CiteNScope — Scholarly Index & Analytics
Discover / Analytics RESEARCH INTELLIGENCE
CiteNScope / Analytics

Explore the evidence.
Understand the reach.

Research across participating journals · All insights follow your collection filters.

Compare journals ↗
OpenAlex coverage 100.0% · 106/106 recordsLast OpenAlex observation 24 Oct 2026, 13:35 UTC
PUBLICATIONS106In the selected collection
CROSSREF CITATIONS353106/106 with known counts
OPENALEX CITATIONS531106/106 with known counts
OPENALEX MEAN5.01Per article with a known count
Explore articles 106 →
Filter collection Publication years, search & more
Reset
country: China Remove ×
Your research collection

Output and reach

Publication activity alongside incoming citations.

Publication activity

Articles grouped by publication year

Publications

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2026 is year to date. 0 undated publications excluded.

View data & coverage

Citations received

OpenAlex · year of the citing work

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage
Two perspectives on citations

Follow the research impact

Independent sources. Clear time scales.

Lifetime citations by publication year

Crossref and OpenAlex · separate totals for the same publication cohorts

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

Latest lifetime totals, grouped by the cited article’s year. These are not citations received in that year.

View data & coverage

Citations received each year

OpenAlex · incoming citation links grouped by citing-work year

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage
Annual history: 106/106 articles. Latest history observation: 2026-10-24T13:35:55.033770+00:00. Source totals are never added together.
Research side by side

Compare journals

Select journals to compare the same collection filters. Source totals stay separate. These measures describe research activity, not journal quality.

Leave all unchecked to include every matching journal. Selection affects only comparison charts.
Display range
Bussecon Review of Social SciencesInternational Journal of Business Ecosystem & StrategyInternational Journal of Finance & Banking StudiesInternational Journal of Research in Business and Social Science

Publications

Articles by publication year

View data & coverage

Crossref citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex citations

Latest lifetime totals · grouped by publication year

View data & coverage

OpenAlex · Citations received

By year of the citing work · 2017–2026

View data & coverage

2026 is year to date. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime charts share a citation scale. Unknown observations appear as gaps; known zero stays zero. Annual receipts use available OpenAlex histories and may not sum to lifetime totals. 0 undated publications excluded from publication-year charts.

Full analytics report All distributions, publications, comparisons & data provenance
106 MATCHING PUBLICATIONSExplore results →Export CSV ↓
INDEXED PUBLICATIONS106
CROSSREF CITATIONS353
CROSSREF · CITED PUBLICATIONS77.4%
CROSSREF · MEAN CITATIONS3.33

Crossref citation coverage: 106 / 106 publications (100.0%). Latest observation: 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC. Means and percentages use records with known counts.

OpenAlex / Separate citation source

A broader view of this research

DOI-matched OpenAlex observations for the same selected publications. These counts are separate from Crossref and are never added together.

OPENALEX CITATIONS531
DOI MATCH COVERAGE100.0%106 / 106 publications
MEAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY5.01106 known · 0 unknown
MEDIAN · KNOWN COUNTS ONLY4.0

Observation range: 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC — 24 Oct 2026 13:35 UTC. Missing matches are not zero citations. Previous observations may remain if a refresh fails or a DOI no longer matches.

OpenAlex citation distributionNo citations211–5516–203121+3Unknown0

Institutions, countries & topics

OpenAlex affiliations and primary-topic classification. Each publication counts once per institution or country; multi-affiliated publications appear in multiple groups, so percentages can sum above 100%. Countries describe author affiliations, not nationality. Topics use one primary topic per publication.

Institutions

106 / 106 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 106 selected publications.

Huazhong University of Science and Technology68 64.2%Hohai University7 6.6%Zhejiang Sci-Tech University4 3.8%University of Barishal4 3.8%University of International Business and Economics3 2.8%Durban University of Technology3 2.8%China University of Political Science and Law3 2.8%Huazhong Agricultural University3 2.8%Dalian University of Technology3 2.8%Northwest University3 2.8%State University of New York at Oswego3 2.8%Rajarata University of Sri Lanka3 2.8%University of Port Harcourt2 1.9%University of Science and Technology of China2 1.9%Cihan University-Erbil2 1.9%Southwest University of Political Science & Law2 1.9%Gopalganj Science and Technology University2 1.9%National Bureau of Statistics of China2 1.9%Hefei University of Technology2 1.9%University of Dhaka2 1.9%North-West University2 1.9%China University of Geosciences2 1.9%Jagannath University2 1.9%Zhejiang Gongshang University2 1.9%Bangladesh University of Textiles2 1.9%University of Chittagong2 1.9%Jatiya Kabi Kazi Nazrul Islam University1 0.9%Hunan University of Science and Technology1 0.9%Bacha Khan University1 0.9%Tianjin University of Science and Technology1 0.9%Zhejiang Normal University1 0.9%Central University of Finance and Economics1 0.9%Nanchang University1 0.9%Army Medical University1 0.9%University of Botswana1 0.9%North South University1 0.9%Mansoura University1 0.9%University of South Africa1 0.9%Zhejiang University of Science and Technology1 0.9%Gomal University1 0.9%University of Sri Jayewardenepura1 0.9%BRAC1 0.9%Wayamba University of Sri Lanka1 0.9%Zhaoqing University1 0.9%Guangdong University of Foreign Studies1 0.9%Wuhan University of Technology1 0.9%Harbin Institute of Technology1 0.9%Nnamdi Azikiwe University1 0.9%Shanghai Normal University1 0.9%North American University1 0.9%HITEC University1 0.9%Iqra National University1 0.9%Shaoguan University1 0.9%Murang'a University of Technology1 0.9%University of Peshawar1 0.9%Central China Normal University1 0.9%Mawlana Bhashani Science and Technology University1 0.9%Zhejiang Financial College1 0.9%Kigali Independent University1 0.9%Xinqiao Hospital1 0.9%Universiti Teknologi MARA System1 0.9%Sayed Jamaluddin Afghani University1 0.9%Government of Kenya1 0.9%Government College University, Lahore1 0.9%Wuhan University of Science and Technology1 0.9%University of Kotli, Azad Jammu and Kashmir1 0.9%Army Institute of Business Administration, Savar1 0.9%World University of Bangladesh1 0.9%University of Education1 0.9%China Agricultural University1 0.9%BRAC University1 0.9%Mekelle University1 0.9%Universiti Teknologi MARA1 0.9%University of Venda1 0.9%Bangladesh University of Professionals1 0.9%

Countries

106 / 106 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 106 selected publications.

Primary topics

106 / 106 with data · 0 missing or unmatched. Percentages use all 106 selected publications.

Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior11 10.4%Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting9 8.5%Environmental Sustainability in Business6 5.7%Technology Adoption and User Behaviour4 3.8%Banking stability, regulation, efficiency4 3.8%Customer Service Quality and Loyalty4 3.8%Digital Marketing and Social Media4 3.8%Agricultural Innovations and Practices3 2.8%Belt and Road Initiative3 2.8%Employee Performance and Leadership3 2.8%Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification2 1.9%International Business and FDI2 1.9%E-Government and Public Services2 1.9%Gender Diversity and Inequality2 1.9%AI in Service Interactions2 1.9%Organizational Change and Leadership2 1.9%Innovation and Knowledge Management1 0.9%Monetary Policy and Economic Impact1 0.9%Financial Markets and Investment Strategies1 0.9%Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences1 0.9%Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance1 0.9%COVID-19 and Mental Health1 0.9%Nursing education and management1 0.9%Higher Education Research Studies1 0.9%Migration and Labor Dynamics1 0.9%Efficiency Analysis Using DEA1 0.9%Construction Project Management and Performance1 0.9%Patient Safety and Medication Errors1 0.9%Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis1 0.9%Sustainable Supply Chain Management1 0.9%Reproductive Health and Contraception1 0.9%Team Dynamics and Performance1 0.9%Microfinance and Financial Inclusion1 0.9%Evaluation of Teaching Practices1 0.9%Corruption and Economic Development1 0.9%Ethics in Business and Education1 0.9%Market Dynamics and Volatility1 0.9%Online Learning and Analytics1 0.9%Mobile Health and mHealth Applications1 0.9%Behavioral Health and Interventions1 0.9%Family Business Performance and Succession1 0.9%Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis1 0.9%Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management1 0.9%Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets1 0.9%FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance1 0.9%Risk Management in Financial Firms1 0.9%Educational Innovations and Challenges1 0.9%Software Engineering and Design Patterns1 0.9%Digital Economy and Work Transformation1 0.9%Working Capital and Financial Performance1 0.9%Collaboration in agile enterprises1 0.9%Public Administration in Developing Nations1 0.9%Sustainable Development and Environmental Management1 0.9%Maritime Security and History1 0.9%Agriculture and Agroindustry Studies1 0.9%Ideological and Political Education1 0.9%Food, Nutrition, and Cultural Practices1 0.9%Employee Performance and Management1 0.9%Real estate and construction management1 0.9%
Citation year / OpenAlex

Citations received over time

Incoming citations to the selected publications, grouped by the year of the citing work. This is separate from lifetime citation totals grouped by the cited article’s publication year.

The publication filters above define which articles receive the citations. The citation-year range below only controls this chart and the incoming-citation comparison. Removing publication-year filters includes older articles’ incoming citations too.

Annual history available for 106 / 106 selected publications. Supported display window: 2017–2026; 2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Missing histories and years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—); partial coverage can understate totals.

Annual-history observations (UTC): 2026-10-21T07:22:43.069954+00:00 — 2026-10-24T13:35:55.033770+00:00. Older observations may be retained after failed or incomplete refreshes.

OpenAlex · Citations received by year

12763.50 2017 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 2 · Annual history coverage 106/1062018 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 0 · Annual history coverage 106/1062019 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 6 · Annual history coverage 106/1062020 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 16 · Annual history coverage 106/1062021 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 43 · Annual history coverage 106/1062022 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 74 · Annual history coverage 106/1062023 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 87 · Annual history coverage 106/1062024 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 127 · Annual history coverage 106/1062025 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 111 · Annual history coverage 106/1062026 · All selected publications · OpenAlex · Citations received by year: 65 · Annual history coverage 106/106 2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
View openalex · citations received by year data & coverage
Citation yearJournal / scopeOpenAlex · Citations received by yearPublicationsAnnual history known
2017All selected publications2106106/106
2018All selected publications0106106/106
2019All selected publications6106106/106
2020All selected publications16106106/106
2021All selected publications43106106/106
2022All selected publications74106106/106
2023All selected publications87106106/106
2024All selected publications127106106/106
2025All selected publications111106106/106
2026All selected publications65106106/106

Counts represent citation links, not unique citing papers across a journal: one paper citing two selected articles contributes two links. Older citations outside this window are excluded, so annual sums need not equal lifetime totals. OpenAlex methodology ↗

Crossref citation distribution

Latest Crossref totals for the selected publications; not citations received in the selected years.

Mean3.33
Median2.0
No citations241–5626–201921+1Unknown0

Unknown counts are excluded from the mean, median and cited-publication rate.

Journal comparison

Same filters, source and counting rules across journals. Descriptive statistics, not a quality ranking.

Journal / publisherPublicationsCrossref citationsOpenAlex citationsOpenAlex coverageCrossref meanCrossref medianCrossref cited %*Crossref coverage
Bussecon Review of Social Sciences
Bussecon International Academy
1441/14.04100.01/1 · 100.0%
International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy
Bussecon International Academy
612146/62.01.550.06/6 · 100.0%
International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies
SSBFNET
63136/60.50.550.06/6 · 100.0%
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science
SSBFNET
9333450093/933.59280.693/93 · 100.0%

* Percentage among publications with a known citation count.

Explore publications

View all 106 →

Most cited · Crossref

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Perception and prediction of intention to use online banking systems

Sk Alamgir Hossain · Yukun Bao · Najmul Hasan · Md Farijul Islam

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2020

Read abstract

Online banking has become a vital instrument for delivering quality and easily reached banking services at the lowest possible time with ensuring affordability both for customers and service providers. Although this banking has huge potentials and benefits, the successful adoption of online banking remains a significant challenge in the context of an emerging economy like Bangladesh. The purpose of this empirical study is to investigate the factors influencing the online banking services adoption in Bangladesh by using the extended Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) with government support and risk factors. A questionnaire survey method was used to collect data from 380 banking customers.  To analyse the collected survey data and test the set of hypothesis, a structural equation modelling (SEM) method was used with the help of SmartPLS3 package. The results illustrate that perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, attitude towards use, government support positively influence the intention to use as well as the intention to use positively impact on intention to continue to the adoption of online banking services. However, the relationship between risk and intention to use was statistically insignificant. Finally, the findings may assist banking professionals and programmers to develop and design successful policies regarding online banking services to boost this service industry in the future.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v9i1.59121 Crossref citations28 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Influence of CSR stakeholders on the textile firms performances

Md. Nurun Nabi · Mst. Marium Akter · Ahashan Habib · Abdullah Al Masud

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2022

Read abstract

Ready-made garments (RMG) are one of the most critical sectors in the economy of the South Asian region in terms of the labor force employed and export earnings. This research study aims to determine the Corporate Social Responsibility Stakeholders dimension and its influence on textile firms Performance. The study used organizational legitimacy as mediating variable between the CSR stakeholders and firms’ performances. The research study was used in the quantitative analysis approach to determine the cause and effect of the relationship between CSR and Textile firm’s financial and non-financial performance. Though the study collected primary data & secondary data from 250 respondents using survey questionnaires, the researcher obtained secondary data by analyzing the audited annual and sustainability reports of various RMG companies. We have collected data by conducting a focus group interview forming a team of employers, top-level managers, and CSR officers. We asked them all the questions, filled it, tapped it, reserved it for the interpretations. We have surveyed 67 industries, but it enabled us to collect the data from the 50 sectors—the data collected from 2016 April to 2018 December. Our study has some limitations in that the sample size is small compared to the other research. SPSS-23 & MS-Excel were used to analyze the collected data. CSR practices benefitted RMG companies in terms of long-term sustainable development by increasing the firm’s financial and non-financial performance of the RMG sector.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v10i8.150214 Crossref citations18 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Financial Technology (Fintech) and cybersecurity

Hayder M. Kareem Al Duhaidahawi · Jing Zhang · Mustafa S. Abdulreda · Meriem Sebai

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2021

Read abstract

In this paper, we investigate the definition of Fintech and measure the extent of the impact of Fintech variables on the Cybersecurity as the dependent variable. The hypotheses developed by the authors which are based on research through the statistical results of the research variables and as all correlation coefficients were a positive relationship and at the level of significance 0.01 which made the authors accept the correlation hypotheses, and for the results of the influence factor between the research variables it also had a positive effect when the level of 0.05 for all sections of the independent variable, as we have also noticed that the influence of the independent variable of financial technology when linked to all of its sections with Cybersecurity. We find the influence of the influence coefficient significantly increased to 0.908, which explains that there is a complementarity between the sections of the independent variable.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v9i6.91414 Crossref citations16 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

The Effects of ESG issues on investment decision through corporate reputation: Individual investors’ perspective

Nafisa Rounok · Aimin Qian · Mohammad Ashraful Alam

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2023

Read abstract

Whether investors take into account a company's environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues when making investment decisions (ID), how they interpret corporate reputation (CR) as a result of ESG issues, and whether CR mediates the relationship between ESG issues and ID are the goals of this study. The theory of planned behavior (TPB) and the signaling theory are the bases of the framework. The study was based on a questionnaire survey that received 599 responses from active retail investors in two Bangladeshi cities, Dhaka and Chattagram. The PLS path modeling method was used to analyze the data and test the hypothesis. The empirical findings reveal that corporate ESG issues considerably impact ID and that CR mediates this relationship. This study contributes to behavioral finance by offering empirical proof of the relationship between company ESG issues and investment decisions. By examining the indirect effects of ESG issues on ID via CR, this study contributes to the body of knowledge. It is therefore advised that strategic managers be required to use ESG practices as it builds reputation. At the same time, the government should create public policies, orders, and rules for upholding the ESG issues that contribute to the sustainable development of the capital market and the economy.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v12i2.235413 Crossref citations21 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Understanding the insight of factors affecting mHealth adoption

Md. Abdul Kaium · Yukun Bao · Mohammad Zahedul Alam · Najmul Hasan

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2019

Read abstract

Numerous studies have addressed the different context of mHealth services among diverse user groups. But due to a lack of understanding the insight of factors affecting the mHealth adoption, it’s crucial need to conduct a systematic review on this issue. The objective of this study was to synthesize the present understanding of the influential factors of mHealth adoption. We performed a systematic literature search on eight electronically reputed scientific databases from 2010 to March 2019, such as Science Direct, Springer, IEEE Xplore, JMIR, Taylor & Francis, Emerald, Mary Ann Liebert and Google Scholar. This was accomplished by gathering data including authors, countries, years, target population, sample size, models/theories, and key influential factors. Primarily, a total of 2969 potentially relatable papers were found, of which 50 met the inclusion criteria. It was found that cross-sectional approach, survey methods and structural equation modeling (SEM) were the most explored research methodologies whereas PLS-SEM was found to be the largest used analysis tools. From the analysis, a total of ninety-four influential factors were clearly recognized and the findings represent that the following 15 factors appeared most recurrently and significantly; perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, social-influence, subjective norms, self-efficacy, trust, facilitating conditions, technology anxiety, performance expectancy, effort expectancy, cost, attitude, resistance to change, perceived privacy and security, and perceived behavioral control. The research results have significant theoretical and practical implications for mHealth services providers, researchers and policy makers with regards to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) allied to healthcare.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v8i6.52213 Crossref citations15 OpenAlex citations

Selected results

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Digital platform capabilities and agility: The role of technological uncertainty in SMEs

Saba Hafeez · Ding Xiu-Hao

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

The research aims to explore the impact of digital platform integration and reconstruction capabilities on organizational agility (mediator) and ESG performance of small and medium size enterprises of Pakistan. The study also examines the moderating role of technology uncertainty between digital platform capabilities and organizational agility that further leads to ESG performance. Data is collected from 300 firms while industries include; IT, Manufacturing, Textiles, Electronics, and Automobile in eight big cities of Pakistan and the respondents are middle and senior managers. Data was analyzed using the software; SPSS (reliability analysis) and R Studio (version 4.5.2), Structural Equation modeling (SEM) and regression Analysis. The study used Resource-Based View and Dynamic Capability Theory to see the role of digital platform capabilities, organization agility and uncertain technology conditions’ on ESG. The findings of this research are that such organizations with agility perform better on the ESG dimensions. First, this study takes a capability perspective to explore the impact of digital platform integration and reconstruction capability on Organizational agility, which extends the related studies taking digital perspective. Second, the inner mechanism between organizational agility and firm ESG performance is revealed where organizational agility works as a bridge for ESG performance. Third, the relationship between digital platform capabilities and organizational agility is exposed by the moderation of technology uncertainty. Where technology uncertainty positively moderates the relationship between digital platform capabilities and organizational agility.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v15i2.48320 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Organizational agility as a dynamic capability for improving ESG performance of SMEs

Saba Hafeez · Ding Xiu-Hao

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

Purpose of this research is to examine the relationship between organizational agility (OA) and the Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance of firms. Specifically, it seeks to understand the organizational agility and agility in various industries of Pakistani firms including some control variables e.g. firm size, firm age, industry and city. Data is collected from 300 firms of Pakistan and the respondents are middle and senior managers. R studio is used to analyze data (version 4.5.2). The analysis techniques include; descriptive statistical, correlation, reliability, validity, Common Method Variance (CMV), Structural Equation modeling (SEM) and regression (including control variables). Data is collected from the industries of IT, Manufacturing, Textiles, Electronics, and Automobile, in eight cities of Pakistan. Results show that there exists a positive relationship between organizational agility and firm ESG Performance. This study contributes to the literature by the importance of organizational agility as a dynamic capability in achieving ESG goals, providing new directions for future research and practical recommendations for policymakers and industry leaders.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v15i2.48580 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Humans still touch hearts: Why human streamers spark more empathy and desire than AI in live commerce<i>?</i>

Madina Khudaykulova · Yuanqiong He

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

This paper aims to evaluate how the type of streamer (human vs. AI) influences consumer desire in live-streaming commerce through socio-cognitive and motivational mechanisms. Building on the CASA framework, Self-Determination Theory (SDT), and the Model of Goal-Directed Behavior (MGB), this study examines whether human and AI streamers differentially generate perceived empathy, which then activates intrinsic and extrinsic motivations leading to consumer desire. This paper also aims to test whether personal involvement and skepticism moderate the empathy–motivation pathway. A between-subjects experimental design was used to randomly assign participants to view identical livestreaming scripts presented by either a human or a humanoid AI streamer. Data from all 277 Chinese livestreaming participants were analyzed using PLS-SEM. The key findings show that (i) perceived empathy is significantly higher for human streamers than AI streamers, (ii) perceived empathy significantly boosts intrinsic motivation and consumer desire, with a smaller effect on extrinsic motivation, and (iii) intrinsic motivation, but not extrinsic motivation, is a significant predictor of consumer desire. Additionally, personal involvement strengthens the link between empathy and intrinsic motivation, while skepticism weakens the motivational pathways—especially in AI-based interactions. This research reveals that empathy is the main psychological link between streamer identity and consumer desire, and that intrinsic motivation is the dominant mechanism driving consumer engagement in live commerce, grounded in warmth and relatedness. The findings also indicate that emotional authenticity and the fulfillment of psychological needs remain crucial determinants of consumer desire, even in AI-mediated retail. Practical implications include enhancing empathetic communication and balancing the use of human and AI streamers in digital commerce.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v14i10.47120 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

A study on the pathways to enhance the effectiveness of contemporary youth student organizations: Based on the understanding, prediction, and management of individual thought and behavior

Xiaokun Guo

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2026

Read abstract

Youth student organizations, particularly Student Union Branches, play a vital role in ideological development and talent cultivation within Chinese higher education. Operating within a unique socio-educational context, these organizations must navigate the complex challenge of enhancing organizational effectiveness while ensuring ideological alignment. This study adopts a mixed-methods approach, combining surveys of 127 student cadres with in-depth case studies of 6 Student Union Branches, to investigate how sophisticated mechanisms for understanding, predicting, and managing individual thoughts and behaviors can improve organizational outcomes. The research proposes an integrated U-P-M (Understanding-Prediction-Management) framework. This includes a multi-layered understanding mechanism based on dynamic monitoring, dialogue, and data insight; a prediction mechanism utilizing intelligent forecasting and proactive intervention; and a management mechanism combining value guidance, organizational optimization, and environmental shaping. Quantitative results show that Student Union Branches implementing the systematic U-P-M framework achieved significant gains: a 28% increase in organizational belonging, a 35% rise in activity participation, and a 42% improvement in task execution efficiency. Qualitative findings further reveal contextual implementation challenges and success factors. This study contributes an evidence-based theoretical framework and reproducible pathways for enhancing youth student organization effectiveness within China's specific educational environment. It highlights the delicate balance between organizational autonomy and ideological conformity, offering valuable insights for educational administrators and student affairs professionals seeking to foster high-quality organizational development.

DOI 10.20525/ijrbs.v14i9.46320 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Factors influencing corporate environmental reporting amongst mining companies in developing countries.

Thabani Ncube · Wedzerai S Musvoto · Martha Matashu

International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2025

Read abstract

The study sought to investigate the factors influencing environmental reporting in developing countries. This has been necessited by the inconsistances and non compliant to regulations and laws of environmental reporting among the developing countries. Through examining the factors that influence environmental reporting the study hope to establish context based solutions to the challenge of environmental reporting. The study used a quantitative research method and factor analysis to establish the factors influencing environmental reporting. It was discovered that there are seven key factors influencing environmental reporting among Southern African Development Community (SADC) countries. These factors are: regulatory drivers, risk management drivers, market drivers, management influence drivers, strategic communication drivers, value creation drivers and legitimacy drivers. The study also revealed that there are several sub-factors that influencing environmental reporting under each key factor identified. The study concluded that environmental reporting influenced by the seven key factors. The study recommends that SADC sought for in-depth understanding of factors influencing environmental reporting. This is because understanding of the factors affecting environmental reporting is essential for the formulation and reporting that that satisfies stakeholders' requirements.

DOI 10.36096/ijbes.v7i5.9570 Crossref citations0 OpenAlex citations

Data coverage & freshness

Source coverage refers to this result set; a publication may occur in several sources. Sync times refer to contributing journals.

Missing abstracts: 0 · Missing authors: 0 · Missing publication dates: 0 · Dates without day precision: 0

SourceMost recent successful journal syncLatest attempt
crossref21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
ojs-rest21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 06:46 UTC
oai-pmh20 Oct 2026 19:56 UTC · ijfbscomplete · ijfbs · 20 Oct 2026 19:55 UTC
openalex-enrichment21 Oct 2026 07:23 UTC · ijrbscomplete · ijrbs · 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
Full import history & methodology →