoral Systems and Political Participation1 0.2%Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques1 0.2%COVID-19 and Mental Health1 0.2%Public Policy and Administration Research1 0.2%Higher Education Research Studies1 0.2%Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights1 0.2%Efficiency Analysis Using DEA1 0.2%Agricultural Innovations and Practices1 0.2%Construction Project Management and Performance1 0.2%Global Financial Crisis and Policies1 0.2%Teaching and Learning Programming1 0.2%Sustainable Supply Chain Management1 0.2%Higher Education Governance and Development1 0.2%Family Dynamics and Relationships1 0.2%Early Childhood Education and Development1 0.2%Information and Cyber Security1 0.2%Digital Transformation in Industry1 0.2%Environmental Education and Sustainability1 0.2%Team Dynamics and Performance1 0.2%Disability Rights and Representation1 0.2%Evaluation of Teaching Practices1 0.2%Corruption and Economic Development1 0.2%Service and Product Innovation1 0.2%Hearing Impairment and Communication1 0.2%Problem and Project Based Learning1 0.2%Sex work and related issues1 0.2%Cultural Industries and Urban Development1 0.2%Gender Politics and Representation1 0.2%Mobile Health and mHealth Applications1 0.2%ICT Impact and Policies1 0.2%Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications1 0.2%Healthcare Systems and Reforms1 0.2%Survey Methodology and Nonresponse1 0.2%Employee Performance and Motivation1 0.2%Global trade, sustainability, and social impact1 0.2%Workplace Violence and Bullying1 0.2%Financial Distress and Bankruptcy Prediction1 0.2%Gambling Behavior and Treatments1 0.2%Education and Critical Thinking Development1 0.2%Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies1 0.2%Organizational Management and Innovation1 0.2%Sustainability in Higher Education1 0.2%Family Business Performance and Succession1 0.2%Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis1 0.2%Advanced Statistical Methods and Models1 0.2%Big Data and Business Intelligence1 0.2%Forecasting Techniques and Applications1 0.2%Knowledge Management and Sharing1 0.2%Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling1 0.2%Urban and Rural Development Challenges1 0.2%African cultural and philosophical studies1 0.2%Environmental Justice and Health Disparities1 0.2%Emotional Labor in Professions1 0.2%Workplace Spirituality and Leadership1 0.2%Educational Innovations and Challenges1 0.2%Global Trade and Competitiveness1 0.2%Software Engineering and Design Patterns1 0.2%Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies1 0.2%Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy1 0.2%Criminal Justice and Penology1 0.2%Corporate Identity and Reputation1 0.2%Digital Innovation in Industries1 0.2%COVID-19 Prevention and Impact1 0.2%Human Rights and Development1 0.2%Gender, Education, and Development Issues1 0.2%SMEs Development and Digital Marketing1 0.2%Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion1 0.2%Organizational Learning and Leadership1 0.2%Competitive and Knowledge Intelligence1 0.2%Local Governance and Development1 0.2%Robotic Process Automation Applications1 0.2%Human Resources and Workforce1 0.2%Labor Market and Education1 0.2%Education and Technology Integration1 0.2%Accounting and Financial Management1 0.2%Nostalgia and Consumer Behavior1 0.2%Education Systems and Policy1 0.2%Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts1 0.2%Benford’s Law and Fraud Detection1 0.2%Coaching Methods and Impact1 0.2%Vocational and Entrepreneurial Education1 0.2%Educational Leadership and Practices1 0.2%Cyberloafing and Workplace Behavior1 0.2%Education in Rural Contexts1 0.2%Generational Differences and Trends1 0.2%Economic and Technological Innovation1 0.2%Marriage and Family Dynamics1 0.2%Healthcare Quality and Satisfaction1 0.2%Artificial Intelligence in Education1 0.2%Educational Technology and E-Learning1 0.2%
Citation year / OpenAlex

Citations received over time

Incoming citations to the selected publications, grouped by the year of the citing work. This is separate from lifetime citation totals grouped by the cited article’s publication year.

The publication filters above define which articles receive the citations. The citation-year range below only controls this chart and the incoming-citation comparison. Removing publication-year filters includes older articles’ incoming citations too.

Annual history available for 425 / 425 selected publications. Supported display window: 2017–2026; 2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Missing histories and years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—); partial coverage can understate totals.

Annual-history observations (UTC): 2026-10-21T07:22:43.062987+00:00 — 2026-10-27T19:06:12.523450+00:00. Older observations may be retained after failed or incomplete refreshes.

OpenAlex · Citations received by year

1044522.00 2017 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 19 · Annual history coverage 425/4252018 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 32 · Annual history coverage 425/4252019 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 74 · Annual history coverage 425/4252020 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 108 · Annual history coverage 425/4252021 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 243 · Annual history coverage 425/4252022 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 446 · Annual history coverage 425/4252023 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 873 · Annual history coverage 425/4252024 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 1044 · Annual history coverage 425/4252025 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 898 · Annual history coverage 425/4252026 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 503 · Annual history coverage 425/425 2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
View openalex · citations received by year data & coverage
Citation yearJournal / scopeOpenAlex · Citations received by yearPublicationsAnnual history known
2017All selected publications19425425/425
2018All selected publications32425425/425
2019All selected publications74425425/425
2020All selected publications108425425/425
2021All selected publications243425425/425
2022All selected publications446425425/425
2023All selected publications873425425/425
2024All selected publications1044425425/425
2025All selected publications898425425/425
2026All selected publications503425425/425

Counts represent citation links, not unique citing papers across a journal: one paper citing two selected articles contributes two links. Older citations outside this window are excluded, so annual sums need not equal lifetime totals. OpenAlex methodology ↗

Crossref citation distribution

Latest Crossref totals for the selected publications; not citations received in the selected years.

Mean5.66
Median5
No citations81–52166–2020121+0Unknown0

Unknown counts are excluded from the mean, median and cited-publication rate.

Journal comparison

Same filters, source and counting rules across journals. Descriptive statistics, not a quality ranking.

Journal / publisherPublicationsCrossref citationsOpenAlex citationsOpenAlex coverageCrossref meanCrossref medianCrossref cited %*Crossref coverage
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science
SSBFNET
42524064286425/4255.66598.1425/425 · 100.0%

* Percentage among publications with a known citation count.

Explore publications

View all 425 →

Most cited · Crossref

JOURNAL ARTICLE

The racial hierarchisation of the isiXhosa language in South Africa

Mlamli Diko

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2023

Read abstract

The reality is that there is a relationship between language and race as advanced and qualified by ethnolinguistics. Such a relationship points to the subjugation of the isiXhosa language (habitually situated in South Africa), among other prescripts, which was fueled by racial hierarchization that ought to be debated within the paradigm of scholarly discourses. The subjugation, distortion and erosion of the isiXhosa language were led by the colonial, apartheid governance and administration that sought to impose censorship. Therefore, this article employs post-colonial theory to argue and scholarly prove that the language and many South African indigenous languages were oppressed based on racial notions that sought to accelerate neo-liberalist and imperialist perceptions. Hypothetically speaking, the isiXhosa language still suffers from the effects of (post)colonialism carried by colonial agents who continue to mock and humiliate the language. The debates and findings underline that such claims (racial hierarchization of the language) must be validated through theoretical and practical discourses. As a result, closing remarks infuse potential recommendations open to public scrutiny regarding the problematised phenomenon and/or conundrum.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v12i2.231816 Crossref citations18 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Influence of search engine optimization (SEO) on business performance

Mersid Poturak · Dino Keco · Eldar Tutnic

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2022

Read abstract

The aim of the paper is to investigate the impact of SEO on the business performance of a private university in Sarajevo. Thus, the main research question provides the finding on how does the implementation of SEO influence the performance of the business. Moreover, the tested hypothesis presents whether SEO positively influences the business performance of International Burch University (IBU). The research strategy is to analyze primary data derived from a case study, which is generated following a conversation with the Head of the IBU Marketing and PR team. The data sample is derived from Google Analytics (focusing on the number of visits and sessions, average engagement time, keywords and SERP positioning). Seobility tools are employed in data analysis. Business performance is calculated through the IBU CRM system, focusing on student enrolment. Findings indicate that increasing a site's rankings on search engine results pages (SERPs) led to a variety of positive outcomes for companies including an increase in the number of visitors to the site, an increase in the average amount of time users spent on the site, increased user engagement, and an increase in student enrollment, which resulted in IBU increased annual sales revenue. It will benefit many different groups, including the government, which will benefit in both microeconomic and macroeconomic senses, digital marketing enthusiasts and SEO experts, and the academic world, which will benefit as a framework for future studies and research in the field of SEO recognition and implementation in business queries.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v11i4.186516 Crossref citations19 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Assessing the role of entrepreneurship industry and SMEs to economic growth in South Africa

Trisha Ramsuraj

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2023

Read abstract

The study looked at the role and contribution of entrepreneurship industry to foster social and economic development through small, micro, and medium-sized businesses in South Africa. The conceptual research looked at the influence of small, micro, and medium-sized businesses (SMMEs) on South African development. The study's objective was to evaluate how small, medium-sized businesses (SMMEs) are now driving economic growth and solving social issues in a setting where big businesses and governments appear to be doing very little. As a result, the study examines how SMMEs might help the nation solve persistent societal evils including poverty, inequality, and social isolation. A desktop literature review research design was adopted to collect data on the role of entrepreneurship in South Africa, policies and practices of big business and government that exacerbate social issues in communities and impede socioeconomic development, as well as the specific roles that SMMEs play in achieving socioeconomic development goals. Findings from research indicate that, among other development outcomes, SMMEs are at the vanguard of creating jobs and fostering social and political justice in the nation. Future empirical studies that account for and evaluate the importance of SMME contributions to the construction of economic, social, and political justice in the nation are advised because this work lacks the empirical support necessary to substantiate its conclusions and observations.  

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v12i7.273015 Crossref citations17 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Challenges of school resources management for curriculum delivery in South African Rural High Schools: Principals' perceptions on the way forward

Oluwatoyin Ayodele Ajani

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2023

Read abstract

Various existing studies have established the multi-faceted nature of social inequalities in South Africa. The social inequalities also segregate schools into urban and rural schools, with adequate or lack of infrastructure influencing learners' performances in various South African schools. Hence, school principals are expected to manage the available resources to attain curriculum delivery and the whole school's performance. This qualitative study explored principals' perspectives on managing uneven school resources to achieve the goals and objectives of the education system. This study adopted an interpretive paradigm to understand the voices of 20 rural school principals in semi-structured interviews. The principals were purposively selected from 20 rural schools in King Cetshwayo district in KwaZulu-Natal. The audio-recorded interviews were thematically analysed to generate themes for findings and discussion. Findings revealed that most rural schools need more adequate school resources, and the principals need more support to attain quality curriculum delivery in schools adequately. The principals also lamented the high expectations placed on their schools for the academic excellence of their learners. Thus, the contents of each subject curriculum could not be efficiently unpacked and delivered to learners. The study, therefore, recommends improvement in resource provision to rural schools. At the same time, principals should be capacitated on effectively managing available school resources to achieve desired and efficient curriculum implementation in rural schools.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v12i6.270915 Crossref citations18 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

South African rural students’ adoption and use of learning management systems

Oluwafemi Sunday Afolabi · Oluwatoyin Ayodele Ajani

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2023

Read abstract

This discursive study examined the use of the learning management system (LMS) Moodle in rural South African universities. Moodle, a popular online programme, can be used to deliver learning activities, as well as online learning evaluations. The authors discuss LMS usage and adoption in higher education. LMS is a global online platform used in higher education institutions in developed countries across the globe, for decades. It has improved the education system in these developed countries by providing diverse students with learning opportunities, in their comfort zones. Despite the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown, most developed nations adopted online methods, like LMS, for teaching and learning. Unfortunately, the pandemic lockdown in many developing nations, like South Africa, severely disrupted curriculum and educational activities for months. The South African Department of Higher Education and Training reviewed curriculum delivery approaches, to save academic activities due to COVID-19. Thus, it deemed online learning a higher education alternative to face-to-face curriculum instruction, during the lockdown to salvage the academic calendar, with LMS used as ideal online learning for student engagement.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v12i4.252114 Crossref citations16 OpenAlex citations

Selected results

JOURNAL ARTICLE

The impact of financial literacy on the performance of Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs): A review of literature

Tshepang Molosiwa · Jacob Holland

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2025

Read abstract

This study investigates the impact of financial literacy on small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), focusing on its role in enhancing financial decision-making, access to finance, fintech adoption, and risk management. Grounded in Resource-Based Theory (RBT) and Human Capital Theory (HCT), financial literacy is positioned as both a strategic capability and a form of human capital that strengthens firm resilience and competitiveness. A systematic literature review was conducted, synthesising evidence from 18 empirical studies published between 2016 and 2024. Findings reveal that financial literacy significantly improves SMEs’ ability to budget, manage debt, and evaluate investment decisions. It also enhances creditworthiness through improved financial record-keeping, thereby facilitating access to financing. Moreover, digital financial literacy is identified as a catalyst for fintech adoption, which contributes to cost reduction, operational efficiency, and financial transparency. The study concludes that targeted financial literacy interventions are essential, especially in developing economies where SMEs face structural constraints. It calls for integrated financial education strategies involving policymakers, financial institutions, and SME development agencies. Further empirical research is recommended to examine the long-term and digital dimensions of financial literacy as a driver of sustainable SME performance.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v14i3.41579 Crossref citations8 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Bridging causal explanation and predictive modeling: the role of PLS-SEM

Mei-Lan Lin · Linh Lan Huynh

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2024

Read abstract

Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling has gained considerable attention across diverse academic fields, including business, social sciences, marketing, and management. A key challenge in utilizing PLS-SEM is balancing explanatory and predictive power when selecting the most suitable model from competing alternatives. This paper explores the effectiveness of various quality criteria for evaluating causal-predictive models, with a focus on resistance to change in Vietnamese SMEs. The study emphasizes the importance of both in-sample and out-of-sample predictions, using metrics such as R², BIC, AIC, Q², RMSE, MAE, and CVPAT. The findings reveal that traditional criteria like R² may not be sufficient for identifying the best model, while PLSpredict, CVPAT, BIC, and AIC offer superior performance in determining the optimal balance between explanatory and predictive capabilities. These insights provide practical implications for researchers and practitioners, highlighting the need to tailor model selection to specific objectives, such as theory development or real-world forecasting. For practitioners, the study underscores the benefits of leveraging simpler, more generalizable models for robust decision-making in dynamic or resource-constrained environments.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v13i10.38886 Crossref citations8 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Conflict resolution in indigenous communities: A social work perspective

Rakgwata Phoke Alpha · Sekgobela Tumelo

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2024

Read abstract

Indigenous communities possess rich traditions of conflict resolution rooted in their cultural values, collective decision-making, and community involvement. However, the imposition of Western legal frameworks and colonial histories has often disrupted these practices, leading to increased tensions and unresolved conflicts. This study explored conflict resolution within Indigenous communities, emphasizing the role of social work in facilitating culturally appropriate processes. The study employed a qualitative approach, incorporating interviews with Indigenous leaders, social workers, and community members, alongside a review of relevant literature on traditional practices and social work interventions. Social workers play a crucial role as facilitators, helping to navigate tensions and bridging gaps between traditional practices and contemporary needs. Challenges include a lack of cultural competency and the need for ongoing community engagement. The integration of Indigenous knowledge systems into conflict resolution practices enhance outcomes and foster healing. Social workers prioritize cultural humility and active listening, ensuring that Indigenous voices lead the resolution process. By supporting the reclamation of traditional conflict resolution methods and advocating for culturally sensitive practices, social workers empowered Indigenous communities, promote resilience, and facilitate more effective conflict resolution. This perspective underscores the necessity of collaboration, respect, and recognition of Indigenous sovereignty in all social work interventions.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v13i10.37896 Crossref citations7 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

The emergence of artificial intelligence in the higher education

Oluwatoyin Ajani · Morakinyo Akintolu · Sunday Oluwafemi Afolabi

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2024

Read abstract

This study presents a systematic literature review analysing the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on higher education, focusing on its methods, results, and implications. By synthesising a diverse range of academic papers, the review explores how AI technologies influence educational standards and practices in higher education institutions. Findings reveal that AI has the potential to enhance the quality of higher education by diversifying teaching responsibilities, customising learning experiences, and employing intelligent, adaptive teaching strategies. These capabilities position AI as a transformative tool for improving educational delivery and outcomes. However, the study also highlights significant challenges associated with integrating AI into higher education. These challenges include delineating the appropriate scope of AI use, addressing inequalities in access to digital resources, and ensuring adequate training and support for educators and students. The review underscores the importance of understanding these complexities to guide the development of effective strategies and policies that optimise AI's potential while mitigating its limitations. The review offers critical insights into the dual role of AI in higher education, where it can either advance or hinder educational standards depending on how it is implemented. By examining the advantages, limitations, and broader consequences of AI-powered instructional tools, this study provides a comprehensive perspective on the intricate relationship between AI and educational quality. The findings aim to inform educators, policymakers, and stakeholders about the opportunities and challenges of adopting AI in higher education, contributing to the development of inclusive, innovative, and sustainable educational practices.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v13i8.350712 Crossref citations12 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Has generative AI become of age

Meshel Muzuva · Helper Zhou · Robert Zondo

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2024

Read abstract

Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in South Africa previously faced challenges due to limited resources, restricted access to technology, and the need to constantly adapt to a dynamic business environment. The introduction of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) emerged as a potential solution to these issues, promising to enhance operational efficiency and strategic decision-making. As a representative of developing economies, South Africa experienced a growing interest in AI technologies. This study was conducted to explore the impact of generative AI on SME productivity in South Africa, an area which had been underexplored. Employing a qualitative methodology, the study evaluated the current state and implications of generative AI in South African SMEs. It involved in-depth interviews to gather perceptions, experiences, challenges, and benefits from SME owners and managers regarding the adoption of generative AI technologies. The findings analysed via R Statistical Software revealed significant insights into the specific areas where generative AI substantially impacted SME productivity. It also identified the challenges and opportunities associated with the adoption of generative AI by SMEs, as well as the potential long-term implications. Key findings included notable improvements in data-driven decision-making, operational efficiencies, and market expansion strategies. However, the study also highlighted barriers such as the lack of technical expertise, initial setup costs, and concerns over data security. Overall, the impact of generative AI on SMEs in South Africa was found to be predominantly positive, paving the way for further technological advancements and adoption in the sector.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v13i7.35766 Crossref citations6 OpenAlex citations

Data coverage & freshness

Source coverage refers to this result set; a publication may occur in several sources. Sync times refer to contributing journals.

Missing abstracts: 0 · Missing authors: 0 · Missing publication dates: 0 · Dates without day precision: 0

SourceMost recent successful journal syncLatest attempt
crossref21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
ojs-rest21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 06:46 UTC
oai-pmh20 Oct 2026 19:55 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 20 Oct 2026 19:50 UTC
openalex-enrichment21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
Full import history & methodology →