CiteNScope — Scholarly Index & Analytics
Discover / Analytics RESEARCH INTELLIGENCE
CiteNScope / Analytics

Explore the evidence.
Understand the reach.

Research across participating journals · All insights follow your collection filters.

Compare journals ↗
OpenAlex coverage 100.0% · 4/4 recordsLast OpenAlex observation 23 Oct 2026, 10:27 UTC
PUBLICATIONS4In the selected collection
CROSSREF CITATIONS14/4 with known counts
OPENALEX CITATIONS24/4 with known counts
OPENALEX MEAN0.5Per article with a known count
Explore articles 4 →
Filter collection Publication years, search & more
Reset
institution: University of South Africa Remove ×topic: Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences Remove ×
Your research collection

Output and reach

Publication activity alongside incoming citations.

Publication activity

Articles grouped by publication year

Publications

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.

View data & coverage

Citations received

OpenAlex · year of the citing work

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage

Research landscape

Leading affiliations and themes in this collection.

Full distributions & methodology ↓

Institutions

University of South Africa4University of Limpopo14/4 records with data

Countries

South Africa44/4 records with data

Primary topics

Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences44/4 records with data
Two perspectives on citations

Follow the research impact

Independent sources. Clear time scales.

Lifetime citations by publication year

Crossref and OpenAlex · separate totals for the same publication cohorts

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

Latest lifetime totals, grouped by the cited article’s year. These are not citations received in that year.

View data & coverage

Citations received each year

OpenAlex · incoming citation links grouped by citing-work year

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage
Annual history: 4/4 articles. Latest history observation: 2026-10-23T10:27:37.862260+00:00. Source totals are never added together.
Research side by side

Compare journals

Select journals to compare the same collection filters. Source totals stay separate. These measures describe research activity, not journal quality.

Leave all unchecked to include every matching journal. Selection affects only comparison charts.
Display range
International Journal of Business Ecosystem & StrategyInternational Journal of Research in Business and Social Science

Publications

Articles by publication year

View data & coverage

Crossref citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex · Citations received

By year of the citing work · 2017–2026

View data & coverage

2026 is year to date. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime charts share a citation scale. Unknown observations appear as gaps; known zero stays zero. Annual receipts use available OpenAlex histories and may not sum to lifetime totals. 0 undated publications excluded from publication-year charts.

Full analytics report All distributions, publications, comparisons & data provenance
4 MATCHING PUBLICATIONSExplore results →Export CSV ↓
INDEXED PUBLICATIONS4
CROSSREF CITATIONS1
CROSSREF · CITED PUBLICATIONS25.0%
CROSSREF · MEAN CITATIONS0.25

Crossref citation coverage: 4 / 4 publications (100.0%). Latest observation: 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC. Means and percentages use records with known counts.

OpenAlex / Separate citation source

A broader view of this research

DOI-matched OpenAlex observations for the same selected publications. These counts are separate from Crossref and are never added together.

OPENALEX CITATIONS2
DOI MATCH COVERAGE100.0%4 / 4 publications
MEAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY0.54 known · 0 unknown
MEDIAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY0.5

Observation range: 22 Oct 2026 01:40 UTC — 23 Oct 2026 10:27 UTC. Missing matches are not zero citations. Previous observations may remain if a refresh fails or a DOI no longer matches.

OpenAlex citation distributionNo citations21–526–20021+0Unknown0

Institutions, countries & topics

OpenAlex affiliations and primary-topic classification. Each publication counts once per institution or country; multi-affiliated publications appear in multiple groups, so percentages can sum above 100%. Countries describe author affiliations, not nationality. Topics use one primary topic per publication.

Institutions

4 / 4 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 4 selected publications.

Countries

4 / 4 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 4 selected publications.

Primary topics

4 / 4 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 4 selected publications.

Citation year / OpenAlex

Citations received over time

Incoming citations to the selected publications, grouped by the year of the citing work. This is separate from lifetime citation totals grouped by the cited article’s publication year.

The publication filters above define which articles receive the citations. The citation-year range below only controls this chart and the incoming-citation comparison. Removing publication-year filters includes older articles’ incoming citations too.

Annual history available for 4 / 4 selected publications. Supported display window: 2017–2026; 2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Missing histories and years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—); partial coverage can understate totals.

Annual-history observations (UTC): 2026-10-22T01:40:28.833092+00:00 — 2026-10-23T10:27:37.862260+00:00. Older observations may be retained after failed or incomplete refreshes.

OpenAlex · Citations received by year

10.50 2017 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 4/42018 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 4/42019 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 4/42020 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 4/42021 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 4/42022 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 4/42023 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 4/42024 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 4/42025 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 1 · Annual history coverage 4/42026 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 1 · Annual history coverage 4/4 2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
View openalex · citations received by year data & coverage
Citation yearJournal / scopeOpenAlex · Citations received by yearPublicationsAnnual history known
2017All selected publications044/4
2018All selected publications044/4
2019All selected publications044/4
2020All selected publications044/4
2021All selected publications044/4
2022All selected publications044/4
2023All selected publications044/4
2024All selected publications044/4
2025All selected publications144/4
2026All selected publications144/4

Counts represent citation links, not unique citing papers across a journal: one paper citing two selected articles contributes two links. Older citations outside this window are excluded, so annual sums need not equal lifetime totals. OpenAlex methodology ↗

Crossref citation distribution

Latest Crossref totals for the selected publications; not citations received in the selected years.

Mean0.25
Median0.0
No citations31–516–20021+0Unknown0

Unknown counts are excluded from the mean, median and cited-publication rate.

Journal comparison

Same filters, source and counting rules across journals. Descriptive statistics, not a quality ranking.

Journal / publisherPublicationsCrossref citationsOpenAlex citationsOpenAlex coverageCrossref meanCrossref medianCrossref cited %*Crossref coverage
International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy
Bussecon International Academy
3013/30.000.03/3 · 100.0%
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science
SSBFNET
1111/11.01100.01/1 · 100.0%

* Percentage among publications with a known citation count.

Explore publications

View all 4 →

Most cited · Crossref

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Nurturing entrepreneurial skills and mindsets: the imperative role of higher education

Mncedisi Christian Maphalala · Sharon Dipolelo Mmakola

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

Entrepreneurship has become a vital force for economic development and innovation in the 21st century. Higher education institutions are pivotal in preparing students to succeed in this dynamic landscape by nurturing entrepreneurial skills and mindsets. This systematically reviewed the 23 empirical studies from databases between 2014 and 2024 to explore the imperative role of higher education in fostering entrepreneurship. It examines the evolving demands of the global economy, emphasising the need for individuals equipped with the creativity, resilience, and adaptability characteristic of successful entrepreneurs. The research findings highlight the pivotal role of higher education in fostering entrepreneurial skills and mindsets. Key findings include adopting interdisciplinary curriculum design and integrating business, technology, and creative fields to provide students with a comprehensive understanding of entrepreneurship. The findings reveal that Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) are critical in promoting entrepreneurial skills and mindsets. They can achieve this by driving entrepreneurial growth, providing practical learning opportunities, promoting cross-disciplinary and collaborative learning, and addressing challenges in entrepreneurship education. To fully realise this potential, a comprehensive approach is needed, including changes to the curriculum, development of academics, institutional support, and community involvement. This will enable HEIs to produce competent, knowledgeable graduates who drive innovation and economic development. Experiential learning opportunities such as internships and startup incubators significantly nurture entrepreneurial mindsets by offering real-world experiences and enhancing problem-solving skills. The study emphasises the importance of entrepreneurial ecosystems within higher education institutions, promoting collaboration and innovation through partnerships with various stakeholders.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v14i9.45521 Crossref citations1 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Human Capital Development in the Digital Era: Entrepreneurship Education’s Influence on Entrepreneurial Innovation in South Africa

Arvid Muzanenhamo

International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2026

Read abstract

Entrepreneurship Education (EE) is increasingly recognised as a key driver of economic growth, employment creation, and poverty reduction across African countries. It also contributes to the development of digital competencies that support entrepreneurial innovation, highlighting the importance of human capital development in an evolving business environment. Recent technological advancements have transformed business operations, with the integration of digital technologies into entrepreneurial activities reshaping traditional business models, processes, and strategies. Consequently, digital entrepreneurship has emerged as an important socioeconomic force, creating a growing need for education, training, and skills development to strengthen the digital capabilities required for entrepreneurial innovation. This study examines the influence of Entrepreneurship Education on the development of entrepreneurial innovation through a systematic literature review. Relevant studies published between 2016 and 2026 were retrieved from databases including Scopus and Google Scholar. Of the 230 articles identified, 17 met the inclusion criteria and were selected for review. The findings indicate that student support, access to appropriate technological infrastructure, students’ and teachers’ perceptions of technology’s usefulness, and the nature of the tasks undertaken are important factors shaping the integration of technology into contemporary entrepreneurial activities. These findings have implications for promoting entrepreneurial innovation through human capital development in South Africa. The study therefore seeks to inform educators and policymakers about the contribution of Entrepreneurship Education to the development of digital competencies and the advancement of innovative entrepreneurial practices.                                                                        

DOI 10.36096/ijbes.v8i5.13790 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Entrepreneurial skills and training needs for business management students: A South-African ODeL institution perspective

Thea Visser · Ntsieni Fitzgerald Ramasimu · Sharon Rudansky-Kloppers · Ronny Shibiti

International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2026

Read abstract

The challenges faced by university students in acquiring entrepreneurship skills, knowledge, and training necessitate consideration. This study identifies the profile and business information of student entrepreneurs, together with their skills and training requirements. The research is conducted from the viewpoint of an open distance and e-learning institution. A positivist philosophical approach was adopted, employing a quantitative survey design through an online questionnaire disseminated to students enrolled in four modules within an academic department. Descriptive statistics and contingency tables were employed to summarise the data and examine response patterns among various subgroups. Marketing, financial management, and business management are essential competencies and training requirements for entrepreneurs. They have obstacles in formalising their enterprises, possess constrained financial resources and training, and tax compliance constitutes a regulatory burden for small businesses. Entrepreneurship education programs must encompass a varied array of skills and training to guarantee business creation, growth, and sustainability. The research enhances comprehension of entrepreneurial competencies and training requirements. Insights are provided regarding entrepreneurial education and subsequent skills and training for students in entrepreneurship programs. An effective university entrepreneurship ecosystem cultivates an entrepreneurial mindset, promotes lifelong learning, and fosters innovation to meet the demands of the digital era.

DOI 10.36096/ijbes.v8i3.12380 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Who is not truthful? Discrepancies between SMMEs and their support programmes in responding to the same question

Gosiame Eulenda Molope · Solomon Seeletse · Mmboswobeni Watson Ladzani

International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2025

Read abstract

The small, micro, and medium enterprises (SMMEs) in South Africa were found to be failing at exceedingly high rates. Some government support programmes were established in certain institutions of government to improve the SMME situation. Discrepancies seemed to show that while support programmes offered aid to the SMMEs, SMMEs showed no significant improvement. The support structures claimed that their aid was effective, and the SMMEs were saying they were not being enhanced. The aim of this paper was to analyze and understand the reasons behind any differences in responses or actions between SMMEs and the support programmes meant to aid them. A qualitative study was conducted, where both parties were interviewed, and their results compared. The study showed that the support programmes were not empowered to extend their services beyond offering aid, so they could not even monitor and evaluate their programmes’ effectiveness. When they said they were effective, it meant up to their scope. On the other hand, SMMEs expected the support institutions to visit and support them. Hence, the problem was mainly a misunderstanding. For the success of the support programmes, however, the study recommended that policies of the support structures should be extended, and activities extended to satisfy the SMMEs.

DOI 10.36096/ijbes.v7i1.5410 Crossref citations1 OpenAlex citations

Selected results

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Human Capital Development in the Digital Era: Entrepreneurship Education’s Influence on Entrepreneurial Innovation in South Africa

Arvid Muzanenhamo

International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2026

Read abstract

Entrepreneurship Education (EE) is increasingly recognised as a key driver of economic growth, employment creation, and poverty reduction across African countries. It also contributes to the development of digital competencies that support entrepreneurial innovation, highlighting the importance of human capital development in an evolving business environment. Recent technological advancements have transformed business operations, with the integration of digital technologies into entrepreneurial activities reshaping traditional business models, processes, and strategies. Consequently, digital entrepreneurship has emerged as an important socioeconomic force, creating a growing need for education, training, and skills development to strengthen the digital capabilities required for entrepreneurial innovation. This study examines the influence of Entrepreneurship Education on the development of entrepreneurial innovation through a systematic literature review. Relevant studies published between 2016 and 2026 were retrieved from databases including Scopus and Google Scholar. Of the 230 articles identified, 17 met the inclusion criteria and were selected for review. The findings indicate that student support, access to appropriate technological infrastructure, students’ and teachers’ perceptions of technology’s usefulness, and the nature of the tasks undertaken are important factors shaping the integration of technology into contemporary entrepreneurial activities. These findings have implications for promoting entrepreneurial innovation through human capital development in South Africa. The study therefore seeks to inform educators and policymakers about the contribution of Entrepreneurship Education to the development of digital competencies and the advancement of innovative entrepreneurial practices.                                                                        

DOI 10.36096/ijbes.v8i5.13790 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Entrepreneurial skills and training needs for business management students: A South-African ODeL institution perspective

Thea Visser · Ntsieni Fitzgerald Ramasimu · Sharon Rudansky-Kloppers · Ronny Shibiti

International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2026

Read abstract

The challenges faced by university students in acquiring entrepreneurship skills, knowledge, and training necessitate consideration. This study identifies the profile and business information of student entrepreneurs, together with their skills and training requirements. The research is conducted from the viewpoint of an open distance and e-learning institution. A positivist philosophical approach was adopted, employing a quantitative survey design through an online questionnaire disseminated to students enrolled in four modules within an academic department. Descriptive statistics and contingency tables were employed to summarise the data and examine response patterns among various subgroups. Marketing, financial management, and business management are essential competencies and training requirements for entrepreneurs. They have obstacles in formalising their enterprises, possess constrained financial resources and training, and tax compliance constitutes a regulatory burden for small businesses. Entrepreneurship education programs must encompass a varied array of skills and training to guarantee business creation, growth, and sustainability. The research enhances comprehension of entrepreneurial competencies and training requirements. Insights are provided regarding entrepreneurial education and subsequent skills and training for students in entrepreneurship programs. An effective university entrepreneurship ecosystem cultivates an entrepreneurial mindset, promotes lifelong learning, and fosters innovation to meet the demands of the digital era.

DOI 10.36096/ijbes.v8i3.12380 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Nurturing entrepreneurial skills and mindsets: the imperative role of higher education

Mncedisi Christian Maphalala · Sharon Dipolelo Mmakola

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

Entrepreneurship has become a vital force for economic development and innovation in the 21st century. Higher education institutions are pivotal in preparing students to succeed in this dynamic landscape by nurturing entrepreneurial skills and mindsets. This systematically reviewed the 23 empirical studies from databases between 2014 and 2024 to explore the imperative role of higher education in fostering entrepreneurship. It examines the evolving demands of the global economy, emphasising the need for individuals equipped with the creativity, resilience, and adaptability characteristic of successful entrepreneurs. The research findings highlight the pivotal role of higher education in fostering entrepreneurial skills and mindsets. Key findings include adopting interdisciplinary curriculum design and integrating business, technology, and creative fields to provide students with a comprehensive understanding of entrepreneurship. The findings reveal that Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) are critical in promoting entrepreneurial skills and mindsets. They can achieve this by driving entrepreneurial growth, providing practical learning opportunities, promoting cross-disciplinary and collaborative learning, and addressing challenges in entrepreneurship education. To fully realise this potential, a comprehensive approach is needed, including changes to the curriculum, development of academics, institutional support, and community involvement. This will enable HEIs to produce competent, knowledgeable graduates who drive innovation and economic development. Experiential learning opportunities such as internships and startup incubators significantly nurture entrepreneurial mindsets by offering real-world experiences and enhancing problem-solving skills. The study emphasises the importance of entrepreneurial ecosystems within higher education institutions, promoting collaboration and innovation through partnerships with various stakeholders.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v14i9.45521 Crossref citations1 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Who is not truthful? Discrepancies between SMMEs and their support programmes in responding to the same question

Gosiame Eulenda Molope · Solomon Seeletse · Mmboswobeni Watson Ladzani

International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2025

Read abstract

The small, micro, and medium enterprises (SMMEs) in South Africa were found to be failing at exceedingly high rates. Some government support programmes were established in certain institutions of government to improve the SMME situation. Discrepancies seemed to show that while support programmes offered aid to the SMMEs, SMMEs showed no significant improvement. The support structures claimed that their aid was effective, and the SMMEs were saying they were not being enhanced. The aim of this paper was to analyze and understand the reasons behind any differences in responses or actions between SMMEs and the support programmes meant to aid them. A qualitative study was conducted, where both parties were interviewed, and their results compared. The study showed that the support programmes were not empowered to extend their services beyond offering aid, so they could not even monitor and evaluate their programmes’ effectiveness. When they said they were effective, it meant up to their scope. On the other hand, SMMEs expected the support institutions to visit and support them. Hence, the problem was mainly a misunderstanding. For the success of the support programmes, however, the study recommended that policies of the support structures should be extended, and activities extended to satisfy the SMMEs.

DOI 10.36096/ijbes.v7i1.5410 Crossref citations1 OpenAlex citations

Data coverage & freshness

Source coverage refers to this result set; a publication may occur in several sources. Sync times refer to contributing journals.

Missing abstracts: 0 · Missing authors: 0 · Missing publication dates: 0 · Dates without day precision: 0

SourceMost recent successful journal syncLatest attempt
crossref21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
ojs-rest21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 06:46 UTC
oai-pmh20 Oct 2026 19:55 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 20 Oct 2026 19:50 UTC
openalex-enrichment21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
Full import history & methodology →