CiteNScope — Scholarly Index & Analytics
Journals / IJRBS RESEARCH PROFILE

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science

ISSN 2147-4478 • Journal website ↗

Compare journals ↗
OpenAlex coverage 100.0% · 123/123 recordsLast OpenAlex observation 27 Oct 2026, 19:05 UTC
PUBLICATIONS123In the selected collection
CROSSREF CITATIONS356123/123 with known counts
OPENALEX CITATIONS859123/123 with known counts
OPENALEX MEAN6.98Per article with a known count
Explore articles 123 →
Filter collection Publication years, search & more
Reset
Research in focus

Most cited articles

Top 5 in the selected collection · Ranked by Crossref lifetime citations. Only articles with at least one known citation are included; source totals are never combined.

  1. 40Crossref citations
  2. 17Crossref citations
  3. Understanding the insight of factors affecting mHealth adoption

    2019 · Md. Abdul Kaium · Yukun Bao · Mohammad Zahedul Alam

    13Crossref citations
  4. 13Crossref citations
  5. Competency Model of Social Entrepreneurs

    2019 · Purnaning Dhyah Guritno · Haryono Suyono · Sunarjo Sunarjo

    12Crossref citations
The journal at a glance

Output and reach

Publication activity alongside incoming citations.

Publication activity

Articles grouped by publication year

Publications

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.

View data & coverage

Citations received

OpenAlex · year of the citing work

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage
Two perspectives on citations

Follow the research impact

Independent sources. Clear time scales.

Lifetime citations by publication year

Crossref and OpenAlex · separate totals for the same publication cohorts

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

Latest lifetime totals, grouped by the cited article’s year. These are not citations received in that year.

View data & coverage

Citations received each year

OpenAlex · incoming citation links grouped by citing-work year

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage
Annual history: 123/123 articles. Latest history observation: 2026-10-27T19:05:16.152627+00:00. Source totals are never added together.
Research side by side

Compare journals

Compare across all journals →

Select journals to compare the same collection filters. Source totals stay separate. These measures describe research activity, not journal quality.

Leave all unchecked to include every matching journal. Selection affects only comparison charts.
Display range
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science

Publications

Articles by publication year

View data & coverage

Crossref citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex · Citations received

By year of the citing work · 2017–2026

View data & coverage

2026 is year to date. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime charts share a citation scale. Unknown observations appear as gaps; known zero stays zero. Annual receipts use available OpenAlex histories and may not sum to lifetime totals. 0 undated publications excluded from publication-year charts.

Full research profile All distributions, publications, comparisons & data provenance
123 MATCHING PUBLICATIONSExplore results →Export CSV ↓
INDEXED PUBLICATIONS123
CROSSREF CITATIONS356
CROSSREF · CITED PUBLICATIONS72.4%
CROSSREF · MEAN CITATIONS2.89

Crossref citation coverage: 123 / 123 publications (100.0%). Latest observation: 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC. Means and percentages use records with known counts.

OpenAlex / Separate citation source

A broader view of this research

DOI-matched OpenAlex observations for the same selected publications. These counts are separate from Crossref and are never added together.

OPENALEX CITATIONS859
DOI MATCH COVERAGE100.0%123 / 123 publications
MEAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY6.98123 known · 0 unknown
MEDIAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY4

Observation range: 22 Oct 2026 01:00 UTC — 27 Oct 2026 19:05 UTC. Missing matches are not zero citations. Previous observations may remain if a refresh fails or a DOI no longer matches.

OpenAlex citation distributionNo citations161–5566–204621+5Unknown0

Institutions, countries & topics

OpenAlex affiliations and primary-topic classification. Each publication counts once per institution or country; multi-affiliated publications appear in multiple groups, so percentages can sum above 100%. Countries describe author affiliations, not nationality. Topics use one primary topic per publication.

Institutions

113 / 123 with data · 10 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 123 selected publications.

United States International University Africa23 18.7%Huazhong University of Science and Technology11 8.9%Karatina University9 7.3%Universitas Sumatera Utara5 4.1%Lampung University4 3.3%Chulalongkorn University4 3.3%University of Brawijaya4 3.3%Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya4 3.3%Africa International University3 2.4%Lebanese French University3 2.4%University of Santo Tomas3 2.4%Zhejiang Sci-Tech University2 1.6%Hefei University of Technology2 1.6%Universitas Airlangga2 1.6%Istanbul Medipol University2 1.6%University of Port Harcourt1 0.8%Universitas Kristen Indonesia1 0.8%Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah1 0.8%University of Science and Technology of China1 0.8%Alliant University1 0.8%Bahauddin Zakariya University1 0.8%Bahçeşehir University1 0.8%University of Nairobi1 0.8%State University of New York1 0.8%Anadolu University1 0.8%Istanbul Şehir University1 0.8%Daemen College1 0.8%Sultan Idris Education University1 0.8%Jimma University1 0.8%TU Wien1 0.8%Moi University1 0.8%Universitas Jambi1 0.8%State University of Semarang1 0.8%Kenyatta University1 0.8%University of Greater Manchester1 0.8%Binus University1 0.8%Shiraz University1 0.8%Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember1 0.8%Universitas Syiah Kuala1 0.8%President University1 0.8%Amity University1 0.8%Wuhan University of Technology1 0.8%China University of Geosciences1 0.8%Laikipia University1 0.8%Manado State University1 0.8%University of Benghazi1 0.8%Islamic University of Indonesia1 0.8%Universitas Persada Indonesia Yayasan Administrasi Indonesia1 0.8%Universitas Tribhuwana Tunggadewi1 0.8%Istanbul 29 Mayis University1 0.8%Beykoz Üniversitesi1 0.8%Jagannath University1 0.8%Muhammadiyah University Purwokerto1 0.8%Universitas Bandar Lampung1 0.8%Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara1 0.8%Preston University1 0.8%Universitas Hindu Indonesia1 0.8%National College of Business Administration and Economics1 0.8%Government College University, Lahore1 0.8%Salale University1 0.8%Dhaka Chamber of Commerce & Industry1 0.8%STMIK TIME1 0.8%The Co-operative University of Kenya1 0.8%Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Professional Manajemen College Indonesia1 0.8%Boğaziçi University1 0.8%Addis Ababa University1 0.8%Istanbul Technical University1 0.8%Istanbul Commerce University1 0.8%Sam Ratulangi University1 0.8%SUNY Plattsburgh1 0.8%Istanbul University1 0.8%University of Prishtina1 0.8%University of Pennsylvania1 0.8%Chang Jung Christian University1 0.8%Bangladesh University of Textiles1 0.8%

Countries

112 / 123 with data · 11 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 123 selected publications.

Primary topics

123 / 123 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 123 selected publications.

Employee Performance and Management9 7.3%Customer Service Quality and Loyalty7 5.7%Employee Performance and Leadership6 4.9%Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior5 4.1%Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences4 3.3%Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance3 2.4%Economic Growth and Productivity3 2.4%Gender Diversity and Inequality3 2.4%Corporate Finance and Governance2 1.6%Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research2 1.6%Technology Adoption and User Behaviour2 1.6%Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting2 1.6%Banking stability, regulation, efficiency2 1.6%Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification2 1.6%Quality and Supply Management2 1.6%Team Dynamics and Performance2 1.6%Corruption and Economic Development2 1.6%Mobile Health and mHealth Applications2 1.6%Healthcare Systems and Reforms2 1.6%Financial Analysis and Corporate Governance2 1.6%Employer Branding and e-HRM2 1.6%Global Trade and Competitiveness2 1.6%Public Administration in Developing Nations2 1.6%Management and Organizational Practices2 1.6%Human Resource and Talent Management2 1.6%Agriculture and Agroindustry Studies2 1.6%Consumer Behavior and Marketing Influence2 1.6%Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling1 0.8%Construction Project Management and Performance1 0.8%International Business and FDI1 0.8%Climate change impacts on agriculture1 0.8%Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis1 0.8%Sustainable Supply Chain Management1 0.8%Higher Education Governance and Development1 0.8%Design Education and Practice1 0.8%Career Development and Diversity1 0.8%Accounting and Organizational Management1 0.8%Occupational Health and Safety Research1 0.8%Environmental Sustainability in Business1 0.8%Microfinance and Financial Inclusion1 0.8%Market Dynamics and Volatility1 0.8%Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering1 0.8%Stock Market Forecasting Methods1 0.8%Gender Politics and Representation1 0.8%Corporate Taxation and Avoidance1 0.8%Consumer Retail Behavior Studies1 0.8%Survey Methodology and Nonresponse1 0.8%Employee Performance and Motivation1 0.8%Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management1 0.8%Agricultural risk and resilience1 0.8%Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets1 0.8%Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation1 0.8%Knowledge Management and Sharing1 0.8%Cooperative Studies and Economics1 0.8%Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology1 0.8%Workplace Spirituality and Leadership1 0.8%Digital Economy and Work Transformation1 0.8%Halal products and consumer behavior1 0.8%Financial Reporting and Valuation Research1 0.8%Oil Palm Production and Sustainability1 0.8%Healthcare Quality and Management1 0.8%Sustainable Development and Environmental Management1 0.8%Occupational Health and Safety Management1 0.8%Local Governance and Development1 0.8%Ego Development and Educational Practices1 0.8%Accounting and Financial Management1 0.8%Financial Literacy and Behavior1 0.8%Coaching Methods and Impact1 0.8%Corporate Governance and Financial Management1 0.8%Waste Management and Recycling1 0.8%Banking Sector Performance and Management1 0.8%Fisheries and Aquaculture Studies1 0.8%
Citation year / OpenAlex

Citations received over time

Incoming citations to the selected publications, grouped by the year of the citing work. This is separate from lifetime citation totals grouped by the cited article’s publication year.

The publication filters above define which articles receive the citations. The citation-year range below only controls this chart and the incoming-citation comparison. Removing publication-year filters includes older articles’ incoming citations too.

Annual history available for 123 / 123 selected publications. Supported display window: 2017–2026; 2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Missing histories and years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—); partial coverage can understate totals.

Annual-history observations (UTC): 2026-10-22T01:00:52.714399+00:00 — 2026-10-27T19:05:16.152627+00:00. Older observations may be retained after failed or incomplete refreshes.

OpenAlex · Citations received by year

19798.50 2017 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 123/1232018 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 2 · Annual history coverage 123/1232019 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 18 · Annual history coverage 123/1232020 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 69 · Annual history coverage 123/1232021 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 120 · Annual history coverage 123/1232022 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 143 · Annual history coverage 123/1232023 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 197 · Annual history coverage 123/1232024 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 156 · Annual history coverage 123/1232025 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 115 · Annual history coverage 123/1232026 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 39 · Annual history coverage 123/123 2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
View openalex · citations received by year data & coverage
Citation yearJournal / scopeOpenAlex · Citations received by yearPublicationsAnnual history known
2017All selected publications0123123/123
2018All selected publications2123123/123
2019All selected publications18123123/123
2020All selected publications69123123/123
2021All selected publications120123123/123
2022All selected publications143123123/123
2023All selected publications197123123/123
2024All selected publications156123123/123
2025All selected publications115123123/123
2026All selected publications39123123/123

Counts represent citation links, not unique citing papers across a journal: one paper citing two selected articles contributes two links. Older citations outside this window are excluded, so annual sums need not equal lifetime totals. OpenAlex methodology ↗

Crossref citation distribution

Latest Crossref totals for the selected publications; not citations received in the selected years.

Mean2.89
Median1
No citations341–5716–201721+1Unknown0

Unknown counts are excluded from the mean, median and cited-publication rate.

Journal comparison

Same filters, source and counting rules across journals. Descriptive statistics, not a quality ranking.

Journal / publisherPublicationsCrossref citationsOpenAlex citationsOpenAlex coverageCrossref meanCrossref medianCrossref cited %*Crossref coverage
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science
SSBFNET
123356859123/1232.89172.4123/123 · 100.0%

* Percentage among publications with a known citation count.

Explore publications

View all 123 →

Most cited · Crossref

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Effect of customer loyalty program on customer satisfaction and its impact on customer loyalty

Salihah Khairawati

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2019

Read abstract

The aim of this research is to examine the effect of the customer loyalty program on customer satisfaction and its impact on customer loyalty. This program is developed by the company in order to increase customer satisfaction. Optimal customer satisfaction will be able to create customer loyalty. For a company, customer loyalty will guarantee the company’s income to be constantly optimal. The research is conducted using the survey method involving 110 customers and 100 feasible data used. The sampling technique used is judgment sampling and data collected through the questionnaire. It uses SEM in examining hypotheses assisted by software AMOS version 20.0. Member card significantly affects customer satisfaction, while discount promo has no significant effect on customer satisfaction and it also doesn’t affect customer loyalty. Member cards and discount promo have a direct effect on customer loyalty. In general, it can be understood that the customer loyalty program applied by Alfamart either member card or discount promo affects customer satisfaction and has an impact on customer loyalty. This research gives input to retail business managers in managing customer satisfaction through the proper development of customer loyalty programs.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v9i1.60340 Crossref citations93 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Effect of Organizational Culture on Organizational Citizenship Behavior with Organizational Commitment as a Mediator

Mira Skar Arumi · Neil Aldrin · Tri Ratna Murti

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2019

Read abstract

The contribution of organizational culture to the organization which includes the uniqueness of values, behavior, and psychology is needed by the organization. It also includes trust, experience, ways of thinking, and organizational expectations. Improving employee behavior into organizational citizenship behavior is needed by every organization. To bring OCB to employees, a well-formed commitment is needed. This study uses a quantitative approach to test 3 hypotheses using path analysis to see the role of mediation. Respondents numbered 169 in this study. The results found in this study are that mediators play a maximum role between organizational culture and OCB.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v8i4.27417 Crossref citations47 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Understanding the insight of factors affecting mHealth adoption

Md. Abdul Kaium · Yukun Bao · Mohammad Zahedul Alam · Najmul Hasan

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2019

Read abstract

Numerous studies have addressed the different context of mHealth services among diverse user groups. But due to a lack of understanding the insight of factors affecting the mHealth adoption, it’s crucial need to conduct a systematic review on this issue. The objective of this study was to synthesize the present understanding of the influential factors of mHealth adoption. We performed a systematic literature search on eight electronically reputed scientific databases from 2010 to March 2019, such as Science Direct, Springer, IEEE Xplore, JMIR, Taylor & Francis, Emerald, Mary Ann Liebert and Google Scholar. This was accomplished by gathering data including authors, countries, years, target population, sample size, models/theories, and key influential factors. Primarily, a total of 2969 potentially relatable papers were found, of which 50 met the inclusion criteria. It was found that cross-sectional approach, survey methods and structural equation modeling (SEM) were the most explored research methodologies whereas PLS-SEM was found to be the largest used analysis tools. From the analysis, a total of ninety-four influential factors were clearly recognized and the findings represent that the following 15 factors appeared most recurrently and significantly; perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, social-influence, subjective norms, self-efficacy, trust, facilitating conditions, technology anxiety, performance expectancy, effort expectancy, cost, attitude, resistance to change, perceived privacy and security, and perceived behavioral control. The research results have significant theoretical and practical implications for mHealth services providers, researchers and policy makers with regards to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) allied to healthcare.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v8i6.52213 Crossref citations15 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

The Impact of Audit Committee Characteristics on Environmental and Social Disclosures

Ali Altuğ Biçer · Imad Mohamed Feneir

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2019

Read abstract

The main reasons for corporate participation in environmental and social disclosure are stability, development, and continuity through participation in protecting the environment and optimizing the use of available resources. As well as the company practices and participation in society of the most important means to create a good image of the company in the community. There is a rise demand for companies to take accountability for their environmental and societal impacts. A core role of the Audit Committee (AC) is to help the board of directors in overseeing the company's reporting policy and oversees the quality of financial reporting in the company. This study examined the impact of audit committee characteristics on the level of environmental and social disclosures in listed banks in Borsa Istanbul. The results of the study showed that there is no statistically significant relationship between the characteristics of the audit committee and the environmental and social disclosures. Consequently, these characteristics have no effect on the volume or type of disclosure and their inability to predict them.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v8i3.26213 Crossref citations21 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Competency Model of Social Entrepreneurs

Purnaning Dhyah Guritno · Haryono Suyono · Sunarjo Sunarjo

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2019

Read abstract

Social entrepreneurship is a potential alternative to address social problems but social business still needs to be strengthened to provide far-reaching impact. One strategy to flourish is benchmarking against successful social enterpreneurs because previous studies show that entrepreneur’s competence is a determinant of small-medium business performance and growth. Social entrepreneur competencies which drive social business success and how these competencies are developed, unfortunately have not clear yet. This study aims to build a competency model for social entrepreneurs and to find out pattern (in method, period, sources) for developing competencies by studying successful Indonesian social entrepreneurs. The reports on social entrepreneur competency model presented in this paper. This research adopt qualitative approach using multiple case study design. Data collected by indepth interviewing 29 informants, studying documents and conducting field observation in eight cities. Results show that successful social entrepreneurs have shared competencies which indicate existence of social entrepreneur competency model. The result of this study complements empirical studies in social entrepreneurs’ competencies by showing competencies that drive success of social business i.e: Achievement orientation, Persistence, Initiative, Courage to take opportunities, Networking, Influencing others, Team leadership, Developing others, Teamwork-Colaboration, Orientation to help and serve others, Mission orientation, Affiliate interest, Creative problem solving. The finding has direct implication on social entrepreneur education and development programs included method, materials, design and sources of development because the competencies determine the success constitute mostly of attitudes, motives and traits instead of knowledge and skills.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v8i3.25612 Crossref citations17 OpenAlex citations

Selected results

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Improving the efficiency of human resources with the use of new technologies and reorganization process

Arben Tërstena · Arta Jashari Goga · Bujar Jashari

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2019

Read abstract

Information technology (IT) as a structural factor and instrument transforms the architecture of organizations, business processes, and communication which is increasingly integrated into human resource management (HRM). It is an important part of the human resources work process. IT is designed to support HR professionals at all stages of management. This paper is focused on analyzing how information technology affects the improvement of human resource efficiency. The survey was conducted in private enterprises in Ferizaj, region (Kosovo), through questionnaires. Twenty employees/managers of manufacturing enterprises were surveyed who were well informed about the role of human resources in general and the impact on the efficiency of information technology. The results of the empirical study show that the use of new information technology improves the efficiency of HR and enhances the performance of the enterprise.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v9i1.6067 Crossref citations20 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

The origin of oil palm social conflict in Laman Satong, Ketapang, Kalimantan Barat, Indonesia

Slamet Haryono · Rizabuana Ismail · Zulkifli Lubis · Sismudjito Sismudjito

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2019

Read abstract

This research aims to describe the process and reveal the origin of social conflict in the incoming oil palm investment. Twelve Subjects are involved in this research, located in Laman Satong Village, Ketapang District, Kalimantan Barat Province, Indonesia in February-May 2019. The results showed that a threat to society's identity meaning which depends on the forest was an origin of social conflict. The incoming of oil palm investment was considered as a threat because of the limited formal communication channel, through socialization meetings This limitation indicated to slow down their stock of knowledge renewal, that related to their future fate. Thus, it creates worries that caused resistance and internal community conflict itself. Academically this research contributes to establishing the social conflict theory and stock of knowledge concept in terms of conflict in the incoming of oil palm investment.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v9i1.6000 Crossref citations1 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Influence of relationship management on organizational performance among insurance companies in Kenya

Grace Mwangi · D.M. Gichuhi · S.M Macharia

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2019

Read abstract

This study sought to establish the influence of understanding, stakeholder requirements, good rapport with stakeholders, healthy competition with competitors, conflict resolution, and effective communication on organizational performance among insurance companies in Kenya. Positivism research philosophy was adopted for the study. Descriptive and explanatory cross-sectional research designs were used. Data analysis was conducted using descriptive statistics and inferential analysis. The study concluded as follows: (i) Understanding stakeholder requirements, creating and maintain good rapport with stakeholders, healthy competition with competitors, conflict resolution and effective communication were deployed to a moderate extent in insurance companies in Kenya, (ii) There was a strong positive correlation between organisation performance, understanding stakeholder requirements, good rapport with stakeholders, conflict resolution, and effective communication, (iii) There was a weak positive correlation between organisation performance and healthy competition, (iv) Understanding stakeholder requirements, creating and maintain good rapport with stakeholders, healthy competition with competitors, conflict resolution and effective communication had significant influence on the performance of insurance companies in Kenya. (v) Relationship management has a significant influence on organizational performance.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v9i1.5800 Crossref citations3 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Diversity perspectives in teamwork

Nanik Suryani · Ade Rustiana · Muhsin Muhsin · Wisudani Rahmaningtyas

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2019

Read abstract

This study aims to examine the implementation of diversity in different work teams. The observed aspects include the process of recruitment, cooperation between members, educational background, and division of workload. This research using a qualitative approach, interviews were conducted with 20 informants from 6 work teams. This study concludes that (i) the recruitment process was the absolute right of the leadership, (ii) Some work teams need members who have an educational background that is appropriate to their field of work, (iii) several junior lecturers complained about the quantity of work that was not comparable to other team members.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v9i1.6073 Crossref citations3 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

A link between top managers’ perception and corporate social responsibility

Milkiyas Ayele Tefera · He Yuanqiong · Liu Luming

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2019

Read abstract

Though it is called corporate social responsibility (CSR), it is the people in the organization particularly, top managers who develop and get implemented corporate social policies. Organization behavior is the reflection of their top managers. However, exploration of the role of top managers in spreading CSR in the organization is scant in the literature. The purpose of this paper is to explore the impact of top managers’ CSR perceptions on firm-level CSR in Ethiopia. Structured questionnaires were used to collect data from 294 executive managers of four sectors, namely textile, food, bank, and floriculture industries. Multiple hierarchical regression and process macro 3.3 were employed to analyze the data with the aid of SPSS. The analysis reveals that top managers’ CSR perception is a significant predictor of firm-level CSR behaviors. The result also shows that corporate ethical culture fully mediates the relationship between top managers’ CSR perception and organization CSR. Moreover, transformational leadership has a moderating effect between the direct top managers’ CSR perception and firm-level CSR relationship.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v9i1.6054 Crossref citations7 OpenAlex citations

Data coverage & freshness

Source coverage refers to this result set; a publication may occur in several sources. Sync times refer to contributing journals.

Missing abstracts: 0 · Missing authors: 0 · Missing publication dates: 0 · Dates without day precision: 0

SourceMost recent successful journal syncLatest attempt
crossref21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
ojs-rest21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 06:46 UTC
oai-pmh20 Oct 2026 19:55 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 20 Oct 2026 19:50 UTC
openalex-enrichment21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
Full import history & methodology →